August, 27 2009, 01:36pm EDT

Earthjustice Seeks Supreme Court Review in Mountaintop Removal Mining Case
Clean Water Act violated in issuance of permits for mining
WASHINGTON
Earthjustice and the Appalachian Center for the Economy & the Environment have filed a petition
with the U.S. Supreme Court that asks the Court to review a recent
decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in a
controversial mountaintop removal mining case. The case challenges the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' issuance of permits allowing companies to
dump waste from mountaintop removal mining into streams without
following basic requirements of the Clean Water Act designed to prevent
irreversible harm to the nation's waters.
"This case is of great national importance," said Earthjustice
attorney Steve Roady. "The Corps of Engineers is ripping the heart out
of the Clean Water Act by granting permits that allow coal companies to
permanently entomb vital streams in the rubble of exploded mountains.
The destruction caused by mountaintop removal mining is enormous and
the adverse impacts on local communities are profound. We're asking the
Supreme Court to hold the Corps accountable."
Earthjustice and the Appalachian Center for the Economy & the
Environment filed this lawsuit challenging several West Virginia
mountaintop removal permits in September 2005 on behalf of the Ohio
Valley Environmental Coalition, West Virginia Highlands Conservancy and
Coal River Mountain Watch. The lawsuit challenged the Corps' violation
of the Clean Water Act by authorizing the permits to fill 23 valleys
and 13 miles of mountain streams in southern West Virginia without
first performing even the most basic, legally required assessment of
the harm that would occur when the streams are buried forever.
"The Supreme Court must intervene in a case that strives to provide
essential protections for Appalachian mountain streams under the Clean
Water Act," said Joe Lovett, executive director of the Appalachian
Center for the Economy & the Environment. "The Corps has not
adequately controlled mountaintop mining removal activity and has
allowed for the wholesale destruction of our vital waterways."
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
in March 2007 found those permits violated the Clean Water Act. In
February, a panel of federal judges in the U.S. Court of Appeals for
the Fourth Circuit ruled 2 to 1 in favor of the Corps in the case, with
a strong dissent from one judge on the panel. Earthjustice then
requested rehearing by the full court of appeals, but in late May, by a
close vote of 4 to 3, with 4 additional judges abstaining from the
vote, the court denied that petition.
However, two judges filed dissenting opinions, each of which Judge Diana Gribbon Motz joined.
In his dissent, Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson wrote that he voted for
the full court of appeals to hear the case because of "the potentially
irreversible effects that the permitted operations will have on the
Appalachian ecosystem." He concluded: "The requirements of the Clean
Water Act are important. . . . Once the ecologies of streams and rivers
and bays and oceans turn, they cannot easily be reclaimed. More often
than not, the waterway is simply gone for good."
In his dissent from the denial of rehearing, Judge M. Blane Michael,
who also had dissented from the panel's decision, explained that: "The
ecological impact of filling headwater streams with mining overburden
is both profound and irreversible . . . . No permit should issue until
the Corps fulfills each distinct obligation under the controlling
regulations. And this court should not defer to the Corps until the
agency has done its job."
"We're constantly hearing about the decreasing amounts of clean
water within our nation as well as 'water wars' between states," said
Janet Keating executive director of the Ohio Valley Environmental
Coalition. "Yet the coal industry is recklessly burying and polluting
our headwater streams under millions of tons of mining waste in central
Appalachia. We hope that the Court realizes how vital, urgent and
necessary their input is on this matter."
"Scientific studies show time and time again that mountaintop
removal does horrible damage to our nation's water supplies," said
Vernon Haltom, co-director of Coal River Mountain Watch. "It's now time
for the nation's high court to uphold the laws intended to protect our
communities from polluting industries that care only for their profit
margin."
"In allowing high mountain headwater streams to be filled with waste
rock, the Corps has allowed total disruption of the hydrology of
hundreds of square miles of ancient mountains and the natural and human
lives those ground and surface waters have supported for centuries,"
said Cindy Rank, chair of the West Virginia Highlands Conservancy
Mining Committee. "The future well-being of the region depends on
stricter adherence to the nation's environmental laws."
Mountaintop removal mining is a method of strip mining in which coal
companies use explosives to blast as much as 800 to 1000 feet off the
tops of mountains to reach coal seams underneath. The result is
millions of tons of waste rock, dirt, and vegetation dumped into
surrounding valleys, burying miles and miles of streams under piles of
rubble hundreds of feet deep. Mountaintop removal mining harms not only
aquatic ecosystems and water quality, but also destroys hundreds of
acres of healthy forests and fish and wildlife habitat, including
habitat of threatened and endangered species, when the tops of
mountains are blasted away. As of 2002, the Appalachian region had
already lost 1,200 miles of mountain streams to this destructive
process-and the Environmental Protection Agency has predicted that this
could rise as high as 2,400 miles by the year 2013 if current practices
continue.
This practice also devastates Appalachian communities -- in West
Virginia, Kentucky, southern Virginia and eastern Tennessee -- and
cultures that have existed in these mountains for hundreds of years.
Residents of the surrounding communities are threatened by rock slides,
catastrophic floods, poisoned water supplies, constant blasting and
destroyed property.
Additional Resources:
The EPA's Environmental Impact Statement on mountaintop removal mining can be found here: https://www.epa.gov/region3/mtntop/eis2005.htm
Pending permits can be searched here: https://www.appalachian-center.org/foia/
A map of permits in West Virginia can be found here: https://www.earthjustice.org/library/maps/westva-mining-permits.pdf
Earthjustice is a non-profit public interest law firm dedicated to protecting the magnificent places, natural resources, and wildlife of this earth, and to defending the right of all people to a healthy environment. We bring about far-reaching change by enforcing and strengthening environmental laws on behalf of hundreds of organizations, coalitions and communities.
800-584-6460LATEST NEWS
Restarting Michigan Nuclear Power Plant Risks 'Chernobyl-Scale Catastrophe,' Coalition Warns
"This more than $10 billion in ratepayer and taxpayer robbery would merely fund an insanely high-risk game of radioactive Russian roulette on the Lake Michigan shoreline," said one critic.
Mar 22, 2023
A coalition of 191 individuals and 185 groups representing thousands of people on Wednesday implored the federal government for the third time not to fund the revival of a roughly 51-year-old nuclear power plant that was shut down last May in Covert, Michigan.
In a letter to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), the coalition warned that providing financial aid to Holtec International, which purchased the Palisades Nuclear Plant (PNP) last June, could lead to a massive public health and environmental disaster that reverberates far beyond the shoreline of Lake Michigan—a source of drinking water for millions of people in multiple states.
A little over a week after taking ownership of PNP "under the false pretense of decommissioning it," Holtec secretly applied for funding from the DOE's Civil Nuclear Credit (CNC) program in early July to reopen the plant, the coalition explained in a statement. The company's application—supported by Democratic Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, who had been advocating for a "dangerous 'zombie reactor' bailout and restart scheme at Palisades" since April 2022—was made public in early September.
Thanks in part to opposition from the coalition, which sent its first letter to U.S. Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm in September, the DOE rejected Holtec's first funding request in mid-November. The following month, however, Holtec announced it would apply for federal funding during a second round of allocations, prompting a second letter of opposition from the coalition.
As The Holland Sentinelreported earlier this month: "Holtec is taking a different route with its second attempt at funding. Rather than applying through the CNC program, the company applied for funds from the U.S. Department of Energy loan office."
Terry Lodge, legal counsel for the coalition's lead groups, Beyond Nuclear and Don't Waste Michigan, wrote in Wednesday's letter that "DOE's recently issued amended 'guidance,' which was specifically rewritten to enable Holtec to apply for $1.2 billion of federal taxpayer funds, is not legal under the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA)."
"We understand that Holtec... may be applying to DOE for a subsidized loan under a different law, with the intention of using funds from the IIJA to pay off the loan," wrote Lodge. "We question whether such a combined transaction would be lawful under the IIJA. Even if it is, IIJA credits may not be used to support Palisades. Congress intended the IIJA to support only currently operating commercial nuclear reactors that face termination of operations for economic reasons. Palisades does not meet any criteria for eligibility."
The coalition once again asked Granholm—a former Democratic governor and attorney general of Michigan—and other high-ranking officials at the DOE to deny Holtec's request that the non-operational PNP be certified to receive such federal funding.
Most importantly, PNP is unable "to operate safely due to a litany of chronic and acute problems associated with age-related degradation and neglected maintenance on safety-significant systems, structures, and components," the coalition argued in its statement. "This includes the worst neutron-embrittled reactor pressure vessel in the country and perhaps the world, at risk of pressurized thermal shock through-wall fracture, which would lead to reactor core meltdown."
"But additional pathways to catastrophic meltdown include a reactor lid, as well as steam generators, that have needed replacement for 17 years or longer," the coalition continued. "Palisades' control rod drive mechanism seal leaks have been uniquely bad in all of industry, for more than a half-century. Now added to this long list is Holtec's neglect of vital maintenance, such as of the turbo-generator, bending under its own immense weight, as well as the steam generators, to name but two examples."
Holtec has "applied to DOE for a billion dollar federal taxpayer-backed nuclear loan guarantee under the Inflation Reduction Act, which it would use to promote the reactor restart scheme, hoping to pay it back over time with the CNC program bailout," said the coalition. In addition, Holtec is "seeking a more than billion dollar subsidy from the state of Michigan, as well as yet another lucrative, above-market rate power purchase agreement with an unnamed utility company in the area. Also, Holtec has applied to DOE for $7.4 billion in federal nuclear loan guarantees, authorized under the 2005 Energy Policy Act and congressionally appropriated on December 23, 2007, for the design certification, construction, and operation of four small modular (nuclear) reactors, more than one of which would also be located at the Palisades site."
In the words of Kevin Kamps, a radioactive waste specialist at Beyond Nuclear and board member of Don't Waste Michigan, "This more than $10 billion in ratepayer and taxpayer robbery would merely fund an insanely high-risk game of radioactive Russian roulette on the Lake Michigan shoreline."
"Both extremes of the risk spectrum would be co-located at the Palisades site, if Holtec gets its way," said Kamps. "The ever-worsening breakdown phase risks at the old reactor would exist alongside the break-in phase risks of the new reactors, risking a Chernobyl-scale catastrophe, with the potential for Fukushima-style, domino-effect, multiple meltdowns."
According to The Holland Sentinel: "Holtec has acknowledged there will be 'a number of hurdles' to reopening the plant even if funding is secured. Those include financial commitment from the state, procuring a power purchasing agreement, upgrading the switchyard, partnering with a licensed operator for the restart, rehiring qualified and trained staff, and maintenance and delayed capital improvements of the facility—the plant closed earlier than planned due to failure of a control rod drive seal."
Citing comments a U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission official made during a public meeting on Monday, MLivereported this week that PNP "would be the first plant to enter the decommissioning phase and then try to restart."
During the meeting, Kamps declared, "Over my dead body are you all going to get away with this."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Shocking and Immoral': Report Details Private Equity's Stranglehold on US Healthcare
"The damage that private equity has wrought on Americans' healthcare from cradle to grave, simply for profit, has become a life-or-death situation."
Mar 22, 2023
Private equity's ownership of U.S. healthcare providers is incompatible with the needs and best interests of patients and should be checked with federal legislation, according to a report published Wednesday by the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen.
Critics of for-profit care have long decried private equity's focus on maximizing returns through practices including slashing staff, surprising patients with astronomical bills, and eschewing low-margin care upon which vulnerable populations rely. The new report—authored primarily by Public Citizen healthcare policy advocate Eagan Kemp—examines investment firms' impact on more than a dozen healthcare sectors, from reproductive health through end-of-life care.
"Private equity acquisitions in the healthcare sector have steadily climbed since the financial crisis in 2009, particularly in the past five years," a summary of the report notes. "Unlike acquisitions of hospitals, which typically occur under a public spotlight, the private equity industry's acquisitions of physician practices and other healthcare business lines often occur with little or no disclosure or public scrutiny, hindering the ability of regulators and watchdogs to monitor the effects of private equity ownership."
According to the report:
In general, the private equity industry's business model poses risks to the long-term sustainability of entities that the industry acquires. That is, in large part, because private equity purchases are typically financed with debt that is immediately transferred onto the books of the businesses acquired, thus leaving the acquired entities with debt burdens to manage.
Meanwhile, private equity investors seek outsize returns on an accelerated timeline, generally aiming to exit investments in three to five years with returns of 20%-30% per year. This objective induces them to take short-sighted steps to supercharge profits or otherwise wring capital out of the assets they acquire.
The risks posed by private equity investments in healthcare are particularly acute. After all, the services healthcare providers offer can spell the difference between life and death. Private equity has targeted segments of the healthcare industry since at least the 1990s, with many predictable outcomes. Among them, shocking lapses in safety have occurred, prices have risen faster than at non-private equity acquired entities, and patients have been subjected to price gouging schemes.
The conflict between providers' obligations to provide the best care and private equity investors' insatiable appetites for maximized [returns] provides is clear. "You can't serve two masters," a doctor who previously worked for private equity-owned U.S. Dermatology Partners toldBloomberg. "You can't serve patients and investors."
"Thanks to a lack of transparency, we don't know everything about private equity's incursion into healthcare. But what we do know is shocking and immoral" said Kemp. "The damage that private equity has wrought on Americans' healthcare from cradle to grave, simply for profit, has become a life-or-death situation. Transparency and oversight are needed, stat."
The report suggests legislative solutions including Sen. Elizabeth Warren's (D-Mass.) Stop Wall Street Looting Act and Rep. Pramila Jayapal's Healthcare Ownership Transparency Act. The latter, according to Jayapal's office, "would require private equity firms and other financial interests to disclose ownership stakes in healthcare facilities including nursing homes."
A September 2022 Public Citizen report detailed how federal regulators had failed to implement a 2010 law requiring nursing homes to disclose their owners. Other investigations during the Covid-19 pandemic found that home healthcare, hospice, and nursing facilities and services owned by investment firms often provided a lower standard of care.
"We applaud Rep. Jayapal's ongoing effort to shine a light on the dangerous toll private equity vultures are taking on our health," Public Citizen president Robert Weissman said in a statement. "Adequate regulation of this predatory industry is acutely critical when it comes to the healthcare sector."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Democrats Propose $300 Billion Investment to Treat Housing as Human Right
"In the richest country in the world, it is a moral imperative that we take this issue head-on," said Rep. Pramila Jayapal.
Mar 22, 2023
Declaring that homelessness and housing insecurity is the result of "a structural failure of a country that has refused to make safe and affordable housing a priority," U.S. Reps. Pramila Jayapal and Grace Meng on Wednesday reintroduced the Housing is a Human Right Act and called on the federal government to provide $300 billion to end the crisis facing unhoused people.
The legislation would invest more than $200 billion in affordable housing and support services, $27 billion annually for services for unhoused people, and $100 million per year for community-driven alternatives to people experiencing homelessness.
Other funds would go to support communities at heightened risk for homelessness.
"Housing is a human right, and nobody in the world should be without a place to call home, especially not in America," said Meng (D-N.Y.). "This is an issue that impacts individuals for a number of reasons and sometimes isn't fixed with just a physical roof above a person's head."
The bill was reintroduced as real estate website Realtor.com released an analysis showing that even for people who have a place to live, housing is becoming more precarious across the United States.
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development recommends that people spend less than 30% of their income on housing, but eight of the country's top 50 metropolitan areas now have "a rent share higher than 30% relative to the median household income," including Miami, Los Angeles, New York, and San Diego.
Even in more affordable cities renters are spending more, with the average monthly rent in Cincinnati, Ohio costing 19.4% of the average monthly income—up from 18.4% last year. In Birmingham, Alabama, renters spend an average of 22.2% of their income on housing.
"As costs have risen and the minimum wage has stagnated, it would take the average minimum wage worker more than 96 hours of work per week to afford a two-bedroom rental," noted Jayapal (D-Wash.).
The shrinking stock of affordable housing is linked to the crisis of homelessness, which more than half a million people in the U.S. experienced in 2022—up by 3% from 2020.
"The crisis of housing instability is one that can be fixed by investing in housing infrastructure and supportive services for vulnerable communities," said Jayapal.
The legislation has been co-sponsored by Democratic lawmakers including Reps. Jamaal Bowman of New York, Cori Bush of Missouri, James McGovern of Massachusetts, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, and Rashida Tlaib of Michigan.
The $200 billion proposed investment included in the bill would go toward McKinney-Vento Emergency Solutions Grants, which fund engagement with people experiencing homelessness and improve emergency shelters; and Continuum of Care grants, which help rehouse people who have faced homelessness.
The legislation would also:
- Create a new grant program to invest in humane infrastructure, providing municipalities with $6 billion a year through a flexible program that will allow them to address their most urgent housing needs to keep people in stable housing and support those experiencing homelessness;
- Incentivize local investments in humane, evidence-based models to support people experiencing homelessness, including alternatives to criminalization and penalization;
- Provide $10 billion for Federal Emergency Management Agency food and shelter grants while improving grants to better represent high rates of homelessness and income inequality; and
- Authorize $100 million in grants to public libraries to provide assistance and tailored supports to persons experiencing homelessness.
"In the richest country in the world, it is a moral imperative that we take this issue head-on," said Jayapal. "Housing is a human right—and every person deserves to have a safe place to call home."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular
SUPPORT OUR WORK.
We are independent, non-profit, advertising-free and 100%
reader supported.
reader supported.