July, 21 2010, 12:30pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Susan Roth, 301-530-3539, prsue@rothpr.com
Anne Singer, 202-271-4679, anne@annesingercommunications.
Robert Rubin and Other National Figures Join United for a Fair Economy in Calling on Congress to Move Quickly to Restore a Permanent, Robust Estate Tax
Former Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin, Hedge Fund Pioneer Julian Robertson, Philanthropist Abigail Disney and AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka Argue for Progressive Tax in National Teleconference
BOSTON, MA
With 12 legislative days remaining before the August recess, United
for a Fair Economy (UFE) is calling on Congress to prioritize
reinstating the estate tax, currently the most progressive tax in the
code and the only national tax on wealth. On Wednesday, July 21, four
powerful and expert voices joined UFE and its Responsible Wealth network
(RW) in a teleconference urging Congress to immediately restore a
robust and permanent estate tax.
Among participants on the call was Robert Rubin, the former
Secretary of the Treasury who is widely credited with overseeing the
Clinton era economic boom. "Our country is on an unsustainable fiscal
path. A progressive estate tax can provide needed revenue with no
adverse supply-side economic effect, and that revenue can then fund
deficit reduction, additional public investment, or added assistance to
those affected by the economic crisis," stated Rubin. Moreover, he
added, "our nation has always held itself out as a meritocracy and a
land of opportunity, and an estate tax helps avoid accumulation of
inherited economic and political power that is antithetical to this
historical vision of our society."
Secretary of the Treasury who is widely credited with overseeing the
Clinton era economic boom. "Our country is on an unsustainable fiscal
path. A progressive estate tax can provide needed revenue with no
adverse supply-side economic effect, and that revenue can then fund
deficit reduction, additional public investment, or added assistance to
those affected by the economic crisis," stated Rubin. Moreover, he
added, "our nation has always held itself out as a meritocracy and a
land of opportunity, and an estate tax helps avoid accumulation of
inherited economic and political power that is antithetical to this
historical vision of our society."
In her prepared remarks, Abigail Disney, the grandniece of the
legendary Walt Disney, explained that her family amassed its fortune
"not in spite of, but because of the American system of taxation."
Disney continued, "After all, without reliable and safe roads there'd
have been no Disneyland; without high functioning legal systems and a
well regulated business environment there would have been no copyright
protection for Mickey Mouse."
legendary Walt Disney, explained that her family amassed its fortune
"not in spite of, but because of the American system of taxation."
Disney continued, "After all, without reliable and safe roads there'd
have been no Disneyland; without high functioning legal systems and a
well regulated business environment there would have been no copyright
protection for Mickey Mouse."
Mike Lapham, director of UFE's Responsible Wealth Project, which
brings together high net worth individuals who advocate for an end to
tax breaks for wealthy Americans like themselves, stated, "Members of
Responsible Wealth recognize that our good fortune comes from some
combination of skill, luck, and public investments, and we have a unique
ability and responsibility to give something back."
brings together high net worth individuals who advocate for an end to
tax breaks for wealthy Americans like themselves, stated, "Members of
Responsible Wealth recognize that our good fortune comes from some
combination of skill, luck, and public investments, and we have a unique
ability and responsibility to give something back."
Lee Farris, UFE's Estate Tax Policy Coordinator, added,
"Hardworking families who live paycheck to paycheck pay their fair share
of taxes, and so should the heirs of millionaires. If Congress chooses
to shrink the estate tax, the middle class will face higher taxes or
cuts in vital services like unemployment benefits or education. We don't
need to weaken the estate tax - we need to strengthen it."
"Hardworking families who live paycheck to paycheck pay their fair share
of taxes, and so should the heirs of millionaires. If Congress chooses
to shrink the estate tax, the middle class will face higher taxes or
cuts in vital services like unemployment benefits or education. We don't
need to weaken the estate tax - we need to strengthen it."
Julian Robertson, a hedge fund pioneer who made his fortune on Wall
Street beginning in the 1980's, was also on the call and said: "America
desperately needs to bring its budget more in line. Any move in that
direction is favorable. It seems to me that the least deserving
recipients of wealth are inheritors. Further, there are many
indications that inheritors often have trouble adjusting to their
unearned inheritance. An inheritance tax would de facto help remedy
this."
Street beginning in the 1980's, was also on the call and said: "America
desperately needs to bring its budget more in line. Any move in that
direction is favorable. It seems to me that the least deserving
recipients of wealth are inheritors. Further, there are many
indications that inheritors often have trouble adjusting to their
unearned inheritance. An inheritance tax would de facto help remedy
this."
"Our economy remains on the edge of a double-dip recession, and we
urgently need to create millions of jobs and invest in our future, not
give more tax breaks to the wealthy," said Richard Trumka, President of
the AFL-CIO. "Anyone who pretends to care about cutting deficits while
opposing the restoration of the estate tax is clearly residing on a
different planet."
urgently need to create millions of jobs and invest in our future, not
give more tax breaks to the wealthy," said Richard Trumka, President of
the AFL-CIO. "Anyone who pretends to care about cutting deficits while
opposing the restoration of the estate tax is clearly residing on a
different planet."
UFE is calling on Congress to move quickly on the estate tax as
part of a larger tax package addressing the Bush tax cuts. All the
participants in today's UFE teleconference believe that a proposal,
recently reintroduced by Senators Jon Kyl and Blanche Lincoln, to
further weaken the estate tax is the wrong way to go, and agree the
estate tax should be re-established at its 2009 level or stronger.
part of a larger tax package addressing the Bush tax cuts. All the
participants in today's UFE teleconference believe that a proposal,
recently reintroduced by Senators Jon Kyl and Blanche Lincoln, to
further weaken the estate tax is the wrong way to go, and agree the
estate tax should be re-established at its 2009 level or stronger.
While participants on the call have varying views of what form a
reinstated estate tax should take, UFE supports such progressive
proposals as: the bill offered by Senators Sanders, Harkin, and
Whitehouse (S.3533) with a $3.5 million exemption per spouse, 45-55%
rate, and a 65% rate on amounts over $1 billion; and a House bill from
Rep. Jim McDermott (HR 2023) with a $2 million exemption per spouse and a
45-55% rate.
reinstated estate tax should take, UFE supports such progressive
proposals as: the bill offered by Senators Sanders, Harkin, and
Whitehouse (S.3533) with a $3.5 million exemption per spouse, 45-55%
rate, and a 65% rate on amounts over $1 billion; and a House bill from
Rep. Jim McDermott (HR 2023) with a $2 million exemption per spouse and a
45-55% rate.
The federal estate tax, established in 1916, has been temporarily
suspended for one year at the beginning of 2010 as a result of Bush era
tax policies and Congress's failure to act in 2009. If Congress fails to
pass new legislation, the estate tax reverts in 2011 to a $1 million
exemption per spouse and rates from 41-55%.
suspended for one year at the beginning of 2010 as a result of Bush era
tax policies and Congress's failure to act in 2009. If Congress fails to
pass new legislation, the estate tax reverts in 2011 to a $1 million
exemption per spouse and rates from 41-55%.
To date, UFE and Responsible Wealth have gathered over 5,000
signers on their Call to Preserve the Estate Tax, including over 2,000
individuals whose families have paid or who expect to pay the estate tax
themselves. UFE will continue this effort in the weeks and months ahead
and invites voters across the country to visit www.faireconomy.org/estatetax
to sign the call for a strong estate tax and get the latest information
on UFE's efforts.
signers on their Call to Preserve the Estate Tax, including over 2,000
individuals whose families have paid or who expect to pay the estate tax
themselves. UFE will continue this effort in the weeks and months ahead
and invites voters across the country to visit www.faireconomy.org/estatetax
to sign the call for a strong estate tax and get the latest information
on UFE's efforts.
United for a Fair Economy challenges the concentration of wealth and power that corrupts democracy, deepens the racial divide and tears communities apart. We use popular economics education, trainings, and creative communications to support social movements working for a resilient, sustainable and equitable economy. United for a Fair Economy believes another world is possible. We envision a global society which respects the humanity, rights, and creativity of all people.
LATEST NEWS
Critics Shred JD Vance as He Shrugs Off Millions of Americans Losing Medicaid as 'Minutiae'
"What happened to you J.D. Vance—author of Hillbilly Elegy—now shrugging off Medicaid cuts that will close rural hospitals and kick millions off healthcare as 'minutiae?'" asked Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.).
Jul 01, 2025
Vice President J.D. Vance took heat from critics this week when he downplayed legislation that would result in millions of Americans losing Medicaid coverage as mere "minutiae."
Writing on X, Vance defended the budget megabill that's currently being pushed through the United States Senate by arguing that it will massively increase funding to Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which he deemed to be a necessary component of carrying out the Trump administration's mass deportation operation.
"The thing that will bankrupt this country more than any other policy is flooding the country with illegal immigration and then giving those migrants generous benefits," wrote Vance. "The [One Big Beautiful Bill] fixes this problem. And therefore it must pass."
He then added that "everything else—the CBO score, the proper baseline, the minutiae of the Medicaid policy—is immaterial compared to the ICE money and immigration enforcement provisions."
It was this line that drew the ire of many critics, as the Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the Senate version of the budget bill would slash spending on Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program by more than $1 trillion over a ten-year-period, which would result in more than 10 million people losing their coverage. Additionally, Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) has proposed an amendment that would roll back the expansion of Medicaid under the 2010 Affordable Care Act, which would likely kick millions more off of the program.
Many congressional Democrats were quick to pounce on Vance for what they said were callous comments about a vital government program.
"So if the only thing that matters is immigration... why didn't you support the bipartisan Lankford-Murphy bill that tackled immigration far better than your Ugly Bill?" asked Rep. Daniel Goldman (D-N.Y.). "And it didn't have 'minutiae' that will kick 12m+ Americans off healthcare or raise the debt by $4tn."
"What happened to you J.D. Vance—author of Hillbilly Elegy—now shrugging off Medicaid cuts that will close rural hospitals and kick millions off healthcare as 'minutiae?'" asked Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.).
Veteran healthcare reporter Jonathan Cohn put some numbers behind the policies that are being minimized by the vice president.
"11.8M projected to lose health insurance," he wrote. "Clinics and hospitals taking a hit, especially in rural areas. Low-income seniors facing higher costs. 'Minutiae.'"
Activist Leah Greenberg, the co-chair of progressive organizing group Indivisible, zeroed in on Vance's emphasis on ramping up ICE's funding as particularly problematic.
"They are just coming right out and saying they want an exponential increase in $$$ so they can build their own personal Gestapo," she warned.
Washington Post global affairs columnist Ishaan Tharoor also found himself disturbed by the sheer size of the funding increase for ICE that Vance is demanding and he observed that "nothing matters more apparently than giving ICE a bigger budget than the militaries of virtually every European country."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Heinrich Should Be Ashamed': Lone Senate Dem Helps GOP Deliver Big Pharma Win
The provision, part of the Senate budget bill, was described as "a blatant giveaway to the pharmaceutical industry that would keep drug prices high for patients while draining $5 billion in taxpayer dollars."
Jul 01, 2025
The deep-pocketed and powerful pharmaceutical industry notched a significant victory on Monday when the Senate parliamentarian ruled that a bill described by critics as a handout to drug corporations can be included in the Republican reconciliation package, which could become law as soon as this week.
The legislation, titled the Optimizing Research Progress Hope and New (ORPHAN) Cures Act, would exempt drugs that treat more than one rare disease from Medicare's drug-price negotiation program, allowing pharmaceutical companies to charge exorbitant prices for life-saving medications in a purported effort to encourage innovation. (Medications developed to treat rare diseases are known as "orphan drugs.")
The consumer advocacy group Public Citizen observed that if the legislation were already in effect, Medicare "would have been barred from negotiating lower prices for important treatments like cancer drugs Imbruvica, Calquence, and Pomalyst."
Among the bill's leading supporters is Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), whose spokesperson announced the parliamentarian's decision to allow the measure in the reconciliation package after previously advising that it be excluded. Heinrich is listed as the legislation's only co-sponsor in the Senate, alongside lead sponsor Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.).
"Sen. Heinrich should be ashamed of prioritizing drug corporation profits over lower medicine prices for seniors and people with disabilities," Steve Knievel, access to medicines advocate at Public Citizen, said in a statement Monday. "Patients and consumers breathed a sigh of relief when the Senate parliamentarian stripped the proposal from Republicans' Big Ugly Betrayal, so it comes as a gut punch to hear that Sen. Heinrich welcomed the reversal and continued to champion a proposal that will transfer billions from taxpayers to Big Pharma."
"People across the country are demanding lower drug prices and for Medicare drug price negotiations to be expanded, not restricted," Knievel added. "Sen. Heinrich should apologize to his constituents and start listening to them instead of drug corporation lobbyists."
The Biotechnology Innovation Organization, a lobbying group whose members include pharmaceutical companies, has publicly endorsed and promoted the legislation, urging lawmakers to pass it "as soon as possible."
"This is a blatant giveaway to the pharmaceutical industry that would keep drug prices high for patients."
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the ORPHAN Cures Act would cost U.S. taxpayers around $5 billion over the next decade.
Merith Basey, executive director of Patients For Affordable Drugs Now, said that "patients are infuriated to see the Senate cave to Big Pharma by reviving the ORPHAN Cures Act at the eleventh hour."
"This is a blatant giveaway to the pharmaceutical industry that would keep drug prices high for patients while draining $5 billion in taxpayer dollars," said Basey. "We call on lawmakers to remove this unnecessary provision immediately and stand with an overwhelming majority of Americans who want the Medicare Negotiation program to go further. Medicare negotiation will deliver huge savings for seniors and taxpayers; this bill would undermine that progress."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Trump-Musk Gutting of USAID Could Lead to More Than 14 Million Deaths Over Five Years: Study
"For many low and middle income countries, the resulting shock would be comparable in scale to a global pandemic or a major armed conflict," said the coordinator behind the study.
Jul 01, 2025
A study published Monday by the medical journal The Lancet found that deep funding cuts to the U.S. Agency for International Development, a main target of the Department of Government Efficiency's government-slashing efforts, could result in more than 14 million additional deaths by the year 2030.
For months, humanitarian programs and experts have sounded the alarm on the impact of cutting funding for the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), which is the largest funding agency for humanitarian and development aid around the globe, according to the study.
"Our analysis shows that USAID funding has been an essential force in saving lives and improving health outcomes in some of the world's most vulnerable regions over the past two decades," said Daniella Cavalcanti, postdoctoral researcher at the Institute of Collective Health and an author of the study, according to a statement published Tuesday. Between 2001 and 2021, an estimated 91 million deaths were prevented in low and middle income countries thanks programs supported by USAID, according to the study.
The study was coordinated by researchers from the Barcelona Institute for Global Health with the help of the Institute of Collective Health of the Federal University of Bahia, the University of California Los Angeles, and the Manhiça Centre for Health Research, as well as others.
To project the future consequences of USAID funding cuts and arrive at the 14 million figure, the researchers used forecasting models to simulate the impact of two scenarios, continuing USAID funding at 2023 levels versus implementing the reductions announced earlier this year, and then comparing the two.
Those estimated 14 million additional deaths include 4.5 million deaths among children younger than five, according to the researchers.
The journalist Jeff Jarvis shared reporting about the study and wrote "murder" on X on Tuesday.
In March, Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that the 83% of the programs at USAID were being canceled. In the same post on X, he praised the Department of Government Efficiency, which at that point had already infiltrated the agency. "Thank you to DOGE and our hardworking staff who worked very long hours to achieve this overdue and historic reform," he wrote.
Davide Rasella, research professor at Barcelona Institute for Global Health and coordinator of the study, said in a statement Tuesday that "our projections indicate that these cuts could lead to a sharp increase in preventable deaths, particularly in the most fragile countries. They risk abruptly halting—and even reversing—two decades of progress in health among vulnerable populations. For many low- and middle-income countries, the resulting shock would be comparable in scale to a global pandemic or a major armed conflict."
One country where USAID cuts have had a particularly deadly impact is Sudan, according to The Washington Post, which reported on Monday that funding shortages have led to lack of medical supplies and food in the war-torn nation.
"There's a largely unspoken and growing death toll of non-American lives thanks to MAGA," wrote Ishaan Tharoor, a Post columnist, of the paper's reporting on Sudan.
In reference to the reporting on Sudan, others laid blame on billionaire Elon Musk, the billionaire and GOP mega-donor who was initially tapped to lead the Department of Government Efficiency.
"In a less imperfect world, Musk and [President Donald] Trump would be forever cast as killers of children, and this would be front-page news for months and the subject of Sunday sermons in every church," wrote the journalist David Corn.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular