May, 18 2010, 05:27pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Diana Duarte, Media Coordinator,Phone: +1 212 627 0444,Email:,media@madre.org
Post-Earthquake Violence Against Women in Haiti: Failure to Prevent, Protect and Punish
WASHINGTON
MADRE is working as part of a coalition of organizations seeking
justice for women in Haiti. The coalition submitted the following
statement to the UN Human Rights Council for the upcoming session.
Coalition members include: MADRE KOFAVIV Bureau des Avocats Internationaux (BAI) Institute for Justice & Democracy in Haiti (IJDH) University of Virginia School of Law Human Rights Program Human Rights Litigation and Advocacy Clinic, University of Minnesota
Post-Earthquake Violence Against Women in Haiti: Failure to Prevent, Protect and Punish
- The
January 2010 earthquake not only devastated Haiti's frail
infrastructure, it also worsened already inadequate and inequitable
access to basic social services throughout Haiti. It also created a
severe crisis of safety and security - especially for those living in
the Internally Displaced Persons (IDP) camps - exacerbating the already
grave problem of sexual violence. - Women in Haiti are
disproportionately impacted by the earthquake, both because they face
gender discrimination, exposing them to higher rates of poverty and
violence; and because they are responsible for meeting the needs of the
most vulnerable, including infants, children, the elderly and the
thousands of newly disabled people. - From May 1-10, 2010,
a delegation of U.S. lawyers and a women's health specialist
investigated the prevalence and patterns of rape and other gender-based
violence (GBV) against IDPs in Port-au-Prince in the aftermath of the
earthquake and the governmental, inter-governmental, non-governmental
and grassroots responses to the violence. For firsthand knowledge of
the rapes in the camps, members of the delegation interviewed over 25
survivors of rape or attempted rape. These women and girls were
referred to the delegation by KOFAVIV and FAVILEK, grassroots women's
organizations working within Port-au-Prince. - Although
this report makes no attempt to quantify the rapes that have occurred
in the camps to date, one thing is clear - rapes in the camps are
dramatically underreported. From January 13-March 21, KOFAVIV tracked
230 incidents of rape in 15 camps in Port-au-Prince. There are over 500
camps in the capital. Medicins Sans Frontiers reported 68 cases of rape
in the month of April at one of their clinics in Port-au-Prince. The
vast majority of the women living in camps who were interviewed
reported being raped by two or more individuals, almost always armed
and at night. - There is a demonstrated lack of governmental
response to sexual violence occurring in the camps. This failure to act
appears to have two prongs - the Haitian government is both unwilling
and unable to respond. Rape survivors living in the camps told
interviewers that reporting rape to the police is an exercise in
futility since they could not identify their assailant or assailants.
Many women stated that when they approached the police for help, the
police said that there was nothing they could do and the survivor
should return when she had identified and/or captured their attacker.
One survivor reported that the officer she spoke with disclaimed
responsibility for trying to capture her rapist, telling her that it
was the problem of Haiti's president, Rene Preval. - Conditions
in the camps are bleak. Overcrowding, lack of privacy, weakened family
and community structures, among other things, render women and girls
particularly vulnerable to sexual violence. Women and girls live in
inadequate shelter, often sleeping under nothing more than a tarp or
blanket, with no means of protection and no friends close by, and bathe
in public, in view of men and boys. - Sexual assault
survivors interviewed spoke of widespread occurrence of transactional
sex to obtain food aid cards, although each interviewee denied having
engaged in transactional sex herself. The occurrence of coerced
transactional sex - a form of rape - is beyond the scope of this report
and merits an independent investigation. - Preventative
measures within the camps are critically lacking. In particular, the
survivors we spoke with noted the following issues, a number of which
were confirmed by our own visits to the camps: lack of lighting; lack
of private bathing facilities; lack of tents; and even for those with
tents, utter lack of security (at least one survivor stated that her
attacker had used a blade to cut the side of her tent to gain access);
lack of a police presence (many survivors stated that police only
patrolled the perimeter of the camps and were unwilling to enter the
interior, particularly at night). - Because most of the
camps were erected with little or no planning, patrolling the camps is
an onerous task and poses safety issues even for officers. Police are
unwilling to enter the camps because they fear the armed gangs who
generally are active at night when, due to the lack of lighting,
attackers are less likely to be seen or recognized. - Mechanisms
for redress following sexual violence appear to be lacking,
ineffective, or underutilized. In partnership with the Haitian
government, UNICEF, and NGOs postcards listing psychological and
medical follow-up support have been distributed in the camps. An
informal survey of listed clinics revealed that the card contained
inaccurate information, including out-of-service phone numbers and
incorrect street addresses. Furthermore, the cards were published in
French instead of Kreole, the predominantly spoken language in the
camps. The publication of misinformation could discourage survivors
from attempting to access such resources to the extent they have heard
from others that it is a waste of time. Additionally, not all staffing
and resources are adequate. At least one of the clinics did not provide
HIV prophylaxis or testing. Many survivors believed that even if they
knew of a clinic, they thought they could not afford services or the
cost of transportation. The publication of misinformation not only
hinders survivors from accessing critically needed resources but also
discourages women from attempting to obtain support. - Although
government officials cite a lack of authority and a lack of resources,
efforts must be made to maximize the resources that are available and
provide support to existing programs. The Haitian government should
support community-based anti-violence strategies within a human rights
framework. Haitian women's groups indicated that each of the
following measures could be helpful in increasing the security in the
camps: training programs for officers on GBV and human rights issues;
increasing the number of female police officers; instituting
self-defense training and rape whistle programs within the camps; and
providing various trainings as well as support to community-organized
security patrols. - Along with UNIFEM, two national women's
organizations, Kay Fanm and SOFA, are training the Haitian National
Police on protocol for receiving survivors and will be providing
survivors with transport needs for rapid response. They are also
working with students from the state university to hold self-defense
clinics in the camps. However, these efforts are not well-publicized.
Their impact could be greatly increased if the support of smaller,
grassroots organizations and the resources of NGOs were also brought to
bear. - The Haitian criminal justice system has never
effectively prosecuted rape cases. First, discriminatory practices
pervade the justice system, such as a refusal to credit women's
eyewitness testimony against a man's, discriminatory laws, and gender
imbalance at every level and unit of the justice system. Second, there
is limited access to justice for all women, especially poor women, who
are the majority of rape victims. Lastly, there is a lack of
specialized training and programs for rape prosecutions. This failure
to effectively prosecute denies victims justice, normalizes gender
violence and provides prospective perpetrators assurance of impunity. - We respectfully urge the Human Rights Council to recommend the following:
a.
That the Government of Haiti and other IGOs/NGOs coordinating the
relief effort allocate resources immediately to provide for increased
security and lighting in the camps.b. That the Government
of Haiti act immediately to implement the National Plan for Combating
Violence Against Women (2006-2011) and, upon its expiry, work to renew
a new and stronger national plan of action to eliminate violence
against women that includes legal measures, service programs, redress
and prevention strategies and encourages collaborative participation
with the civil sector for both drafting of a national plan and for
strategic and effective implementation.c. That the
Government of Haiti assess its current laws, policies and programs that
address violence against women; evaluate their compliance with
international obligations; remove discriminatory laws and practices
against women; and implement a legal and policy framework that
guarantees due diligence and promotes the full protection and promotion
of women's human rights.d. That the UN Special Rapporteur on Violence Against Women visit Haiti.
e.
That the Haitian and donor governments guarantee women's full
participation and leadership in all phases of the reconstruction of
Haiti as mandated by UN Security Council Resolution 1325 and other
internationally recognized standards.f. That the
Government of Haiti enact a systematic collection of data that
documents the prevalence and incidences of all forms of violence
against women in the IDP camps; in collaboration with civil society
organizations.
MADRE is an international women's human rights organization that partners with community-based women's groups to advance women's human rights, challenge injustice and create social change in contexts of war, conflict, disaster and their aftermath. MADRE advocates for a world in which all people enjoy individual and collective human rights; natural resources are shared equitably and sustainably; women participate effectively in all aspects of society; and all people have a meaningful say in policies that affect their lives. For more information about MADRE, visit www.madre.org.
LATEST NEWS
'Tragic Outcome' for Gig Workers as California Supreme Court Hands Win to Uber, DoorDash
"Today's ruling only strengthens our demand for the right to join together in a union so that we can begin improving the gig economy for workers and our customers," the case plaintiff said.
Jul 25, 2024
Labor advocates on Thursday decried a ruling by the California Supreme Court upholding a lower court's affirmation of a state ballot measure allowing app-based ride and delivery companies to classify their drivers as independent contractors, limiting their worker rights.
The court's seven justices ruled unanimously in Castellanos v. State of California that Proposition 22, which was approved by 58% of California voters in 2020, complies with the state constitution. Prop 22—which was overturned in 2021 by an Alameda County Superior Court judge in 2021—was upheld in March 2023 by the state's 1st District Court of Appeals.
The business models of app-based companies including DoorDash, Instacart, Lyft, and Uber rely upon minimizing frontline worker compensation by categorizing drivers as independent contractors instead of employees. Independent contractors are not entitled to unemployment insurance, health insurance, or compensation for business expenses.
There are approximately 1.4 million app-based gig workers in California, according to industry estimates.
While DoorDash hailed Thursday's ruling as "not only a victory for Dashers, but also for democracy itself," gig worker advocates condemned the decision.
"Over the last three years, gig workers across California have experienced firsthand that Prop 22 is nothing more than a bait-and-switch meant to enrich global corporations at the expense of the Black, brown, and immigrant workers who power their earnings," plaintiff Hector Castellanos, who drives for Uber and Lyft, said in a statement.
"Prop 22 has allowed gig companies like Uber, Lyft, and DoorDash to deprive us of a living wage, access to workers compensation, paid sick leave, and meaningful healthcare coverage," Castellanos added. "Today's ruling only strengthens our demand for the right to join together in a union so that we can begin improving the gig economy for workers and our customers."
Lorena Gonzalez, president of the California Federation of Labor Unions, AFL-CIO, said that "we are deeply disappointed that the state Supreme Court has allowed tech corporations to buy their way out of basic labor laws despite Proposition 22's inconsistencies with our state constitution."
"These companies have upended our social contract, forcing workers and the public to take on the inherent risk created by this work, while they profit," she continued. "A.B. 5 granted virtually all California workers the right to be paid for all hours worked, health and safety standards, unemployment insurance, workers compensation, and the right to organize."
"Rideshare and delivery drivers deserve those rights as well," Gonzalez stressed.
The Gig Workers Rising campaign said on social media that "Uber and other app corporations spent $220 million to buy this law, and they did it by tricking Californians."
Prop 22's passage in November 2020 with nearly 59% of the vote was the culmination of what was by far the most expensive ballot measure in California history. App-based companies and their backers outspent labor and progressive groups by more than 10 to 1, with proponents pouring a staggering $204.5 million into the "yes" campaign's coffers against just $19 million for the "no" side.
"Voters were told the initiative would provide us with 'historic new benefits' and guaranteed earnings," said Gig Workers Rising. "But since it went into effect, drivers have seen our pay go down, learned the benefits are a sham, and have to accept unsafe rides because of the constant threat of being 'deactivated,' kicked off the app with little explanation or warning."
"If Uber really cared about good benefits and fair wages, it could make that happen tomorrow," the campaign added. "Instead, it has shown it would rather slash pay, bamboozle voters, and put drivers' lives and livelihoods in danger—all while promising $7 billion in stock buybacks to banks and billionaires."
Veena Dubal, a law professor at the University of California, Irvine who focuses on labor and inequality, toldCalMatters that Thursday's ruling was "a really tragic outcome," but "it's not the end of the road."
Dubal's sentiment was echoed by some California state legislators, who said the ruling presents an opportunity to act.
"While this decision is frustrating, it must also be motivating," said state Senate Labor Committee Chair Lola Smallwood-Cuevas (D-28). "I'm more determined than ever to ensure that all workers—including our diverse and Black, Indigenous, and people of color-led gig workforce—have the basic protections of workers compensation, paid sick leave, family leave, disability insurance, and the right to form a union."
Prop 22 has served as a template for lawmakers in other states seeking to deny or limit basic worker rights, benefits, and protections.
In Massachusetts, app-based companies have been fighting for years to get a measure to classify drivers as contractors on the state ballot. In 2022, Lyft made the largest political donation in state history—$14.4 million—to a coalition funding one such proposal.
Last month, Uber and Lyft reached an agreement with the office of Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Campbell, a Democrat, to pay $175 million to settle a lawsuit filed in 2020. As part of the deal, the companies also agreed to increase driver pay and provide paid sick leave, accident insurance, and some health benefits. The agreement does not address how app-based gig workers should be classified.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Young Voters Tell Kamala Harris to 'Fight for Our Future'
"This is your chance to energize young people and our communities to vote, mount one of the greatest political comebacks in decades, and deliver a resounding defeat to the far-right agenda of Trump and Vance."
Jul 25, 2024
Four youth-led groups on Thursday urged Vice President Kamala Harris, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, to "fight for our future" by pursuing a policy agenda the coalition unveiled in a March letter to U.S. President Joe Biden.
It's been less than a week since Biden left the race and endorsed Harris, who is expected to face former Republican Donald Trump and his running mate, U.S. Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio), in the November election. Since then, she's racked up endorsements from Democratic members of Congress and progressive groups focused on issues including climate, labor, and reproductive rights.
March for Our Lives, which was launched after the 2018 mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, honored Harris with the group's first-ever endorsement on Wednesday, calling her "the right person to stand up for us and fight for the country we deserve."
"To defeat Trump, you must rebuild support and enthusiasm among young voters."
The gun violence prevention organization is part of the youth-led coalition behind the new letter, which also includes the climate-focused Sunrise Movement; Gen-Z for Change, which advocates on a range of issues; and the national immigrant network United We Dream Action.
"You have an urgent and important task. To defeat Trump, you must rebuild support and enthusiasm among young voters," the coalition told Harris on Thursday, noting that she sought the Democratic nomination during the last cycle. "You should build on your 2020 campaign platform where you put forward a strong vision to make the economy work for everyday people and ensure a livable future for us all."
The groups urged Harris to support the Green New Deal, Medicare for All, and the Reverse Mass Incarceration Act. They pushed her to expand pathways to citizenship, keep families together, end fossil fuel subsidies, and create good, union jobs. They also called on her to prioritize gun violence prevention and investments in public health solutions and green, affordable housing.
"Democrats are at a critical crossroads with young people," the coalition wrote to Harris on Thursday. "Polls showed Biden and Trump neck-and-neck among young voters."
ANew York Times/Siena College poll conducted July 22-24 shows Trump leading Harris 48% to 47% among likely voters and 48% to 46% among registered voters—differences that fall within the margin of error.
Forbesnoted Thursday that "Democrats are far more enthusiastic about Harris than they were Biden, the Times/Siena survey found, with nearly 80% of voters who lean Democrat saying they would like Harris to be the nominee, compared to 48% of Democrats who said the same about Biden three weeks ago."
The outlet also pointed to two other polls conducted by Morning Consult and Reuters/Ipsos since Biden dropped out, which both show Harris with a narrow lead over Trump.
"You have an opportunity to win the youth vote by turning the page and differentiating yourself from Biden policies that are deeply unpopular with us, such as approving new oil and gas projects, denying people their right to seek refuge and asylum, and funding the Israeli government's killing of civilians in Gaza," the youth coalition highlighted Thursday. "You must speak to the economic pain young people are facing from crushing student debt and skyrocketing housing and food prices."
Looking beyond November, the groups told Harris—who could be the first Black woman and person of Asian descent elected to the country's highest office—that "you could be a historic president. Not just because of who you are, but what you can accomplish."
"Young people are energized and ready to organize against fascism and for the future we deserve," they concluded. "This is your chance to energize young people and our communities to vote, mount one of the greatest political comebacks in decades, and deliver a resounding defeat to the far-right agenda of Trump and Vance."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Video Game Actors Strike for AI Protections
"The video game industry generates billions of dollars in profit annually," said one union leader. "The driving force behind that success is the creative people who design and create those games."
Jul 25, 2024
After nearly two years of negotiations with video game giants and no deal that would protect performers from artificial intelligence, unionized voice and motion capture actors who work in video game development announced Thursday that they will go on strike starting at 12:01 am on Friday, July 26.
The performers are represented by Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (SAG-AFTRA), which last year won a contract for TV and film actors that included "unprecedented provisions for consent and compensation that will protect members from the threat of AI," after the union went on strike for four months.
The union has been negotiating on behalf of video game actors with major production companies including Disney Character Voices Inc., Activision Productions Inc., and WB Games Inc., and has won concessions over wages and job safety—but "AI protections remain the sticking point," said SAG-AFTRA on Thursday as the impending strike was announced.
Unionized actors want protections that would stop video game companies from training AI to replicate actors' voices or likeness without their consent and without compensating them.
"The video game industry generates billions of dollars in profit annually," said Duncan Crabtree-Ireland, national executive director and chief negotiator for SAG-AFTRA. "The driving force behind that success is the creative people who design and create those games. That includes the SAG-AFTRA members who bring memorable and beloved game characters to life, and they deserve and demand the same fundamental protections as performers in film, television, streaming, and music: fair compensation and the right of informed consent for the AI use of their faces, voices, and bodies."
"Frankly, it's stunning that these video game studios haven't learned anything from the lessons of last year—that our members can and will stand up and demand fair and equitable treatment with respect to AI, and the public supports us in that," he added.
Sarah Elmaleh, negotiating committee chair for the union's interactive media agreement, said the negotiations have shown the companies "are not interested in fair, reasonable AI protections, but rather flagrant exploitation."
"We look forward to collaborating with teams on our interim and independent contracts, which provide AI transparency, consent, and compensation to all performers, and to continuing to negotiate in good faith with this bargaining group when they are ready to join us in the world we all deserve," said Elmaleh.
The unionized actors voted in favor of the strike authorization with a 98.32% yes vote, said SAG-AFTRA.
The strike was announced as more than 500 workers who help develop the popular World of Warcraft video game franchise voted to join the Communications Workers of America (CWA), with the games publisher, Blizzard Entertainment, recognizing the bargaining unit.
CWA noted that the workers' journey to union representation began with a walkout in 2021 at Activision Blizzard, which was later bought by Microsoft, over sexual harassment and discrimination.
"What we've accomplished at World of Warcraft is just the beginning," Eric Lanham, a World of Warcraft test analyst, said in a statement. "We know that when workers have a protected voice, it's a win-win for employee standards, the studio, and World of Warcraft fans looking for the best gaming experience."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular