June, 04 2010, 04:03pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Michelle Bazie,202-408-1080,bazie@cbpp.org
Statement: Chad Stone, Chief Economist, on the May Employment Report
Today's jobs report shows a labor market that has turned the corner
and is creating jobs but one with a long way to go toward a full
recovery from the devastating job losses of 2008-09. The percentage of
the population with a job is generally moving in the right direction but
remains at a very depressed level (see chart). Unemployment is still
very high, and jobs are still hard to find.
WASHINGTON
Today's jobs report shows a labor market that has turned the corner
and is creating jobs but one with a long way to go toward a full
recovery from the devastating job losses of 2008-09. The percentage of
the population with a job is generally moving in the right direction but
remains at a very depressed level (see chart). Unemployment is still
very high, and jobs are still hard to find.
Under these
circumstances, policymakers should have no qualms about passing a robust
jobs bill -- indeed, they would be derelict not to. Unemployed workers
struggling to find a job need the help, and based on current forecasts
of relatively weak economic growth for the rest of the year, the
economic recovery could really use an additional boost.
For over
a year now, the economy has benefited from the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act, which included fast-acting and highly effective
measures that Congress should renew, such as additional unemployment insurance
(UI) benefits and subsidized COBRA health insurance coverage for
unemployed workers and fiscal assistance to states. The Congressional
Budget Office estimates that real (inflation-adjusted) gross domestic
product (GDP) was between 1.7 percent and 4.2 percent higher in the
first quarter of this year than it would have been without the Recovery
Act and that the number of full-time equivalent jobs was between 1.8
million and 4.1 million higher.
It may have been hard for
policymakers to see that the Recovery Act was working (in keeping things
from being much worse) while the economy was still losing jobs through
much of 2009. Now, by renewing UI/COBRA and state fiscal relief,
Congress has the opportunity to see positive results by making the
recovery stronger, with faster growth and job creation. Lawmakers got
off to a bad start last week, when the House failed to include state
fiscal relief and COBRA in the jobs bill that it passed. It's now up to
the Senate, which passed a better bill than the current House version in
March, to get the process of enacting an adequate jobs bill back on
track.
About the May Jobs Report
While there
are increasing signs that the long deterioration in the labor market is
over, there continue to be many more people looking for work than there
are new jobs being created and the unemployment rate remains
disturbingly high.
- Private and government payrolls
rose by 431,000 jobs in May, with 411,000 of those jobs coming from
temporary government hiring for the decennial census. Private-sector
payrolls rose by 41,000 jobs. State and local payrolls shrank by 15,000
and 7,000 jobs, respectively. There are 7.4 million jobs on nonfarm
payrolls than there were when the recession began in December 2007 and
8.0 million fewer jobs on private payrolls. - The
unemployment rate dropped back to 9.7 percent in May, the rate it has
been for most of this year. The number of unemployed fell but that
decline was largely accounted for by people leaving the labor force
rather than an increase in the number of people with jobs. - The
encouraging rise in labor force participation this year experienced a
temporary setback in May as more people left the labor force than
entered it. Still, the labor force participation rate (the percentage of
people with a job or actively looking for a job) is 0.4 percentage
points higher than it was in December of last year. - The
number of people with a job (which is estimated from a different survey
from the one used to estimate payroll employment) fell slightly in May.
As a result, the percentage of the population with a job edged down to
58.7 percent. That is still 0.5 percentage points higher than in
December. Nevertheless, both the labor force participation rate and the
percentage of the population with a job remain near lows that were last
seen in the 1980s. - The Labor Department's most
comprehensive alternative unemployment rate measure -- which includes
people who want to work but are discouraged from looking and people
working part time because they can't find full-time jobs -- moved down to
16.6 percent in May. While that figure is below the peak of 17.4
percent reached in October 2009, it is still quite high. - Long-term
unemployment remains a significant concern. Over two-fifths (46.0
percent) of the 15.0 million people who are unemployed -- 6.8 million
people -- have been looking for work for 27 weeks or longer. That is the
highest percentage on record in data going back to 1948. These long-term
unemployed represent 4.4 percent of the labor force, a higher
percentage than at any point in the past six decades (the next highest
was 2.6 percent in June 1983).
The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities is one of the nation's premier policy organizations working at the federal and state levels on fiscal policy and public programs that affect low- and moderate-income families and individuals.
LATEST NEWS
Trump CFPB Cancels $95 Million Settlement With Credit Union Accused of Charging Illegal 'Junk Fees'
"How many millions did this CFPB just take from servicemembers?" wrote one consumer financial protection advocate.
Jul 02, 2025
According to an order published Tuesday, the country's top financial protection watchdog nixed a $95 million settlement reached in 2024 with Navy Federal Credit Union, which serves military servicemembers, veterans, Department of Defense employees, and their families. The President Joe Biden-led Consumer Financial Protection Bureau last year accused the bank of illegally charging overdraft fees to customers and ordered the credit union to refund consumers and pay a civil penalty.
Multiple observers, including a former Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) employee, said that the move appears to run counter to the CFPB's stated priority of focusing "its enforcement and supervision resources on pressing threats to consumers, particularly service members and their families, and veterans."
The Tuesday order means that Navy Federal will not have to pay $80 million to impacted customers, or a $15 million civil penalty.
In November 2024, the CFPB under then-President Joe Biden said that from 2017 to 2022, the credit union charged customers "surprise overdraft fees on certain ATM withdrawals and debit card purchases, even when their accounts showed sufficient funds at the time of the transactions," in a statement announcing the $80 million refund and the civil penalty.
Then-CFPB Director Rohit Chopra accused the credit union of "illegally harvested tens of millions of dollars in junk fees, including from active duty servicemembers and veterans."
The order on Tuesday is not the first time the Trump administration has canceled enforcement actions brought under the Biden-led CFPB. The Trump administration has sought to drastically cut personnel at the CFPB, which is currently led by Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought.
Adam Rust, director of financial services at the Consumer Federation of America, a non-profit association of pro-consumer organizations, wrote on X on Tuesday that "it doesn't square when the CFPB gives a free pass to Navy Federal for charging illegal overdraft fees AND claims it cares about servicemembers."
"How many millions did this CFPB just take from servicemembers?" he asked.
Allison Preiss, a former senior advisor to the director at the CFPB, reacted to the news by writing on X that "for months, Trump's CFPB has insisted it is focusing its efforts on protecting servicemembers and veterans," and included some screenshots of statements from the CFPB, such as a statement from May 2025 announcing that the bureau will not prioritize enforcement action related to Buy Now, Pay Later loans.
"The bureau takes this step in the interest of focusing resources on supporting hard-working American taxpayers, servicemen, veterans, and small businesses," according to that statement.
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Spineless Capitulation to Extortion': Paramount Caves to Trump With $16 Million Settlement
Critics characterized the payment as a bribe in exchange for federal approval of Paramount's pending merger with Skydance.
Jul 02, 2025
The parent company of CBS News, Paramount Global, announced Tuesday that it has agreed to pay U.S. President Donald Trump $16 million to settle what legal experts called an entirely meritless lawsuit over the media organization's handling of a pre-election "60 Minutes" interview with Kamala Harris.
Under the reported terms of the settlement, the money will go toward Trump's legal fees and his future presidential library. Paramount said the settlement deal does not include a formal apology, but the company agreed to release written transcripts of future "60 Minutes" interviews with presidential candidates.
Critics responded with outrage to news of the settlement, which one observer characterized as "spineless capitulation to extortion." Some posted screenshots to social media showing they canceled their Paramount+ subscriptions in response.
As Paramount engaged in talks with Trump's legal team over the lawsuit in recent weeks, press freedom advocates and members of Congress implored the organization not to settle, warning that caving to the president would reward and embolden his attacks on media outlets he views as his political enemies.
"If you settle cases, you're going to send a message to your news team to not push the envelope for fear of people being sued," media attorney Edward Klaris toldThe Washington Post, "and you're going to court more cases against your company because they might think that if they sue you they're going to collect."
"A line is being drawn between the owners of American news media who are willing to stand up for press freedom and those who capitulate to the demands of the president."
Paramount's controlling shareholder, Shari Redstone, supported a settlement with Trump in the hope that it would "clear the way" for federal approval of the company's merger with the entertainment company Skydance, according to The Wall Street Journal, which cited sources familiar with the internal discussions. Bloombergreported that Redstone could reap $180 million in "severance and other benefits on top of hundreds of millions from the sale of her stock" if the merger goes through.
In May, the Freedom of the Press Foundation—a Paramount shareholder—cautioned that a settlement with Trump "could amount to a bribe" to the Trump administration in exchange for approval of the merger. The advocacy group said it would sue Paramount if the company caved to the president, arguing that "a settlement of Trump's meritless lawsuit may well be a thinly veiled effort to launder bribes through the court system."
Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) similarly warned Paramount that a settlement with Trump could run afoul of federal anti-bribery laws.
"Paramount appears to be attempting to appease the administration in order to secure merger approval," the senators wrote in a May 19 letter to Redstone.
Clayton Weimers, executive director of Reporters Without Borders USA, said in a statement Wednesday that the settlement was "a shameful decision by Paramount."
"Shari Redstone and Paramount's board should have stood by CBS journalists and the integrity of press freedom," said Weimers. "Instead, they chose to reward Donald Trump for his petty legal assault against both. A line is being drawn between the owners of American news media who are willing to stand up for press freedom and those who capitulate to the demands of the president."
"Paramount's leaders chose to be on the wrong side of that dividing line, but they'd be mistaken to believe appeasing Trump today will stop his attacks in the future," Weimers added. "News media owners are much better off standing strong than acquiescing."
This story has been updated to include a statement from Reporters Without Borders USA.
Keep ReadingShow Less
'We Will Not Accept This Intimidation,' Mamdani Says of Trump Threat to Arrest Him
"That Trump included praise for Eric Adams in his authoritarian threats is unsurprising, but highlights the urgency of bringing an end to this mayor's time in City Hall," said the New York City mayoral candidate.
Jul 01, 2025
Democratic New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani made clear on Tuesday that he would not be intimidated by Republican U.S. President Donald Trump's threat to arrest him.
A journalist who falsely described Mamdani—a democratic socialist—as a "communist" asked Trump about the candidate's pledge not to cooperate with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), whose agents are working to carry out the president's promised mass deportations.
"Well then, we'll have to arrest him," said Trump, a former New Yorker who has taken aim at Mamdani since his victory in last Tuesday's Democratic primary. "Look, we don't need a communist in this country."
Mamdani, who currently serves in the New York State Assembly, was born in Uganda to Indian parents and moved to NYC as a child. He was naturalized as a U.S. citizen in 2018. Throughout his campaign, the 33-year-old has faced numerous Islamophobic attacks, and after his primary win, Congressman Andy Ogles (R-Tenn.) urged the Trump administration to target him with "denaturalization proceedings," in line with a broader effort at the Department of Justice (DOJ).
Trump said Tuesday that his administration would be watching Mamdani "very carefully." The president, a well-documented liar, added that "a lot of people are saying he's here illegally—you know, we're gonna look at everything... and ideally he's gonna turn out to be much less than a communist, but right now he's a communist, that's not a socialist."
Trump also blasted Congressman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), a supporter of Mamdani, and praised the city's current mayor, Eric Adams, who is seeking another term as an Independent. After Trump returned to office in January, the DOJ instructed prosecutors to drop federal corruption charges against Adams, triggering widespread outrage over the attempted "illegal quid pro quo," as some critics called it.
Responding to Trump's remarks in a lengthy statement, Mamdani said Tuesday that "the president of the United States just threatened to have me arrested, stripped of my citizenship, put in a detention camp, and deported. Not because I have broken any law, but because I will refuse to let ICE terrorize our city."
"His statements don't just represent an attack on our democracy but an attempt to send a message to every New Yorker who refuses to hide in the shadows: If you speak up, they will come for you," Mamdani continued. "We will not accept this intimidation."
"That Trump included praise for Eric Adams in his authoritarian threats is unsurprising, but highlights the urgency of bringing an end to this mayor's time in City Hall," he asserted, directing attention to the GOP budget bill advanced by the U.S. Senate on Tuesday.
Mamdani said that "at this very moment, when MAGA Republicans are attempting to destroy the social safety net, kick millions of New Yorkers off of healthcare, and enrich their billionaire donors at the expense of working families, it is a scandal that Eric Adams echoes this president's division, distraction, and hatred. Voters will resoundingly reject it in November."
In addition to Mamdani and Adams, the general election candidates are Republican Curtis Sliwa, Independent Jim Walden, and disgraced former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who is now running as an Independent after losing the Democratic primary. According to results released Tuesday, Mamdani got 56% of the vote compared to Cuomo's 44%.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular