August, 27 2009, 01:36pm EDT
Earthjustice Seeks Supreme Court Review in Mountaintop Removal Mining Case
Clean Water Act violated in issuance of permits for mining
WASHINGTON
Earthjustice and the Appalachian Center for the Economy & the Environment have filed a petition
with the U.S. Supreme Court that asks the Court to review a recent
decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in a
controversial mountaintop removal mining case. The case challenges the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' issuance of permits allowing companies to
dump waste from mountaintop removal mining into streams without
following basic requirements of the Clean Water Act designed to prevent
irreversible harm to the nation's waters.
"This case is of great national importance," said Earthjustice
attorney Steve Roady. "The Corps of Engineers is ripping the heart out
of the Clean Water Act by granting permits that allow coal companies to
permanently entomb vital streams in the rubble of exploded mountains.
The destruction caused by mountaintop removal mining is enormous and
the adverse impacts on local communities are profound. We're asking the
Supreme Court to hold the Corps accountable."
Earthjustice and the Appalachian Center for the Economy & the
Environment filed this lawsuit challenging several West Virginia
mountaintop removal permits in September 2005 on behalf of the Ohio
Valley Environmental Coalition, West Virginia Highlands Conservancy and
Coal River Mountain Watch. The lawsuit challenged the Corps' violation
of the Clean Water Act by authorizing the permits to fill 23 valleys
and 13 miles of mountain streams in southern West Virginia without
first performing even the most basic, legally required assessment of
the harm that would occur when the streams are buried forever.
"The Supreme Court must intervene in a case that strives to provide
essential protections for Appalachian mountain streams under the Clean
Water Act," said Joe Lovett, executive director of the Appalachian
Center for the Economy & the Environment. "The Corps has not
adequately controlled mountaintop mining removal activity and has
allowed for the wholesale destruction of our vital waterways."
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
in March 2007 found those permits violated the Clean Water Act. In
February, a panel of federal judges in the U.S. Court of Appeals for
the Fourth Circuit ruled 2 to 1 in favor of the Corps in the case, with
a strong dissent from one judge on the panel. Earthjustice then
requested rehearing by the full court of appeals, but in late May, by a
close vote of 4 to 3, with 4 additional judges abstaining from the
vote, the court denied that petition.
However, two judges filed dissenting opinions, each of which Judge Diana Gribbon Motz joined.
In his dissent, Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson wrote that he voted for
the full court of appeals to hear the case because of "the potentially
irreversible effects that the permitted operations will have on the
Appalachian ecosystem." He concluded: "The requirements of the Clean
Water Act are important. . . . Once the ecologies of streams and rivers
and bays and oceans turn, they cannot easily be reclaimed. More often
than not, the waterway is simply gone for good."
In his dissent from the denial of rehearing, Judge M. Blane Michael,
who also had dissented from the panel's decision, explained that: "The
ecological impact of filling headwater streams with mining overburden
is both profound and irreversible . . . . No permit should issue until
the Corps fulfills each distinct obligation under the controlling
regulations. And this court should not defer to the Corps until the
agency has done its job."
"We're constantly hearing about the decreasing amounts of clean
water within our nation as well as 'water wars' between states," said
Janet Keating executive director of the Ohio Valley Environmental
Coalition. "Yet the coal industry is recklessly burying and polluting
our headwater streams under millions of tons of mining waste in central
Appalachia. We hope that the Court realizes how vital, urgent and
necessary their input is on this matter."
"Scientific studies show time and time again that mountaintop
removal does horrible damage to our nation's water supplies," said
Vernon Haltom, co-director of Coal River Mountain Watch. "It's now time
for the nation's high court to uphold the laws intended to protect our
communities from polluting industries that care only for their profit
margin."
"In allowing high mountain headwater streams to be filled with waste
rock, the Corps has allowed total disruption of the hydrology of
hundreds of square miles of ancient mountains and the natural and human
lives those ground and surface waters have supported for centuries,"
said Cindy Rank, chair of the West Virginia Highlands Conservancy
Mining Committee. "The future well-being of the region depends on
stricter adherence to the nation's environmental laws."
Mountaintop removal mining is a method of strip mining in which coal
companies use explosives to blast as much as 800 to 1000 feet off the
tops of mountains to reach coal seams underneath. The result is
millions of tons of waste rock, dirt, and vegetation dumped into
surrounding valleys, burying miles and miles of streams under piles of
rubble hundreds of feet deep. Mountaintop removal mining harms not only
aquatic ecosystems and water quality, but also destroys hundreds of
acres of healthy forests and fish and wildlife habitat, including
habitat of threatened and endangered species, when the tops of
mountains are blasted away. As of 2002, the Appalachian region had
already lost 1,200 miles of mountain streams to this destructive
process-and the Environmental Protection Agency has predicted that this
could rise as high as 2,400 miles by the year 2013 if current practices
continue.
This practice also devastates Appalachian communities -- in West
Virginia, Kentucky, southern Virginia and eastern Tennessee -- and
cultures that have existed in these mountains for hundreds of years.
Residents of the surrounding communities are threatened by rock slides,
catastrophic floods, poisoned water supplies, constant blasting and
destroyed property.
Additional Resources:
The EPA's Environmental Impact Statement on mountaintop removal mining can be found here: https://www.epa.gov/region3/mtntop/eis2005.htm
Pending permits can be searched here: https://www.appalachian-center.org/foia/
A map of permits in West Virginia can be found here: https://www.earthjustice.org/library/maps/westva-mining-permits.pdf
Earthjustice is a non-profit public interest law firm dedicated to protecting the magnificent places, natural resources, and wildlife of this earth, and to defending the right of all people to a healthy environment. We bring about far-reaching change by enforcing and strengthening environmental laws on behalf of hundreds of organizations, coalitions and communities.
800-584-6460LATEST NEWS
'Crushing Blow to the Labor Agenda' as Manchin, Sinema Block Biden NLRB Nominee
"These two senators effectively handed Trump control of the board when his term begins," noted one observer.
Dec 11, 2024
In a move likely fraught with major implications for worker rights during the impending second administration of Republican President-elect Donald Trump, Democratic-turned-Independent U.S. Sens. Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema on Wednesday blocked Democrat Lauren McFerran's bid for a second term on the National Labor Relations Board.
With every Republican senator except Sen. Roger Marshall of Kansas voting against President Joe Biden's nomination of McFerran for a new five-year term, the fate of the woman who has led the agency since 2021 was up to Manchin and Sinema—who, as More Perfect Union founder and executive director Faiz Shakir put it on social media, "consistently spoiled the story of 'what could have been'" by years of fighting to thwart their own former party's agenda.
Sinema struck first, her "no" vote on McFerran grinding the confirmation tally to a 49-49 tie. Manchin, who showed up later, cast the decisive vote, negating speculation that Vice President Kamala Harris, the Senate president who lost the presidential contest to Trump last month, would break the stalemate.
"It is deeply disappointing, a direct attack on working people, and incredibly troubling that this highly qualified nominee—with a proven track record of protecting worker rights—did not have the votes," lamented Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.).
Chris Jackson, a former Democratic Lawrence County, Tennessee commissioner and longtime labor advocate, called Manchin and Sinema's votes "a crushing blow to the labor agenda."
"By casting decisive NO votes against President Biden's NLRB nominee, they've guaranteed Democrats will lose control of the national labor board until at least 2026," Jackson said. "Their votes effectively hand Donald Trump the keys to the board the moment he takes office again. This is a betrayal of working families—and a gift to corporate interests, which is par for the course for these two."
Trump's first term saw relentless attacks on workers' rights. Critics fear a second Trump administration—whose officials and agenda are steeped in the anti-worker Project 2025—will roll back gains achieved under Biden and work to weaken the right to organize, water down workplace health and safety rules, and strip overtime pay, to name but a handful of GOP wish-list items.
The latest votes by Manchin and Sinema—who are both leaving Congress after this term—sparked widespread outrage among workers' rights defenders on social media, with one account on X, formerly known as Twitter, posting: "Manchin is geriatric and Sinema has a long fruitful career ahead of her in a consulting firm that advocates child slave labor, but at least they kicked the working class in the teeth one last time. Nothing to do now but hope there's a hell."
Keep ReadingShow Less
With Defeat of Megamerger, Sanders Thanks Khan for Taking On 'Corporate Greed'
"The proposed Kroger-Albertsons merger would have led to higher prices at the grocery store and harmed workers," said the Vermont senator.
Dec 11, 2024
Praise for Federal Trade Commission Chair Lina Khan continued to pour in on Wednesday after a pair of judges blocked the merger of grocery chains Kroger and Albertsons following challenges by the FTC and state attorneys general.
"The proposed Kroger-Albertsons merger would have led to higher prices at the grocery store and harmed workers," said U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders. "Let me thank FTC Chair Lina Khan for successfully fighting this merger and standing up to corporate greed."
Congressman Mark Pocan (D-Wis.) also welcomed the rulings and sent "a big thank you to Lina Khan and her team at the FTC."
Their comments on Wednesday followed similar applause from Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Rep. Pramila Jayapal as well as groups including the American Economic Liberties Project (AELP) and Groundwork Collaborative.
Khan addressed the win during a Tuesday stream with political commentator Hasan Piker, noting that "this is the first time that the FTC has ever sought to block a merger not just because it's gonna be bad for consumers, but also because it's gonna be bad for workers."
Khan, an appointee of outgoing Democratic President Joe Biden, has won praise from progressives for taking on not only grocery giants and other companies trying to build monopolies but also Big Pharma and Big Tech.
Sanders recently called her "the best FTC chair in modern history" and AELP earlier this year published a document detailing how, under Khan's leadership, the agency "has entered a new era of more effective, modern, and democratic enforcement to better protect consumers, workers, and independent businesses."
Examples included in the AELP roundup include Khan's "crackdown on deceptive 'junk fees,'" a ban on noncompete clauses that's being challenged in court, a historic lawsuit against Amazon.com, and a "click-to-cancel" rule that requires sellers to "make it as easy for consumers to cancel their enrollment as it was to sign up."
However, the new era of the FTC is set to soon come to an end. Since President-elect Donald Trump's victory last month, speculation has been building that he would replace Khan with someone who would do the bidding of big business. Amid celebrations of the rulings against the Kroger-Albertsons merger on Tuesday, the Republican announced Andrew Ferguson as his pick for chair.
As Common Dreamsreported earlier Wednesday, Basel Musharbash, principal attorney at Antimonopoly Counsel, said that elevating Ferguson, who already sits on the FTC, to chair, "is an affront to the antitrust laws and a gift to the oligarchs and monopolies bleeding this country dry."
Although the agency is expected to be friendlier to mergers under the next Trump administration, Albertsons responded to the Tuesday rulings by bailing on the $24.6 billion deal and suing Kroger for billions of dollars on Wednesday, rather than appealing or moving to in-house FTC hearings.
That move could reflect industry fears of U.S. courts that are willing to block major mergers, as The Prospect executive editor David Dayen pointed out after the federal court decision on Tuesday.
"The important thing here is not that Biden's enforcers blocked a merger... it's that courts are increasingly comfortable with merger enforcement," he said. "States can sue under the Sherman Act, and they will. The real change to track is in the judiciary. Wall Street, take note."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Watchdog Says Wray Should Not Assist Trump's Attack on FBI by Resigning
"FBI directors are given 10-year terms for a reason: to insulate them from political pressure," said Robert Weissman, co-president of Public Citizen.
Dec 11, 2024
Current FBI Director Christopher Wray announced Wednesday that he will depart his post when President Joe Biden's term ends in January—a move that drew criticism from the watchdog group Public Citizen.
Public Citizen co-president Robert Weissman pointed out that Wray's planned departure follows President-elect Donald Trump's threat to fire him.
"FBI directors are given 10-year terms for a reason: to insulate them from political pressure. To defend the vital independence of the FBI, Director Wray should not preemptively resign in face of Donald Trump's bad-faith threats to remove him," Weissman said in a statement.
Patel, who served as chief of staff to acting Secretary of Defense Christopher Miller at the end of Trump's first term, was characterized by The Associated Press earlier this year as a "trusted aide and swaggering campaign surrogate who mythologizes the former president while promoting conspiracy theories and his own brand."
Some of Patel's past statements have alarmed critics, who worry he may be willing to weaponize the agency to go after political enemies or media critics of Trump.
"We will go out and find the conspirators, not just in government, but in the media. Yes, we're going to come after the people in the media who lied about American citizens, who helped Joe Biden rig presidential elections," he said during an appearance on former Trump advisor Steve Bannon's War Room podcast last year.
Weissman said that "if Donald Trump fires [Wray], so be it. But Wray should not aid and abet the effort to weaponize the FBI by bowing out in advance."
Weissman was not the only person to criticize Wray along these lines: "A profile in courage, Chris Wray is not. Wray bowed to political pressure; his early resignation is the easy way out. It avoids a very public conversation when Trump inevitably would have fired him," wrote Anthony Coley, an analyst at NBC News, CNBC, and MSNBC.
In announcing his decision to leave, Wray said the choice "is the best way to avoid dragging the bureau deeper into the fray, while reinforcing the values and principles that are so important to how we do our work," according to The New York Times.
He also struck a wistful tone. "This is not easy for me," Wray said, per the Times. "I love this place, I love our mission, and I love our people."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular