August, 28 2009, 03:50pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Jessica Levin (202) 772-8162
Media Matters to Klein: Dobbs Represents 'Ongoing Threat'; Prime-Time Host's Appearance at Anti-Immigration Rally on Capitol Hill Causes Further Problems for CNN's Credibility
WASHINGTON
Today, Media
Matters for America President Eric Burns issued an open letter to
CNN President Jonathan Klein regarding prime-time anchor Lou Dobbs'
scheduled appearance on September 15 and 16 at the "Hold Their Feet to
the Fire" legislative advocacy event and rally sponsored by the anti-immigration
organization Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR). FAIR, an
organization that has been designated
a "hate group"
by the Southern Poverty Law Center and that has been sharply
criticized for its racially-tinged ads, was founded
by John Tanton, who has a long history of making racist statements and espousing racist
beliefs.
A FAIR press release announced that Dobbs will broadcast his show from
the rally and will be joined by 47 conservative talk radio hosts.
Burns writes, in part:
"Mr. Dobbs represents an ongoing threat to CNN's credibility
as a serious news organization, in no small part because of his polemical
coverage of immigration issues and his continued use of his CNN show to lend
prominence to groups such as FAIR. The attention and legitimacy he gave to the
"birther" movement -- and CNN's condoning of his actions --
did real damage to that credibility. His participation in the upcoming FAIR
rally would do further, serious damage. We urge you to finally acknowledge that
Mr. Dobbs' actions in this and other contexts are inconsistent with the
reputation that CNN strives to maintain."
The complete text of the letter reads:
August 28, 2009
Dear Mr. Klein:
On September 15 and 16, Lou Dobbs is scheduled to broadcast from
Capitol Hill as a leading voice of the annual "Hold Their Feet to the
Fire" two-day legislative advocacy conference and rally sponsored by the
Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR). Including Mr. Dobbs, the
event will feature 47 conservative talk radio hosts from around the country. We
write to urge you to prohibit Mr. Dobbs from participating in this event.FAIR is a rabidly anti-immigrant organization founded by an unrepentant
racist, who remains on its board. The Southern Poverty Law Center has designated
FAIR a "hate group."
Mr. Dobbs' participation -- and, inextricably, CNN's -- would bestow
legitimacy on the rally and on FAIR, as the group itself recognizes and touts.
In announcing its 2008 "Hold Their Feet to the Fire" conference (from
which Mr. Dobbs was allowed to broadcast
his CNN television show), the FAIR Congressional Task Force boasted in a press
release that Mr. Dobbs' "prominence will add to
the visibility and stature of an event that has already had an enormous impact
on the national debate about immigration policy." FAIR's website
approvingly stated that in 2007, "talk radio and cable news programs such
as Dobbs' " helped turn the public against immigration reform
efforts, which it labels as "amnesty." The press
release announcing this year's rally notes that it will
be "led by Roger Hedgecock ... and Lou Dobbs." In addition, the group has
given Mr. Dobbs its "People's Voice Award"
for "his continued efforts in leading the immigration reform movement
through both his talk radio show and his television show."CNN's association with FAIR through Mr. Dobbs is nothing less
than a stain on an organization that calls itself "The Most Trusted Name
in News." FAIR was founded
by John Tanton, who still sits on the organization's board
of directors. Tanton has a long history of making racist
statements, espousing racist beliefs, and funding racist organizations. In
1986, Tanton reportedly wrote:
"As Whites see their power and control over their lives declining, will
they simply go quietly into the night?" In 1993, he reportedly wrote:
"I've come to the point of view that for European-American society
and culture to persist requires a European-American majority, and a clear one
at that." In 1997, Tanton was quoted by the Detroit Free Press as saying that without a reduction in
immigration levels, the United
States will be overwhelmed by people
"defecating and creating garbage and looking for jobs." In 2001,
Tanton reportedly praised
the work of John Trevor, a notorious Nazi sympathizer, saying his work should
form "a guidepost to what we must follow again this time." Tanton
is not a relic of FAIR's past: In the organization's 2004
annual report, chairman of the board of directors Nancy Anthony wrote that
Tanton's "visionary qualities have not waned one bit. He stills
floods us with more ideas than we can possibly absorb."In March, Dobbs' CNN show
reported that FAIR "supports a temporary moratorium on immigration."
FAIR executive director Dan Stein has been quoted saying the following:
"Many [immigrants] hate America,
hate everything the United
States stands for. Talk to some of these
Central Americans."FAIR has been sharply criticized in the media for racially tinged ads.
A 2000 campaign ad the group ran against former Sen. Spencer Abraham, a Lebanese-American,
attacked his support for making more visas available for foreign workers and
accused him of "trying to make it easier for terrorists like Osama bin
Laden to export their way of terror to any city street in America."
In 2004, a group of FAIR-backed ads targeting former Texas Democrat Martin Frost
and former Republican Sen. Chuck Hagel featured dark-skinned men loitering on
street corners and running from the police. The Dallas Morning News denounced the ads in an April 2004
editorial, calling them "as racially tinged as those Willie Horton ads the
late Mr. [Lee] Atwater
put together for the first President Bush during his 1988 White House
bid." In an April 24, 2004, editorial, the Lincoln (Nebraska) Journal
Star called the ads "trash" that "incite hate,"
"play upon stereotypical racial fears," and "are full of
half-truths and lies.'"And yet, rather than denouncing the group, Mr. Dobbs' CNN show
has cited FAIR as a credible source on immigration issues no fewer than six
times in the last year while also routinely failing to disclose his close
association with the group.There should be no doubt concerning the content of the upcoming rally.
It will give a platform to precisely the type of radio host you, Mr. Klein,
reportedly said would no longer be invited on CNN. Speakers last
year included Les Kinsolving, a WorldNetDaily.com columnist
who asked
Robert Gibbs at a White House press briefing why the president won't
release his "long-form birth certificate." Another speaker from last
year, South Florida radio host Joyce Kaufman, has reportedly said of undocumented
immigrants: "If you commit a crime while you're here, we should hang you
and send your body back to where you came from, and your family should pay for
it." Also on the roster last year was Steve Gill, a Nashville radio host who has said of
President Obama: "This man, and his evil minions, really do hate this
country." Jeff Katz, while a radio host in Sacramento, reportedly
"said motorists should be awarded a sombrero-shaped bumper sticker for
every illegal immigrant hit while
attempting to cross the border from Mexico," adding, in the words of the Sacramento Bee, that "[f]or every 10
bumper stickers ... a motorist would earn a free drink or meal at Taco
Bell."As Media Matters has
highlighted repeatedly, Mr. Dobbs represents an ongoing threat to CNN's
credibility as a serious news organization, in no small part because of his polemical
coverage of immigration issues and his continued use of his CNN show to lend
prominence to groups such as FAIR. The attention and legitimacy he gave to the
"birther" movement -- and CNN's condoning of his actions --
did real damage to that credibility. His participation in the upcoming FAIR
rally would do further, serious damage. We urge you to finally acknowledge that
Mr. Dobbs' actions in this and other contexts are inconsistent with the
reputation that CNN strives to maintain.We await your response.
Sincerely,
Eric Burns
President
Media Matters for America
Media Matters for America is a Web-based, not-for-profit, 501(c)(3) progressive research and information center dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media.
LATEST NEWS
'Important Victory' for Florida Higher Ed: Court Upholds Block on DeSantis Censorship Law
"This is an important step in preserving the truth, civil liberties, and a better future," said one state ACLU attorney.
Mar 16, 2023
The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday kept in place a preliminary injunction against Florida GOP policymakers' school censorship law in what rights advocates celebrated as "an important victory for professors, other educators, and students."
The appellate court denied a request from Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis' administration and higher education officials to block a district judge's injunction that is currently preventing enforcement of the Stop Wrongs Against Our Kids and Employees (WOKE) Act—rebranded by its supporters as the Individual Freedom Act—in the state's public colleges and universities.
DeSantis' Stop WOKE Act "limits the ways concepts related to systemic racism and sex discrimination can be discussed in teaching or conducting training in workplaces or schools," parroting a Trump administration executive order that was ultimately rescinded by President Joe Biden, the ACLU explained last year.
The plaintiffs in one of the relevant cases, Pernell v. Florida Board of Governors, are represented by the national and state ACLU along with the Legal Defense Fund (LDF) and Ballard Spahr, who first filed the federal suit last August—the same day U.S. District Judge Mark Walker, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, issued a separate injunction against the law related to employers.
The new appeals court order upholds the injunction Walker issued in November, which began by quoting George Orwell's novel 1984. Calling the controversial law "positively dystopian," the judge wrote at the time that "the powers in charge of Florida's public university system have declared the state has unfettered authority to muzzle its professors in the name of 'freedom.'"
"All students and educators deserve to have a free and open exchange about issues related to race in our classrooms."
Leah Watson, a senior staff attorney with the ACLU Racial Justice Program, said Thursday that "the court's decision to leave in place the preliminary injunction is a recognition of the serious injury posed to educators and students by the Stop WOKE Act."
"All students and educators deserve to have a free and open exchange about issues related to race in our classrooms," Watson argued, rather than censored discussions that erase "the history of discrimination and lived experiences of Black and Brown people, women and girls, and LGBTQ+ individuals."
LDF assistant counsel Alexsis Johnson similarly stressed that "institutions of higher education in Florida should have the ability to provide a quality education, which simply cannot happen when students and educators, including Black students and educators, feel they cannot speak freely about their lived experiences, or when they feel that they may incur a politician's wrath for engaging in a fact-based discussion of our history."
The order also pertains to a challenge filed by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) in September.
"Professors must be able to discuss subjects like race and gender without hesitation or fear of state reprisal," FIRE said Thursday. "Any law that limits the free exchange of ideas in university classrooms should lose in both the court of law and the court of public opinion."
The Stop WOKE Act is part of a nationwide effort by Republican state lawmakers and governors—especially DeSantis, a potential 2024 GOP presidential candidate—to curtail what content can be shared and discussed in classrooms and workplaces.
"Since January 2021, 44 states have introduced bills or taken other steps that would restrict teaching critical race theory or limit how teachers can discuss racism and sexism," according to an Education Week analysis updated on Monday. "Eighteen states have imposed these bans and restrictions either through legislation or other avenues."
ACLU of Florida staff attorney Jerry Edwards warned Thursday that "lawmakers continue to threaten our democracy by attempting to curtail important discussions about our collective history and treatment of Black and Brown communities."
"This is an important step in preserving the truth, civil liberties, and a better future," Edwards said of the 11th Circuit's decision.
Though legal groups welcomed the order, the battle over the law is ongoing. The court will eventually rule on the merits of the case—which DeSantis' press secretary Bryan Griffin highlighted Thursday, adding, "We remain confident that the law is constitutional."
Opponents of the law are also undeterred, as Ballard Spahr litigation department chair Jason Leckerman made clear.
"The movement to restrict academic freedom and curtail the rights of marginalized communities is as pervasive as it is pernicious," he said. "We are proud of the work we have done so far with our partners, the ACLU and Legal Defense Fund, but the fight is far from over. Today, we'll take a moment to savor this result—and then we'll keep working."
This post has been updated with comment from FIRE and Gov. Ron DeSantis' press secretary.
Keep ReadingShow Less
In Reversal of Trump-Era Stance, Biden DOJ Backs Colorado Communities Suing Big Oil
"The Justice Department has added its voice to a series of unanimous court rulings that support communities in their efforts to hold fossil fuel companies accountable for their climate lies," said one campaigner.
Mar 16, 2023
Climate defenders on Thursday applauded the Justice Department's move to support communities suing a pair of oil companies by urging the U.S. Supreme Court to deny the corporations' bid to keep the case out of state court.
U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar filed an amicus brief urging the high court to deny a petition from ExxonMobil and Suncor Energy asking the justices to review lower court rulings allowing a lawsuit from three Colorado communities to proceed.
In 2018, Boulder County, San Miguel County, and the city of Boulder sued the corporations for damages related to their decades of fossil fuel extraction—which is fueling global heating—and their lies.
"It's past time that Big Oil companies face the evidence of their climate lies and answer to juries in state court."
Common Dreamsreported in July 2020 that the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the lawsuit could proceed in state rather than federal court, the second time in two months that federal judges handed down such decisions.
Fossil fuel giants have repeatedly tried to shift such suits from state to federal courts in a bid to get the cases dismissed and avoid paying massive amounts of money for their significant contributions to the climate emergency.
"By finally ending its Trump-era support for Big Oil, the Justice Department has added its voice to a series of unanimous court rulings that support communities in their efforts to hold fossil fuel companies accountable for their climate lies," Richard Wiles, president of the Center for Climate Integrity, said in a statement Thursday.
According to the Center for Climate Integrity:
On the campaign trail, President [Joe] Biden pledged he would direct his attorney general to "strategically support" such lawsuits, but the department had allowed its Trump-era support of oil companies to remain in effect until today. To date, five federal appeals courts and 13 federal district courts have unanimously ruled against the fossil fuel industry's arguments to avoid trials in state courts. Last year, the Supreme Court asked the Justice Department to express its views on the matter.
"Big Oil companies have fought tirelessly to escape accountability for fueling the climate crisis and then lying about it, but judges have uniformly denied their pleas to escape trial in state courts," said Wiles. "Communities in Colorado and across the U.S. have waited long enough for justice. It's past time that Big Oil companies face the evidence of their climate lies and answer to juries in state court."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Biden Shows Support as Senate Advances Repeal of Iraq War Authorizations
"Repeal of these authorizations would have no impact on current U.S. military operations and would support this administration's commitment to a strong and comprehensive relationship with our Iraqi partners."
Mar 16, 2023
As the U.S. Senate on Thursday teed up a vote to end the congressional authorizations for the Gulf and Iraq wars, President Joe Biden formally backed the bipartisan bill.
The progress on finally repealing the 1991 and 2002 authorizations for use of military force (AUMFs) comes just ahead of the 20th anniversary of the George W. Bush administration's costly and devastating invasion of Iraq.
The bill ( S. 316/H.R. 932) was reintroduced in February by Sens. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) and Barbara Lee (D-Calif.), and has GOP co-sponsors in both chambers. On Thursday, 19 Republican senators joined with all Democrats present to advance the measure.
The legislation has not yet been approved by the House of Representatives, which is narrowly controlled by the GOP. However, if it reaches the president's desk, he supports it, according to the statement of administration policy released Thursday.
While former Presidents Barack Obama and Donald Trump used the 2002 authorization to justify strikes against Islamic State in Iraq and Syria and Iranian Gen. Qasem Soleimani, respectively, the new Biden administration document notes that "the United States conducts no ongoing military activities that rely primarily on the 2002 AUMF, and no ongoing military activities that rely on the 1991 AUMF, as a domestic legal basis."
"Repeal of these authorizations would have no impact on current U.S. military operations and would support this administration's commitment to a strong and comprehensive relationship with our Iraqi partners," that policy statement adds. "President Biden remains committed to working with the Congress to ensure that outdated authorizations for the use of military force are replaced with a narrow and specific framework more appropriate to protecting Americans from modern terrorist threats."
Demand Progress Education Fund policy adviser Cavan Kharrazian said in a statement that "we are glad President Biden is supportive of getting these outdated AUMFs off the books, and that he is committed to work with Congress on presumably replacing the 2001 AUMF with a narrower framework."
"However, any serious attempt by President Biden to work with Congress on war powers reforms requires the administration to halt unauthorized participation of U.S. armed forces in hostilities that contravene the War Powers Act," Kharrazian stressed. "This includes ending U.S. support for the Saudi-led coalition's war on Yemen, ceasing the use of U.S. forces to protect Syrian oil fields and battling Iranian-backed militias, and putting an end to legally dubious military operations in the Horn of Africa."
The campaigner continued:
Moreover, the administration must commit to full legal transparency regarding the use of military force. Both this administration and previous administrations have failed to provide Congress with timely reporting on the 2001 AUMF, as required by 50 U.S. Code § 1550. Additionally, President Biden has failed to respond to lawmakers' inquiries about the administration's legal justifications for the expansive use of the 2001 AUMF and Article 2 authorities. Without such transparency, Congress is unable to fully exercise its oversight and legislative duties over war and peace.
It's encouraging to see an administration committed to addressing outdated AUMFs. However, a genuine commitment will involve respecting congressional authority over war by proactively ending unauthorized military activities and implementing comprehensive transparency measures.
In a series of tweets, the Quaker advocacy group Friends Committee on National Legislation (FCNL) welcomed the administration's position and highlighted fresh comments from Kaine and Sen. Todd Young (R-Ind.), a co-sponsor, who gathered outside the U.S. Capitol on Thursday with members of the American Legion.
"There's no reason—none—to have a war authorization against a strategic partner, and so that's the first reason why we need to do this," Kaine said of Iraq, adding that the repeal must also occur to honor U.S. service members.
Kaine called out previous failures by Congress to end the AUMFs, and noted that leaving them in place enables abuse. While confirming he has not spoken with House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) about the bill, the senator expressed optimism that it will pass—saying of the lower chamber, "there's a wonderful bipartisan coalition there as well."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular
SUPPORT OUR WORK.
We are independent, non-profit, advertising-free and 100%
reader supported.
reader supported.