September, 28 2009, 11:03am EDT

For Immediate Release
Contact:
Laurelle Keough (international media) on +66 86 530 8394, laurellek@oxfam.org.au
Uamdao Noikorn (regional media) on +66 81 855 3196, unoikorn@oxfam.org.uk
Flooding in the Philippines Highlights Urgency of Climate Leadership
Climate change is already affecting South-East Asia
LONDON
The worst flooding the
Philippines has seen in decades highlights the urgent need for US
leadership to push UN climate change negotiations in Bangkok forward to
help ensure the best chance of securing a global climate treaty in
Copenhagen.
In the Philippines, with many dead and 330,000 displaced by flooding
in Manila, climate-related factors are blamed for an increased burden
on the health budget, which is struggling to keep up with increased
cases of nutritional deficiencies and diseases such as dengue, malaria
and cholera.
Oxfam research shows that the number of people affected by climate
crises is projected to rise by 54 per cent to 375 million over the next
six years, threatening the world's ability to respond.
Oxfam International Senior Climate Policy Adviser Antonio Hill said
the content of the new US Climate Change and Energy Bill due to be
introduced in the Senate this week, and moves from US officials in
Bangkok from today, would provide a stronger picture of whether the US
was willing to step up and provide the momentum desperately needed in
the negotiations.
Mr Hill said recent announcements by British Prime Minister Gordon
Brown and the EU on climate financing, and Japan and China's stronger
language last week on emissions reductions and finance, would put extra
pressure on the US to step up and signal its intentions on its role in
a global deal.
"Despite good intentions and warm words over the past six months,
the US didn't deliver real leadership last week at the UN Climate
Summit and G20. Either the US lifts its game, or the next two weeks in
Bangkok could go down as just a holding pattern before a fatal nosedive
in Copenhagen," he said.
He said while many key countries, including China, India, Japan, the
African Union, the Least Developed Countries and the Alliance of Small
Island States, had shown they were ready to enter the final, more
detailed phase of negotiations, intransigence on the part of rich
countries like the US, Canada and Australia was proving an obstacle to
progress.
Key sticking points remain the emissions reductions developed
countries are willing to deliver - current commitments are around 15
per cent instead of the science-based 40 per cent reductions on 1990
levels by 2020 - and the amount of financing they will put on the table
for developing countries to both adapt to the impacts of climate change
and develop on a low carbon pathway.
The two-week negotiations, held in South-East Asia, one of the
world's most vulnerable regions to climate change, is the penultimate
negotiation session before Copenhagen in December, when a fair and safe
global climate change treaty must be secured.
Mr Hill said that whilst last week's summits in the US were forums
for world leaders to signal their intentions, the UN negotiating
process continuing in Bangkok was the only place where countries could
forge an agreement to avoid catastrophic climate change.
"It's crunch time," Mr Hill said. "What is needed for a
breakthrough is a clear commitment from developed countries -
responsible for three-quarters of the carbon in the atmosphere - to
commit to substantial finance, additional to existing aid levels, to
developing countries."
Climate change is already affecting South-East Asia: extreme
weather events such as heat waves, droughts, floods and tropical
cyclones have increased in frequency and intensity in recent decades,
exacerbating water shortages, hampering agricultural production and
threatening food security, causing forest fires and coastal
degradation, and increasing health risks.
Mr Hill said a study in Thailand found that aquaculture farmers in
Bang Khu Thian were spending an average of US$3,130 per household every
year to protect their farms from coastal erosion and flooding between
1993 and 2007 - a fourth of annual household income.
"Once developing countries have confidence about the scale of
resources rich countries are prepared to negotiate, then they can turn
their attention to how they might achieve emissions reductions in their
own countries, and work can begin on how a global climate fund could
operate. These detailed negotiations must not be left till the
eleventh hour in Copenhagen," he said.
Mr Hill said it was crucial that this finance be over and above
existing aid commitments otherwise decades of development gains would
be reversed and millions more people would be plunged deeper into
poverty.
He said the Copenhagen framework also needed to help enable
smallholder farmers make agriculture resilient to climate impacts and
achieve emissions reductions from the sector.
Notes to editors
Oxfam
calculates that at least US $150 billion is needed to help people in
developing countries adapt to the escalating impacts of climate change
and reduce their emissions, and proposes a fair and transparent global
fund operated through the UN system.
The Asian Development Bank estimates that for Indonesia,
Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam as a whole, the cost of adaptation
for the agriculture and coastal zones (mainly for the construction of
sea walls and development of drought and heat-resistant crops) will be
about US $5 billion per year by 2020 on average.
Investment in adaptation will pay off, with the annual benefit in
terms of avoided damage from climate change likely to exceed the annual
cost after 2050.
For the next two weeks, Oxfam will have policy experts and
spokespeople in Bangkok from countries including Indonesia, Bangladesh,
Germany, Spain, the US, the Philippines, Cambodia, Thailand, Malawi,
Australia and New Zealand. We can arrange interviews in a range of
languages.
Events throughout the two weeks organised by civil society groups including Oxfam include:
Thursday 1 October:
Women's Rally, Bangkok, 11am - 1pm (Rachadamnoen Road and around the UNESCAP building)
Celebrities including Miriam Quiambao (Philippines) and Oppie
Andaresta (Indonesia) will join with hundreds of women from across the
region to raise awareness of the disproportionate impact climate change
has on women;
Tuesday 6 October:
Asian People's Climate Court, Bangkok, 9am - 11am
People from countries including Thailand, Bangladesh, Philippines,
Indonesia and Nepal will tell their personal stories of how climate
change is affecting them now, in front of a judge and panel of experts.
Interviews are available.
Oxfam International is a global movement of people who are fighting inequality to end poverty and injustice. We are working across regions in about 70 countries, with thousands of partners, and allies, supporting communities to build better lives for themselves, grow resilience and protect lives and livelihoods also in times of crisis.
LATEST NEWS
Dems Demand Answers as Trump Photo Disappears From DOJ Online Epstein Files
"What else is being covered up?"
Dec 20, 2025
Congressional Democrats on Saturday pressed US Attorney General Pam Bondi for answers regarding the apparent removal of a photo showing President Donald Trump surrounded by young female models from Friday's Department of Justice release of files related to the late convicted child sex criminal Jeffrey Epstein.
Amid the heavily redacted documents in Friday's DOJ release was a photo of a desk with an open drawer containing multiple photos of Trump, including one of him with Epstein and convicted child sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell and another of him with the models.
However, the photo—labeled EFTA00000468 in the DOJ's Epstein Library—was no longer on the site as of Saturday morning.
"This photo, file 468, from the Epstein files that includes Donald Trump, has apparently now been removed from the DOJ release," Democrats on the House Oversight Committee noted in a Bluesky post. "AG Bondi, is this true? What else is being covered up? We need transparency for the American public."
This photo, file 468, from the Epstein files that includes Donald Trump has apparently now been removed from the DOJ release.AG Bondi, is this true? What else is being covered up? We need transparency for the American public.
[image or embed]
— Oversight Dems (@oversightdemocrats.house.gov) December 20, 2025 at 9:30 AM
Numerous critics have accused the Trump administration of a cover-up due to the DOJ's failure to meet a Friday deadline to release all Epstein-related documents and heavy redactions—including documents of 100 pages or more that are completely blacked out—to many of the files.
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche responded to the criticism by claiming that "the only redactions being applied to the documents are those required by law—full stop."
"Consistent with the statute and applicable laws, we are not redacting the names of individuals or politicians unless they are a victim," he added.
Earlier this year, officials at the Federal Bureau of Investigation reportedly redacted Trump's name from its file on Epstein, who was the president's longtime former friend and who died in 2019 in a New York City jail cell under mysterious circumstances officially called suicide while facing federal child sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.
Trump has not been accused of any crimes in connection with Epstein.
House Oversight Committee Ranking Member Robert Garcia (D-Calif.) said during a Friday CNN interview that the DOJ only released about 10% of the full Epstein files.
The DOJ is breaking the law by not releasing the full Epstein files. This is not transparency. This is just more coverup by Donald Trump and Pam Bondi. They need to release all the files, NOW.
[image or embed]
— Congressman Robert Garcia (@robertgarcia.house.gov) December 19, 2025 at 5:06 PM
"The DOJ has had months and hundreds of agents to put these files together, and yet entire documents are redacted—from the first word to the last," Garcia said on X. "What are they hiding? The American public deserves transparency. Release all the files now!"
In a joint statement Friday, Garcia and House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) said, "We are now examining all legal options in the face of this violation of federal law."
"The survivors of this nightmare deserve justice, the co-conspirators must be held accountable, and the American people deserve complete transparency from DOJ," they added.
Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.)—who along with Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) introduced the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which was signed into law by Trump last month and required the release of all Epstein materials by December 19—said in a video published after Friday's document dump that he and Massie "are exploring all options" to hold administration officials accountable.
"It can be the impeachment of people at Justice, inherent contempt, or referring for prosecution those who are obstructing justice," he added.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Israeli Forces Massacre 6 Palestinians Celebrating Wedding at Gaza School Shelter
"This isn't a truce, it's a bloodbath," said a relative of some of the victims, who included women, an infant, and a teenage girl.
Dec 20, 2025
Funerals were held Saturday in northern Gaza for six people, including children, massacred the previous day by Israeli tank fire during a wedding celebration at a school sheltering displaced people, as the number of Palestinians killed during the tenuous 10-week ceasefire rose to over 400.
On Friday, an Israel Defense Forces (IDF) tank blasted the second floor of the Gaza Martyrs School, which was housing Palestinians displaced by the two-year war on Gaza in the al-Tuffah neighborhood of Gaza City.
Al Jazeera and other news outlets reported that the attack occurred while people were celebrating a wedding.
Al-Shifa Hospital director Mohammed Abou Salmiya said those slain included a 4-month-old infant, a 14-year-old girl, and two women. At least five others were injured in the attack.
"It was a safe area and a safe school and suddenly... they began firing shells without warning, targeting women, children and civilians," Abdullah Al-Nader—who lost relatives including 4-month-old Ahmed Al-Nader in the attack—told Agence France-Presse.
Witnesses said IDF troops subsequently blocked first responders including ambulances and civil defense personnel from reaching the site for over two hours.
"We gathered the remains of children, elderly, infants, women, and young people," Nafiz al-Nader, another relative of the infant and others killed in Friday's attack, told reporters. "Unfortunately, we called the ambulance and the civil defense, but they couldn't get by the Israeli army."
The IDF said that “during operational activity in the area of the Yellow Line in the northern Gaza Strip, a number of suspicious individuals were identified in command structures," and that "troops fired at the suspicious individuals to eliminate the threat."
The Yellow Line is a demarcation boundary between areas of Gaza under active Israeli occupation—more than half of the strip's territory, including most agricultural and strategic lands—and those under the control of Hamas.
"The claim of casualties in the area is familiar; the incident is under investigation," the IDF said, adding that it "regrets any harm to uninvolved parties and acts as much as possible to minimize harm to them."
Since the October 7, 2023 Hamas-led attack on Israel, more than 250,000 Palestinians have been killed or wounded by Israeli forces, including approximately 9,500 people who are missing and presumed dead and buried beneath rubble. Classified IDF documents suggest that more than 80% of the Palestinians killed by Israeli forces were civilians.
Around 2 million Palestinians have also been displaced—on average, six times—starved, or sickened in the strip.
Gaza officials say at least 401 Palestinians have been killed since a US-brokered ceasefire between Israel and Hamas took effect on October 10. Gaza's Government Media Office says Israel has violated the ceasefire at least 738 times.
"This isn't a truce, it's a bloodbath," Nafiz al-Nader told Agence France-Presse outside al-Shifa Hospital on Saturday.
Israel says Hamas broke the truce at least 32 times, with three IDF soldiers killed during the ceasefire.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Yoav Gallant, his former defense minister, are fugitives from the International Criminal Court in The Hague, where they are wanted for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity in Gaza, including murder and forced starvation.
Israel is also facing a genocide case filed by South Africa at the International Court of Justice, also in The Hague. A United Nations commission, world leaders, Israeli and international human rights groups, jurists, and scholars from around the world have called Israel's war on Gaza a genocide.
Friday's massacre came as Steve Witkoff, President Donald Trump's Mideast envoy, other senior US officials, and representatives of Egypt, Qatar, Turkey, and the United Arab Emirates met in Miami to discuss the second phase of Trump's peace plan, which includes the deployment of an international stabilization force, disarming Hamas, the withdrawal of IDF troops from the strip, and the establishment of a new government there.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Trump's 9 New Prescription Drug Deals 'No Substitute' for Systemic Reform
"Patients are overwhelmingly calling on Congress to do more to lower prescription drug prices by holding Big Pharma accountable and addressing the root causes of high drug prices," said one campaigner.
Dec 19, 2025
"Starting next year, American drug prices will come down fast and furious and will soon be the lowest in the developed world," President Donald Trump claimed Friday as the White House announced agreements with nine pharmaceutical manufacturers.
The administration struck most favored nation (MFN) pricing deals with Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, GSK, Merck, Novartis, and Sanofi. The president—who has launched the related TrumpRx.gov—previously reached agreements with AstraZeneca, EMD Serono, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, and Pfizer.
"The White House said it has made MFN deals with 14 of the 17 biggest drug manufacturers in the world," CBS News noted Friday. "The three drugmakers that were not part of the announcement are AbbVie, Johnson & Johnson, and Regeneron, but the president said that deals involving the remaining three could be announced at another time."
However, as Trump and congressional Republicans move to kick millions of Americans off of Medicaid and potentially leave millions more uninsured because they can't afford skyrocketing premiums for Affordable Care Act (ACA) plans, some critics suggested that the new drug deals with Big Pharma are far from enough.
"When 47% of Americans are concerned they won't be able to afford a healthcare cost next year, steps to reduce drug prices for patients are welcomed, especially by patients who rely on one of the overpriced essential medicines named in today's announcement," said Merith Basey, CEO of Patients for Affordable Drugs Now, in a statement.
"But voluntary agreements with drug companies—especially when key details remain undisclosed—are no substitute for durable, system-wide reforms," Basey stressed. "Patients are overwhelmingly calling on Congress to do more to lower prescription drug prices by holding Big Pharma accountable and addressing the root causes of high drug prices, because drugs don't work if people can't afford them."
As the New York Times reported Friday:
Drugs that will be made available in this way include Amgen's Repatha, for lowering cholesterol, at $239 a month; GSK's asthma inhaler, Advair Diskus, at $89 a month; and Merck's diabetes medication Januvia, at $100 a month.
Many of these drugs are nearing the end of their patent protection, meaning that the arrival of low-cost generic competition would soon have prompted manufacturers to lower their prices.
In other cases, the direct-buy offerings are very expensive and out of reach for most Americans.
For example, Gilead will offer Epclusa, a three-month regimen of pills that cures hepatitis C, for $2,492 a month on the site. Most patients pay far less using insurance or with help from patient assistance programs. Gilead says on its website that "typically a person taking Epclusa pays between $0 and $5 per month" with commercial insurance or Medicare.
While medication prices are a concern for Americans who face rising costs for everything from groceries to utility bills, the outcome of the ongoing battle on Capitol Hill over ACA tax credits—which are set to expire at the end of the year—is expected to determine how many people can even afford to buy health insurance for next year.
The ACA subsidies fight—which Republicans in the US House of Representatives ignored in the bill they passed this week before leaving Capitol Hill early—has renewed calls for transitioning the United States from its current for-profit healthcare system to Medicare for All.
"At the heart of our healthcare crisis is one simple truth: Corporations have too much power over our lives," Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), former chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, said on social media Friday. "Medicare for All is how we take our power back and build a system that puts people over profits."
Jayapal reintroduced the Medicare for All Act in April with Rep. Debbie Dingell (D-Mich.) and Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee Ranking Member Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.). The senator said Friday that some of his top priorities in 2026 will be campaign finance reform, income and wealth inequality, the rapid deployment of artificial intelligence, and Medicare for All.
Earlier this month, another backer of that bill, US Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), said: "We must stop tinkering around the edges of a broken healthcare system. Yes, let's extend the ACA tax credits to prevent a huge spike in healthcare costs for millions. Then, let's finally create a system that puts your health over corporate profits. We need Medicare for All."
It's not just progressives in Congress demanding that kind of transformation. According to Data for Progress polling results released late last month, 65% of likely US voters—including 78% of Democrats, 71% of Independents, and 49% of Republicans—either strongly or somewhat support "creating a national health insurance program, sometimes called 'Medicare for All.'"
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


