November, 04 2009, 08:19am EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Brad Luna | Phone: 202/216.1514,Trevor Thomas | Phone: 202/216.1547
Maine Families Denied Protections in Marriage Vote
Voters in WA Likely to Approve Ref 71; NY-23 Rejects Extremism
WASHINGTON
Today
the Human Rights Campaign, the nation's largest lesbian, gay, bisexual
and transgender civil rights organization, expressed profound sadness
and anger at the passage of Question 1 in Maine. Question 1 was a
referendum vetoing the state's law recognizing same-sex marriages. Also
in last night's election results, voters in Washington are headed for
approval of Referendum 71, an initiative to approve the state's
domestic partnership law. And in New York's 23rd Congressional
District, voters rejected the anti-gay extremist positions of
Conservative Party candidate Doug Hoffman, instead electing Democrat
Bill Owens.
"Although
we lost our battle in Maine, we will not allow the lies and hate--the
foundation on which our opponents built their campaign--to break our
spirits. We are on the right side of history and we will continue this
fight," said Human Rights Campaign President Joe Solmonese. "I am
angry. But more importantly, I am determined that with the anger I feel
today from this outcome in Maine, we'll rise ever stronger to demand
equal treatment under the law and equal respect for our relationships
in Maine, California, New Jersey, and every state of the Union."
we lost our battle in Maine, we will not allow the lies and hate--the
foundation on which our opponents built their campaign--to break our
spirits. We are on the right side of history and we will continue this
fight," said Human Rights Campaign President Joe Solmonese. "I am
angry. But more importantly, I am determined that with the anger I feel
today from this outcome in Maine, we'll rise ever stronger to demand
equal treatment under the law and equal respect for our relationships
in Maine, California, New Jersey, and every state of the Union."
Maine
was poised to become the fifth state in the United States to recognize
same-sex marriage in May 2009, after the measure was passed by the
state Senate and House of Representatives and signed into law by
Governor John Baldacci. The issue was placed on the statewide ballot
after opponents to marriage equality submitted sufficient signatures
for a people's veto referendum.
was poised to become the fifth state in the United States to recognize
same-sex marriage in May 2009, after the measure was passed by the
state Senate and House of Representatives and signed into law by
Governor John Baldacci. The issue was placed on the statewide ballot
after opponents to marriage equality submitted sufficient signatures
for a people's veto referendum.
"This
law did not threaten families; rather it was an historic step that
strengthened Maine families. For enacting this law, we owe a debt of
gratitude to Maine legislators and Governor Baldacci. And for giving
their best to protect it at the ballot, we thank the incredibly
talented and dedicated staff and volunteers who brought life to the No
on 1 campaign."
law did not threaten families; rather it was an historic step that
strengthened Maine families. For enacting this law, we owe a debt of
gratitude to Maine legislators and Governor Baldacci. And for giving
their best to protect it at the ballot, we thank the incredibly
talented and dedicated staff and volunteers who brought life to the No
on 1 campaign."
In the
state of Washington, a bill to expand domestic partner benefits was
passed in May 2009 and signed into law by Governor Christine Gregoire.
The measure was placed on the ballot after opponents collected enough
signatures to qualify for a referendum. The law provides
state-registered same-sex and senior domestic partners with the same
state-level benefits that married couples enjoy. Voters in Washington
appear to have approved the new law by passing the initiative.
state of Washington, a bill to expand domestic partner benefits was
passed in May 2009 and signed into law by Governor Christine Gregoire.
The measure was placed on the ballot after opponents collected enough
signatures to qualify for a referendum. The law provides
state-registered same-sex and senior domestic partners with the same
state-level benefits that married couples enjoy. Voters in Washington
appear to have approved the new law by passing the initiative.
"Although
we are bitterly disappointed at the loss in Maine, we are also able to
see what appears to be a silver lining in Washington where the people
of that state joined together and have likely voiced a 'yes' for
equality. Their votes will ensure that state-registered domestic
partners will be fully protected under the law," said Solmonese.
we are bitterly disappointed at the loss in Maine, we are also able to
see what appears to be a silver lining in Washington where the people
of that state joined together and have likely voiced a 'yes' for
equality. Their votes will ensure that state-registered domestic
partners will be fully protected under the law," said Solmonese.
In New
York, Democrat Bill Owens was elected to represent the 23rd
Congressional District of that state. The race took a dramatic turn
when the Republican candidate state assemblywoman Dede Scozzafava, a
supporter of marriage equality endorsed by the Human Rights Campaign
PAC, withdrew from the race in the face of blistering attacks by
Conservative Party candidate Doug Hoffman, his backers in the Club for
Growth and many within the conservative wing of the Republican Party.
The National Organization for Marriage endorsed Hoffman and conducted
an independent expenditure campaign on his behalf: https://www.nationformarriage.org/site/c.omL2KeN0LzH/b.5556129/k.279A/NOM_Endorses_Doug_Hoffman_for_Congress.htm.
York, Democrat Bill Owens was elected to represent the 23rd
Congressional District of that state. The race took a dramatic turn
when the Republican candidate state assemblywoman Dede Scozzafava, a
supporter of marriage equality endorsed by the Human Rights Campaign
PAC, withdrew from the race in the face of blistering attacks by
Conservative Party candidate Doug Hoffman, his backers in the Club for
Growth and many within the conservative wing of the Republican Party.
The National Organization for Marriage endorsed Hoffman and conducted
an independent expenditure campaign on his behalf: https://www.nationformarriage.org/site/c.omL2KeN0LzH/b.5556129/k.279A/NOM_Endorses_Doug_Hoffman_for_Congress.htm.
After
the withdrawal of Scozzafava, and her subsequent endorsement of Owens,
HRC worked to mobilize support for Owens through e-mail and phone calls
to its more than 1,000 members and supporters in the 23rd Congressional
District.
the withdrawal of Scozzafava, and her subsequent endorsement of Owens,
HRC worked to mobilize support for Owens through e-mail and phone calls
to its more than 1,000 members and supporters in the 23rd Congressional
District.
"The
voters in New York's 23rd Congressional District stood up and rejected
bigotry," said Human Rights Campaign President Joe Solmonese. "Voters
sent a clear signal of who they want to represent them and defeated the
extreme positions held by Doug Hoffman. We salute tonight's victory in
New York."
voters in New York's 23rd Congressional District stood up and rejected
bigotry," said Human Rights Campaign President Joe Solmonese. "Voters
sent a clear signal of who they want to represent them and defeated the
extreme positions held by Doug Hoffman. We salute tonight's victory in
New York."
The
Human Rights Campaign contributed significant resources to these three
campaigns, in addition to other targeted races across the country.
Human Rights Campaign contributed significant resources to these three
campaigns, in addition to other targeted races across the country.
MAINE: HRC played a key role in efforts to defeat Question 1:
* Made more than $280,000 in monetary and in-kind contributions to the efforts to defeat Question 1.
o $145,400
in monetary contributions to the No on 1 campaign, including nearly
$54,000 raised from hundreds of individual donors to the HRC Maine
Marriage PAC.
in monetary contributions to the No on 1 campaign, including nearly
$54,000 raised from hundreds of individual donors to the HRC Maine
Marriage PAC.
o More
than $135,000 in in-kind contributions to the No on 1 campaign and
Equality Maine PAC, including staff time, consultants and phone banks.
than $135,000 in in-kind contributions to the No on 1 campaign and
Equality Maine PAC, including staff time, consultants and phone banks.
* Provided
senior-level campaign support by contributing the services of a
nationally-known communications consultant and a respected Maine
field-organizing and political strategist, as well as facilitating the
hiring of a campaign fundraiser.
senior-level campaign support by contributing the services of a
nationally-known communications consultant and a respected Maine
field-organizing and political strategist, as well as facilitating the
hiring of a campaign fundraiser.
* Deployed
a regional field organizer to work full time with Equality Maine and
the No on 1 campaign from the earliest days of the legislative campaign
to pass marriage equality through the subsequent referendum efforts.
a regional field organizer to work full time with Equality Maine and
the No on 1 campaign from the earliest days of the legislative campaign
to pass marriage equality through the subsequent referendum efforts.
* Sent 11 additional staff to Maine to assist with get-out-the-vote efforts through the final month of the campaign.
* Coordinated
volunteer phone banks - for months - several evenings per week at HRC
headquarters to call Maine voters, generating more than 20,000
telephone calls and nearly 4,000 conversations.
volunteer phone banks - for months - several evenings per week at HRC
headquarters to call Maine voters, generating more than 20,000
telephone calls and nearly 4,000 conversations.
* Mobilized
more than 5,000 HRC members and supporters via special online action
alerts and telephone calls to get them involved in the referendum
efforts.
more than 5,000 HRC members and supporters via special online action
alerts and telephone calls to get them involved in the referendum
efforts.
* Increased the visibility of the referendum issue by making it the cover story in HRC's hard-copy magazine Equality
- which is sent to hundreds of thousands of households nationwide - and
by providing timely news updates on HRC's Back Story blog.
- which is sent to hundreds of thousands of households nationwide - and
by providing timely news updates on HRC's Back Story blog.
WASHINGTON: HRC played an important role in the passage of Referendum 71:
* Made
more than $90,000 in monetary and in-kind contributions to the efforts
to approve Referendum 71 and protect domestic partnership benefits.
more than $90,000 in monetary and in-kind contributions to the efforts
to approve Referendum 71 and protect domestic partnership benefits.
o $78,500
in monetary contributions to the Approve 71 campaign, including more
than $67,000 raised from hundreds of individual donors to the HRC
Approve 71 PAC;
in monetary contributions to the Approve 71 campaign, including more
than $67,000 raised from hundreds of individual donors to the HRC
Approve 71 PAC;
o More than $15,000 in in-kind contributions to the Approve 71 campaign.
* Deployed
a field organizer to work full time with Washington Families Standing
Together Approve Referendum 71 from early September through Election
Day.
a field organizer to work full time with Washington Families Standing
Together Approve Referendum 71 from early September through Election
Day.
* Coordinated
phone banks several evenings per week in Seattle, staffed by HRC
volunteers, to call Washington voters, generating thousands of
telephone calls and conversations.
phone banks several evenings per week in Seattle, staffed by HRC
volunteers, to call Washington voters, generating thousands of
telephone calls and conversations.
* Organized nearly 100 HRC local steering committee members and other HRC volunteers to assist with get-out-the-vote efforts.
* Mobilized
more than 30,000 HRC members and supporters via special online action
alerts and telephone calls to get them involved in the referendum
efforts.
more than 30,000 HRC members and supporters via special online action
alerts and telephone calls to get them involved in the referendum
efforts.
The Human Rights Campaign represents a grassroots force of over 750,000 members and supporters nationwide. As the largest national lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender civil rights organization, HRC envisions an America where LGBT people are ensured of their basic equal rights, and can be open, honest and safe at home, at work and in the community.
LATEST NEWS
Grand Jury Indicts Top Trump Aides, 11 Arizona Republicans Over 'Fake Electors' Scheme
Had it succeeded, said the state's attorney general, the scheme would have "deprived Arizona's voters of their right to have their votes counted for their chosen president."
Apr 25, 2024
A grand jury in Arizona on Wednesday charged seven aides to Donald Trump and nearly a dozen Republican officials over a "fake electors" scheme in the state that aimed to keep the former president in power after his 2020 loss to President Joe Biden.
Trump, who is currently facing nearly 90 charges across four criminal cases as he runs for another White House term, was described as "unindicted co-conspirator 1" in the 58-page indictment, which was announced by Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes.
"The people of Arizona elected President Biden," Mayes, a Democrat, said Wednesday. "Unwilling to accept this fact, the defendants charged by the state grand jury allegedly schemed to prevent the lawful transfer of the presidency. Whatever their reasoning was, the plot to violate the law must be answered for."
The indictment names former Arizona Republican Party Chair Kelli Ward, sitting state Republican Sens. Jake Hoffman and Anthony Kern, former U.S. Senate candidate Jim Lamon, and seven others as the "fake electors" who sought to declare Trump the rightful winner of the state's presidential contest.
The names of other individuals indicted by the state grand jury are redacted, but the document's descriptions make clear that former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, former Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani, and top Trump legal strategist Boris Epshteyn are among those facing felony charges—including fraud, forgery, and conspiracy.
"In Arizona, defendants, unindicted coconspirators, and others pressured the three groups of election officials responsible for certifying election results to encourage them to change the election results," the document reads. "Discussions about using the Republican electors to change the outcome of the election began as early as November 4, 2020. Those plans evolved during
November based on memos drafted by [an attorney for the Trump campaign, Kenneth Chesebro]."
Mayes said Wednesday that had the fake elector scheme succeeded, it would have "deprived Arizona's voters of their right to have their votes counted for their chosen president."
"It effectively would have made their right to vote meaningless," said Mayes.
A state grand jury, made up of everyday, regular Arizonans, has handed down felony indictments in the ongoing investigation into the fake elector scheme in Arizona. pic.twitter.com/Nu8GcD4ZqJ
— AZ Attorney General Kris Mayes (@AZAGMayes) April 24, 2024
Alex Gulotta, state director of All Voting Is Local Action Arizona, said Wednesday that "the indictment of the eleven fake electors is one of the first steps required in holding these election deniers accountable for their alleged attempts to take power away from voters by disrupting our free and fair elections."
"Arizonans deserve to trust the election officials responsible for administering our elections and preserving our democracy," said Gulotta, "and this is a positive step forward as we continue to strengthen the foundations of our democracy and restore faith in our elections."
The Arizona Republicreported Wednesday that "several of the Arizona electors have previously claimed they were merely offering Congress a backup plan, though nothing in the documents they sent to Congress and the National Archives backs up that assertion."
"The indictment includes several statements the false electors made on social media that contradict those claims," the newspaper observed.
Jenny Guzman, director of Common Cause's Arizona program, said the indictment "marks the start of a new chapter for the fake elector scheme that has plagued Arizona."
"Arizonans are still dealing with the fallout from the false electors and the Big Lie about the 2020 elections," said Guzman. "We are relieved that the investigation by Attorney General Mayes has concluded and Arizonans can now know that what comes next is accountability. These efforts by these fake electors to undermine the will of Arizona’s voters have had implications far beyond their failed attempt to overthrow the 2020 election."
"This indictment can reassure all Arizonans that if anyone, regardless of their political affiliation, attempts to undermine their vote, consequences will follow," Guzman added.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Watchdog Urges FEC to Investigate Trump Campaign Over Scheme for Legal Fees
"By not disclosing the vendors that actually provided legal services, the Trump-affiliated committees effectively blocked the public from knowing which attorneys and firms are being paid—and how much."
Apr 24, 2024
A campaign finance watchdog on Wednesday filed a Federal Election Commission complaint accusing former President Donald Trump's 2024 campaign, affiliated political groups, and an accounting firm of violating U.S. law in a scheme "seemingly designed to obscure the true recipients of a noteworthy portion of Trump's legal bills."
The Washington, D.C.-based Campaign Legal Center (CLC) said that "evidence appears to show an illegal arrangement between several Trump-affiliated committees and a compliance firm named Red Curve Solutions that is designed to obscure the identities of those providing legal services and how much they are being paid."
"Voters have a right to know how the presidential campaigns and other committees supporting presidential candidates spend their money."
CLC alleges that the Trump campaign, Trump's political action committee (PAC) Save America, and three affiliated organizations "violated federal reporting requirements based on a scheme in which the committees reportedly paid over $7.2 million—described as 'reimbursement for legal' costs or expenses"—to Red Curve.
The watchdog also said that Red Curve appears to be "making or facilitating illegal contributions that violate either federal contribution limits or the prohibition on corporate contributions."
According to CLC:
Red Curve is a domestic limited liability company that offers compliance and FEC reporting services but does not appear to offer any legal services. It is managed by Bradley Crate, who also serves as the treasurer for each of the five Trump-affiliated committees concerned in this complaint, as well as over 200 other federal committees.
According to filings with the FEC, Red Curve appears to have been fronting legal costs for Trump since at least December 2022, with Trump-affiliated committees repaying the company later. This arrangement appears to violate FEC rules that require campaigns to disclose not only the entity being reimbursed (here, Red Curve) but also the underlying vendor. By not disclosing the vendors that actually provided legal services, the Trump-affiliated committees effectively blocked the public from knowing which attorneys and firms are being paid—and how much they are being paid—through this arrangement.
"Voters have a right to know how the presidential campaigns and other committees supporting presidential candidates spend their money," CLC senior director of campaign finance Erin Chlopak said in a statement. "When campaigns and committees obscure that information from the public, not only do they make it difficult to determine if the law has been violated, but they deny voters the ability to make an informed choice when casting a ballot."
"The steps taken by the Trump campaign, its affiliated committees, and Red Curve Solutions concealed information about how campaign funds were used to pay former President Trump's legal expenditures, including the amounts and ultimate recipients of these expenditures—and the FEC must investigate immediately," Chlopak added.
Trump—who is the presumptive 2024 GOP presidential nominee—faces 91 federal and state felony charges related to his role in the January 6 insurrection and his organization's business practices. He is currently on trial in New York for allegedly falsifying business records related to hush money payments to cover up sex scandals during the 2016 election cycle. The twice-impeached former president has been open about his use of campaign donations to pay his legal costs.
The new CLC filing comes a day after the watchdog filed separate FEC complaints urging investigations into a pair of Trump-affiliated "scam PACs," which "pretend to fundraise for major candidates or issues while secretly diverting almost all of their donors' money back into fundraising or the fraudsters' own pockets."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'One Step Closer': Arizona House Votes to Repeal 1864 Abortion Ban
"With a total ban still set to take effect June 8, the Arizona Abortion Access Act is needed now more than ever," one state campaigner said of a November ballot measure.
Apr 24, 2024
Three Republicans in the Arizona House of Representatives on Wednesday joined with Democrats to advance legislation that would repeal an 1864 ban on abortion—a development rights advocates welcomed while stressing that the fight is far from over.
The 32-28 vote on House Bill 2677—with GOP Reps. Tim Dunn (25), Matt Gress (4), and Justin Wilmeth (2) voting in favor—was the third attempt in as many weeks to pass repeal legislation since the Arizona Supreme Court upheld the ban.
"The state Senate could vote on the repeal as early as next Wednesday, after the bill comes on the floor for a 'third reading,' as is required under chamber rules," according toNBC News. Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs on Wednesday toldThe Washington Post that "I am hopeful the Senate does the right thing and sends it to my desk so I can sign it."
Applauding the House passage of H.B. 2677, Planned Parenthood Advocates of Arizona president and CEO Angela Florez said that "today, Arizona is one step closer to repealing the state's Civil War-era total abortion ban. While the repeal still must pass the Senate, this is a major win for reproductive freedom."
"We must celebrate today's vote in support of abortion rights and harness our enthusiasm to spread the word and urge lawmakers in the Senate to support this necessary repeal bill," she continued. "Despite this step forward, Arizonans cannot stop fighting."
Florez noted that "even with the repeal of the Civil War-era ban, the state will still have a ban on abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy that denies people access to critical care. And lawmakers continue to attack Arizonans' ability to access reproductive healthcare. Our right to control our bodies and lives is hanging on by a thread."
"Thankfully, voters will have the opportunity to take back control if the Arizona Abortion Access Act is on the ballot this November," she added. "Abortion bans are out-of-step with the will of Arizonans and will force pregnant people to leave their communities for essential healthcare. Planned Parenthood Advocates of Arizona will continue fighting to ensure everyone has the right to make decisions about their health and futures."
The Arizona Abortion Access Act is a proposed state constitutional amendment that would prevent many limits on abortions before fetal viability and safeguard access to care after viability to protect the life or physical or mental health of the patient.
The coalition supporting the amendment, Arizona for Abortion Access, highlighted on social media that the House-approved bill "did not include the emergency clause required to stop the 1864 ban from taking effect on June 8," meaning H.B. 2677 wouldn't apply until 90 days after the end of the legislative session.
Coalition campaign manager Cheryl Bruce said that "with a total ban still set to take effect June 8, the Arizona Abortion Access Act is needed now more than ever. We remain committed to taking these decisions out of the hands of extremist politicians."
Arizona is one of multiple states where rights advocates are promoting abortion rights ballot measures this cycle. Reproductive freedom is also dominating political races at all levels, including the presidential contest. Democratic President Joe Biden is set to face former Republican President Donald Trump in November.
"Donald Trump is responsible for Arizona's abortion ban. Women in the state are still living under a ban with no exceptions for rape or incest and have been stripped of the freedom to make their own healthcare decisions," said Julie Chávez Rodriguez, Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris' reelection campaign manager.
While the presumptive GOP nominee has tried to distance himself from the Arizona Supreme Court's reinstatement of a 160-year-old abortion ban, he has also campaigned on his three appointees to the U.S. Supreme Court who helped reverse Roe v. Wade.
"Trump brags that he is 'proudly' the person responsible for these bans and if he retakes power, the chaos and cruelty he has created will only get worse in all 50 states," Chávez Rodriguez said. "President Biden and Vice President Harris are the only candidates who will stop him."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular