

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Worldwatch
Institute's 15th Annual State of the World Symposium, convened today,
brought together leading thinkers for a targeted dialogue focused on
agricultural development, hunger, and poverty alleviation. The symposium
occurred in conjunction with the release of Worldwatch's flagship
publication, State of the World 2011: Innovations that Nourish the Planet,which outlines 15 proven, environmentally sustainable prescriptions for alleviating hunger and poverty.
Keynote speakers and panelists included: Kathleen Merrigan, Deputy
Secretary of the U.S. Department of Agriculture; David Beckmann,
President, Bread for the World; Hans Herren, President, Millennium
Institute; Meera Shekar, Lead Health & Nutrition Specialist with the
Human Development Network at the World Bank; Sara Scherr, President and
CEO, Ecoagriculture Partners; Catherine Alston, Cocoa Livelihoods
Program Coordinator, World Cocoa Foundation; and Stephanie Hanson,
Director of Policy and Outreach, One Acre Fund.
"Farmers-from
sub-Saharan Africa to the U.S.-are the first stewards of the land
because they understand the importance of sustaining the world's natural
resource base," said Merrigan. She addressed an audience that included a
broad variety of international stakeholders, from agricultural
policymakers and nongovernmental representatives to members of the donor
and funding communities. "Our soils and land, our water, our
biodiversity are central to long-term farm productivity. And it is this
understanding that drives farmers to be some of our best innovators. The
ability of small-scale farmers with limited capital to farm in
sustainable ways improves not only their own productivity but also
benefits all of us."
Worldwatch's Nourishing the Planet project (www.nourishingtheplanet.org), which produced this year's State of the World
report, gathered its findings during a 15-month tour of agricultural
innovations, researching projects on the ground in 25 sub-Saharan
African countries. Representatives from two of these projects
participated in the symposium: Edward Mukiibi, co-founder and Project
Coordinator of Developing Innovations in School Cultivation (DISC) in
Uganda, and Sithembile Ndema with the Food and Natural Resources Policy
Analysis Network (FANRPAN) in South Africa.
State of the World 2011 highlights projects
like Uganda's DISC program as a way to give a voice to farmers "from
the field" and to help them share their ideas globally. DISC, for
example, is integrating indigenous vegetable gardens as well as
information about nutrition, food preparation, and culture into school
curricula to teach children how to grow local crop varieties that will
help combat food shortages and revitalize the country's culinary
traditions. An estimated 33 percent of African children currently face
hunger and malnutrition, which could affect some 42 million children by
2025. But many youth are moving away from agriculture and rural regions
in the hope of finding work in urban areas.
"School nutrition programs shouldn't simply feed children," said Mukiibi.
"We must also inspire and teach them to become the farmers of the
future and revitalize the vegetables and traditions of our culture.
Ensuring that the next generation of farmers is well versed in local
biodiversity and sustainable growing practices is a huge step toward improving food security."
South
Africa's FANRPAN is focused on another frequently neglected audience:
women. The organization uses interactive community plays to engage women
farmers, community leaders, and policymakers in an open dialogue about
gender equity, food security, land tenure, and access to resources.
Because women in sub-Saharan Africa make up more than 75 percent of
agricultural workers and provide 60-80 percent of the labor to produce
food for household consumption and sale, it is crucial that they have
opportunities to express their needs in local governance and
decision-making. FANRPAN's entertaining and amicable forum makes it
easier for them to speak openly.
In addition to spotlighting these and other successful agricultural innovations, State of the World 2011: Innovations that Nourish the Planet
draws from the world's leading agricultural experts to outline major
successes in preventing food waste, building resilience to climate
change, and strengthening farming in cities. The report comes at a time
when many global hunger and food
security initiatives-such as the Obama administration's Feed the Future
program, the Global Agriculture and Food Security Program (GAFSP), the
United Nations World Food Programme (WFP), and the Comprehensive Africa
Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP)-can benefit from new insight
into projects that are working today to alleviate hunger and poverty in
an environmentally sustainable manner.
"The
international community has been neglecting entire segments of the food
system in its efforts to reduce hunger and poverty," said Danielle
Nierenberg, co-director of the Nourishing the Planet project. "The
solutions won't necessarily come from producing more food, but from
changing what children eat in schools, how foods are processed and
marketed, and what sorts of food businesses we are investing in."
The
report provides a roadmap for increased agricultural investment to more
effectively target projects that are empowering farmers to lift
themselves out of hunger and poverty.
"Bread for the World is calling on Congress to make U.S. foreign
assistance more effective in reducing hunger and poverty around the
world," said Rev. Beckmann. "Reforming foreign aid will
allow developing countries to reduce hunger and help poor people to
build a better future for themselves and their communities."
Serving
locally raised crops to school children, for example, has proven to be
an effective hunger- and poverty-reducing strategy in many African
nations, with strong similarities to successful farm-to-cafeteria
programs in the United States and Europe. Efforts to prevent food waste
are also critical. "Roughly 40 percent of the food produced worldwide is
wasted before it is consumed, creating large opportunities for farmers
and households to save both money and resources by reducing this waste,"
said Brian Halweil, Nourishing the Planet co-director.
The findings of State of the World 2011 will
be shared in over 20 languages with global agricultural stakeholders
that include government ministries, policymakers, farmer and community
networks, and the increasingly influential nongovernmental environmental
and development communities.
Worldwatch
Institute and the Nourishing the Planet project are gratefully
supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, as well as
additional foundations, governments, and institutions including the
Rockefeller and Surdna Foundations, the United Nations Foundation, the
Goldman Environmental Prize, the Shared Earth Foundation, the Wallace
Global Fund, and the Winslow Foundation.
The Worldwatch Institute was a globally focused environmental research organization based in Washington, D.C., founded by Lester R. Brown. Worldwatch was named as one of the top ten sustainable development research organizations by Globescan Survey of Sustainability Experts. Brown left to found the Earth Policy Institute in 2000. The Institute was wound up in 2017, after publication of its last State of the World Report. Worldwatch.org was unreachable from mid-2019.
"An unmistakable majority wants a party that will fight harder against the corporations and rich people they see as responsible for keeping them down," wrote the New Republic's editorial director.
Democratic voters overwhelmingly want a leader who will fight the superrich and corporate America, and they believe Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is the person to do it, according to a poll released this week.
While Democrats are often portrayed as squabbling and directionless, the poll conducted last month by the New Republic with Embold Research demonstrated a remarkable unity among the more than 2,400 Democratic voters it surveyed.
This was true with respect to policy: More than 9 in 10 want to raise taxes on corporations and on the wealthiest Americans, while more than three-quarters want to break up tech monopolies and believe the government should conduct stronger oversight of business.
But it was also reflected in sentiments that a more confrontational governing philosophy should prevail and general agreement that the party in its current form is not doing enough to take on its enemies.
Three-quarters said they wanted Democrats to "be more aggressive in calling out Republicans," while nearly 7 in 10 said it was appropriate to describe their party as "weak."
This appears to have translated to support for a more muscular view of government. Where the label once helped to sink Sen. Bernie Sanders' (I-Vt.) two runs for president, nearly three-quarters of Democrats now say they are either unconcerned with the label of "socialist" or view it as an asset.
Meanwhile, 46% said they want to see a "progressive" at the top of the Democratic ticket in 2028, higher than the number who said they wanted a "liberal" or a "moderate."
It's an environment that appears to be fertile ground for Ocasio-Cortez, who pitched her vision for a "working-class-centered politics" at this week's Munich summit in what many suspected was a soft-launch of her presidential candidacy in 2028.
With 85% favorability, Bronx congresswoman had the highest approval rating of any Democratic figure in the country among the voters surveyed.
It's a higher mark than either of the figures who head-to-head polls have shown to be presumptive favorites for the nomination: Former Vice President Kamala Harris and California Gov. Gavin Newsom.
Early polls show AOC lagging considerably behind these top two. However, there are signs in the New Republic's poll that may give her supporters cause for hope.
While Harris is also well-liked, 66% of Democrats surveyed said they believe she's "had her shot" at the presidency and should not run again after losing to President Donald Trump in 2024.
Newsom does not have a similar electoral history holding him back and is riding high from the passage of Proposition 50, which will allow Democrats to add potentially five more US House seats this November.
But his policy approach may prove an ill fit at a time when Democrats overwhelmingly say their party is "too timid" about taxing the rich and corporations and taking on tech oligarchs.
As labor unions in California have pushed for a popular proposal to introduce a billionaire's tax, Newsom has made himself the chiseled face of the resistance to this idea, joining with right-wing Silicon Valley barons in an aggressive campaign to kill it.
While polls can tell us little two years out about what voters will do in 2028, New Republic editorial director Emily Cooke said her magazine's survey shows an unmistakable pattern.
"It’s impossible to come away from these results without concluding that economic populism is a winning message for loyal Democrats," she wrote. "This was true across those who identify as liberals, moderates, or progressives: An unmistakable majority wants a party that will fight harder against the corporations and rich people they see as responsible for keeping them down."
In some cases, the administration has kept immigrants locked up even after a judge has ordered their release, according to an investigation by Reuters.
Judges across the country have ruled more than 4,400 times since the start of October that US Immigration and Customs Enforcement has illegally detained immigrants, according to a Reuters investigation published Saturday.
As President Donald Trump carries out his unprecedented "mass deportation" crusade, the number of people in ICE custody ballooned to 68,000 this month, up 75% from when he took office.
Midway through 2025, the administration had begun pushing for a daily quota of 3,000 arrests per day, with the goal of reaching 1 million per year. This has led to the targeting of mostly people with no criminal records rather than the "worst of the worst," as the administration often claims.
Reuters' reporting suggests chasing this number has also resulted in a staggering number of arrests that judges have later found to be illegal.
Since the beginning of Trump's term, immigrants have filed more than 20,200 habeas corpus petitions, claiming they were held indefinitely without trial in violation of the Constitution.
In at least 4,421 cases, more than 400 federal judges have ruled that their detentions were illegal.
Last month, more than 6,000 habeas petitions were filed. Prior to the second Trump administration, no other month dating back to 2010 had seen even 500.

In part due to the sheer volume of legal challenges, the Trump administration has often failed to comply with court rulings, leaving people locked up even after judges ordered them to be released.
Reuters' new report is the most comprehensive examination to date of the administration's routine violation of the law with respect to immigration enforcement. But the extent to which federal immigration agencies have violated the law under Trump is hardly new information.
In a ruling last month, Chief Judge Patrick J. Schiltz of the US District Court in Minnesota—a conservative jurist appointed by former President George W. Bush—provided a list of nearly 100 court orders ICE had violated just that month while deployed as part of Trump's Operation Metro Surge.
The report of ICE's systemic violation of the law comes as the agency faces heightened scrutiny on Capitol Hill, with leaders of the agency called to testify and Democrats attempting to hold up funding in order to force reforms to ICE's conduct, which resulted in a partial shutdown beginning Saturday.
Following the release of Reuters' report, Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.) directed a pointed question over social media to Kristi Noem, the secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees ICE.
"Why do your out-of-control agents keep violating federal law?" he said. "I look forward to seeing you testify under oath at the House Judiciary Committee in early March."
"Aggies do what is necessary for our rights, for our survival, and for our people,” said one student organizer at North Carolina A&T State University, the largest historically Black college in the nation.
As early voting began for the state primaries, North Carolina college students found themselves walking more than a mile to cast their ballots after the Republican-controlled State Board of Elections closed polling places on their campuses.
The board, which shifted to a 3-2 GOP majority, voted last month to close a polling site at Western Carolina University and to reject the creation of polling sites at two other colleges—the University of North Carolina at Greensboro (UNC Greensboro), and the North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University (NC A&T), the largest historically Black college in the nation. Each of these schools had polling places available on campus during the 2024 election.
The decision, which came just weeks before early voting was scheduled to begin, left many of the 40,000 students who attend these schools more than a mile away from the nearest polling place.
It was the latest of many efforts by North Carolina Republicans to restrict voting ahead of the 2026 midterms: They also cut polling place hours in dozens of counties and eliminated early voting on Sundays in some, which dealt a blow to "Souls to the Polls" efforts led by Black churches.
A lawsuit filed late last month by a group of students at the three schools said, “as a result, students who do not have access to private transportation must now walk that distance—which includes walking along a highway that lacks any pedestrian infrastructure—to exercise their right to vote.
The students argued that this violates their access to the ballot and to same-day registration, which is only available during the early voting period.
Last week, a federal judge rejected their demand to open the three polling centers. Jay Pavey, a Republican member of the Jackson County elections board, who voted to close the WCU polling site, dismissed fears that it would limit voting.
“If you really want to vote, you'll find a way to go one mile,” Pavey said.
Despite the hurdles, hundreds of students in the critical battleground state remained determined to cast a ballot as early voting opened.
On Friday, a video posted by the Smoky Mountain News showed dozens of students marching in a line from WCU "to their new polling place," at the Jackson County Recreation Center, "1.7 miles down a busy highway with no sidewalks."
The university and on-campus groups also organized shuttles to and from the polling place.
A similar scene was documented at NC A&T, where about 60 students marched to their nearest polling place at a courthouse more than 1.3 miles away.
The students described their march as a protest against the state's decision, which they viewed as an attempt to limit their power at the ballot box.
The campus is no stranger to standing up against injustice. February 1 marked the 66th anniversary of when four Black NC A&T students launched one of the most pivotal protests of the civil rights movement, sitting down at a segregated Woolworth's lunch counter in downtown Greensboro—an act that sparked a wave of nonviolent civil disobedience across the South.
"Aggies do what is necessary for our rights, for our survival, and for our people,” Jae'lah Monet, one of the student organizers of the march, told Spectrum News 1.
Monet said she and other students will do what is necessary to get students to the polls safely and to demonstrate to the state board the importance of having a polling place on campus. She said several similar events will take place throughout the early voting period.
"We will be there all day, and we will all get a chance to vote," Monet said.