November, 04 2009, 08:19am EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Brad Luna | Phone: 202/216.1514,Trevor Thomas | Phone: 202/216.1547
Maine Families Denied Protections in Marriage Vote
Voters in WA Likely to Approve Ref 71; NY-23 Rejects Extremism
WASHINGTON
Today
the Human Rights Campaign, the nation's largest lesbian, gay, bisexual
and transgender civil rights organization, expressed profound sadness
and anger at the passage of Question 1 in Maine. Question 1 was a
referendum vetoing the state's law recognizing same-sex marriages. Also
in last night's election results, voters in Washington are headed for
approval of Referendum 71, an initiative to approve the state's
domestic partnership law. And in New York's 23rd Congressional
District, voters rejected the anti-gay extremist positions of
Conservative Party candidate Doug Hoffman, instead electing Democrat
Bill Owens.
"Although
we lost our battle in Maine, we will not allow the lies and hate--the
foundation on which our opponents built their campaign--to break our
spirits. We are on the right side of history and we will continue this
fight," said Human Rights Campaign President Joe Solmonese. "I am
angry. But more importantly, I am determined that with the anger I feel
today from this outcome in Maine, we'll rise ever stronger to demand
equal treatment under the law and equal respect for our relationships
in Maine, California, New Jersey, and every state of the Union."
we lost our battle in Maine, we will not allow the lies and hate--the
foundation on which our opponents built their campaign--to break our
spirits. We are on the right side of history and we will continue this
fight," said Human Rights Campaign President Joe Solmonese. "I am
angry. But more importantly, I am determined that with the anger I feel
today from this outcome in Maine, we'll rise ever stronger to demand
equal treatment under the law and equal respect for our relationships
in Maine, California, New Jersey, and every state of the Union."
Maine
was poised to become the fifth state in the United States to recognize
same-sex marriage in May 2009, after the measure was passed by the
state Senate and House of Representatives and signed into law by
Governor John Baldacci. The issue was placed on the statewide ballot
after opponents to marriage equality submitted sufficient signatures
for a people's veto referendum.
was poised to become the fifth state in the United States to recognize
same-sex marriage in May 2009, after the measure was passed by the
state Senate and House of Representatives and signed into law by
Governor John Baldacci. The issue was placed on the statewide ballot
after opponents to marriage equality submitted sufficient signatures
for a people's veto referendum.
"This
law did not threaten families; rather it was an historic step that
strengthened Maine families. For enacting this law, we owe a debt of
gratitude to Maine legislators and Governor Baldacci. And for giving
their best to protect it at the ballot, we thank the incredibly
talented and dedicated staff and volunteers who brought life to the No
on 1 campaign."
law did not threaten families; rather it was an historic step that
strengthened Maine families. For enacting this law, we owe a debt of
gratitude to Maine legislators and Governor Baldacci. And for giving
their best to protect it at the ballot, we thank the incredibly
talented and dedicated staff and volunteers who brought life to the No
on 1 campaign."
In the
state of Washington, a bill to expand domestic partner benefits was
passed in May 2009 and signed into law by Governor Christine Gregoire.
The measure was placed on the ballot after opponents collected enough
signatures to qualify for a referendum. The law provides
state-registered same-sex and senior domestic partners with the same
state-level benefits that married couples enjoy. Voters in Washington
appear to have approved the new law by passing the initiative.
state of Washington, a bill to expand domestic partner benefits was
passed in May 2009 and signed into law by Governor Christine Gregoire.
The measure was placed on the ballot after opponents collected enough
signatures to qualify for a referendum. The law provides
state-registered same-sex and senior domestic partners with the same
state-level benefits that married couples enjoy. Voters in Washington
appear to have approved the new law by passing the initiative.
"Although
we are bitterly disappointed at the loss in Maine, we are also able to
see what appears to be a silver lining in Washington where the people
of that state joined together and have likely voiced a 'yes' for
equality. Their votes will ensure that state-registered domestic
partners will be fully protected under the law," said Solmonese.
we are bitterly disappointed at the loss in Maine, we are also able to
see what appears to be a silver lining in Washington where the people
of that state joined together and have likely voiced a 'yes' for
equality. Their votes will ensure that state-registered domestic
partners will be fully protected under the law," said Solmonese.
In New
York, Democrat Bill Owens was elected to represent the 23rd
Congressional District of that state. The race took a dramatic turn
when the Republican candidate state assemblywoman Dede Scozzafava, a
supporter of marriage equality endorsed by the Human Rights Campaign
PAC, withdrew from the race in the face of blistering attacks by
Conservative Party candidate Doug Hoffman, his backers in the Club for
Growth and many within the conservative wing of the Republican Party.
The National Organization for Marriage endorsed Hoffman and conducted
an independent expenditure campaign on his behalf: https://www.nationformarriage.org/site/c.omL2KeN0LzH/b.5556129/k.279A/NOM_Endorses_Doug_Hoffman_for_Congress.htm.
York, Democrat Bill Owens was elected to represent the 23rd
Congressional District of that state. The race took a dramatic turn
when the Republican candidate state assemblywoman Dede Scozzafava, a
supporter of marriage equality endorsed by the Human Rights Campaign
PAC, withdrew from the race in the face of blistering attacks by
Conservative Party candidate Doug Hoffman, his backers in the Club for
Growth and many within the conservative wing of the Republican Party.
The National Organization for Marriage endorsed Hoffman and conducted
an independent expenditure campaign on his behalf: https://www.nationformarriage.org/site/c.omL2KeN0LzH/b.5556129/k.279A/NOM_Endorses_Doug_Hoffman_for_Congress.htm.
After
the withdrawal of Scozzafava, and her subsequent endorsement of Owens,
HRC worked to mobilize support for Owens through e-mail and phone calls
to its more than 1,000 members and supporters in the 23rd Congressional
District.
the withdrawal of Scozzafava, and her subsequent endorsement of Owens,
HRC worked to mobilize support for Owens through e-mail and phone calls
to its more than 1,000 members and supporters in the 23rd Congressional
District.
"The
voters in New York's 23rd Congressional District stood up and rejected
bigotry," said Human Rights Campaign President Joe Solmonese. "Voters
sent a clear signal of who they want to represent them and defeated the
extreme positions held by Doug Hoffman. We salute tonight's victory in
New York."
voters in New York's 23rd Congressional District stood up and rejected
bigotry," said Human Rights Campaign President Joe Solmonese. "Voters
sent a clear signal of who they want to represent them and defeated the
extreme positions held by Doug Hoffman. We salute tonight's victory in
New York."
The
Human Rights Campaign contributed significant resources to these three
campaigns, in addition to other targeted races across the country.
Human Rights Campaign contributed significant resources to these three
campaigns, in addition to other targeted races across the country.
MAINE: HRC played a key role in efforts to defeat Question 1:
* Made more than $280,000 in monetary and in-kind contributions to the efforts to defeat Question 1.
o $145,400
in monetary contributions to the No on 1 campaign, including nearly
$54,000 raised from hundreds of individual donors to the HRC Maine
Marriage PAC.
in monetary contributions to the No on 1 campaign, including nearly
$54,000 raised from hundreds of individual donors to the HRC Maine
Marriage PAC.
o More
than $135,000 in in-kind contributions to the No on 1 campaign and
Equality Maine PAC, including staff time, consultants and phone banks.
than $135,000 in in-kind contributions to the No on 1 campaign and
Equality Maine PAC, including staff time, consultants and phone banks.
* Provided
senior-level campaign support by contributing the services of a
nationally-known communications consultant and a respected Maine
field-organizing and political strategist, as well as facilitating the
hiring of a campaign fundraiser.
senior-level campaign support by contributing the services of a
nationally-known communications consultant and a respected Maine
field-organizing and political strategist, as well as facilitating the
hiring of a campaign fundraiser.
* Deployed
a regional field organizer to work full time with Equality Maine and
the No on 1 campaign from the earliest days of the legislative campaign
to pass marriage equality through the subsequent referendum efforts.
a regional field organizer to work full time with Equality Maine and
the No on 1 campaign from the earliest days of the legislative campaign
to pass marriage equality through the subsequent referendum efforts.
* Sent 11 additional staff to Maine to assist with get-out-the-vote efforts through the final month of the campaign.
* Coordinated
volunteer phone banks - for months - several evenings per week at HRC
headquarters to call Maine voters, generating more than 20,000
telephone calls and nearly 4,000 conversations.
volunteer phone banks - for months - several evenings per week at HRC
headquarters to call Maine voters, generating more than 20,000
telephone calls and nearly 4,000 conversations.
* Mobilized
more than 5,000 HRC members and supporters via special online action
alerts and telephone calls to get them involved in the referendum
efforts.
more than 5,000 HRC members and supporters via special online action
alerts and telephone calls to get them involved in the referendum
efforts.
* Increased the visibility of the referendum issue by making it the cover story in HRC's hard-copy magazine Equality
- which is sent to hundreds of thousands of households nationwide - and
by providing timely news updates on HRC's Back Story blog.
- which is sent to hundreds of thousands of households nationwide - and
by providing timely news updates on HRC's Back Story blog.
WASHINGTON: HRC played an important role in the passage of Referendum 71:
* Made
more than $90,000 in monetary and in-kind contributions to the efforts
to approve Referendum 71 and protect domestic partnership benefits.
more than $90,000 in monetary and in-kind contributions to the efforts
to approve Referendum 71 and protect domestic partnership benefits.
o $78,500
in monetary contributions to the Approve 71 campaign, including more
than $67,000 raised from hundreds of individual donors to the HRC
Approve 71 PAC;
in monetary contributions to the Approve 71 campaign, including more
than $67,000 raised from hundreds of individual donors to the HRC
Approve 71 PAC;
o More than $15,000 in in-kind contributions to the Approve 71 campaign.
* Deployed
a field organizer to work full time with Washington Families Standing
Together Approve Referendum 71 from early September through Election
Day.
a field organizer to work full time with Washington Families Standing
Together Approve Referendum 71 from early September through Election
Day.
* Coordinated
phone banks several evenings per week in Seattle, staffed by HRC
volunteers, to call Washington voters, generating thousands of
telephone calls and conversations.
phone banks several evenings per week in Seattle, staffed by HRC
volunteers, to call Washington voters, generating thousands of
telephone calls and conversations.
* Organized nearly 100 HRC local steering committee members and other HRC volunteers to assist with get-out-the-vote efforts.
* Mobilized
more than 30,000 HRC members and supporters via special online action
alerts and telephone calls to get them involved in the referendum
efforts.
more than 30,000 HRC members and supporters via special online action
alerts and telephone calls to get them involved in the referendum
efforts.
The Human Rights Campaign represents a grassroots force of over 750,000 members and supporters nationwide. As the largest national lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender civil rights organization, HRC envisions an America where LGBT people are ensured of their basic equal rights, and can be open, honest and safe at home, at work and in the community.
LATEST NEWS
Trump Says He's 'Entitled' to Illegal Third Term as Allies Draft Voter Suppression Decree
Extensions of presidential terms or abolition of limits are hallmarks of dictators and backsliding leaders of erstwhile democracies.
Feb 27, 2026
President Donald Trump raised eyebrows and angst among democracy defenders Friday for saying he deserves an unconstitutional third term in office, remarks that came a day after reporting that right-wing activists are drafting an executive order that could empower him to ban mail-in ballots and voting machines ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.
"Maybe we do one more term. Should we do one more?" the 79-year-old Republican president asked attendees of an event at the Port of Corpus Christi in Texas, to roaring applause. "Do one more term. Well, we are entitled to it."
During his State of the Union address on Tuesday, Trump rehashed his thoroughly debunked claim that Democrats stole the 2020 election for former President Joe Biden, saying this "should be my third term."
A third term would require a constitutional amendment, as the 22nd Amendment restricts US presidents to two terms in office.
Trump: Maybe we do one more term. Should we do one more? One more term. Well, we are entitled to it. pic.twitter.com/Niue0Q75Oo
— Acyn (@Acyn) February 27, 2026
Extensions of presidential terms or abolition of limits are hallmarks of dictators and backsliding leaders of erstwhile democracies. After Chinese President Xi Jinping lifted constitutional term limits in 2018, Trump marveled, "He's great," adding, "He's now president for life."
Trump has made cryptic allusions to a third term in office on multiple occasions.
While many Trump supporters believe he should also be president for life, his allies in actual positions of power—including Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and political strategist and convicted fraudster Steve Bannon, whom Trump granted clemency—have backed a third term for his administration.
A constitutional amendment enabling a third Trump term is not under any consideration and is all but impossible by the 2028 election. So Trump and his allies are working on other ways for the president to remain in office, focusing heavily on voter suppression. The Washington Post reported Thursday that a group of right-wing activists is writing a draft decree that would give the president “extraordinary power over voting." On Friday, Democracy Docket published an April 2025 version of the draft order provided by a Trump ally, which the outlet described as "riddled with errors."
According to the Post, the draft executive order would cite the pretext of alleged Chinese interference in the 2020 election. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence concluded that there was no such interference.
MS NOW national security contributor Marc Polymeropoulos called the draft order “batshit authoritarianism."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Trump Cuts Off Anthropic, AI Firm That Stood Against Killer Robots and Mass Surveillance
"Demanding security guardrails for how AI is used by the Department of Defense isn't radical—it's protecting the constitutional rights of the American people," said New Jersey's Democratic governor.
Feb 27, 2026
US President Donald Trump "is throwing this tantrum and calling Anthropic 'radical left' because they refuse to have their AI be used for illegal mass surveillance and murder. That's literally it."
That's how progressive commentator Kyle Kulinski described Trump's Friday social media post "directing EVERY Federal Agency in the United States Government to IMMEDIATELY CEASE all use" of the artificial intelligence firm's technology—including its chatbot Claude.
As Kulinski's podcast co-host and wife Krystal Ball summarized, "According to the president, objecting to autonomous killer robots and mass surveillance is 'radical left.'"
Earlier this week, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth gave Anthropic until 5:01 pm Eastern time Friday to agree to let the Pentagon use the company's AI tech however it wants. He threatened to declare Anthropic a "supply chain risk," effectively blacklisting it for military use and ending its current contract, or invoke the Defense Production Act, which would force the company to tailor the product to the Department of Defense's (DOD) needs.
After the DOD reportedly sent Anthropic its "best and final" offer Wednesday night, the company's CEO, Dario Amodei, published a blog post explaining that "we cannot in good conscience accede to their request," and reiterated opposition to enabling autonomous weapons or surveillance of US citizens.
While Anthropic employees, other tech experts, and critics of the current administration praised Amodei for "standing on principle" and choosing "war with the Department of War"—the president's preferred name for the Pentagon—Trump predictably lashed out at the company on his Truth Social platform.
"THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WILL NEVER ALLOW A RADICAL LEFT, WOKE COMPANY TO DICTATE HOW OUR GREAT MILITARY FIGHTS AND WINS WARS! That decision belongs to YOUR COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF, and the tremendous leaders I appoint to run our Military," Trump wrote Friday afternoon.
"The Leftwing nut jobs at Anthropic have made a DISASTROUS MISTAKE trying to STRONG-ARM the Department of War, and force them to obey their Terms of Service instead of our Constitution," he continued. "Their selfishness is putting AMERICAN LIVES at risk, our Troops in danger, and our National Security in JEOPARDY."
Directing agencies to stop using Anthropic's tech, Trump added:
We don't need it, we don't want it, and will not do business with them again! There will be a Six Month phase out period for Agencies like the Department of War who are using Anthropic's products, at various levels. Anthropic better get their act together, and be helpful during this phase out period, or I will use the Full Power of the Presidency to make them comply, with major civil and criminal consequences to follow.
WE will decide the fate of our Country—NOT some out-of-control, Radical Left AI company run by people who have no idea what the real World is all about. Thank you for your attention to this matter. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!
Amodei had notably written in his blog post that "our strong preference is to continue to serve the department and our warfighters—with our two requested safeguards in place. Should the department choose to offboard Anthropic, we will work to enable a smooth transition to another provider, avoiding any disruption to ongoing military planning, operations, or other critical missions."
While Trump's order preceded Hegseth's initial deadline, the defense secretary publicly weighed in at 5:14 pm, writing on Elon Musk's social media network X that "this week, Anthropic delivered a master class in arrogance and betrayal as well as a textbook case of how not to do business with the United States government or the Pentagon."
Hegseth described the company's terms of service as "defective altruism," and reiterated the Pentagon's position that "the Department of War must have full, unrestricted access to Anthropic's models for every LAWFUL purpose in defense of the republic."
The Pentagon chief also officially directed the DOD to designate the company a supply chain risk to national security, meaning that "effective immediately, no contractor, supplier, or partner that does business with the United States military may conduct any commercial activity with Anthropic."
"Anthropic will continue to provide the Department of War its services for a period of no more than six months to allow for a seamless transition to a better and more patriotic service," Hegseth added. "America's warfighters will never be held hostage by the ideological whims of Big Tech. This decision is final."
The New York Times noted that "the Pentagon is ready to move forward with Grok, produced by Elon Musk's xAI, on its classified system. But Grok is considered by current and former government officials to be an inferior product. And switching AI software would take time and almost certainly cause disruption."
While Anthropic hasn't publicly responded to Trump or Hegseth, critics, including congressional Democrats, have continued to praise the company and blast the administration for how they've each handled the conflict this week.
"Anthropic objected in part to the Department of Defense using its AI technology to engage in domestic mass surveillance. Do you agree that's a radical left, woke position?" asked Congressman Ted Lieu (D-Calif.). "That's actually the constitutional position, one that should be embraced by Americans regardless of party."
Replying to Trump's post specifically, Democratic New Jersey Gov. Mikie Sherrill similarly said: "Yet another alarming attack by the president on a private company defending its principles. Standing up against mass surveillance and demanding security guardrails for how AI is used by the Department of Defense isn't radical—it's protecting the constitutional rights of the American people."
Describing himself as "one of Congress' most vocal proponents for the modernization" of DOD and US intelligence community (IC) missions with transformative technology, Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Vice Chair Mark R. Warner (D-Va.) said in a statement that "the president's directive to halt the use of a leading American AI company across the federal government, combined with inflammatory rhetoric attacking that company, raises serious concerns about whether national security decisions are being driven by careful analysis or political considerations."
"President Trump and Secretary Hegseth's efforts to intimidate and disparage a leading American company—potentially as the pretext to steer contracts to a preferred vendor whose model a number of federal agencies have already identified as a reliability, safety, and security threat—pose an enormous risk to US defense readiness and the willingness of the US private sector and academia to work with the IC and DOD, consistent with their own values and legal ethics," he continued.
"Indeed," he added, "Secretary Hegseth's loud insistence on the sufficiency of an 'all lawful purposes' standard provides cold comfort against the backdrop of Pentagon leadership that has routinely sidelined career military attorneys and challenged longstanding norms and rules regarding lethal force."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Peace President' Trump Floats 'Friendly Takeover' of Cuba While Preparing to Attack Iran
"Trump ran on an explicitly anti-interventionist platform when he ran for president," noted one critic. "He lied to the American people."
Feb 27, 2026
As the world braces for a possible US war on Iran and people in Venezuela, Nigeria, and Yemen still reel from recent US attacks, President Donald Trump—the self-proclaimed "peace president" who has bombed more countries than any other American administration—said Friday that the United States may launch a "friendly takeover" of Cuba.
"The Cuban government is talking with us, they're in a big deal of trouble, as you know," Trump told reporters outside the White House before departing for Texas. "They have no money. They have no anything right now. But they're talking to us, and maybe we'll have a friendly takeover of Cuba."
"We could very well end up having a friendly takeover of Cuba," he added.
Cuban Deputy Foreign Minister Carlos Fernández de Cossío posted on social media Friday that "the US maintains its fuel embargo against Cuba in full force, and its impact as a form of collective punishment is unwavering."
"Nothing announced in recent days changes this reality," he added. "The possibility of conditional sales to the private sector already existed and does not alleviate the impact on the Cuban population."
Trump's comments sparked criticism on social media, with one X user writing: "A 'friendly takeover' is an interesting phrase in international diplomacy. If the US is discussing Cuba’s future, I’m sure [Russian President] Vladimir Putin is suddenly very interested in the definition of friendly' too."
University of North Texas, Dallas political science professor Orlando Pérez said on X that "more often than not, [Trump's] mouth is his worst enemy."
"This BS plays into the hands of hard-liners on both sides of the Florida Straits and reduces chances of a negotiated deal," he added. "Why would anyone in Cuba agree to a deal that leads to a US 'takeover'?"
Meanwhile, dozens of civil society groups on Friday sent a letter to Congress urging lawmakers "to press the Trump administration to reverse its aggressive policy towards Cuba."
"Instead, Congress should call on the administration to expand humanitarian relief, support political and economic engagement, and foster a more vibrant private sector that can deliver a better quality of life for the Cuban people," added the groups, which include Alianza Americas, American Friends Service Committee, CodePink, Demand Progress, Peace Action, Presbyterian Church USA, RootsAction, United Church of Christ, and Win Without War.
Trump's remarks Friday came in response to a question from NBC News senior White House correspondent Gabe Gutierrez regarding Wednesday's incident in which Cuban maritime defense forces killed four men and captured six others during a shootout with a Florida-registered speedboat allegedly carrying weapons intended for what Havana called “an infiltration for terrorist purposes.” South Florida has long been a base for right-wing Cuban exiles who have launched numerous terror attacks against the Cuban people and international tourists on the island, including by speedboat strafings.
Trump did not clarify his comments, seemingly suggesting that moves to topple Cuba's socialist government—which has outlasted a dozen US presidents—could be freshly afoot. Since Cubans overthrew a brutal US-backed dictatorship in 1959, the United States or allied exile forces tried to assassinate former Cuban President Fidel Castro hundreds of times, backed an ill-fated invasion at Bay of Pigs, served as a base for perpetrators of some of the hemisphere's worst terror attacks, and even hatched a plan to detonate a nuclear bomb high above the island to convince its people that the return of Jesus Christ was nigh and the only thing standing in the way of the so-called "Second Coming" was Castro.
A 64-year US economic embargo on Cuba, which Trump recently worsened by cutting off fuel, has been a leading force crippling Cuba's economy and is now being blamed for a soaring infant mortality on the island.
Friday's remarks by Trump came as Iranians and people across the Middle East and beyond are bracing for a possible US attack on Iran—the second in as many years—and less than than two months after the president ordered the bombing and invasion of Venezuela during an operation that ended with Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro abducted and jailed in United States, where he is expected to face trial for dubious narco-trafficking charges.
If the US strikes Cuba, it will be the 11th country attacked during Trump's two terms in office. The president—who says he deserves a Nobel Peace Prize—has ordered attacks on Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Libya, Nigeria, Pakistan, Somalia, Syria, Venezuela, and Yemen, and has bombed dozens of boats allegedly transporting drugs in international waters in the Caribbean Sea and Pacific Ocean.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


