November, 12 2009, 10:24am EDT

ACLU Urges US to Address Voting Rights for Minorities
Recommendations Presented at Annual United Nations Forum
NEW YORK
The American Civil Liberties Union today urged the U.S. government to
address lingering obstacles to voting rights for minorities, including
enforcing anti-discrimination provisions of the Voting Rights Act and
eliminating barriers to vote based on criminal records. The
recommendations were presented at the annual United Nations Forum on
Minority Issues, which this year focused on political participation.
The
ACLU submission includes analysis and recommendations to end felony
disfranchisement, the practice of denying the right to vote to
individuals with felony convictions, which has a serious and
disproportionate effect on the voting power of minority communities.
Laws vary in severity from state to state, but taken together legally
bar more than 5 million Americans from voting. A lack of clarity and
public education leads many more formerly incarcerated individuals to
incorrectly believe they are disfranchised. The over-representation of
people of color in the criminal justice system - resulting from
punitive sentencing policies, the over-policing of communities of color
and other factors - leads people and communities of color to suffer
disproportionally from this barrier to voting. In its submission, the
ACLU calls on Congress to pass the Democracy Restoration Act of 2009, a
bill that would restore voting rights in federal elections to millions
of Americans who continue to be denied their ability to fully
participate in civic life.
The ACLU also presented findings from a recent report - Voting Rights in Indian Country
- which documents continued discriminatory policies and actions against
American Indians that deny them their constitutional right to vote. The
report provides a historical overview of systemic discrimination
against American Indians by limiting their ability to participate in
local, state and national elections and highlights ACLU litigation
challenging unlawful election practices on behalf of Indians. The
report exposed electoral systems that dilute Indian voting strength,
discriminatory voter registration procedures, onerous voter
identification requirements, lack of language assistance at the polls
and noncompliance with the Voting Rights Act.
The
U.N. Forum on Minority Issues is an annual gathering that takes place
in Geneva, Switzerland and provides a platform for promoting dialogue
and cooperation on issues pertaining to national, ethnic, religious and
linguistic minorities and makes recommendations on steps to promote
minority rights worldwide. This year, the Forum will be chaired by U.S.
Representative Barbara Lee (D-CA) and will include over 400
participants.
The following can be attributed to Jamil Dakwar, Director of the ACLU Human Rights Program:
"The
U.S. government has historically failed to protect the voting rights of
people with felony convictions, residents of certain geographic
territories and the millions of voters who continue to be disfranchised
due to their race or ethnicity. The U.S. cannot consider itself a model
democracy while so many of its citizens are denied the human right to
participate in the political process. The Obama administration has
thankfully committed to fully enforcing the Voting Rights Act. This is
an important first step in removing the barriers to the fundamental
human right to vote and ensuring the effective participation of
minority communities in the democratic process."
The following can be attributed to Laughlin McDonald, Director of the ACLU Voting Rights Project:
"No public interest is served by making persons who commit crimes permanent political outcasts. Restoring
voting rights is an important step in rehabilitation and reducing rates
of recidivism. Though the movement for equal rights has led to dramatic
gains for Indian voters and transformed elected bodies that serve
Indian communities, much work remains. Well into the 20th century,
American Indians' status as U.S. citizens was questioned across the
U.S. and they continue to struggle against ongoing disfranchisement and
discriminatory election practices that prevent them from participating
equally in the political process."
The following can attributed to Rachel Bloom, advocacy coordinator with the ACLU Racial Justice Program:
"Felony
disfranchisement is devastating, not only for minority individuals but
also for entire minority communities. Incarcerated individuals tend to
come from - and return to - a relatively small number of low-income,
under-resourced communities of color, so entire communities suffer the
consequences of fewer eligible voters and reduced political power. As
such, felony disfranchisement policies constitute a serious barrier to
political participation for minorities in the United States."
The ACLU submission to the U.N. Forum on Minority Issues is available here:
www.aclu.org/human-rights-voting-rights/aclu-submission-un-forum-minority-issues-human-rights-council-second-sess
The ACLU report, Voting Rights in Indian Country, is available here: www.aclu.org/pdfs/votingrights/indiancountryreport.pdf
The American Civil Liberties Union was founded in 1920 and is our nation's guardian of liberty. The ACLU works in the courts, legislatures and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to all people in this country by the Constitution and laws of the United States.
(212) 549-2666LATEST NEWS
'Heinrich Should Be Ashamed': Lone Senate Dem Helps GOP Deliver Big Pharma Win
The provision, part of the Senate budget bill, was described as "a blatant giveaway to the pharmaceutical industry that would keep drug prices high for patients while draining $5 billion in taxpayer dollars."
Jul 01, 2025
The deep-pocketed and powerful pharmaceutical industry notched a significant victory on Monday when the Senate parliamentarian ruled that a bill described by critics as a handout to drug corporations can be included in the Republican reconciliation package, which could become law as soon as this week.
The legislation, titled the Optimizing Research Progress Hope and New (ORPHAN) Cures Act, would exempt drugs that treat more than one rare disease from Medicare's drug-price negotiation program, allowing pharmaceutical companies to charge exorbitant prices for life-saving medications in a purported effort to encourage innovation. (Medications developed to treat rare diseases are known as "orphan drugs.")
The consumer advocacy group Public Citizen observed that if the legislation were already in effect, Medicare "would have been barred from negotiating lower prices for important treatments like cancer drugs Imbruvica, Calquence, and Pomalyst."
Among the bill's leading supporters is Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), whose spokesperson announced the parliamentarian's decision to allow the measure in the reconciliation package after previously advising that it be excluded. Heinrich is listed as the legislation's only co-sponsor in the Senate, alongside lead sponsor Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.).
"Sen. Heinrich should be ashamed of prioritizing drug corporation profits over lower medicine prices for seniors and people with disabilities," Steve Knievel, access to medicines advocate at Public Citizen, said in a statement Monday. "Patients and consumers breathed a sigh of relief when the Senate parliamentarian stripped the proposal from Republicans' Big Ugly Betrayal, so it comes as a gut punch to hear that Sen. Heinrich welcomed the reversal and continued to champion a proposal that will transfer billions from taxpayers to Big Pharma."
"People across the country are demanding lower drug prices and for Medicare drug price negotiations to be expanded, not restricted," Knievel added. "Sen. Heinrich should apologize to his constituents and start listening to them instead of drug corporation lobbyists."
The Biotechnology Innovation Organization, a lobbying group whose members include pharmaceutical companies, has publicly endorsed and promoted the legislation, urging lawmakers to pass it "as soon as possible."
"This is a blatant giveaway to the pharmaceutical industry that would keep drug prices high for patients."
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the ORPHAN Cures Act would cost U.S. taxpayers around $5 billion over the next decade.
Merith Basey, executive director of Patients For Affordable Drugs Now, said that "patients are infuriated to see the Senate cave to Big Pharma by reviving the ORPHAN Cures Act at the eleventh hour."
"This is a blatant giveaway to the pharmaceutical industry that would keep drug prices high for patients while draining $5 billion in taxpayer dollars," said Basey. "We call on lawmakers to remove this unnecessary provision immediately and stand with an overwhelming majority of Americans who want the Medicare Negotiation program to go further. Medicare negotiation will deliver huge savings for seniors and taxpayers; this bill would undermine that progress."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Trump-Musk Gutting of USAID Could Lead to More Than 14 Million Deaths Over Five Years: Study
"For many low and middle income countries, the resulting shock would be comparable in scale to a global pandemic or a major armed conflict," said the coordinator behind the study.
Jul 01, 2025
A study published Monday by the medical journal The Lancet found that deep funding cuts to the U.S. Agency for International Development, a main target of the Department of Government Efficiency's government-slashing efforts, could result in more than 14 million additional deaths by the year 2030.
For months, humanitarian programs and experts have sounded the alarm on the impact of cutting funding for the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), which is the largest funding agency for humanitarian and development aid around the globe, according to the study.
"Our analysis shows that USAID funding has been an essential force in saving lives and improving health outcomes in some of the world's most vulnerable regions over the past two decades," said Daniella Cavalcanti, postdoctoral researcher at the Institute of Collective Health and an author of the study, according to a statement published Tuesday. Between 2001 and 2021, an estimated 91 million deaths were prevented in low and middle income countries thanks programs supported by USAID, according to the study.
The study was coordinated by researchers from the Barcelona Institute for Global Health with the help of the Institute of Collective Health of the Federal University of Bahia, the University of California Los Angeles, and the Manhiça Centre for Health Research, as well as others.
To project the future consequences of USAID funding cuts and arrive at the 14 million figure, the researchers used forecasting models to simulate the impact of two scenarios, continuing USAID funding at 2023 levels versus implementing the reductions announced earlier this year, and then comparing the two.
Those estimated 14 million additional deaths include 4.5 million deaths among children younger than five, according to the researchers.
The journalist Jeff Jarvis shared reporting about the study and wrote "murder" on X on Tuesday.
In March, Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that the 83% of the programs at USAID were being canceled. In the same post on X, he praised the Department of Government Efficiency, which at that point had already infiltrated the agency. "Thank you to DOGE and our hardworking staff who worked very long hours to achieve this overdue and historic reform," he wrote.
Davide Rasella, research professor at Barcelona Institute for Global Health and coordinator of the study, said in a statement Tuesday that "our projections indicate that these cuts could lead to a sharp increase in preventable deaths, particularly in the most fragile countries. They risk abruptly halting—and even reversing—two decades of progress in health among vulnerable populations. For many low- and middle-income countries, the resulting shock would be comparable in scale to a global pandemic or a major armed conflict."
One country where USAID cuts have had a particularly deadly impact is Sudan, according to The Washington Post, which reported on Monday that funding shortages have led to lack of medical supplies and food in the war-torn nation.
"There's a largely unspoken and growing death toll of non-American lives thanks to MAGA," wrote Ishaan Tharoor, a Post columnist, of the paper's reporting on Sudan.
In reference to the reporting on Sudan, others laid blame on billionaire Elon Musk, the billionaire and GOP mega-donor who was initially tapped to lead the Department of Government Efficiency.
"In a less imperfect world, Musk and [President Donald] Trump would be forever cast as killers of children, and this would be front-page news for months and the subject of Sunday sermons in every church," wrote the journalist David Corn.
Keep ReadingShow Less
GOP Still Lacks Votes to Pass Budget Bill 'Because It's a Moral Monstrosity,' Says Senate Democrat
"We have been debating amendments for 21 hours and we are still going because through 12 hours of debate and 21 hours of amendment votes, Republicans still don't have 50 votes for their bill," said Sen. Chris Murphy.
Jul 01, 2025
Even after an all-night session of amendment votes and wrangling behind closed doors, Senate Republicans still did not have enough support to pass their reconciliation package as of Tuesday morning, leaving party leaders scrambling to placate GOP holdovers who are purportedly nervous about the legislation's unprecedented cuts to Medicaid and federal nutrition assistance.
Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) argued in a social media post that the reason for the GOP's inability to quickly rally its own members around the legislation is straightforward: "Because it's a moral monstrosity."
"We have been debating amendments for 21 hours and we are still going because through 12 hours of debate and 21 hours of amendment votes, Republicans still don't have 50 votes for their bill," Murphy wrote at roughly 5:30 am ET, as the marathon "vote-a-rama" continued with no end in sight.
With Democrats unanimously opposed to the bill, Senate Republicans can only afford to lose three GOP votes if they are to send the measure back to the House for final approval. Sens. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) have said they will vote against the bill in its current form, and Sens. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Susan Collins (R-Maine) are undecided. Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) also suggested he's on the fence.
Republican leaders have been working to bring Murkowski into the yes column with a proposal that would temporarily exempt Alaska and other states from the bill's massive cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), the top Democrat on the Senate Agriculture Committee, ripped the proposal as "absurd" and said it would reward the states with the highest SNAP error rates.
"Insanity reigns," Klobuchar wrote on social media.
Senate Republicans' margins became more difficult after Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) announced his opposition to the legislation over the weekend, pointing to the Senate version's devastating cuts to Medicaid.
"What do I tell 663,000 people in two years or three years, when President Trump breaks his promise by pushing them off of Medicaid because the funding's not there anymore?" Tillis asked in a floor speech on Sunday, citing an estimate of the number of people in North Carolina who could lose health insurance under the Republican bill.
Throughout the country, nearly 12 million people would lose coverage under the Senate reconciliation bill, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.
"Kicking millions off healthcare, blowing up the national debt by trillions, and devastating generational economic harms—all being written into law on the fly," Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) said early Tuesday morning after hours of debate and amendment votes.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular