July, 21 2010, 12:30pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Susan Roth, 301-530-3539, prsue@rothpr.com
Anne Singer, 202-271-4679, anne@annesingercommunications.
Robert Rubin and Other National Figures Join United for a Fair Economy in Calling on Congress to Move Quickly to Restore a Permanent, Robust Estate Tax
Former Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin, Hedge Fund Pioneer Julian Robertson, Philanthropist Abigail Disney and AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka Argue for Progressive Tax in National Teleconference
BOSTON, MA
With 12 legislative days remaining before the August recess, United
for a Fair Economy (UFE) is calling on Congress to prioritize
reinstating the estate tax, currently the most progressive tax in the
code and the only national tax on wealth. On Wednesday, July 21, four
powerful and expert voices joined UFE and its Responsible Wealth network
(RW) in a teleconference urging Congress to immediately restore a
robust and permanent estate tax.
Among participants on the call was Robert Rubin, the former
Secretary of the Treasury who is widely credited with overseeing the
Clinton era economic boom. "Our country is on an unsustainable fiscal
path. A progressive estate tax can provide needed revenue with no
adverse supply-side economic effect, and that revenue can then fund
deficit reduction, additional public investment, or added assistance to
those affected by the economic crisis," stated Rubin. Moreover, he
added, "our nation has always held itself out as a meritocracy and a
land of opportunity, and an estate tax helps avoid accumulation of
inherited economic and political power that is antithetical to this
historical vision of our society."
Secretary of the Treasury who is widely credited with overseeing the
Clinton era economic boom. "Our country is on an unsustainable fiscal
path. A progressive estate tax can provide needed revenue with no
adverse supply-side economic effect, and that revenue can then fund
deficit reduction, additional public investment, or added assistance to
those affected by the economic crisis," stated Rubin. Moreover, he
added, "our nation has always held itself out as a meritocracy and a
land of opportunity, and an estate tax helps avoid accumulation of
inherited economic and political power that is antithetical to this
historical vision of our society."
In her prepared remarks, Abigail Disney, the grandniece of the
legendary Walt Disney, explained that her family amassed its fortune
"not in spite of, but because of the American system of taxation."
Disney continued, "After all, without reliable and safe roads there'd
have been no Disneyland; without high functioning legal systems and a
well regulated business environment there would have been no copyright
protection for Mickey Mouse."
legendary Walt Disney, explained that her family amassed its fortune
"not in spite of, but because of the American system of taxation."
Disney continued, "After all, without reliable and safe roads there'd
have been no Disneyland; without high functioning legal systems and a
well regulated business environment there would have been no copyright
protection for Mickey Mouse."
Mike Lapham, director of UFE's Responsible Wealth Project, which
brings together high net worth individuals who advocate for an end to
tax breaks for wealthy Americans like themselves, stated, "Members of
Responsible Wealth recognize that our good fortune comes from some
combination of skill, luck, and public investments, and we have a unique
ability and responsibility to give something back."
brings together high net worth individuals who advocate for an end to
tax breaks for wealthy Americans like themselves, stated, "Members of
Responsible Wealth recognize that our good fortune comes from some
combination of skill, luck, and public investments, and we have a unique
ability and responsibility to give something back."
Lee Farris, UFE's Estate Tax Policy Coordinator, added,
"Hardworking families who live paycheck to paycheck pay their fair share
of taxes, and so should the heirs of millionaires. If Congress chooses
to shrink the estate tax, the middle class will face higher taxes or
cuts in vital services like unemployment benefits or education. We don't
need to weaken the estate tax - we need to strengthen it."
"Hardworking families who live paycheck to paycheck pay their fair share
of taxes, and so should the heirs of millionaires. If Congress chooses
to shrink the estate tax, the middle class will face higher taxes or
cuts in vital services like unemployment benefits or education. We don't
need to weaken the estate tax - we need to strengthen it."
Julian Robertson, a hedge fund pioneer who made his fortune on Wall
Street beginning in the 1980's, was also on the call and said: "America
desperately needs to bring its budget more in line. Any move in that
direction is favorable. It seems to me that the least deserving
recipients of wealth are inheritors. Further, there are many
indications that inheritors often have trouble adjusting to their
unearned inheritance. An inheritance tax would de facto help remedy
this."
Street beginning in the 1980's, was also on the call and said: "America
desperately needs to bring its budget more in line. Any move in that
direction is favorable. It seems to me that the least deserving
recipients of wealth are inheritors. Further, there are many
indications that inheritors often have trouble adjusting to their
unearned inheritance. An inheritance tax would de facto help remedy
this."
"Our economy remains on the edge of a double-dip recession, and we
urgently need to create millions of jobs and invest in our future, not
give more tax breaks to the wealthy," said Richard Trumka, President of
the AFL-CIO. "Anyone who pretends to care about cutting deficits while
opposing the restoration of the estate tax is clearly residing on a
different planet."
urgently need to create millions of jobs and invest in our future, not
give more tax breaks to the wealthy," said Richard Trumka, President of
the AFL-CIO. "Anyone who pretends to care about cutting deficits while
opposing the restoration of the estate tax is clearly residing on a
different planet."
UFE is calling on Congress to move quickly on the estate tax as
part of a larger tax package addressing the Bush tax cuts. All the
participants in today's UFE teleconference believe that a proposal,
recently reintroduced by Senators Jon Kyl and Blanche Lincoln, to
further weaken the estate tax is the wrong way to go, and agree the
estate tax should be re-established at its 2009 level or stronger.
part of a larger tax package addressing the Bush tax cuts. All the
participants in today's UFE teleconference believe that a proposal,
recently reintroduced by Senators Jon Kyl and Blanche Lincoln, to
further weaken the estate tax is the wrong way to go, and agree the
estate tax should be re-established at its 2009 level or stronger.
While participants on the call have varying views of what form a
reinstated estate tax should take, UFE supports such progressive
proposals as: the bill offered by Senators Sanders, Harkin, and
Whitehouse (S.3533) with a $3.5 million exemption per spouse, 45-55%
rate, and a 65% rate on amounts over $1 billion; and a House bill from
Rep. Jim McDermott (HR 2023) with a $2 million exemption per spouse and a
45-55% rate.
reinstated estate tax should take, UFE supports such progressive
proposals as: the bill offered by Senators Sanders, Harkin, and
Whitehouse (S.3533) with a $3.5 million exemption per spouse, 45-55%
rate, and a 65% rate on amounts over $1 billion; and a House bill from
Rep. Jim McDermott (HR 2023) with a $2 million exemption per spouse and a
45-55% rate.
The federal estate tax, established in 1916, has been temporarily
suspended for one year at the beginning of 2010 as a result of Bush era
tax policies and Congress's failure to act in 2009. If Congress fails to
pass new legislation, the estate tax reverts in 2011 to a $1 million
exemption per spouse and rates from 41-55%.
suspended for one year at the beginning of 2010 as a result of Bush era
tax policies and Congress's failure to act in 2009. If Congress fails to
pass new legislation, the estate tax reverts in 2011 to a $1 million
exemption per spouse and rates from 41-55%.
To date, UFE and Responsible Wealth have gathered over 5,000
signers on their Call to Preserve the Estate Tax, including over 2,000
individuals whose families have paid or who expect to pay the estate tax
themselves. UFE will continue this effort in the weeks and months ahead
and invites voters across the country to visit www.faireconomy.org/estatetax
to sign the call for a strong estate tax and get the latest information
on UFE's efforts.
signers on their Call to Preserve the Estate Tax, including over 2,000
individuals whose families have paid or who expect to pay the estate tax
themselves. UFE will continue this effort in the weeks and months ahead
and invites voters across the country to visit www.faireconomy.org/estatetax
to sign the call for a strong estate tax and get the latest information
on UFE's efforts.
United for a Fair Economy challenges the concentration of wealth and power that corrupts democracy, deepens the racial divide and tears communities apart. We use popular economics education, trainings, and creative communications to support social movements working for a resilient, sustainable and equitable economy. United for a Fair Economy believes another world is possible. We envision a global society which respects the humanity, rights, and creativity of all people.
LATEST NEWS
Watched by Millions, 'People's State of the Union' Counters Unhinged Trump
"We live in a country where we have one reality for everyday people and another for the rich and the well-connected and the well-protected," said Rep. Summer Lee.
Feb 25, 2026
As President Donald Trump prepared to deliver his State of the Union address on Tuesday to applause from sycophantic Republicans, dozens of Democratic lawmakers, progressive advocates, and people impacted by White House policies gathered on the National Mall to present an alternative assessment of the country's trajectory.
"We live in a country where we have one reality for everyday people and another for the rich and the well-connected and the well-protected," said Rep. Summer Lee (D-Pa.), preempting Trump's claim of a "golden age of America" despite rising costs, deepening inequality, and staggering corruption.
While many Democratic lawmakers opted to attend Trump's speech, saying they did not want the president to deliver his remarks to a House of Representatives full of Republicans, Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) told the crowd gathered blocks from the US Capitol that "these are not normal times, and Democrats have to stop behaving normally."
Watch the full counter-rally, which organizers said millions watched online:
Among those who joined Democratic lawmakers at the People's State of the Union were Epstein survivors and people harmed by the Trump administration's lawless assault on immigrants, assault on the social safety net, and other policies.
Rep. Greg Casar, chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, said during his remarks at Tuesday's rally that "I’m not in the Capitol building tonight because I have a pretty good idea of what's going to happen."
"For an hour or two or three or four, a man who's made $4 billion off of being president is going to lecture you, the American people, about how good you have it," said Casar. "A man who is building himself a golden ballroom is going to tell you that if you're struggling to get by, that's your fault, because he's killing it."
"Everyone but Donald Trump's rich friends knows that it's a disaster," Casar added.
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Disgusting': Republicans Applaud as Trump Brags About Taking Food Aid From Millions
"His Big Ugly Bill ripped food away from hungry moms, kids, and seniors to fund tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans," said one House Democrat.
Feb 25, 2026
US President Donald Trump received a standing ovation from Republican lawmakers and administration officials Tuesday night when he bragged during his State of the Union address about taking nutrition assistance from millions, which he euphemistically characterized as lifting people off food stamps.
"In one year, we have lifted 2.4 million Americans—a record—off of food stamps," Trump said during his nearly two-hour speech.
The Republican reconciliation package that Trump signed into law last summer included $187 billion in cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) over a 10-year period, the largest cuts to the program in US history.
Trump: "In one year, we have lifted 2.4 million Americans -- a record -- off of food stamps" (In other words, Republicans cut food stamps) pic.twitter.com/19EoNEUmPF
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) February 25, 2026
The Republican law includes reductions in federal nutrition funding for states—which administer SNAP—as well as expanded work requirements, which the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated would strip nutrition benefits from "roughly 2.4 million people in an average month" over the next decade.
As the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities noted in a recent analysis, changes enacted by the Trump-GOP law mean that "for the first time in the 50-year history of the modern SNAP program, the federal government will no longer ensure that the lowest-income people, including children, older adults, veterans, and people with disabilities, in every state have access to the food assistance they need because states that refuse to pay the cost share could see the program end."
Shortly after Trump signed the Republican megabill into law, his administration canceled an annual US Department of Agriculture survey aimed at measuring food insecurity, undercutting efforts to track the impact of the unprecedented SNAP cuts. The USDA's final reports estimated that nearly 48 million people in the US faced food insecurity in 2024—including nearly one in five households with children.
"Trump says he 'lifted' millions off food stamps," Rep. Brittany Pettersen (D-Colo.) wrote in response to the president's State of the Union remarks. "But what he really means is his Big Ugly Bill ripped food away from hungry moms, kids, and seniors to fund tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans. The lies are blatant and disgusting."
Rep. Sarah McBride (D-Del.) denounced her Republican colleagues for their celebratory response to Trump's boast.
"They're applauding ripping food out of people’s mouths to fund their tax cuts for billionaires," McBride wrote on social media.
USDA data released ahead of Trump's speech shows that around 696,000 fewer people received SNAP benefits in November 2025 compared to the previous month.
Katie Bergh, a senior policy analyst on the food assistance team at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, noted that "people haven’t been dropping off SNAP because they no longer need help."
"Economic conditions haven’t improved and groceries haven’t gotten more affordable," Bergh added. "They're losing basic food assistance because of policy choices. Allowing this trend to continue is also a policy choice."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Congress Urged to Require Warrants in Reauthorization of Key Spy Power
"FISA 702 has been abused in shocking ways," said one campaigner. "If Congress genuinely cares about surveillance abuse, weaponization, and 'lawfare,' it needs to rein in this warrantless surveillance power."
Feb 24, 2026
Privacy advocates are backing a bipartisan bill introduced in the US Senate this week that's intended to protect Americans from warrantless government surveillance.
Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Mike Lee (R-Utah) unveiled the Security and Freedom Enhancement (SAFE) Act on Monday, in the wake of Politico reporting that President Donald Trump's White House "is quietly pushing for a key spy authority to be extended as is into 2027, according to five people granted anonymity to discuss the private talks."
There have long been arguments on Capitol Hill and beyond over Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which empowers the federal government to surveil electronic communications without a warrant. The law only allows for targeting foreigners outside the United States to acquire foreign intelligence information, but Americans' data is also collected.
Despite such arguments, Congress reauthorized Section 702 nearly two years ago, under then-President Joe Biden. That decision is set to expire on April 20, setting up a new battle over the spying power—hence the bill's introduction this week.
Under Durbin and Lee's proposal, the authority would be extended another two years, but government agencies must obtain a FISA Title I order or a warrant before accessing Americans' communications. As the pair noted in a statement, it also "closes the 'data broker loophole' that intelligence and law enforcement agencies use to buy their way around the Fourth Amendment" to the US Constitution, which bars unreasonable searches and seizures and details requirements for issuing warrants.
"Section 702 is a valuable tool to help keep our nation safe," said Durbin. "However, it's being used to conduct thousands of warrantless searches of Americans' private communications. That's unacceptable. Our bipartisan SAFE Act is a commonsense solution to continue protecting our country from foreign threats—while safeguarding Americans' civil liberties and privacy."
In a Tuesday statement welcoming the legislation, Demand Progress senior policy adviser Hajar Hammado highlighted that "right now, the government can freely troll through your private emails and texts swept up in 702 collections and this power has been abused to spy on everyday Americans, journalists, and even members of Congress."
"No government, whether it's run by Donald Trump and Stephen Miller or Joe Biden, should be able to do this," argued Hammado. According to Politico, Miller, the White House deputy chief of staff for policy and homeland security adviser, "is a leading advocate" for extending Section 702.
Hammado stressed that "the SAFE Act is a bipartisan solution to this problem, and all members of Congress should not support reauthorization without these critical reforms. We thank Sens. Lee and Durbin for their leadership on this bill and for modeling how Republicans and Democrats can come together to stop oppressive government overreach."
Jake Laperruque, deputy director of the Center for Democracy & Technology's Security & Surveillance project, also endorsed the bill in a Tuesday statement.
"FISA 702 has been abused in shocking ways," said Laperruque. "The FBI has misused it to snoop on protesters, lawmakers, journalists, judges, and campaign donors. If Congress genuinely cares about surveillance abuse, weaponization, and 'lawfare,' it needs to rein in this warrantless surveillance power."
"The SAFE Act includes bold FISA reforms, creates strong guardrails against surveillance misconduct, and has been meticulously crafted to protect national security," he continued. "With less than 10 weeks until FISA 702 expires, Congress should take up reform legislation quickly. Kicking the can on FISA would be a dereliction of duty."
A CDT-led coalition of privacy advocates across the political spectrum recently identified these as the four key issues to address in FISA reform. The SAFE Act effectively takes on all of them. With just SEVEN weeks until FISA 702 expires, we hope Congress will quickly take up this vital bill.
[image or embed]
— Jake Laperruque (@jakelaperruque.bsky.social) February 24, 2026 at 12:22 PM
Republicans have a narrow majority in both chambers of Congress but, due to Senate rules, generally need some Democratic support to send legislation to Trump's desk. However, the GOP could also run into trouble on this issue in the House of Representatives. As Politico pointed out last week:
Ultimately, there's no easy path to pass a clean extension in the House. One of the people with knowledge of the discussions said GOP leaders are "going to have a problem" trying to unite Republicans behind a special "rule" allowing for an up-or-down floor vote on a clean extension, which are typically party-line affairs.
But Republicans also believe that with Trump in office, a number of Democrats who previously supported leaving Section 702 intact will now support putting more fetters on intelligence agencies—making the alternative route, a two-thirds-majority bipartisan vote under suspension of the rules, all but impossible.
The latest Section 702 fight comes as Trump is under fire for his rising authoritarianism, from invasions of US cities targeting immigrants to his sweeping assault on First Amendment rights, including reported federal watch lists to track and categorize US citizens—especially activists and protesters—as "domestic terrorists."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


