January, 04 2011, 12:50pm EDT

For Immediate Release
Contact:
Tim Shenk,Press Officer,Direct: 212-763-5764,E-mail:,tim.shenk@newyork.msf.org
Statement: Pfizer Falsely Claims MSF Involvement in the Company's Unethical 1996 Drug Trials in Nigeria
WASHINGTON
Among the US government diplomatic cables recently published by the
Wikileaks website were details of a meeting between an official from the
pharmaceutical company, Pfizer, and US Embassy officials in Nigeria in
April 2009.
At the time of the meeting, Pfizer was in the midst of a legal battle
with Nigerian government officials regarding a medically unethical
antibiotic clinical trial in children. The clinical trial took place in
Kano State in 1996 during a massive meningitis outbreak.
Pfizer carried out the trial of the oral antibiotic trovafloxacin,
branded Trovan, even though there had not been any previous medical
evidence that it could be effective against meningitis. The Pfizer
researchers conducted the trial in Kano State Hospital, where a Doctors
Without Borders/Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) was treating children
using a preferred and clinically approved antibiotic regimen for
bacterial meningitis.
A US$75 million settlement with the State of Kano was reached July 30,
2009. Other cases are still pending before the US courts and the
Nigerian federal government continues to pursue legal claims against
Pfizer.
It is against this backdrop that Pfizer falsely accused MSF in the US
diplomatic cables of using Trovan. Documented evidence has shown that
these accusations are patently false. MSF did not, at any time,
administer Trovan to patients. Litigation connected to this case and
comprehensive investigative reports on the matter suggest that Pfizer's
attempts to rewrite history are intended to deflect responsibility for
the company's actions.
MSF was not working in the same part of the hospital in Kano State as
Pfizer clinical researchers, and MSF staff had no connection to Pfizer.
When MSF staff became aware of what Pfizer was doing, they were appalled
at the practices of the company's team. MSF personnel on the ground
communicated their concerns to both Pfizer and the local authorities.
"It was not a time for a drug trial," says Jean Herve Bradol, former
president of MSF France, to whom the Kano teams were reporting at the
time. "They were panicking in the hospital, overrun by critically ill
patients. The team were shocked that Pfizer continued the so-called
scientific work in the middle of hell."
Pfizer officials have made no attempt to clear the record as of yet and
retract these unsubstantiated claims against MSF. A handful of internet
reports have adopted the version of events proffered by the Pfizer
official.
An exhaustive Washington Post investigation, drawing on extensive
background information and interviews provided by MSF staff, published
on December 17, 2000, makes clear the distinction between Pfizer's
activities and the work of MSF during the meningitis outbreak:
"Behind a gate besieged by suffering crowds stood two very different
clinics. A humanitarian charity, Doctors Without Borders, had erected a
treatment center solely in an effort to save lives. Researchers for
Pfizer Inc., a huge American drug company, had set up a second center.
They were using Nigeria's meningitis epidemic to conduct experiments on
children with what Pfizer believed was a promising new antibiotic--a drug
not yet approved in the United States."
The article later triggered the various legal proceeding taken by the victims and Nigerian authorities against Pfizer.
With proven treatments at hand, Pfizer instead chose to carry out tests
for an unproven drug on children whose lives hung in the balance. "The
situation...called for using treatment protocols known to be effective
rather than carrying out clinical trials on a new antibiotic, with
uncertain results," said Dr. Bradol.
Pfizer's researchers put at risk not only the children in Kano but also
other clinical trials done under the proper circumstances that could
have a positive impact on sick people in the developing world. Pfizer
never intended to sell Trovan at an accessible price in Africa if it had
been approved.
Further Reading:
The Washington Post: Where Profits and Lives Hang in the Balance
The Guardian: As Doctors Fought to Save Lives, Pfizer Flew in a Drug Trail Team
Interview with Dr. Jean Herve Bradol: Ethical Research Needed on Diseases
Interview with Philippe Guerin of Epicentre: Strict Rules Govern the Conduct of Clinical Trials in Africa
Doctors Without Borders/Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) is an international medical humanitarian organization created by doctors and journalists in France in 1971. MSF's work is based on the humanitarian principles of medical ethics and impartiality. The organization is committed to bringing quality medical care to people caught in crisis regardless of race, religion, or political affiliation. MSF operates independently of any political, military, or religious agendas.
LATEST NEWS
'Drop the Assange Case Now,' Advocates Tell Biden DOJ as Critical Hearing Begins
"The responsibility still lies with the U.S. Department of Justice," said a Reporters Without Borders campaigner. "At any point, they could drop the charges, they could close this case, they could let Julian Assange free."
Feb 20, 2024
Press freedom advocates on Tuesday issued last-ditch calls for the Biden administration to drop the case against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange as the journalist and publisher's legal team appeared before the United Kingdom's High Court to fight his extradition to the United States.
The hearings on Tuesday and Wednesday will determine whether Assange, who is 52 years old and in increasingly poor health, can appeal an earlier decision by the U.K. government to approve his extradition to the U.S., where he could be hit with a prison sentence of up to 175 years for publishing classified information—something that journalists do all the time.
Assange's disclosures revealed U.S. war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan, including the killing of two Reuters journalists.
"It's a terrible thing that this hearing is necessary," Jameel Jaffer, executive director of the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, said in a statement Tuesday. "The U.S. Justice Department should never have charged Assange under the Espionage Act, because the indictment and prosecution of a publisher under this act poses a grave threat to press freedom."
"The indictment focuses almost entirely on the kinds of activities that national security journalists engage in routinely and as a necessary part of their work—cultivating sources, communicating with them confidentially, soliciting information from them, protecting their identities from disclosure, and publishing classified information," Jaffer added. "A successful prosecution of Assange on the basis of this indictment would criminalize a great deal of the investigative journalism that is absolutely crucial to our democracy."
Rebecca Vincent, director of campaigns at Reporters Without Borders, said during a rally during Tuesday's hearing that "we're not letting the U.S. government off the hook today no matter what happens here in London."
"The responsibility still lies with the U.S. Department of Justice," said Vincent. "At any point, they could drop the charges, they could close this case, they could let Julian Assange free."
RSF's Rebecca Vincent speaking outside Julian Assange court hearing this morning: "RSF is engaged because of Julian Assange's contribution to journalism...he exposed war crimes and human rights violations...If he is extradited, the chilling effect will be enormous" #FreeAssange pic.twitter.com/O87pQ4IHW3
— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) February 20, 2024
Assange did not attend the first day of the critical hearings in person or by video link for health reasons. The publisher has been languishing in a high-security London prison for more than five years while fighting extradition to the U.S., which his supporters and wife say would be a death sentence.
"We have two big days ahead," Stella Assange, whom Julian married in prison in 2022, told supporters at a demonstration outside the London court on Tuesday. "We don't know what to expect, but you're here because the world is watching. They just cannot get away with this. Julian needs his freedom and we all need the truth."
Seth Stern, director of advocacy at the Freedom of the Press Foundation, warned Tuesday that "as Assange inches closer to extradition, the danger to press freedom grows."
"An Espionage Act trial and conviction of Assange in an American court would be a disaster for journalists and for journalism," said Stern. "If the Biden administration cares as much about press freedom as it claims, it wouldn't wait for the U.K. to send this dangerous case to American courts. The Department of Justice should drop the Assange case now."
"The U.S. is actually engaged in an admission—an admission that they now criminalize journalism."
Assange, who has been fighting U.S. extradition attempts for more than a decade, was indicted under the Trump administration in 2019 on 17 counts of violating the Espionage Act, and the Biden Justice Department has decided to continue pursuing the case against the WikiLeaks founder despite dire warnings about the implications for press freedom.
Edward Fitzgerald, Assange's attorney, said during Tuesday's hearing that "is being prosecuted for engaging in ordinary journalistic practice of obtaining and publishing classified information, information that is both true and of obvious and important public interest."
Fitzgerald argued Tuesday that sending Assange across the Atlantic would violate the U.S.-U.K. Extradition Treaty, which prohibits extraditions for political offenses.
Should the U.K. High Court reject Assange's attempt to appeal, the publisher's legal team is expected to ask the European Court of Human Rights to halt the extradition, warning that his life is in danger. The U.S. has insisted it would not subject Assange to harsh treatment, but United Nations experts and human rights groups have said such assurances are not to be trusted.
Stella Assange told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation ahead of Tuesday's hearing that the WikiLeaks founder would not accept a plea deal with the U.S. Justice Department in exchange for a lighter sentence.
"The only thing that he would be pleading to is journalism," she said. "He is being accused of receiving information from a source, information that was in the public interest, that belonged in the public, and the U.S. is actually engaged in an admission—an admission that they now criminalize journalism."
"That is the case that has been brought against Julian," Stella Assange added. "Journalism has been re-classed as espionage. An unprecedented prosecution has been taken against a publisher for the very first time in the more than 100-year history of this Act and it is going to set a precedent. It already is setting a precedent that can then be used against the rest of the press anywhere in the world."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Gaza Will See 'Explosion in Preventable Child Deaths' If Israeli Assault Continues: UN
"If the conflict doesn't end now, children's nutrition will continue to plummet," said a UNICEF official.
Feb 20, 2024
With malnutrition and infectious diseases spreading rapidly, United Nations officials warned Monday that child deaths in the Gaza Strip are set to surge if Israel's war and blockade are allowed to continue.
In a joint statement, the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), the World Food Program (WFP), and the World Health Organization (WHO) said that "food and safe water have become incredibly scarce" in Gaza, imperiling the health of children as well as pregnant and breastfeeding women.
The U.N. organizations cited a recent analysis by the Global Nutrition Cluster, which found that children in northern Gaza and Rafah—a severely overcrowded city that Israel is preparing to invade—are facing particularly severe malnutrition. But "while there are differences in the data from different governates," the analysis stressed, all the available evidence "indicates a dire nutrition situation for the entire population of Gaza."
The Global Nutrition Cluster found that more than 90% of Gaza children between the ages of 6 and 23 months are facing "severe food poverty," eating "two or fewer food groups each day." At least 90% of children under 5 years old have been impacted by one or more infectious diseases, the analysis estimated.
Infectious diseases are spreading among children in part due to the lack of clean water, a scarcity fueled by Israel's siege and attacks on the enclave's water infrastructure. "An increased number of infants now rely on formula milk for survival—which requires safe and clean water," the analysis notes.
Mike Ryan, executive director of the WHO's emergencies program, said Monday that "hunger and disease are a deadly combination."
"Hungry, weakened, and deeply traumatized children are more likely to get sick, and children who are sick, especially with diarrhea, cannot absorb nutrients well," said Ryan. "It's dangerous, and tragic, and happening before our eyes."
"The Gaza Strip is poised to witness an explosion in preventable child deaths which would compound the already unbearable level of child deaths in Gaza."
Despite an order from the International Court of Justice to ensure the delivery of humanitarian aid to Gaza, Israel has continued impeding critical assistance in recent weeks. Le Mondereported last week that Israel "has blocked a shipment of United Nations food aid, intended to feed over a million Gazans for a month."
"Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich said Tuesday, February 13, he had issued a directive blocking the 1,049 containers, which mainly contain flour, but also cooking oil, chickpeas, sugar, and rice," noted the French newspaper. "The U.N. was set to distribute these supplies in and around the city of Rafah, where more than half of Gaza's inhabitants are caught between the Egyptian border and Israeli infantry."
Access to humanitarian assistance has been further hampered by Israeli forces firing on Gazans as they wait for aid convoys to arrive. In desperation, some Gazans have resorted to eating grass and bread made from animal feed.
