May, 18 2010, 02:55pm EDT
Mexico/US: Obama-Calderon Meeting Questions and Answers
Drug Violence, Military Abuse and US Aid
WASHINGTON
When President Barack Obama meets with President Felipe Calderon of
Mexico at the White House on May 19, 2010, he is expected to reaffirm
the United States' support for Mexico's struggle against its violent
drug cartels.
Calderon began an aggressive campaign to combat organized crime
after taking office in December 2006. Since then, he has relied heavily
on the armed forces in public security operations, deploying more than
50,000 soldiers across the country.
The need for public security is clear. The competition among and
fighting within powerful drug cartels, as well as shootouts between
cartel members and law enforcement agents, have resulted in nearly
23,000 deaths since 2007.
The United States government became a partner in the struggle
against drug-related violence in 2007, when it announced the Merida
Initiative to combat organized crime. It has since given more than $1.3
billion to Mexico through the initiative, and the Obama administration
pledged to continue its support for years to come.
The United States and Mexico agreed to condition part of the Merida
funds on respect for human rights, in recognition of the fact that
abuses undermine public confidence in security forces and make them
less effective in efforts to confront cartels.
1. Are military abuses widespread?
2. When military officers commit abuses, are they held accountable?
3.
Would these human rights problems be resolved if Mexico removed the
military from public security operations and replaced them with police?
4. Is US support in the Merida Initiative tied to human rights?
5. Have Merida's human rights requirements been effective at improving Mexico's human rights practices?
6. How much aid has the United States given to the Mexican military through the Merida Initiative?
7. What can Obama do to address these problems during Calderon's visit?
1. Are military abuses widespread?
Mexico's official National Human Rights Commission
has issued comprehensive reports on more than 50 cases involving
egregious army abuses, including killings, rape, and torture, since
Calderon took office in 2006. The commission has reported receiving
nearly 4,000 additional complaints during this period.
The numbers of both complaints and comprehensive reports of abuses
have increased significantly with each year of the military's
deployment. In 2006, the commission did not issue a single
comprehensive report on abuses by the military; in 2009, it issued 30.
And from 2006 to 2009 the number of complaints of military abuse
registered with the commission grew ten-fold. Local and international
nongovernmental organizations have documented widespread abuses by
Mexico's security forces under Calderon, a fact acknowledged by the UN
Human Rights Committee.
2. When military officers commit abuses, are they held accountable?
No. Virtually all military abuses of civilians go unpunished. A major reason for this is that they are investigated and prosecuted by the military itself,
and the military justice system is not structured to address human
rights violations independently and impartially. The system is
extremely opaque and secretive; the defense secretary controls both the
armed forces and the military justice system; military judges lack
security of tenure; and there is virtually no civilian review of
military court decisions. What's more, victims and their families
cannot effectively challenge the decision that their allegations of
human rights abuses be heard in a military tribunal rather than a
civilian court.
Proof of the military justice system's failure to hold soldiers
accountable is in the numbers. According to information provided the
Mexican government - made available only after Human Rights Watch
repeatedly requested evidence that the military justice system was in
fact prosecuting abuses - only three soldiers have been found guilty of
human rights crimes committed during the Calderon administration.
However, one of those convictions resulted from an automobile accident,
which does not constitute a human rights violation, and another was
overturned on appeal. Therefore, only one case qualifies as a conviction for a human rights abuse, in which a soldier was sentenced to 9 months in prison for killing a civilian by opening fire at a military checkpoint.
For these reasons, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights - the
top human rights tribunal for Latin America - mandated in November 2009
that Mexico reform its military justice code to exclude cases involving
human rights violations from military courts.
3. Would these human
rights problems be resolved if Mexico removed the military from public
security operations and replaced them with police?
Mexico's armed forces have not been adequately trained to carry out
public security operations, and military officers are not held
accountable when they commit abuses. The military is particularly
ill-suited to play this role given its history of committing serious
human rights violations against civilians.
However, while police in theory are better suited for such
assignments, the Mexican police have also been responsible for grave
violations. For example, the practice of torture is widespread across
Mexico's security forces, in part due to perverse incentives created by
Mexico's justice system, in which judges routinely accept the coerced
confessions as proof of guilt. In a fact-finding mission to Tijuana two
weeks ago, Human Rights Watch found credible allegations of the
systematic use of torture by both military and police, including more
than 100 cases since 2009 of individuals who alleged they were
arbitrarily detained, transported to military bases, and tortured to
extract confessions.
Although Mexico approved a comprehensive justice reform in 2008 that
explicitly prohibits the use of torture and eliminates many of these
perverse incentives, most states in Mexico have yet to put the reforms
into practice, and still have six more years to implement it.
4. Is US support in the Merida Initiative tied to human rights?
Yes. The legislation creating the Merida Initiative conditioned 15
percent of select funds on Mexico's fulfillment of four human rights
requirements:
- ending military jurisdiction for the investigation and prosecution of military officers who commit human rights violations;
- enforcing the prohibition on torture and other forms of ill-treatment to extract confessions;
- improving police transparency and accountability;
- consulting with Mexican human rights organizations and civil society to improve the Merida Initiative.
By law, the select funds are to be withheld until the US State
Department reports in writing to the House and Senate Committees on
Appropriations that Mexico is meeting all four human rights
requirements.
5. Have Merida's human rights requirements been effective at improving Mexico's human rights practices?
No, the conditions have not been effective, in a large part because they have not been enforced by the US government.
In August 2009, the State Department submitted a report to Congress
on the Merida Initiative that showed that Mexico was not meeting at
least two of the human rights requirements. For example, on the
prohibition of torture, the report said: "Since 2007, we are not aware
that any official has ever been convicted of torture, giving rise to
concern about impunity. Despite the law's provisions to the contrary,
police and prosecutors have attempted to justify an arrest by forcibly
securing a confession to a crime." The State Department also reported
that it is "uncommon" for civil authorities to prosecute violations
committed by soldiers, because such cases are usually handled by
military prosecutors and courts.
However, despite these findings, and in contravention of the law,
the 15 percent of select Merida funds were released by the US
government following the State Department report.
6. How much aid has the United States given to the Mexican military through the Merida Initiative?
The US government has directed $420.8 million
of the Merida Initiative funds to the Mexican military: $116.5 million
in the 2008 supplemental budget; $39 million in 2009 budget; $260
million in 2009 supplemental budget; and $5.3 million in 2010 budget.
A December 2009 report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office
found that only 2 percent of the $1.3 billion appropriated for the
Merida Initiative, or $26 million, had actually been spent by Mexico.
This means that the overwhelming majority of US aid to Mexico's armed
forces has not yet been spent, and that the collaboration between the
US and Mexican militaries will continue for years to come as these
funds are put to use.
7. What can Obama do to address these problems during Calderon's visit?
Obama should impress upon Calderon that it is imperative for Mexico
to meet the human rights requirements set out by the Merida Initiative.
Because it is in the interest of both countries, Obama should make
clear that if Mexico fails in this regard, the United States is
prepared to withhold the 15 percent of Merida funds tied to human
rights requirements.
Obama should argue that meeting these requirements will not only
benefit human rights, but will also make Mexico's security forces more
effective in their campaign against violent drug cartels. That's why
the United States and Mexico agreed to put the protection of human
rights at the heart of the Merida initiative.
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
LATEST NEWS
Israeli Finance Minister Denounced for Calling for 'Total Annihilation' of Gaza
"But… did he say it on a college campus? Otherwise, it's just not news. Sorry, them's the rules," said one journalist sardonically.
May 01, 2024
In just the latest example of a top Israeli official openly calling for the elimination of Gaza and the 2.3 million Palestinians who live there, Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich on Tuesday demanded the destruction of cities and refugee camps in the blockaded enclave.
"There are no half measures," said Smotrich at a government meeting. "Rafah, Deir al-Balah, Nuseirat—total annihilation."
"'You will blot out the remembrance of Amalek from under heaven,'" he added, quoting the biblical story of the nation of Amalek, whose people God commanded the Israelites to exterminate and which right-wing Israeli leaders have long invoked to justify the killing of Palestinians.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also referenced Amalek in the first weeks of Israel's current escalation against Gaza; Smotrich's comments came as he and other government officials pushed Netanyahu to forge ahead with a planned attack on the southern city of Rafah, where more than 1.5 million people have been displaced as other cities across Gaza have been decimated by Israeli forces.
Ibrahim Hooper, national communications director for the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), called on President Joe Biden to stop condemning thousands of U.S. college students who have demanded a cease-fire and an end to military aid for Israel and direct his ire toward the Israeli government, which he has repeatedly insisted is targeting Hamas despite its genocidal statements and indiscriminate attacks.
"In case the Israeli government's genocidal intent in Gaza was unclear to anyone despite its daily war crimes against the Palestinian people, Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich's words should serve as another wake-up call," said Hooper. "The intent of the Netanyahu government has always been Palestinian land without Palestinians, and violence has always been the route to achieve that heinous goal. Instead of condemning college students, President Biden must condemn Israeli leaders for making and acting on their genocidal threats."
In recent months, Israeli officials have stated that the "migration" of Gaza residents is their ultimate goal in relentlessly attacking the enclave, that all Palestinians in Gaza are "responsible" for a Hamas-led attack on southern Israel in October and are legitimate targets, that the enclave should be "flattened," and that the Israel Defense Forces is fighting "human animals."
Journalist Mehdi Hasan sardonically suggested that Smotrich's comments will be deemed acceptable by the Biden administration, members of Congress, and the U.S. corporate media because he didn't "say it on a college campus."
"Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, a member of the security cabinet, ought to be fired immediately over his latest remarks," read an editorial in Haaretz Tuesday night that was published as police in New York were storming Columbia University to arrest students. "That's how any properly run country would act, and all the more so a country against which the International Court of Justice in The Hague has issued provisional measures requiring it to refrain from genocide, including one requiring it to deal properly with incitement to genocide."
Smotrich and others have objected to what National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir on Tuesday called a "reckless" deal that would allow for the release of scores of Israeli hostages being held by Hamas in exchange for Palestinian prisoners who have long been detained in Israeli jails. The deal would include a 40-day halt in fighting.
CAIR also pointed out Tuesday that five units of Israel's security forces have been accused of committing a "gross violation of human rights," according to a U.S. State Department analysis.
"Our nation's repeated claim that it supports international law and human rights," said national executive director Nihad Awad, "is a cruel illusion."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Florida's Near-Total Ban Shows Real-Life Version of Trump Abortion Policy
"There is one person responsible for this nightmare: Donald Trump," said President Joe Biden. "This November, voters are going to teach him a valuable lesson: Don't mess with the women of America."
May 01, 2024
As former Republican U.S. President Donald Trump campaigns on his contribution to reversing
Roe v. Wade and endorses letting states track pregnancies and prosecute those who violate local restrictions on reproductive care, Florida's six-week abortion ban took effect on Wednesday.
Abortion rights have dominated this year's contest between Trump, a Florida resident, and Democratic President Joe Biden—who blamed the presumptive GOP candidate for the new ban, which prohibits care before many patients know they are pregnant.
"There is one person responsible for this nightmare: Donald Trump," Biden said in a campaign statement. "Trump brags about overturning Roe v. Wade, making extreme bans like Florida's possible, saying his plan is working 'brilliantly.' He thinks it's brilliant that more than 4 million women in Florida, and more than 1 in 3 women in America, can't get access to the care they need."
"Trump brags about overturning Roe v. Wade, making extreme bans like Florida's possible."
"Now, he wants to go even further, making it clear he would sign a national abortion ban if elected. Just yesterday, he once again endorsed punishing women for getting the care they need," Biden continued. "Trump is worried the voters will hold him accountable for the cruelty and chaos he created. He's right. Trump ripped away the rights and freedom of women in America. This November, voters are going to teach him a valuable lesson: Don't mess with the women of America."
Florida's six-week ban—signed last spring by a failed Trump primary challenger, Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis—was allowed to go into effect because of a state Supreme Court ruling last month. The same day, the high court approved a ballot initiative—known as Amendment 4—that would outlaw pre-viability abortion bans in Florida. The measure is expected to appear on the November ballot.
Dr. Chelsea Daniels of the Yes on 4 campaign, which is working the pass the ballot measure, said Wednesday that "the women of Florida are in trouble. Today, we awoke to a new world. A world where the state, and not individuals, is in control of our bodies, our lives, and our futures. A world where treatable complications in pregnancies will become life-threatening, not because we don't know how to treat them, but because we won't be allowed."
Daniels continued:
It should go without saying that doctors should not have to risk criminal prosecution to treat the patient in front of them.
But these bans have even more dangerous consequences for patients: a 10-year-old girl from Ohio who was raped had to travel to Indiana to get the abortion she needed, and in Texas, one woman who miscarried lost liters of blood and had to go on a breathing machine before doctors were legally able to intervene and help her. And in Louisiana, we've seen the OB-GYN shortage that anti-abortion bans have caused for the entire state.
"Don't believe the politicians who say there are meaningful exceptions in this law for rape and incest," the doctor added. "The so-called exceptions are a cruel deception designed to fail women and girls when they are most in need."
NBC Newsreported Tuesday that before Florida's new law took effect, abortion clinics in the state had full waiting rooms and "phones were ringing off the hook" as providers were "trying to see as many patients as possible" before Wednesday.
"Tomorrow is going to look very different," Kelly Flynn, CEO of A Woman's Choice of Jacksonville, told the outlet Tuesday. "A lot of patients will come in for the consult and be told that we can't see them."
Planned Parenthood of Southwest and Central Florida interim CEO Barbara Zdravecky similarly told the Orlando Sentinel that she expects the group's clinics will have to decline care.
"Planned Parenthood's motto has always been 'care no matter what.' And we don't turn patients away," she said. "So this is a very devastating and tragic situation for our staff, who have to say, 'We can't take care of you, we have to send you someplace else.'"
Zdravecky confirmed clinics will still provide follow-up exams to those who acquire abortion pills online, saying that "we want to be able to assist anyone with any type of care that we legally can do in order to make sure they have the care that they need to stay healthy."
The newspaper noted that "those who can find the funds will travel to other states. For most Floridians, and most of the southeast U.S., the closest state to get an abortion past six weeks will be North Carolina. The closest place to terminate a pregnancy past 12 weeks will be Virginia or Illinois."
"It is horrifying that extremist politicians have forced pregnant people and their healthcare providers into this nightmare. But it does not have to be this way."
Kara Gross, legislative director and senior policy counsel at the ACLU of Florida, said in a statement that "no one should be forced to travel thousands of miles across state lines in search of essential healthcare."
"It is horrifying that extremist politicians have forced pregnant people and their healthcare providers into this nightmare. But it does not have to be this way," Gross added. "Amendment 4, which limits government interference with abortion, will be on the ballot this November and we must all vote yes on 4 to ensure that the freedom to determine whether and when to grow our family remains with the people—not politicians."
Like the ACLU of Florida, Planned Parenthood is among the groups backing the ballot measure. So is Flynn, who founded the independent clinic in Jacksonville over two decades ago.
"I am optimistic that we will have the votes," she said. "In the meantime, we are really talking to patients and explaining to them how important this is to get out and vote."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Gaza Child Amputees Struggle to Recover Amid Israeli Destruction of Health System
Save the Children's Palestine director said that children wounded in Israeli attacks "are suffering unimaginable physical and mental harm."
May 01, 2024
Thousands of Palestinian children who have lost limbs and suffered other debilitating injuries to Israeli bombs and bullets are struggling to recover due to the destruction of Gaza's healthcare infrastructure and a lack of adequate treatment, medication, and equipment like wheelchairs, Save the Children said Tuesday.
The London-based international charity recently published an analysis concluding that "the rate of attacks on healthcare in Gaza has been higher than in any other recent conflict globally." The group cited figures from the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), which found that more than 1,000 Gazan children had one or both legs amputated during just the first month of Israel's 208-day assault on the besieged coastal enclave. Many more children—the exact number is unknown—have had limbs amputated since then in what UNICEF called "the world's most dangerous place to be a child."
"Our pediatric staff say they are seeing lots of children with injuries caused by explosive weapons who are suffering unimaginable physical and mental harm," Xavier Joubert, Save the Children's country director for Palestine, said in a statement Tuesday.
The father of one 10-year-old boy who was playing outside when he was struck in the leg by shrapnel from an Israeli airstrike described how his wounded son "was left on the floor for four hours lying in his own blood before there was a bed available for him" at a desperately overcrowded hospital.
"My son witnessed things that children should not see. Scenes of blood, his leg being broken, scenes of children being killed around him," the father told Save the Children. "Now he talks about what happened to him all the time. He talks about his dead cousin and his other friends who died. He's always talking about missiles. He even talks about it in his sleep. The scenes he has seen are terrible. One of the girls had her head split open. His cousin had a severe head injury and was in the ambulance with Ahmed."
Ghassan Abu-Sittah, a London-based plastic-and-reconstructive surgeon who specializes in pediatric trauma, recently toldThe New Yorker that "this is the biggest cohort of pediatric amputees in history" and that he sometimes performs as many as six amputations per day in Gaza.
"Sometimes you have no other medical option," he explained. "The Israelis had surrounded the blood bank, so we couldn't do transfusions. If a limb was bleeding profusely, we had to amputate."
The story of 4-year-old Gazal Bakr, as told by The New Yorker's Eliza Griswold, is not atypical:
Gazal was wounded on November 10th, when, as her family fled Gaza City's al-Shifa hospital, shrapnel pierced her left calf. To stop the bleeding, a doctor, who had no access to antiseptic or anesthesia, heated the blade of a kitchen knife and cauterized the wound. Within days, the gash ran with pus and began to smell. By mid-December, when Gazal's family arrived at Nasser Medical Center—then Gaza's largest functioning healthcare facility—gangrene had set in, necessitating amputation at the hip. On December 17th, a projectile hit the children's ward of Nasser. Gazal and her mother watched it enter their room, decapitating Gazal's 12-year-old roommate and causing the ceiling to collapse... Gazal and her mother managed to crawl out of the rubble. The next day, their names were added to the list of evacuees who could cross the border into Egypt and then fly to Qatar for medical treatment. Gazal's mother was nine months pregnant; she gave birth to a baby girl while awaiting the airlift to Doha.
Other children have suffered worse fates. Dunia Abu Mohsen, 12, lost a leg in an October 27 Israeli airstrike on her family home in Khan Younis that killed six of her relatives, including her parents and two siblings. Undaunted, Abu Mohsen resolved to become a doctor so she could help other wounded children. She was recovering in the maternity ward of Nasser Hospital—site of recently discovered mass graves containing the bodies of hundreds of Palestinians—when a shell fired from an Israel tank came blasting into her room. It didn't explode but it hit Abu Mohsen in the head, killing her and wounding several other patients.
Israeli attacks on hospitals and other facilities have obliterated Gaza's healthcare infrastructure and medical workers' ability to adequately treat injured patients. According to the World Health Organization, Israeli forces carried out at least 435 attacks on health facilities or personnel during the first six months of the war on Gaza.
Only 11 of Gaza's 36 hospitals are at least partially functional, leaving around 350,000 Palestinians suffering from chronic illnesses unable to access essential medicines, supplies, and services.
In addition to the at least 34,568 Palestinians killed by Israeli forces in Gaza, more than 77,000 others have been wounded. Palestinian and international officials say the majority of casualties have been women and children. Overwhelmed and undersupplied hospitals have been forced to amputate arms, legs—and sometimes both—from children without anesthesia.
"We've recently seen an influx of children from other hospitals with wounds and lost limbs, often needing skin grafting and multiple operations, but even getting hold of simple things like strong pain relief is a major challenge," said Becky Platt, a nurse at Rafah field hospital.
"Children are psychologically destroyed by everything that's happened."
"When children have to undergo a procedure to save their limb and avoid infection, we are forced to do it with less pain relief than we'd normally use," she continued. "So, I brought bubbles and games on my phone to distract them, but the reality is that a lot of these procedures need strong pain relief. That is causing huge distress, and it will also add to long-term psychological damage."
"Children are psychologically destroyed by everything that's happened," Platt added.
Joubert said that "children who have suffered life-changing injuries don't have the sustained, specialist treatment they need—from effective pain relief to long-term rehabilitation—or even a safe home to go back to. They live in overcrowded displacement camps, sharing a tent with their whole family, and sanitation facilities with hundreds of people."
"After six months of unimaginable horror, the healthcare system in Gaza has been brought to its knees," he added. "Healthcare workers are risking their lives daily to give Palestinian children a chance at survival. The constant attacks on healthcare are simply unjustifiable and must stop."
On Tuesday, dozens of humanitarian organizations including Save the Children sent a letter to U.S. President Joe Biden urging his administration to "use all of its influence" to prevent an expected Israeli assault on Rafah, where more than 1.5 million people—most of them forcibly displaced from other parts of Gaza—are sheltering.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular