

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Laurelle Keough (international media) on +66 86 530 8394, laurellek@oxfam.org.au
Uamdao Noikorn (regional media) on +66 81 855 3196, unoikorn@oxfam.org.uk
The worst flooding the
Philippines has seen in decades highlights the urgent need for US
leadership to push UN climate change negotiations in Bangkok forward to
help ensure the best chance of securing a global climate treaty in
Copenhagen.
In the Philippines, with many dead and 330,000 displaced by flooding
in Manila, climate-related factors are blamed for an increased burden
on the health budget, which is struggling to keep up with increased
cases of nutritional deficiencies and diseases such as dengue, malaria
and cholera.
Oxfam research shows that the number of people affected by climate
crises is projected to rise by 54 per cent to 375 million over the next
six years, threatening the world's ability to respond.
Oxfam International Senior Climate Policy Adviser Antonio Hill said
the content of the new US Climate Change and Energy Bill due to be
introduced in the Senate this week, and moves from US officials in
Bangkok from today, would provide a stronger picture of whether the US
was willing to step up and provide the momentum desperately needed in
the negotiations.
Mr Hill said recent announcements by British Prime Minister Gordon
Brown and the EU on climate financing, and Japan and China's stronger
language last week on emissions reductions and finance, would put extra
pressure on the US to step up and signal its intentions on its role in
a global deal.
"Despite good intentions and warm words over the past six months,
the US didn't deliver real leadership last week at the UN Climate
Summit and G20. Either the US lifts its game, or the next two weeks in
Bangkok could go down as just a holding pattern before a fatal nosedive
in Copenhagen," he said.
He said while many key countries, including China, India, Japan, the
African Union, the Least Developed Countries and the Alliance of Small
Island States, had shown they were ready to enter the final, more
detailed phase of negotiations, intransigence on the part of rich
countries like the US, Canada and Australia was proving an obstacle to
progress.
Key sticking points remain the emissions reductions developed
countries are willing to deliver - current commitments are around 15
per cent instead of the science-based 40 per cent reductions on 1990
levels by 2020 - and the amount of financing they will put on the table
for developing countries to both adapt to the impacts of climate change
and develop on a low carbon pathway.
The two-week negotiations, held in South-East Asia, one of the
world's most vulnerable regions to climate change, is the penultimate
negotiation session before Copenhagen in December, when a fair and safe
global climate change treaty must be secured.
Mr Hill said that whilst last week's summits in the US were forums
for world leaders to signal their intentions, the UN negotiating
process continuing in Bangkok was the only place where countries could
forge an agreement to avoid catastrophic climate change.
"It's crunch time," Mr Hill said. "What is needed for a
breakthrough is a clear commitment from developed countries -
responsible for three-quarters of the carbon in the atmosphere - to
commit to substantial finance, additional to existing aid levels, to
developing countries."
Climate change is already affecting South-East Asia: extreme
weather events such as heat waves, droughts, floods and tropical
cyclones have increased in frequency and intensity in recent decades,
exacerbating water shortages, hampering agricultural production and
threatening food security, causing forest fires and coastal
degradation, and increasing health risks.
Mr Hill said a study in Thailand found that aquaculture farmers in
Bang Khu Thian were spending an average of US$3,130 per household every
year to protect their farms from coastal erosion and flooding between
1993 and 2007 - a fourth of annual household income.
"Once developing countries have confidence about the scale of
resources rich countries are prepared to negotiate, then they can turn
their attention to how they might achieve emissions reductions in their
own countries, and work can begin on how a global climate fund could
operate. These detailed negotiations must not be left till the
eleventh hour in Copenhagen," he said.
Mr Hill said it was crucial that this finance be over and above
existing aid commitments otherwise decades of development gains would
be reversed and millions more people would be plunged deeper into
poverty.
He said the Copenhagen framework also needed to help enable
smallholder farmers make agriculture resilient to climate impacts and
achieve emissions reductions from the sector.
Oxfam
calculates that at least US $150 billion is needed to help people in
developing countries adapt to the escalating impacts of climate change
and reduce their emissions, and proposes a fair and transparent global
fund operated through the UN system.
The Asian Development Bank estimates that for Indonesia,
Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam as a whole, the cost of adaptation
for the agriculture and coastal zones (mainly for the construction of
sea walls and development of drought and heat-resistant crops) will be
about US $5 billion per year by 2020 on average.
Investment in adaptation will pay off, with the annual benefit in
terms of avoided damage from climate change likely to exceed the annual
cost after 2050.
For the next two weeks, Oxfam will have policy experts and
spokespeople in Bangkok from countries including Indonesia, Bangladesh,
Germany, Spain, the US, the Philippines, Cambodia, Thailand, Malawi,
Australia and New Zealand. We can arrange interviews in a range of
languages.
Events throughout the two weeks organised by civil society groups including Oxfam include:
Thursday 1 October:
Women's Rally, Bangkok, 11am - 1pm (Rachadamnoen Road and around the UNESCAP building)
Celebrities including Miriam Quiambao (Philippines) and Oppie
Andaresta (Indonesia) will join with hundreds of women from across the
region to raise awareness of the disproportionate impact climate change
has on women;
Tuesday 6 October:
Asian People's Climate Court, Bangkok, 9am - 11am
People from countries including Thailand, Bangladesh, Philippines,
Indonesia and Nepal will tell their personal stories of how climate
change is affecting them now, in front of a judge and panel of experts.
Interviews are available.
Oxfam International is a global movement of people who are fighting inequality to end poverty and injustice. We are working across regions in about 70 countries, with thousands of partners, and allies, supporting communities to build better lives for themselves, grow resilience and protect lives and livelihoods also in times of crisis.
A Maine woman accused the Democratic US Senate candidate of drunkenly assaulting her at her home in 2021, which he denied.
US Senate candidate Graham Platner on Monday denied allegations of sexual assault, but the Maine Democrat also said his campaign is considering the "best path forward" in the wake of Politico's reporting.
Jenny Racicot told The New York Times in an article published last month that Platner's behavior was "reckless" and "unsettling" during their on-and-off relationship in 2019-21, and she cut off contact after he arrived at her Maine home drunk, despite her telling him not to come over. Politico reported Monday that the 41-year-old had told the newspaper off the record that he assaulted her.
Racicot told Politico that Platner came into her home uninvited that night and forced himself on her while she repeatedly told him to stop. She said that she was conflicted about publicly accusing him in part because she agrees with the candidate politically, but decided to speak out after much of the reaction to the Times focused on another ex with ties to the Republican Party. The outlet reviewed documents, including emails with her therapist, and spoke with sources Racicot had previously told about her experience.
In a two-minute video shared on social media Monday, Platner called Racicot's allegations "troubling, serious, and false," and said that "any accusation of nonconsensual behavior is categorically false." He also said that, "mindful of the political reality" that the reporting will inflict, "we are taking the time to reflect on the best path forward."
Platner decisively won his primary last month, after his opponent, Democratic Gov. Janet Mills, suspended her campaign in late April. The oyster farmer and combat veteran is a political newcomer who has championed progressive policies and called out the ultrarich, as well as the politicians who serve them—including longtime Republican Sen. Susan Collins, whom he's running to unseat in November.
While Platner has traveled Maine, speaking and rallying with working-class voters, he's also faced a series of controversies, including concerns over his offensive posts on Reddit, and the skull and crossbones tattoo he got with fellow Marines in Croatia, which he claimed he did not know closely resembled a Nazi symbol and got covered up during the campaign.
There was also the allegation from the GOP-affiliated ex interviewed by the Times, Lyndsey Fifield, that Platner was physically aggressive during their relationship, which he denied, and reporting that Platner's wife, Amy Gertner, told a senior campaign staffer that he had exchanged sexual messages with other women during their marriage, which Gertner responded to with a video.
In a statement to Politico on Monday, Platner's campaign pointed to previous controversies, saying:
These allegations are very serious and Graham vigorously denies them. They are also coached and coordinated by out-of-state establishment operatives. For a year, opponents of this campaign have thrown everything they can at Graham—calling him a Nazi, a war criminal, and a communist. None of it has been true, and this is no different. It is not a coincidence that this story comes a week before the ballot deadline, just as the previous false allegations came a week before the primary. Graham began this campaign to fight for a Maine where everyone is treated with dignity and where Mainers are put first, and no amount of desperate smears will stop this movement from seeing that vision through.
Following Politico's reporting, Platner has lost some key support. At least two members of Congress who backed him—Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) and Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.)—withdrew their endorsements, and the Maine Democratic Party's chair, vice chair, and executive director issued a joint statement urging him to withdraw as the party nominee.
The US National Domestic Violence Hotline can be reached at 1-800-799-SAFE (7233), by texting "START" to 88788, or through chat at thehotline.org. It offers 24/7, free, and confidential support. DomesticShelters.org has a list of global and national resources.
"Children are not incidental victims; they are directly affected, facing forced recruitment, sexual violence, unlawful detention, torture, and a lack of medical care," Amnesty International USA stressed.
Demands for a ceasefire in Sudan's three-year civil war mounted this week amid reports that more than 300 children have been killed or injured in the northeastern African nation this year alone, mostly by drone strikes.
The United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) said Modaysu that "children across Sudan continue to bear the brunt of a war that is becoming increasingly deadly, with at least 330 children reported killed or injured during the first six months of 2026. Darfur and Kordofan states continued to record the highest levels of child casualties."
"The situation in and around al-Obeid, and more broadly across North Kordofan, is particularly alarming," UNICEF continued. "Since May 2026, drone strikes and other attacks have reportedly resulted in more than 35 child casualties in the state, including at least 18 children killed and more than 17 injured. The affected children ranged in age from just 2 months to 17 years. According to reports, drone attacks accounted for 60% of these casualties, highlighting the growing impact of this method of warfare on children and families."
"Repeated drone strikes and shelling have also damaged civilian infrastructure, including homes, schools, health facilities, water systems, and markets; disrupted supply routes; and placed essential services under increasing strain," the agency added. "With an estimated 500,000 civilians at risk in and around al-Obeid and across North Kordofan, any further deterioration could expose even more children to death, injury, displacement, and other grave protection risks."
Amnesty International USA said Monday that both the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and Rapid Support Forces (RSF) rebels "have committed numerous human rights violations, including deliberate attacks on civilians."
"Ethnic targeting has resulted in assaults on non-Arab communities, with women and girls subjected to sexual violence and exploitation," Amnesty added. "Children are not incidental victims; they are directly affected, facing forced recruitment, sexual violence, unlawful detention, torture, and a lack of medical care."
On Monday, the United Nations Human Rights Council approved a measure proposed by five European countries—Germany, Ireland, the Netherlands, Norway, and the United Kingdom—condemning escalating RSF-led violence in and around al-Obeid.
While both the SAF adnd RSF have committed documented human rights crimes, an independent United Nations panel released a report earlier this year detailing allegedly genocidal crimes committed by RSF rebels during last October's offensive in Darfur, where thousands of people were killed and others tortured, raped, and starved during the capture of el-Fasher.
The UN experts found that “genocidal intent is the only reasonable inference that can be drawn” from RSF's actions.
The ceasefire demands from UNICEF and Amnesty follow similar calls from governments, including France and the United Arab Emirates, as well as other UN agencies.
On Friday, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk warned that "another human rights catastrophe is unfolding" in al-Obeid.
"The signs from #ElObeid are clear & unmistakable: another human rights catastrophe is unfolding in #Sudan," @volker_turk told the @UN Human Rights Council.
"This is not a drill. It is a red alert that needs to land on the desks of Heads of State & Government around the world." pic.twitter.com/zH3bVIpX34
— UN Human Rights Council (@UN_HRC) July 3, 2026
“Civilians have been subjected to siege-like conditions for 18 months, battered by relentless drone attacks as the Sudanese Armed Forces and the Rapid Support Forces battle for control over areas surrounding the city," Türk noted.
“Some people are selling their belongings to finance their escape from the city," he continued. "For many, the exorbitant cost of transport and constant attacks on vehicles along exit routes, make leaving impossible."
"We have documented patterns of summary executions, abductions, torture and ill-treatment, sexual violence, and looting along the routes taken by displaced people across the Kordofan region," Türk added. "This is not a drill. It is a red alert that needs to land on the desks of heads of state and government around the world."
Since April 2023, Sudan's conflict has killed at least 59,000 people, displaced around 13 million others, and fueled famine in different parts of the country of approximately 52 million inhabitants. More than 30 million Sudanese are also in need of humanitarian assistance.
"We need robust enforcement of antitrust and fair trade practice laws to finally protect producers from meatpackers’ fundamentally unfair and illegal practices," said one campaigner.
A leading government accountability watchdog group on Monday ripped the Trump administration's move to rescind Biden-era rules enacted to protect ranchers and farmers from abuse by meatpacking corporations and boost competition in the key industry.
The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) has announced the reversal of three Biden administration rules under the Packers and Stockyards Act of 1921. One of the rules prohibits meatpackers, swine contractors, and poultry companies from retaliating against producers for actions like joining associations, speaking with regulators, or seeking other buyers.
Another rule mandated improved transparency in poultry grower contracts. The third rule‚ which was set to take effect this month, would have limited how poultry companies use the tournament payment system.
USDA said it plans to start the revocation process with proposed rulemakings scheduled for later this month and October.
Farm groups and antitrust advocates argue the move removes protections against monopolistic, deceptive, and retaliatory practices by dominant meatpacking and poultry companies.
“For years, meat corporations have abused hardworking farmers and ranchers. Now, the Trump administration is proposing to undo long-overdue progress made to level the playing field," Emily Miller, staff attorney at Food & Water Watch, said Monday in a statement. "This move is a slap in the face to all those who have long fought for fair treatment in livestock and poultry markets."
The USDA's move comes amid increased meat sector consolidation, which studies by Food & Water Watch, More Perfect Union, and others have found results in higher consumer prices and lower farmer profits.
Over the course of his two terms in office, Trump has boosted the meatpacking industry at the expense of worker rights, competition, and public health. His administration refused to issue binding rules requiring businesses to institute safety measures amid the Covid-19 pandemic, and he invoked the Defense Production Act to classify meatpacking plants as critical infrastructure and force them to stay open even as the coronavirus ravaged industry workers.
Trump has also supported corporate monopolization in meatpacking, and his administration has shut down a Department of Justice antitrust probe of alleged industry collusion. Just four meatpackers control approximately 80% of the market. Meanwhile, cattle producers who in 1980 received 63 cents for every dollar paid by consumers for beef were receiving just 37 cents four decades later.
"We need robust enforcement of antitrust and fair trade practice laws to finally protect producers from meatpackers’ fundamentally unfair and illegal practices," Miller said on Monday. "These rollbacks will do the opposite. We won’t rest until USDA does its job by putting producers above corporations.”