Ted Chaiban, UNICEF's deputy executive director for humanitarian action and supply operations, said Monday that "if the conflict doesn't end now, children's nutrition will continue to plummet, leading to preventable deaths or health issues which will affect the children of Gaza for the rest of their lives and have potential intergenerational consequences."
"The Gaza Strip is poised to witness an explosion in preventable child deaths which would compound the already unbearable level of child deaths in Gaza," said Chaiban.
Israel's assault on Gaza has killed more than 29,000 people in less than five months; women and children account for two-thirds of the death toll.
The U.N. organizations said Monday that "an immediate humanitarian cease-fire continues to provide the best chance to save lives and end suffering."
After opposing and obstructing the global push for a cease-fire, the administration of U.S. President Joe Biden is reportedly circulating a U.N. Security Council resolution that calls for a "temporary cease-fire in Gaza as soon as practicable, based on the formula of all hostages being released."
"The good news: Biden is finally willing to endorse a U.N. Security Council resolution on a Gaza cease-fire," Kenneth Roth, the former executive director of Human Rights Watch, wrote early Tuesday in response to the draft text. "The bad news: He wants it to be 'as soon as practicable,' which for [Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu probably means never. That wiggle room must be closed."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Wife Says 'Day X' Hearing for Julian Assange 'Will Determine if He Lives or Dies'
"This could very well be the final hearing for Julian," said Stella Assange on the eve of the critical U.K. High Court session.
Feb 19, 2024
Stella Assange, the wife of Julian Assange, said Monday that the jailed WikiLeaks founder will likely die if he is extradited from Britain to the United States, where he could imprisoned for the rest of his life for publishing classified documents including numerous files exposing U.S. war crimes.
Assange's final appeal is scheduled to be heard on Tuesday by the U.K. High Court. The Australian publisher's supporters are calling it "Day X," and his wife told the BBC that it "could very well be the final hearing for Julian."
"There's no possibility for further appeal in this jurisdiction," she explained, adding that Assange could still seek an emergency injunction from the European Court of Human Rights.
Assange said her husband—who is 52 years old and suffers from physical and mental health problems including heart and respiratory issues—is very weak and "in a very difficult place."
"This case will determine if he lives or dies, essentially," she asserted.
Imprisoned in London's notorious Belmarsh Prison since April 2019, Assange could be sentenced to as many as 175 years behind bars if convicted of all the Espionage Act and Computer Fraud and Abuse Act charges against him.
WikiLeaks published a series of document dumps inculding "Collateral Murder" video—which shows a U.S. Army helicopter crew killing a group of Iraqi civilians—the Afghan War Diary, and the Iraq War Logs, which revealed American and allied war crimes.
In 2016, The United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention found that Assange had been arbitrarily deprived of his freedom since his first arrest on December 7, 2010, including house arrest, imprisonment in London, and nearly seven years of political asylum in the Ecuadorian Embassy in the British capital.
Nils Melzer, the U.N.'s top torture official from 2016 to 2022, repeatedly said that Assange's treatment amounted to torture.
Alice Jill Edwards, the current U.N. special rapporteur on torture, is imploring the U.K. government to decline Assange's transfer to the U.S. because she says his health is likely to be "irreparably damaged" by extradition. Edwards cited conditions in U.S. prisons including the use of prolonged solitary confinement and excessive sentences as causes for concern.
Countless human rights defenders, press freedom advocates, and elected officials around the world have called on the U.S. to drop charges against Assange and for the U.K. to refuse his extradition.
"All eyes are on the U.K. High Court during this fateful hearing, but it remains to be seen whether the British judiciary can deliver some form of justice by preventing Assange's extradition at this late stage," Rebecca Vincent, campaigns director at Reporters Without Borders, said in a statement Monday.
"Regardless, none of this is inevitable—it remains within the U.S. government's power to bring this judicial tragedy to an end by dropping its 13-year-old case against Assange and ceasing this endless persecution," Vincent continued. "No one should face such treatment for publishing information in the public interest."
"It's time to protect journalism, press freedom, and all of our right to know," she added. "It's time to free Assange now."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


