March, 03 2009, 06:59pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Almerindo Ojeda, 530-752-3046,
530-574-4865, humanrights@ucdavis.edu
Stephen Abraham, 949-706-5903 (w),
949-878-8608 (m), sabraham@falawyers.com
Colby Vokey, 214-237-0900,
214-697-0274, cvokey@fhsulaw.com
Daniel Schuman, Communications Dir. and Counsel, Constitution Project, 202-580-6922
Military Experts and Scholars Call for Presidential Commission on Post 9/11 Detention Policy
A day
before the Senate Judiciary Committee will hold hearings on whether to
investigate post-9/11 detention policies, a group of leading scholars, human
rights specialists, and retired military officers has issued a statement
calling on President Obama to create a commission of inquiry to investigate
those matters.
WASHINGTON
A day
before the Senate Judiciary Committee will hold hearings on whether to
investigate post-9/11 detention policies, a group of leading scholars, human
rights specialists, and retired military officers has issued a statement
calling on President Obama to create a commission of inquiry to investigate
those matters.
"At
this moment of national renewal, it is important to face the future armed with
a thorough understanding of the past," said Almerindo Ojeda, the group's
co-founder and principal investigator for the Guantanamo Testimonials Project
of the University of California-Davis Center for the Study of Human Rights in
the Americas.
Calling
itself the Davis Group, the 13-member organization includes scholars, retired
military officers, human rights specialists, practicing attorneys who have
represented detainees held at Guantanamo Bay, Bagram and other locations,
individuals with experience in conducting previous government commissions,
intelligence specialists, and constitutional rights experts. Members include
retired U.S. Army Reserves Lt. Col. Stephen Abraham; Salomon Lerner Febres,
president of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, Republic of Peru;
retired U.S. Marine Corps Lt. Col. Colby Vokey; and Eugene R. Fidell, president
of National Institute of Military Justice. (Full roster below.)
The
group's statement, submitted to the Senate Judiciary Committee and included
below, calls for the creation of an independent, nonpartisan commission
comprised of respected experts and charged with issuing a final report within
two years. The commission would possess subpoena powers, be granted appropriate
security clearances, possess the ability to receive testimony of foreign
witnesses, and have the power to grant limited testimonial immunity. However,
its actions should not impede other avenues of accountability or related
efforts to effect reforms, prosecutions or reparations, the statement
emphasizes.
"An
independent and nonpartisan commission of inquiry is the essential first step
to achieving President Obama's goals of reforming U.S. detention policy and
safeguarding against future abuses. The American people deserve a full
accounting of the facts and policies relating to the capture, detention,
transfer, interrogation, and treatment of persons who have been detained by, or
transferred for detention by others at the direction of, the United States
since September 11, 2001," said Hope Metcalf, director of the National
Litigation Project of the Allard K. Lowenstein International Human Rights
Clinic at Yale Law School.
Former
Army Reserves Lt. Col. Abraham, an attorney, said that U.S. detention policies have eroded
the moral foundations upon which the nation is built.
"When
this nation faltered from its moral footing, we damaged our intelligence
efforts, our national security, and our international standing,which
cannot easily be measured but will assuredly be felt for years if not
generations to come," Abraham said.
While
some maintain that expanded executive powers and the use of torture have been
necessary and appropriate to protect our national security, Vokey, a former
Marine Corps lawyer, counters that the measures have made the nation less safe.
"The
abuse of detainees continues to threaten the security of our own military
forces, undermining both our moral authority and our ability to protect U.S. forces in
the future," Vokey said. "Only through an independent, nonpartisan,
transparent and thorough investigation into the facts, circumstances and
policies employed in response to the Sept. 11 attacks can we begin to
objectively assess what has been done in the name of the American people and
restore our nation's great history," said Vokey.
Ojeda,
whose Guantanamo Testimonials Project has gathered accounts of Guantanamo experiences
from hundreds of detainees, FBI agents, interrogators, military physicians and
lawyers, said that an effective commission must be able to gather overseas
evidence.
"We
need to listen to the individuals who have been the most affected by these
practices and policies-the detainees themselves," Ojeda said. "The
technical and political costs involved will pale in comparison to the gains it
will yield. Not just to establish the facts, but also to strengthen U.S. relations
with key allies in the fight against terrorism."
The
Davis Group first met Jan. 16-18 at UC Davis. It continues to work toward the
goal of establishing a U.S. Commission of Inquiry into U.S. detention
policies and practices.
* * *
THE DAVIS GROUP*
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A
COMMISSION OF INQUIRY
INTO U.S.
DETENTION POLICIES AND PRACTICES SINCE 9/11
1. Commission and
Mandate. The President of the United
States should appoint an Independent Commission of Inquiry into U.S. Detention
Policies and Practices Since 9/11 ("the Commission on Detentions") to provide a
full accounting of the facts, circumstances and policies relating to the
capture, detention, transfer, interrogation, and treatment of persons who have
been detained by, or transferred for detention by others at the direction of,
the United States since September 11, 2001. The mandate of the Commission on
Detentions should also include, but not be limited to, assessing the legality
of such policies and practices, making recommendations it deems appropriate,
and identifying any lessons learned.
2. The Need for
the Commission on Detentions. Like
President Obama, many Americans have expressed concerns that the detention,
transfer, and treatment of detainees in U.S. custody carried out under expanded
powers of the government have eroded the moral foundations upon which our
country was built and undermined our national security and military objectives.
Others maintain, however, that such expanded powers have been necessary and
appropriate to protect our national security. It is only through an
independent, nonpartisan, transparent, and thorough investigation into the
facts, circumstances, and policies employed in response to the September 11
attacks, that we can begin to objectively assess what has been done in the name
of the American people.
3. Composition. The Commission on Detentions should be nonpartisan rather
than bipartisan in its composition. Its members should be men and women with a
demonstrated commitment to truth and to our nation's founding principles.
Commissioners should be individuals of irreproachable integrity, credibility,
and independence. Retired military officers, judges, government officials,
attorneys, intelligence officials, leading academics and human rights experts
are examples of the types of members that should be sought. The Commission
should be supported by adequate staff with appropriate expertise to carry out
the mandate of the Commission.
4. Security
Clearances. In a manner consistent with
existing procedures and requirements, members and appropriate staff of the
Commission on Detentions should be granted such security clearances as are
necessary to perform the functions of the Commission.
5. Subpoena
Powers. Congress should grant the
Commission on Detentions the authority of compulsory process, including
subpoena power, in furtherance of its mandate.
6. Testimonial
Immunity. In order to secure full and
truthful disclosures to the Commission on Detentions, and in recognition of the
Constitutional right of witnesses against self-incrimination, the Commission
should have the authority, at its discretion, to grant limited testimonial
immunity to witnesses.
7. Other Remedial
Efforts. The Commission on Detentions
should not impede other avenues of accountability or related efforts to effect
reforms, prosecutions, or reparations.
8. Foreign
Testimony. In order to thoroughly
investigate and evaluate U.S.
detention practices, the Commission on Detentions should solicit testimony and
reports from foreign nationals, including former detainees, other nations, and
non-governmental and international organizations. Robust efforts to include
overseas evidence will also buttress the credibility of the Commission's
findings, thereby strengthening foreign relations with our allies and our
national security. The Commissions on Detentions may hear such evidence in
person, when practical, or through alternative means such as remote testimony
or reports of investigative efforts.
9. Transparency. The Commission on Detentions should carry out its mandate
as openly and transparently as considerations of privacy and national security
will allow.
10. Reporting. The Commission on Detentions should convey its findings by
issuing one report in two versions-one public, the other classified. This
report should provide the full accounting of the facts, circumstances and
policies called for in the Commission's mandate, as well as make
recommendations, and identify lessons learned. The public version should
contain as much information as may be publicly disclosed. The second version
should be classified but only to the extent strictly necessary to protect any
classified information contained therein. Both versions should be released
simultaneously.
11. Duration. The Commission on Detentions should issue its report no
later than two years after it is convened.
12. Funding. The
Commission on Detentions should be funded at levels that will enable it to
carry out its mandate. These should be comparable to the levels of funding of
the 9/11 Commission. The funds are to remain available until expended or until
the Commission issues its reports.
The points of contact for The
Davis Group are:
- The Constitution Project, Daniel Schuman, Director of Communications and
Counsel at (202) 580-6922 or dschuman@constitutionproject.org - Colby Vokey at (214) 237-0900, (214) 697-0274 or cvokey@fhsulaw.com
- Stephen Abraham at
(949) 706-5903, (949) 878-8608 or sabraham@falawyers.com - Almerindo Ojeda at humanrights@ucdavis.edu
In witness whereof, the
undersigned signatures of members of The Davis Group have been affixed this
third day of March, 2009.
/s/
Stephen E. Abraham
Stephen E. Abraham
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Reserve (Ret.)
Law Offices of Stephen Abraham
Newport Beach,
California
/s/
Mark Denbeaux
Mark Denbeaux*
Professor of Law
Director, Seton Hall Law School Center for Policy and Research
Seton Hall Law School
/s/
Buz Eisenberg
Buz Eisenberg
Weinberg & Garber, P.C.
Northhampton,
Massachusetts
Chairman, International Justice Network Board of Directors
/s/
Eugene R. Fidell
Florence Rogatz Visiting Lecturer in Law
Assistant Professor of Human
Rights Law
Yale Law School
President, National Institute of
Military Justice
/s/ Tina Monshipour Foster
Tina Monshipour Foster
Executive Director
International Justice
Network
/s/ Kathleen Kelly
Kathleen Kelly
Clinical Teaching Fellow
International
Human Rights Clinic
Stanford
Law School
/s/
Ramzi Kassem
Ramzi Kassem
Lecturer in Law
Yale Law School
/s/
Salomon Lerner Febres
Salomon Lerner Febres
President, Truth and Reconciliation
Commission
Republic
of Peru
President Emeritus, Pontificia
Universidad Catolica del Peru
/s/
Michael Meltsner
Michael Meltsner*
Matthews Distinguished University
Professor of Law
Northeastern University School
of Law
Boston, Massachusetts
/s/
Hope Metcalf
Hope Metcalf
Director, National Litigation
Project of the
Allard K. Lowenstein International
Human Rights Clinic
Clinic Lecturer in Law
Yale Law School
/s/Becky
L. Monroe
The Constitution Project
Washington D.C.
Contact: Becky L. Monroe, Policy
Counsel
/s/
Almerindo E. Ojeda
Almerido E. Ojeda
Director, Center for the Study of
Human Rights in the Americas
University of California at Davis
/s/
Barbara Olshansky
Barbara Olshansky
Leah Kaplan Visiting Professor in
Human Rights
Stanford
Law School
/s/
Colby Vokey
Colby Vokey
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Marine Corps (Ret.)
Attorney at Law
Fitzpatrick Hagood Smith & Uhl
LLP
Dallas, Texas
/s/
Elizabeth A. Wilson
Elizabeth A. Wilson
Whitehead
School of Diplomacy and International Relations
Seton Hall University
[*] The
Davis Group is an assemblage of individuals with diverse experiences and
backgrounds, including: scholars; retired military officers; human rights
specialists; practicing attorneys who have represented detainees held at Guantanamo Bay, Bagram and other locations;
individuals with experience in conducting previous government commissions;
intelligence specialists; and Constitutional rights experts. The Group first
met January 16-18, 2009 at the University
of California, Davis. The Davis Group continues to work
toward the goal of establishing a United States Commission of Inquiry into U.S.
detention policies and practices and has, since the original meeting, added
several other experts who concur with this recommendation. These additional
signatories are annotated by an asterisk (*) next to their name.
The Constitution Project is a politically independent think tank established in 1997 to promote and defend constitutional safeguards. More information about the Constitution Project is available at https://constitutionproject.org/.
LATEST NEWS
Head of Bombed Gaza Hospital Appeals Directly to Biden
"You have destroyed the international rules of the game, insulted the authority of the U.N., torn apart the sense of justice... and tarnished the face of human civilization."
Nov 21, 2023
The director of the aid group that runs the Indonesian Hospital in Gaza—where Israeli attacks killed at least a dozen people on Monday—appealed directly to U.S. President Joe Biden, imploring him to push Israel to accept a cease-fire in a war that's killed or maimed more than 40,000 Palestinians.
"Gazans are facing death every day. Every five minutes, a Palestinian child is killed," Sarbini Abdul Murad, head of Medical Emergency Rescue Committee (MER-C) Indonesia, wrote in a letter to Biden.
Noting that Israeli forces have attacked "babies, children, women, the elderly, the disabled, hospitals, ambulances, medics, schools, teachers, residential complexes, worship places, and much more," Murad asserted that "this is completely genocide and ethnic cleansing."
"It is very unfortunate that your siding with Israel by facilitating weapons of mass destruction has actually made the conflict even wider," Murad continued. "Your action clearly contradicts various international treaties and agreements that apply to the existence of Palestine. You have destroyed the international rules of the game, insulted the authority of the [United Nations], torn apart the sense of justice, hurt human values, and tarnished the face of human civilization."
"Mr. President, we believe you still have a conscience," Murad wrote. "Your great country certainly wants to be seen as honorable for its humanitarian defenses. Moreover, your administration has determined to make the principles of multilateralism, justice, and human rights the foundation of United States foreign policy. So, actually, this is the right to prove it."
Urging Biden to "avoid double standards in dealing with the Palestinian-Israeli conflict," Murad added: "For the sake of peace and humanity, we demand that you immediately do [a] cease-fire. Restore the dignity of the United States as a country that upholds human rights. The cease-fire must be implemented now, so as not to increase the loss of life on both sides."
Murad's letter came as Israel Defense Forces tanks surrounded the Indonesian Hospital in northern Gaza after IDF artillery shelling killed 12 people in the facility's compound, including patients and their companions, according to the Gaza Health Ministry. The ministry also said many people were wounded in the attack, including patients in critical condition.
"The attack is a clear violation of international humanitarian laws. All countries, especially those that have close relations with Israel, must use all their influence and capabilities to urge Israel to stop its atrocities," Indonesian Foreign Minister Retno Marsudi said Monday.
According to Gaza officials, there are about 700 patients, staff, and other Palestinians trapped in the Indonesian Hospital. People trying to flee the compound have reportedly come under Israeli fire.
Marwan Abdallah, a medical worker at hospital, toldAl Jazeera that Israeli tanks could be seen maneuvering around the compound.
"You can see them moving around and firing," Abdallah said. "Women and children are terrified. There are constant sounds of explosions and gunfire."
The World Health Organization (WHO) said it is "appalled" by the attacks on Indonesian Hospital.
"Health workers and civilians should never have to be exposed to such horror, and especially while inside a hospital," the agency said in a statement.
"There have been multiple and ongoing attacks on health facilities in the last six weeks, that have resulted in forced mass evacuations from hospitals, and multiple fatalities and casualties among patients, their companions, and those who had sought refuge in hospitals," WHO continued.
"The Indonesian Hospital had already reportedly sustained damages due to at least five attacks since October 7," the organization added, referring to the date when Israel began bombarding Gaza by air, land, and sea following the Hamas-led attacks on southern Israel that killed around 1,200 people, with another 240 or so taken hostage.
"The world cannot stand silent while these hospitals, which should be safe havens, are transformed into scenes of death, devastation, and despair."
"WHO has recorded 335 attacks on healthcare in the occupied Palestinian territory since October 7, including 164 attacks in the Gaza Strip and 171 attacks in the West Bank," WHO noted. "There were also 33 attacks on healthcare in Israel during the violent events of October 7."
"The world cannot stand silent while these hospitals, which should be safe havens, are transformed into scenes of death, devastation, and despair," the agency added.
On Tuesday, Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), or Doctors Without Borders, said two of its physicians—Drs. Mahmoud Abu Nujaila and Ahmad Al Sahar—were killed along with another doctor, Ziad Al-Tatari, in a strike on al-Awda Hospital in northern Gaza.
"We condemn this strike in the strongest terms, and call yet again for the respect and protection of medical facilities, staff, and patients," MSF said in a statement.
Israeli officials
claim Hamas and other Palestinian militants are using hospitals as headquarters. However, Israel has provided no proof to support its allegations, which Palestinian and international medical professionals working in the facilities resoundingly refute.
According to Palestine's WAFANews Agency, at least 205 Palestinian medical workers have been killed by Israeli bombs and bullets during the war.
The WHO said Tuesday that one of its employees, Dima Alhaj, was killed in an Israeli attack on Gaza alongside her husband, their 6-month-old baby, and two of the woman's brothers.
Israel and Hamas appeared close to reaching a Qatar-brokered multiday cease-fire agreement on Tuesday, with hard-right holdouts in Israel's government—most notably, National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich—opposed to the deal, which would reportedly involve the release of around 50 civilian hostages held by Hamas and of Palestinian women and children imprisoned by Israel.
Gaza officials said Tuesday that the death toll from Israel's 46-day onslaught rose to at least 14,128, including over 3,900 women and 5,800 children. Tens of thousands more Palestinians have been wounded, nearly 1.7 million others have been forcibly displaced, and around half of all homes in the embattled strip have been damaged or destroyed.
Keep ReadingShow Less
200 Private Jet Owners Burned as Much CO2 as 40,000 Brits
The planes tracked by a new Guardian report belong to celebrities, billionaires, CEOs, and their families, among them the Murdoch family, Taylor Swift, and the Rolling Stones.
Nov 21, 2023
The private jets of just 200 rich and famous individuals or groups released around 415,518 metric tons of climate-heating carbon dioxide between January 2022 and September 22, 2023, The Guardian revealed Tuesday.
That's equal to the emissions burned by nearly 40,000 British residents in all aspects of their lives, the newspaper calculated.
The planes tracked by the outlet belong to celebrities, billionaires, CEOs, and their families, among them the Murdoch family, Taylor Swift, and the Rolling Stones. All told, the high-flyers made a total of 44,739 trips during the study period for a combined 11 years in the air.
"Pollution for wasteful luxury has to be the first to go, we need a ban on private jets."
Notable emitters included the Blavatnik family, the Murdoch family, and Eric Schmidt, whose flights during the 21-month study period released more than 7,500 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent. The Sawiris family emitted around 7,500 metric tons, and Lorenzo Fertitta more than 5,000.
The Rolling Stones' Boeing 767 wide-body aircraft released around 5,046 metric tons of carbon dioxide, which is equal to 1,763 economy flights from London to New York. The 39 jets owned by 30 Russian oligarchs released 30,701 metric tons of carbon dioxide.
For comparison, average per capita emissions were 14.44 metric tons in the U.S. for 2022, 13.52 metric tons in Russia in 2021, and 5.2 metric tons in the U.K. the same year.
Taylor Swift was the only celebrity or billionaire in the report whose team responded to a request for comment.
"Before the tour kicked off in March of 2023, Taylor bought more than double the carbon credits needed to offset all tour travel," a spokesperson for the pop star told The Guardian.
Swift appears to have responded to public pressure to reduce private jet use. Her plane averaged 19 flights a month between January and August 2022, when she received criticism after sustainability firm Yard named her the celebrity who used her plane the most. After that point, the plane's average monthly flights dropped to two.
The Guardian's investigation was based on private aircraft registrations compiled by TheAirTraffic Database and flight records from OpenSky. Reporters calculated flight emissions based on model information found in the ADSBExchange Aircraft database and Planespotters.net and emissions per hour per model found in the Conklin & De Decker's CO2 calculator and the Eurocontrol emission calculator.
The report was released the day after an Oxfam study found that the world's richest 1% emitted the same amount as its poorest two-thirds. Given their high carbon footprint and luxury status, private jets have emerged as a rallying point for the climate justice movement.
"It's hugely unfair that rich people can wreck the climate this way, in just one flight polluting more than driving a car 23,000 kilometers," Greenpeace E.U. transport campaigner Thomas Gelin said in March. "Pollution for wasteful luxury has to be the first to go, we need a ban on private jets."
In the U.S., a group of climate campaigners is mobilizing to stop the expansion of Massachusetts' Hanscom Field, the largest private jet field in New England. An October report found that flights from that field between January 1, 2022, and July 15, 2023, released a total of 106,676 tons of carbon emissions.
"While plenty of business is no doubt discussed over golf at Aberdeen, Scotland, or at bird hunting reserves in Argentina (destinations we also documented), this is probably the least defensible form of luxury travel on a warming planet when a Zoom call would often do," Chuck Collins, who co-authored the Hanscom report, wrote for Fortune on November 14.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Israel-Hamas Hostage Deal Reportedly in 'Final Stages'
The leader of Hamas and Israel's prime minister both confirmed progress on a potential agreement to pause fighting and release hostages.
Nov 21, 2023
This is a developing story... Check back for possible updates...
Israel and Hamas are reportedly on the verge of a deal that would involve the release of hostages and a pause in bombing that has killed more than 13,000 people in Gaza and intensified the strip's humanitarian crisis.
An unnamed source briefed on the talks toldReuters on Tuesday that negotiations are in the "final stages" and a deal is "closer than it has ever been" since October 7, when a Hamas-led attack on southern Israel killed around 1,200 people.
The Qatar-mediated deal, according to Reuters, "envisages the release of around 50 civilian hostages by Hamas and of female and minor-aged Palestinian detainees from Israeli custody, as well as a multi-day pause in fighting."
Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh confirmed Tuesday that a "deal on a truce" with Israel is "close." Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that "we are making progress" on a hostage agreement and hopes "there will be good news soon."
Netanyahu rejected a similar proposal earlier this month.
News of a potential deal comes after six weeks of Israeli bombing that has leveled much of the Gaza Strip, destroying homes and other civilian infrastructure, killing thousands of children, and displacing more than a million people. Additionally, Israel's siege has prevented adequate humanitarian aid from reaching desperate Gazans, leaving virtually the entire population at risk of starvation and forcing hospitals in the northern part of the strip to shut down.
A spokesperson for Gaza's Health Ministry toldAl Jazeera on Tuesday that the occupancy rate in northern Gaza's hospitals has reached 190%, overrun with victims of Israeli airstrikes.
Philippe Lazzarini, commissioner-general of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), said in a speech Tuesday that "the people of Gaza are not safe anywhere: not at home, not under the U.N. flag, not in a hospital, not in the north, and not in the south."
"More than 900,000 people are sheltering in UNRWA installations, including in the north," said Lazzarini. "The conditions in these shelters are indescribable. They are massively overcrowded and shockingly unsanitary. On average, 150 people share a single toilet and 700 people share a single shower when available. These are breeding grounds for despair and disease."
A negotiated multi-day pause could allow additional humanitarian aid to enter Gaza, but it's unlikely that will be enough to alleviate emergency conditions in the Gaza Strip.
"We need an immediate humanitarian cease-fire," Lazzarini said. "We need respect for international humanitarian law so civilians are protected, and humanitarian organizations can work unhindered. We need a meaningful supply of humanitarian aid and commercial goods flowing into Gaza. The siege must be lifted."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular