February, 01 2011, 10:10am EDT
Papua New Guinea: Serious Abuses at Barrick Gold Mine
Systemic Failures Underscore Need for Canadian Government Regulation
TORONTO
Private security personnel employed at a gold mine in Papua New
Guinea have been implicated in alleged gang rapes and other violent
abuses, Human Rights Watch said in a report released today. The Porgera
mine has produced billions of dollars of gold in its twenty years of
operation, and is operated and 95 percent owned by Barrick Gold, a
Canadian company that is the world's largest gold producer.
The 94-page report, "Gold's Costly Dividend: Human Rights Impacts of Papua New Guinea's Porgera Gold Mine,"
identifies systemic failures on the part of Toronto-based Barrick Gold
that kept the company from recognizing the risk of abuses, and
responding to allegations that abuses had occurred. The report examines
the impact of Canada's failure to regulate the overseas activities of
its companies and also calls on Barrick to address environmental and
health concerns around the mine with greater transparency.
"We interviewed women who described brutal gang rapes by security
guards at Barrick's mine," said Chris Albin-Lackey, senior business and
human rights researcher at Human Rights Watch. "The company should have
acted long before Human Rights Watch conducted its research and prompted
them into action".
Human Rights Watch said that in response to its investigation,
Barrick has taken meaningful steps to investigate past abuses and make
it less likely for similar abuses to occur in future.
Most of the world's mining and exploration companies are based in
Canada. But Canada's government has not exercised meaningful oversight
or regulation of the overseas operations of Canadian companies, Human
Rights Watch said. Bill C-300, a modest but important effort to impose
greater government oversight, was defeated in Canada's House of Commons
in October 2010. Barrick had lobbied vigorously against the measure.
"Canada's government is asleep at the wheel," Albin-Lackey said. "And
if Barrick wants to hold itself out as a responsible corporate citizen,
it should support meaningful government oversight and regulation of
Canadian companies."
Papua New Guinea's sprawling Porgera gold mine has produced more than
16 million ounces of gold since opening in 1990 - an amount that would
be worth more than US$20 billion at today's prices. In 2010, Barrick's
worldwide operations were on track to produce more than 7.5 million
ounces of gold, an amount worth more than $9.7 billion at current
prices.
Papua New Guinea has an abundance of natural resources, but poor
governance and corruption have prevented this wealth from benefitting
ordinary citizens. The government has failed to bring economic
opportunity or deliver basic government services to Porgera, and the
region is mired in poverty and violence.
Barrick maintains a private security force of nearly 450 personnel at
Porgera. The mine must cope with extraordinary security challenges,
including violent raids by groups of illegal miners. But Human Rights
Watch research documents opportunistic, violent abuses allegedly
committed by some security force members that are in no way a reaction
to these threats.
Every day, hundreds of people try to eke out a living by scouring the
waste rock dumps around the mine for minute traces of gold. In contrast
to the participants in violent raids that the mine confronts on a
regular basis, these miners are for the most part engaged in an entirely
nonviolent - albeit unauthorized - practice. They face arrest by
company security officers if they are caught on the waste dumps.
Human Rights Watch investigated six alleged incidents of gang rape by
company security personnel. In each case, women were allegedly raped
after being captured by company security personnel on the waste dumps.
The women interviewed by Human Rights Watch described scenes of extreme
violence. One described being gang raped by six security personnel after
one of her assailants kicked her in the face and shattered her teeth.
Human Rights Watch also documented cases of people who alleged that they
were beaten or otherwise mistreated by guards who apprehended them on
the waste dumps.
None of the women interviewed by Human Rights Watch said they had
reported the alleged rapes to the local authorities or to the company.
Some said their assailants had told them they would be arrested if they
tried to complain. Compounding matters, Barrick did not have any safe
channels of communication that community members could use to report
abuses.
Barrick has responded with appropriate vigor to the allegations
brought forward by Human Rights Watch. The company opened a major
internal investigation, facilitated a criminal investigation by the
Papua New Guinea police, and made a commitment to take steps that could
strengthen oversight and accountability for the security force at
Porgera.
The alleged gang rapes appear to be part of a wider pattern, Human
Rights Watch said. The company and police investigations that followed
the Human Rights Watch disclosures have uncovered other cases of alleged
sexual violence.
In a public statement, Barrick called the results of its internal
investigation "disturbing" and announced the termination of several
security personnel for involvement in, or failure to report, alleged
incidents of sexual violence. Police arrested three current and former
Porgera Joint Venture employees in January, 2011. Two were charged with
rape and the third with inflicting grievous bodily harm.
A January 17 police statement predicted that more charges were likely
to flow from their investigation and said that the arrests should serve
as a warning that serious abuses will not be tolerated. That message is
important but it will take work to convince many people to believe it,
Human Rights Watch said.
Members of the Papua New Guinea police force are regularly implicated
in incidents of torture and rape, and the force's abusive reputation
makes the public reluctant to turn to it for help. If the government
wants to combat impunity for rape and other serious crimes, it will have
to start by ensuring that the police themselves are held accountable
for their conduct, Human Rights Watch said.
Human Rights Watch's research also examines concerns about the health
and environmental impacts of the Porgera mine. The mine dumps 16,000
tons of liquid waste into the nearby Porgera River every day. This
controversial practice is out of line with current industry standards,
and critics worry that it could pose health risks to communities far
downstream.
Human Rights Watch called on Barrick to publish several specific
sources of relevant data to allow for independent evaluation of the
company's claims. The company has now agreed to make public its annual
environmental reports for the first time. This is a good first step,
Human Rights Watch said.
Human Rights Watch also called for the Papua New Guinea government
and international donors to facilitate a public health survey of
possible mercury poisoning around Porgera. Impoverished small-scale and
illegal miners in the area regularly process gold ore by combining it
with mercury and then burning the combined materials over an open flame.
This is an extremely dangerous practice and one that local medical
professionals believe may have given rise to an untreated epidemic of
mercury poisoning in local communities.
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
LATEST NEWS
'Make Polio Great Again': Alarm Over RFK Jr. Lawyer Who Targeted Vaccine
"So if you're wondering if Donald Trump is trying to kill your kids, yes, yes he is," said one critic.
Dec 13, 2024
Public health advocates, federal lawmakers, and other critics responded with alarm to The New York Timesreporting on Friday that an attorney helping Robert F. Kennedy Jr. select officials for the next Trump administration tried to get the U.S. regulators to revoke approval of the polio vaccine in 2022.
"The United States has been a leader in the global fight to eradicate polio, which is poised to become only the second disease in history to be eliminated from the face of the earth after smallpox," said Liza Barrie, Public Citizen's campaign director for global vaccines access. "Undermining polio vaccination efforts now risks reversing decades of progress and unraveling one of the greatest public health achievements of all time."
Public Citizen is among various organizations that have criticized President-elect Donald Trump's choice of Kennedy to lead the Department of Health and Human Services, with the watchdog's co-president, Robert Weissman, saying that "he shouldn't be allowed in the building... let alone be placed in charge of the nation's public health agency."
Although Kennedy's nomination requires Senate confirmation, he is already speaking with candidates for top health positions, with help from Aaron Siri, an attorney who represented RFK Jr. during his own presidential campaign, the Times reported. Siri also represents the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) in petitions asking the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) "to withdraw or suspend approval of vaccines not only for polio, but also for hepatitis B."
According to the newspaper:
Mr. Siri is also representing ICAN in petitioning the FDA to "pause distribution" of 13 other vaccines, including combination products that cover tetanus, diphtheria, polio, and hepatitis A, until their makers disclose details about aluminum, an ingredient researchers have associated with a small increase in asthma cases.
Mr. Siri declined to be interviewed, but said all of his petitions were filed on behalf of clients. Katie Miller, a spokeswoman for Mr. Kennedy, said Mr. Siri has been advising Mr. Kennedy but has not discussed his petitions with any of the health nominees. She added, "Mr. Kennedy has long said that he wants transparency in vaccines and to give people choice."
After the article was published, Siri called it a "typical NYT hit piece plainly written by those lacking basic reading and thinking skills," and posted a series of responses on social media. He wrote in part that "ICAN's petition to the FDA seeks to revoke a particular polio vaccine, IPOL, and only for infants and children and only until a proper trial is conducted, because IPOL was licensed in 1990 by Sanofi based on pediatric trials that, according to FDA, reviewed safety for only three days after injection."
The Times pointed out that experts consider placebo-controlled trials that would deny some children polio shots unethical, because "you're substituting a theoretical risk for a real risk," as Dr. Paul A. Offit, a vaccine expert at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, explained. "The real risks are the diseases."
Ayman Chit, head of vaccines for North America at Sanofi, told the newspaper that development of the vaccine began in 1977, over 280 million people worldwide have received it, and there have been more than 300 studies, some with up to six months of follow-up.
Trump, who is less than six weeks out from returning to office, has sent mixed messages on vaccines in recent interviews.
Asked about RFK Jr.'s anti-vaccine record during a Time "Person of the Year" interview published Thursday, the president-elect said that "we're going to be able to do very serious testing" and certain vaccines could be made unavailable "if I think it's dangerous."
Trump toldNBC News last weekend: "Hey, look, I'm not against vaccines. The polio vaccine is the greatest thing. If somebody told me to get rid of the polio vaccine, they're going to have to work real hard to convince me. I think vaccines are—certain vaccines—are incredible. But maybe some aren't. And if they aren't, we have to find out."
Both comments generated concern—like the Friday reporting in the Times, which University of Alabama law professor and MSNBC columnist Joyce White Vance called "absolutely terrifying."
She was far from alone. HuffPost senior front page editor Philip Lewis said that "this is just so dangerous and ridiculous" while Zeteo founder Mehdi Hasan declared, "We are so—and I use this word advisedly—fucked."
Ryan Cooper, managing editor at The American Prospect, warned that "they want your kids dead."
Author and musician Mikel Jollett similarly said, "So if you're wondering if Donald Trump is trying to kill your kids, yes, yes he is."
Multiple critics altered Trump's campaign slogan to "Make Polio Great Again."
U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) responded with a video on social media:
Without naming anyone, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), a polio survivor, put out a lengthy statement on Friday.
"The polio vaccine has saved millions of lives and held out the promise of eradicating a terrible disease. Efforts to undermine public confidence in proven cures are not just uninformed—they're dangerous," he said in part. "Anyone seeking the Senate's consent to serve in the incoming administration would do well to steer clear of even the appearance of association with such efforts."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Biden Pardon of 'Kids-for-Cash' Judge Michael Conahan Sparks Outrage
"It's a big slap in the face for us once again," said one of the disgraced judge's victims.
Dec 13, 2024
Victims of a scheme in which a pair of Pennsylvania judges conspired to funnel thousands of children into private detention centers in exchange for millions of dollars in kickbacks expressed outrage following U.S. President Joe Biden's Thursday commutation of one of the men's sentences.
In 2010, former Luzerne County Judge Michael Conahan pleaded guilty to federal racketeering charges and was sentenced to more than 17 years in prison after he and co-conspirator Mark Ciavarella shut down a county-run juvenile detention facility and then took nearly $3 million in payments from the builder and co-owner of for-profit lockups, into which the judges sent children as young as 8 years old.
"It's a big slap in the face for us once again," Amanda Lorah—who was sentenced by Conahan to five years of juvenile detention over a high school fight—toldWBRE.
Sandy Fonzo, whose son killed himself after being sentenced to juvenile detention, said in a statement: "I am shocked and I am hurt. Conahan's actions destroyed families, including mine, and my son's death is a tragic reminder of the consequences of his abuse of power."
"This pardon feels like an injustice for all of us who still suffer," Fonzo added. "Right now I am processing and doing the best I can to cope with the pain that this has brought back."
Many of Conahan's victims were first-time or low-level offenders. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court would later throw out thousands of cases adjudicated by the Conahan and Ciaverella, the latter of whom is serving a 28-year sentence for his role in the scheme.
Conahan—who is 72 and had been under house arrest since being transferred from prison during the Covid-19 pandemic—was one of around 1,500 people who received commutations or pardons from Biden on Thursday. While the sweeping move was welcomed by criminal justice reform advocates, many also decried the president's decision to not grant clemency to any of the 40 men with federal death sentences.
Others have called on Biden—who earlier this month pardoned his son Hunter Biden after promising he wouldn't—to grant clemency to people including Indigenous activist Leonard Peltier and environmental lawyer Steven Donziger.
"There's never going to be any closure for us."
"So he wants to talk about Conahan and everybody else, but what is Joe Biden doing for all of these kids who absolutely got nothing, and almost no justice in this whole thing that happened?" said Lorah. "So it's nothing for us, but it seems that Conahan is just getting a slap on the wrist every which way he possibly could still today."
"There's never going to be any closure for us," she added. "There's never going to be, somehow, some way, these two men are always going to pop up, but now, when you think about the president of the United States letting him get away with this, who even wants to live in this country at this point? I'm totally shocked, I can't believe this."
Keep ReadingShow Less
77 House Dems Call for 'Full Assessment' of Israeli Compliance With US Law
Lawmakers told the Biden administration they are "deeply troubled by the continued level of civilian casualties and humanitarian suffering in Gaza."
Dec 13, 2024
As Israel continues to decimate the Gaza Strip with American weapons, 77 Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives this week demanded that the Biden administration "provide a full assessment of the status of Israel's compliance with all relevant U.S. policies and laws, including National Security Memorandum 20 (NSM-20) and Section 620I of the Foreign Assistance Act."
Reps. Jason Crow (D-Colo.), Madeleine Dean (D-Pa.), and Chrissy Houlahan (D-Pa.) spearheaded the Thursday letter to Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, with less than six weeks left in President Joe Biden's term.
Since Biden issued NSM-20 in February, his administration has repeatedly accepted the Israel government's assurances about the use of U.S. weapons, despite reports from journalists and human rights groups about how they have helped Israeli forces slaughter at least 44,875 Palestinians and injure another 106,454 people in the besieged enclave over the past 14 months.
"Our concerns remain urgent and largely unresolved, including arbitrary restrictions on humanitarian aid and insufficient delivery routes."
House Democrats' letter begins by declaring support for "Israel's right to self-defense," denouncing the Hamas-led October 2023 attack, and endorsing the Biden administration's efforts "to broker a bilateral cease-fire that includes the release of hostages," noting the deal recently negotiated for the Israeli government and the Lebanese group Hezbollah.
"Further, we condemn the unprecedented Iranian attacks against Israel launched on April 13, 2024, and October 1, 2024," the letter states, declining to mention the Israeli actions that led to those responses. "We must continue to avoid a major regional conflict—and we welcome the concerted diplomatic efforts by the U.S. and our allies to prevent further escalation."
"We are also deeply troubled by the continued level of civilian casualties and humanitarian suffering in Gaza," the lawmakers wrote, citing the administration's October 13 letter imposing a 30-day deadline for Israel to improve humanitarian conditions in Palestinian territory. "That deadline has expired, and while some progress has been made, we believe the Israeli government has not yet fulfilled the requirements outlined in your letter."
Asked during a November 12 press conference if the Israeli government has met the administration's demands, State Department spokesperson Vedant Patel said that "we have not made an assessment that they are in violation of U.S. law."
Shortly after that, U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) forced votes on resolutions to block the sale of 120mm tank rounds, 120mm high-explosive mortar rounds, and Joint Direct Attack Munitions (JDAMs) to Israel, but they didn't pass.
Progressives and Democrats in Congress have been sounding the alarm about U.S. government complicity in Israel's armed assault and starvation campaign—which have led to an ongoing genocide case at the International Court of Justice—to varying degrees since October 2023, including with a May letter led by Crow and Rep. Chris Deluzio (D-Pa.) and signed by 85 others.
Citing that letter on Thursday, the 77 House Democrats wrote that "our concerns remain urgent and largely unresolved, including arbitrary restrictions on humanitarian aid and insufficient delivery routes, among others. As a result, Gaza's civilian population is facing dire famine."
"We believe further administrative action must be taken to ensure Israel upholds the assurances it provided in March 2024 to facilitate, and not directly or indirectly obstruct, U.S. humanitarian assistance," the letter concludes. "We remain committed to a negotiated solution that can bring an end to the fighting, free the remaining hostages, surge humanitarian aid, and lay the groundwork to rebuild Gaza with a legitimate Palestinian governing body. We thank you and the administration for its ongoing work to achieve those shared goals."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular