January, 08 2010, 01:38pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Margaret Flowers, M.D., mdpnhp@gmail.com
Carol Paris, M.D.
Mark Almberg, PNHP, (312) 782-6006, mark@pnhp.org
As Probation Ends for 'Baucus 8,' Group Vows to Press for Single-Payer Health Reform
Members of the "Baucus 8," a group of doctors and health advocates
who were arrested at a Senate Finance Committee meeting last May for
standing up and asking why single-payer proponents were not being
allowed to testify, appeared at the H. Carl Moultrie Courthouse today
for their final hearing following six months of probation and, for
three of them, 40 hours of community service.
WASHINGTON
Members of the "Baucus 8," a group of doctors and health advocates
who were arrested at a Senate Finance Committee meeting last May for
standing up and asking why single-payer proponents were not being
allowed to testify, appeared at the H. Carl Moultrie Courthouse today
for their final hearing following six months of probation and, for
three of them, 40 hours of community service.
Dr. Pat Salomon, a retired pediatrician, commented on the
circumstances that prompted their original action. "When we looked at
the list of 41 people testifying in the three days of the Finance
Committee's roundtable on health care, we saw that not a single witness
was an advocate of the principle that health care should be a
fundamental human right for all in America, nor was there anyone to
speak for the majority of the American people who support single-payer
Medicare for All," she said.
Senator Max Baucus, D-Mont., chair of the Senate Finance Committee,
had convened the May 5 roundtable to kick off the public consideration
of the 111th Congress' legislative proposals for health care reform.
Weeks before, the Leadership Conference for Guaranteed Health Care, a
coalition of nurses, doctors, labor, faith, health advocate and
community groups representing over 20 million people nationwide, had
sent a request to the Finance Committee for one of its leaders testify.
When the request was denied, thousands of single-payer supporters
across the nation contacted the committee to request that single payer
be included in the discussion of health reform proposals, Salomon said.
"Despite the outpouring of requests, we were clearly told that we
would be excluded," said Katie Robbins of Healthcare-NOW. "This
cemented our growing impression that the health care debate was at
best, political theater, and that we would have to try a different
tactic in order that the only really affordable health reform solution
that addresses the real health care needs of 100 percent of our nation
be heard."
Robbins and the seven others then decided to stand up and speak out
in a dignified way, one by one, at the Finance Committee and risk
arrest for committing nonviolent civil disobedience. They were taken
into custody by the Capitol Police, charged with "disruption of
Congress" and released several hours later. Another five single-payer
advocates were arrested the following week after taking similar action.
Kevin Zeese of ProsperityAgenda.US called the committee "pay to
play" because, as he said, "Every seat at the roundtable was bought by
the lobbyists. Sen. Baucus received nearly $2 million in campaign
contributions from the health industry in 2008 and the entire Senate
Finance Committee received over $13 million in 2008."
"Congress and the White House keep calling the medical industry
corporations 'the stakeholders' in this reform process," said Dr.
Margaret Flowers of Physicians for a National Health Program (PNHP).
"But we know that the true stakeholders are those who provide and
receive medical care, not those who profit off the current situation."
Russell Mokhiber of Single Payer Action said, "After we were
arrested, Senator Baucus admitted that it was a mistake to take single
payer off the table. Clearly it was. Both the House and Senate bills
would require Americans to buy a junk insurance at an inflated price.
This bill is a bailout of the insurance industry. Instead of bailing
out the private insurance companies, we ought to get rid of them and
replace them with one public insurance pool. Everybody in, nobody out.
Congress ought to defeat this monstrosity, start from scratch and pass
single payer. We will get single payer sooner or later. Better sooner."
Dr. Carol Paris, also of PNHP and a practicing physician in southern
Maryland, said, "Wendell Potter, formerly of CIGNA and Humana, calls
the legislation pending in Congress 'The Private Health Insurance
Profit Protection and Enhancement Act.' And we agree, because the final
legislation will benefit the medical corporations, further
strengthening their ability to buy members of Congress, and will
continue the expensive and complicated health situation that we have in
this country right now which makes it difficult for patients and
doctors to focus on health care."
In fact, as an example of the revolving door between those who are
lobbyists and those who are staff, several members of the group pointed
to Liz Fowler, former vice president of public policy at WellPoint, one
of the largest health insurers in the nation. Fowler left her lucrative
position to work as the point person in the Senate Finance Committee to
oversee the legislation, they said, and her name appears as the creator
of a Baucus document titled "Framework for Comprehensive Health Reform"
issued last September.
Mark Dudzic of the Labor Campaign for Single Payer said the group's
action has been vindicated by the subsequent actions in the Senate.
"The current deplorable proposals for health care reform under
consideration in Congress show what happens when you start bargaining
by conceding all of the terrain to your opponent. Any shop steward in
America would have done a better job than the leaders of the political
party in control of overwhelming majorities in both houses of Congress."
In addition to requesting that the eight be put on probation, the
prosecutor insisted that the three defendants who lived in the
Washington area also perform 40 hours of community service.
"I spend every day serving my community," said Adam Schneider, who
is employed by Health Care for the Homeless. "I'm proud of the stand we
took and had no problem doing an extra 40 hours of service to my
community. But if there was any justice in the world, Sen. Baucus and
his corporate sponsors would have also been required to spend 40 hours
with my clients to understand their desperate need for access to health
care before they give a $500 billion bailout to the private health
insurance industry."
The group is unanimous that no matter what passes this year, the
push for genuine health care reform is not over. Patients will continue
to suffer and die needlessly, families will continue to face bankruptcy
and foreclosure because of medical debt until we have a national
publicly financed and privately delivered single-payer,
Medicare-for-All health system. Such a system would be transparent and
accountable to the public, unlike the current situation in which
private insurers are experts at hiding information from the public and
at violating their own written rules without recourse.
This year saw tremendous growth in a national movement for Medicare
for All, they said. They vowed to continue to do whatever it takes,
even facing arrest again, to get an honest and open-minded debate about
what type of health system is best, so that people of the United States
can be healthy and productive and stop worrying about what they will do
if accident or illness strikes.
Physicians for a National Health Program is a single issue organization advocating a universal, comprehensive single-payer national health program. PNHP has more than 21,000 members and chapters across the United States.
LATEST NEWS
Warning of 'Unprecedented Risks,' Scientists Say Mirror Bacteria 'Should Not Be Created'
"Our analysis suggests that mirror bacteria could broadly evade many immune defenses of humans, animals, and plants," according to a group of 38 scientists, including multiple Nobel Prize winners.
Dec 13, 2024
Dozens of scientists are calling in no uncertain terms for a halt on research to create "mirror life," particularly "mirror bacteria" that could "pose ecological risks" and possibly cause "pervasive lethal infections in a substantial fraction of the plant and animal species, including humans."
The group of 38 scientists, who include Nobel laureates and other experts, addressed research into "mirror life"—mirror-image biological molecules—in a piece of commentary published in the journal Science published Friday, which accompanied a technical report that was released earlier in December.
One of the scientists, synthetic biologist Kate Adamala at the University of Minnesota, was working on creating a mirror cell but "changed track last year" after studying the risks, according to the Guardian.
"We should not be making mirror life," she told the outlet. "We have time for the conversation. And that's what we were trying to do with this paper, to start a global conversation."
To that end, the authors of the commentary plan to convene discussions on the risks of mirror life and related topics in 2025, with the hope that "society at large will take a responsible approach to managing a technology that might pose unprecedented risks."
The ability to create mirror life is likely over a decade away and would require sizable investment and technical progress, meaning the world has the opportunity to "preempt risks before they are realized," according to the scientists.
When broken down into simple terms, mirror life sounds like something out of science fiction. All the biomolecules that constitute life have a "handedness" to them—"right-handed" nucleotides make up DNA and RNA, and proteins are formed from "left-handed" amino acids.
"So when we're talking about mirror-image life, it's kind of like a 'what if' experiment: What if we constructed life with right-handed proteins instead of left-handed proteins? Something that would be very, very similar to natural life, but doesn't exist in nature. We call this mirror-image life or mirror life," explained to Michael Kay, a professor of biochemistry at University of Utah's medical school.
Some scientists like Kay are interested in the medical possibilities of mirror-image therapeutics—which Kay says holds potential for treating chronic illness in a more cost-effective way—but both he and the authors of the recently published commentary are concerned about the potential threats posed by mirror bacteria.
"Our analysis suggests that mirror bacteria could broadly evade many immune defenses of humans, animals, and plants. Chiral interactions, which are central to immune recognition and activation in multicellular organisms, would be impaired with mirror bacteria," according to the scientists.
Essentially, as Kay puts it, it’s unlikely that mirror bacteria would be subject to the same constraints as regular bacteria, such as the human immune system or antibiotics.
The scientists warn that further developing this research could open a Pandora's box: "Unless compelling evidence emerges that mirror life would not pose extraordinary dangers, we believe that mirror bacteria and other mirror organisms, even those with engineered biocontainment measures, should not be created."
The authors argue that scientific research with the goal of creating mirror bacteria should not be allowed, and that potential funders should not support work related to mirror bacteria.
Keep ReadingShow Less
In Wake of Killing, UnitedHealth CEO Admits 'No One Would Design a System Like the One We Have'
One critic said UnitedHealth Group chief executive Andrew Witty should "resign and then dedicate every dollar he has to dismantling the current system brick by brick and building one based on public health in its stead."
Dec 13, 2024
UnitedHealth Group CEO Andrew Witty wrote in a New York Times op-ed Friday that the for-profit U.S. healthcare system "does not work as well as it should" and that "no one would design a system like the one we have," admissions that came as his industry faced a torrent of public anger following the murder of UnitedHealthcare's chief executive.
Witty declared that his firm, the parent company of UnitedHealthcare and the nation's largest private insurer, is "willing to partner with anyone, as we always have—healthcare providers, employers, patients, pharmaceutical companies, governments, and others—to find ways to deliver high-quality care and lower costs."
But critics didn't buy Witty's expressed commitment to reforming an industry that his company has helped shape and profited from massively. Witty was the highest-paid healthcare executive in the U.S. last year, and 40% of the private insurance industry's total profit since the passage of the Affordable Care Act has flowed to UnitedHealth Group.
"It is (barely) true that UnitedHealth didn't design the U.S. system of corporate insurance, which kills tens of thousands of people a year through denial of care," Alex Lawson, executive director of the progressive advocacy group Social Security Works, told Common Dreams. "But they certainly have perfected it and turned it into a medical murder apparatus at industrial scale. They not only block all attempts to change the system in the direction of public health, they bribe and bully with their billions in blood money to make it even crueler."
"Andrew Witty is the high priest of the temple to Moloch and Mammon, murder and money," Lawson added. "And there is no way for him to wash his hands of it, except perhaps to resign and then dedicate every dollar he has to dismantling the current system brick by brick and building one based on public health in its stead."
"Medicare for All is the only proposal on the table capable of delivering universal, continuous coverage for everyone, while also securing the efficiency and savings only possible through the elimination of private insurance."
While publicly pledging to cooperate with reform efforts, Witty has defended his company's care denials in private and urged his employees not to engage with media outlets in the aftermath of Thompson's murder.
Contrary to Witty's depiction of his company in his Times op-ed, UnitedHealth has historically been an aggressive opponent of reform efforts aimed at mitigating the harms of for-profit insurance and building public alternatives. The Leverreported in 2021 that UnitedHealth Group "held a webinar to pressure its rank-and-file employees to mobilize against efforts in Connecticut to create a state-level public health insurance option."
At the national level, UnitedHealth has spent over $5.8 million this year lobbying the federal government, according to OpenSecrets.
Witty, who was born in a country with a public healthcare system, did not detail the kinds of reforms he would support in his op-ed Friday, but it's clear he would oppose a transition to a single-payer system such as Medicare for All, which would effectively abolish private health insurance and provide coverage to all Americans for free at the point of service—and at a lower total cost than the status quo.
In a column for The Nation on Friday, writer Natalie Shure argued that "the appalling amount of resources and energy we put into maintaining the existence of health insurance is wasted on an industry with no social value whatsoever."
"You could eliminate every one of these corporations tomorrow and build a system without them that works better, for less money, and with less hassle," Shure wrote. "Other countries already have systems like this. Medicare for All is the only proposal on the table capable of delivering universal, continuous coverage for everyone, while also securing the efficiency and savings only possible through the elimination of private insurance."
"None of that means that murder is justified or useful," Shure added. "But anger can be. Some politicians, from Bernie Sanders, to Elizabeth Warren, to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, have begun to make public statements ascribing the reaction to Brian Thompson's murder to widespread fury over the health insurance industry. The next step is to harness it, and to build something new."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Why Can't We Fund Universal Public Goods? Blame the Tax-Dodging Billionaire Nepo Babies
"In 2024, these billionaire families used their enormous wealth to make record-breaking political contributions to secure a GOP trifecta," reads a new report.
Dec 13, 2024
The children of the richest families in the U.S. are well-known for spending their vast wealth on frivolous luxuries—constructing a replica of a medieval church on their acres of property, in the case of banking heir Timothy Mellon, or starting a brand of T-shirts described by one critic as "terrible beyond your wildest imagination," as Wyatt Koch, nephew of Republican megadonors Charles and David, did.
But a report released by Americans for Tax Fairness (ATF) on Thursday shows how "billionaire nepo babies" don't just waste their families' fortunes. They also benefit from "a rigged system" that allows them to "pass that wealth down over generations without being properly taxed–often without being taxed at all."
In addition, the heirs of the country's biggest fortunes spend vast sums "to elect politicians who protect their unearned wealth and manipulate the country's economy in their favor," said ATF.
Along with Mellon and Koch, the report profiles Samuel Logan of the Scripps media dynasty; Nicola Peltz-Beckham, daughter of billionaire investor Nelson Peltz; Gabrielle Rubenstein, whose family has made its fortune in private equity; and President-elect Donald Trump's son, Eric Trump.
The nepo babies are part of a small group of billionaire families in the U.S. who benefit from tax loopholes that ensure little of their immense wealth ever goes to benefit the public good.
At least 90 billionaires have passed away over the last decade, leaving their beneficiaries $455 billion in collective wealth.
But according to ATF, "$255 billion (56%) of that amount was likely entirely exempt from the capital gains tax because of a special break called 'stepped up basis.'"
"Trump and his allies in Congress are doing their donors' bidding by rigging the system in their favor and pushing a $4 trillion giveaway to wealthy elites and giant corporations."
Without loopholes included the stepped up basis tax cut, the current estate tax on billionaires and centimillionaires would yield enough revenue to fund universal childcare, preschool, and paid family leave for U.S. workers, with hundreds of billions of dollars left over, according to ATF's report.
The wealthy heirs profiled in the report and their families are some of the Republican Party's top donors—contributing hundreds of millions of dollars to candidates including Trump in the hopes of securing even more tax cuts.
Mellon, for example, is Trump's "biggest supporter, giving $140 million to a pro-Trump PAC in 2024 alone," reads the report.
A previous analysis by ATF found that as of late October, just 150 billionaire families had spent $1.9 billion on the 2024 elections.
As the Center for American Progress found earlier this year, Trump's plan to extend the tax cuts that he pushed through in 2017 would cost $4 trillion over the next decade.
"The vast wealth inherited by centuries-old billionaire families is staggering. While these heirs and their billions go undertaxed, enormous sums are squandered on lavish mansions, private jets, and vanity projects instead of funding crucial public investments," said ATF executive director David Kass. "In 2024, these billionaire families used their enormous wealth to make record-breaking political contributions to secure a GOP trifecta. Now, Trump and his allies in Congress are doing their donors' bidding by rigging the system in their favor and pushing a $4 trillion giveaway to wealthy elites and giant corporations—all while advocating for cuts to vital programs that working and middle-class Americans depend on."
The report calls for Congress to pass "proven, pragmatic proposals to unrig the tax system that enjoy high levels of popular support," such as the Ultra Millionaire Tax Act that was proposed by Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Reps. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) and Brendan Boyle (D-Pa.) this year. The bill would tax fortunes between $50 million and $1 billion at 2% and wealth above $1 billion at $1 billion.
The small tax on enormous wealth would generate "a whopping $3 trillion over 10 years," said ATF.
The estate tax could also be "restored so that it can play a meaningful role in promoting fairness and equal opportunities" through the passage of the For the 99.5% Act, which was introduced in 2023 by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. Jimmy Gomez (D-Calif.).
Under the bill, the estate tax exemption would be lowered to $7 million per couple and the current 40% flat rate would be replaced with a sliding scale that would charge higher rates as a family's wealth grows.
"None of these tax reforms would impoverish the ultra wealthy, nor even inconvenience them in any meaningful way–but they would reduce the concentration of wealth that is so corrosive to society," reads the report. "At the same time, they would raise trillions of dollars that could be used to reduce inequality and improve the lives of families that can only dream of the kind of security and opportunity enjoyed by the nation’s richest clans."
"And if rich families ever did need to tighten their belts a bit to pay their taxes," the report continues, "the economizing might begin by reducing the flow of money funding the extravagant lifestyles of America's Billionaire Nepo Babies."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular