SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Study Shows Those Armed More Likely To Be Shot
Oct 06, 2009
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
A new study by University of Pennsylvania researchers shows that people
in possession of a firearm are almost 4.5 times more likely to be shot
in an assault than people who are not in possession of a firearm. The
study was funded in part by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and
appears in the November 2009 issue of the American Journal of Public
Health.
The published conclusions state "on average, guns did
not protect those who possessed them from being shot in an assault.
Although successful defensive gun uses occur each year, the probability
of success may be low for civilian gun users in urban areas."
Possessors
of guns may be in more, not less, danger for a number of reasons,
researchers wrote. Offenders often use surprise to overpower their
victims, making it difficult to use a gun for self-defense; if a victim
is able to draw a gun, it signals to the offender that he must use
maximum force to overpower the victim. In addition, the increased
possibility of guns being carried in the community may lead to an
escalation in the lethality of weapons brought to an argument,
researchers argued.
Paul Helmke, President of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, responded to the report as follows:
"The
study's findings show once again the risks of gun ownership and how
having more guns correlates with more gun violence. This research
severely undermines the argument by gun pushers that carrying a gun
automatically makes a person safer. In urban areas, gun possessors,
far from being protected by their guns, are at an increased risk of
harm. Restrictions on carrying guns clearly makes sense as a smart
public safety strategy."
The study's lead author is Charles C.
Branas, of the Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Firearm
and Injury Center at Penn, University of Pennsylvania School of
Medicine. Researchers enrolled 677 case participants who had been shot
in an assault and 684 control participants. The study lasted from
October 2003 through April 2006, was funded by the National Institutes
of Health (NIH) and was published in the November issue of the American
Journal of Public Health.
A study abstract is at www.ajph.org/cgi/content/abstract/AJPH.2008.143099v1.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A new study by University of Pennsylvania researchers shows that people
in possession of a firearm are almost 4.5 times more likely to be shot
in an assault than people who are not in possession of a firearm. The
study was funded in part by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and
appears in the November 2009 issue of the American Journal of Public
Health.
The published conclusions state "on average, guns did
not protect those who possessed them from being shot in an assault.
Although successful defensive gun uses occur each year, the probability
of success may be low for civilian gun users in urban areas."
Possessors
of guns may be in more, not less, danger for a number of reasons,
researchers wrote. Offenders often use surprise to overpower their
victims, making it difficult to use a gun for self-defense; if a victim
is able to draw a gun, it signals to the offender that he must use
maximum force to overpower the victim. In addition, the increased
possibility of guns being carried in the community may lead to an
escalation in the lethality of weapons brought to an argument,
researchers argued.
Paul Helmke, President of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, responded to the report as follows:
"The
study's findings show once again the risks of gun ownership and how
having more guns correlates with more gun violence. This research
severely undermines the argument by gun pushers that carrying a gun
automatically makes a person safer. In urban areas, gun possessors,
far from being protected by their guns, are at an increased risk of
harm. Restrictions on carrying guns clearly makes sense as a smart
public safety strategy."
The study's lead author is Charles C.
Branas, of the Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Firearm
and Injury Center at Penn, University of Pennsylvania School of
Medicine. Researchers enrolled 677 case participants who had been shot
in an assault and 684 control participants. The study lasted from
October 2003 through April 2006, was funded by the National Institutes
of Health (NIH) and was published in the November issue of the American
Journal of Public Health.
A study abstract is at www.ajph.org/cgi/content/abstract/AJPH.2008.143099v1.
A new study by University of Pennsylvania researchers shows that people
in possession of a firearm are almost 4.5 times more likely to be shot
in an assault than people who are not in possession of a firearm. The
study was funded in part by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and
appears in the November 2009 issue of the American Journal of Public
Health.
The published conclusions state "on average, guns did
not protect those who possessed them from being shot in an assault.
Although successful defensive gun uses occur each year, the probability
of success may be low for civilian gun users in urban areas."
Possessors
of guns may be in more, not less, danger for a number of reasons,
researchers wrote. Offenders often use surprise to overpower their
victims, making it difficult to use a gun for self-defense; if a victim
is able to draw a gun, it signals to the offender that he must use
maximum force to overpower the victim. In addition, the increased
possibility of guns being carried in the community may lead to an
escalation in the lethality of weapons brought to an argument,
researchers argued.
Paul Helmke, President of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, responded to the report as follows:
"The
study's findings show once again the risks of gun ownership and how
having more guns correlates with more gun violence. This research
severely undermines the argument by gun pushers that carrying a gun
automatically makes a person safer. In urban areas, gun possessors,
far from being protected by their guns, are at an increased risk of
harm. Restrictions on carrying guns clearly makes sense as a smart
public safety strategy."
The study's lead author is Charles C.
Branas, of the Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Firearm
and Injury Center at Penn, University of Pennsylvania School of
Medicine. Researchers enrolled 677 case participants who had been shot
in an assault and 684 control participants. The study lasted from
October 2003 through April 2006, was funded by the National Institutes
of Health (NIH) and was published in the November issue of the American
Journal of Public Health.
A study abstract is at www.ajph.org/cgi/content/abstract/AJPH.2008.143099v1.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.