January, 13 2009, 06:26pm EDT
USDA Secretary Nominee Causes Dustup in Organic Industry
Obama Administration Challenged to Clean up Bush's Organic Mess
WASHINGTON
As former Iowa Governor Tom Vilsack begins his confirmation hearings in
Congress, a controversy is brewing in the organic food and farming industry
concerning his appointment.
For the last eight years, Bush administration officials at the USDA
have been widely criticized for "monkeywrenching" the National
Organic Program. They have been accused of not enforcing the law and,
among other improprieties, allowing giant factory farms to produce organic
milk, meat, and eggs.
Understandably, the industry viewed Barack Obama's election as a likely
turning point. "We were and still are optimistic that when Mr. Obama
talked about 'change' during his campaign, that he included a shift
away from corporate agribusiness domination at the USDA," said Mark Kastel, Senior Farm Policy Analyst at The
Cornucopia Institute.
Over 130,000 petition signatures have been collected by two advocacy
groups, urging the Obama transition team to appoint a USDA secretary who would
embody that change. When Obama tapped former Governor Tom Vilsack, an Iowa lawyer with strong
past backing for genetic engineering and a close relationship with corporate
agribusiness interests, some organic proponents expressed their opposition.
The Organic Consumers Association, the largest group of its nature, is
now in the midst of a pressure campaign, backed by 40,000 signatures, calling on Congress to reject the
Vilsack nomination.
The success of the Organic Consumer Association's outreach prompted a
group of the organic industry's corporate CEOs to launch their own
counter petition drive in support of the Obama nominee.
Officers of some of the largest corporate entities like Whole Foods,
Stonyfield and United Natural Foods Inc., the nation's near-monopoly organic
and natural foods distributor, have signed on in support of Mr. Vilsack.
Their petition, totaling about 500 signatories, includes many Iowa residents who personally worked with
Mr. Vilsack when he was governor.
"We hate to see what appears to be the grassroots lining up in
opposition of this nominee and corporate investors breaking with their most
dedicated customers. This split is not healthy for the organic
community," Kastel added.
Although The Cornucopia Institute is not endorsing either petition
drive, they have not given up hope
that the election of Barack Obama will usher in material changes at the USDA's
National Organic Program.
"Mr. Obama has made it clear that he will be the CEO of the new executive
branch management team," Kastel added. We fully expect, whether or
not Mr. Vilsack is confirmed, which appears likely, that the White House will
reinstate transparency and a sense of dedication to serving the public at what
Lincoln called the 'People's Department.'"
President-Elect Obama, and his family, will be the first residents of
the White House with a history of eating, and support for, organic food.
In a candid communique to the Obama transition team, The Cornucopia
Institute described the USDA's National Organic Program (NOP) as
"dysfunctional" and experiencing a "crisis in confidence"
and asked for the Obama administration to make its rehabilitation a priority.
Their letter described the NOP's long-standing adversarial
relationship with the majority of organic farmers and consumers and the groups
that represent them. It said, based on information gathered from freedom
of information documents: "Senior management, with oversight of the NOP,
has treated industry stakeholders arrogantly and disrespectfully and has
overridden NOP career staff when their findings might have been unfavorable to
corporations with interests in the organic industry."
"We would strongly recommend, as many public corporations do when
trying to regain shareholder and Wall Street confidence, that the Department
bring in a highly respected and skilled individual from the outside to run this
program," added Kastel.
Cornucopia has backed a widely circulated list of progressive
agricultural policy experts as potential sub-Cabinet level appointees including
Kathleen Merrigan, Ph.D.,
a food policy professor at Tufts University as well as a former top
USDA administrator, and James Riddle, currently with the University of
Minnesota, who is an organic farming and certification expert and former
chairman of the USDA's National Organic Standards Board (NOSB).
"We expect that the new Obama leadership at the USDA will fully
respect the intent of Congress by vigorously enforcing the organic regulations,
protecting ethical farmers and the nation's consumers," said Will Fantle,
Cornucopia's Research Director and cofounder of the Wisconsin-based farm policy
research group.
In addition to having a program staff devoid of professional or
academic backgrounds in organic agriculture, the USDA has been sharply
criticized for "stacking" the NOSB, the expert advisory panel set up
by Congress, with corporate interests.
Audits prepared by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and
the Inspector General's office were damning in their criticism of the program's
failure to respect the NOSB's Congressionally mandated purview over policy and
the program's failure to carry out its most fundamental
responsibility-oversight and accreditation of the nation's network of
independent organic certifiers.
"If confirmed by Congress, we stand ready to work with former
Governor Vilsack to create an organic program within the USDA that the Obama
administration can truly be proud of and that will help grow a segment of the
agricultural industry that shows so much promise for our rural economies and
the health of our citizenry," stated Kastel.
- 30 -
MORE:
Copies of the audits of the National Organic Program by the American
National Standards Institute and the office of the Inspector General at the
USDA are available upon request: kastel@cornucopia.org
An organizing campaign, by Food Democracy Now, supporting a dozen
"progressive" candidates for sub-Cabinet appointments at the USDA
(originally the list was circulated as suggestions to the Obama transition team
for Secretary), and now including over 69,000 electronic signatures, can be
found at: https://www.fooddemocracynow.org/
The Organic Consumers Association petition, currently with over 40,000
names, opposing the confirmation of former Governor Tom Vilsack, can be viewed
at:
https://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/642/petition.jsp?petition_KEY=1783
The petition, and signatories, organized by corporate officials of a
number of the nation's leading organic brands can be viewed at:
https://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/support-vilsack-for-secretary-of-agriculture/
Although the organizers of the industry-backed petition include many
corporate officers, and a few nonprofit advocacy groups, some that get the
majority of their financial backing from corporate interests in the organic
industry, the list includes many respected individuals, including farmers from Iowa, and even relatives
of the former Governor. Their petition drive states a goal of 10,000
electronic signatures. The list stands currently at 539 (PM/CST on
1-13-09).
"Because of the blowback that the Vilsack nomination has garnered
in the organic and sustainable farming communities, it would be an astute
political move to come right out of the
blocks with a strong affirmation, on the record, in support of the
wholesale housecleaning at the USDA's organic program," stated
Kastel. "A positive statement on organics now, by Mr. Vilsack,
should satisfy both the corporate and grassroots factions now competing in the
(organic) marketplace of ideas.
"During Governor Vilsack's tenure in office, Iowa was one of the
early states investing in an organic program at their department of
agriculture, and its land grant university started addressing the needs of
organic farmers," added Kastel. "We hope that history is
representative of how the nominee will balance competing interests within the
department."
Even though a handful of giant industrial-scale farms are producing a
growing share of the nation's organic milk, meat, and eggs, the majority of all
organic brands still get their produce and commodities from ethical,
family-scale farmers.
A scorecard, listing the nation's 110+ organic dairy brands, can be
found on The Cornucopia Institute website: www.cornucopia.org.
The Cornucopia Institute, a Wisconsin-based nonprofit farm policy research group, is dedicated to the fight for economic justice for the family-scale farming community. Their Organic Integrity Project acts as a corporate and governmental watchdog assuring that no compromises to the credibility of organic farming methods and the food it produces are made in the pursuit of profit.
LATEST NEWS
Israeli Raid on UNRWA Compound Slammed as 'Dangerous Precedent'
"This latest action represents a blatant disregard of Israel’s obligation as a United Nations member state to protect and respect the inviolability of UN premises," said UNRWA chief Philippe Lazzarini.
Dec 08, 2025
United Nations officials and others strongly condemned Monday's raid by Israeli authorities on a facility run by the UN's office for Palestinian refugees in occupied East Jerusalem—an act one rights group decried as part of an ongoing effort "to undermine and ultimately eliminate" the lifesaving agency.
Israeli police and other officials forcibly entered the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) compound early Monday, pulling down a UN flag on the facility's roof and replacing it with an Israeli one. Israeli officials said the raid was ordered over unpaid taxes.
"They call it 'debt collection'—we call it erasure," Claudia Webbe, a socialist former member of British Parliament, said on social media. "Over 70,000 dead in Gaza, they now seek to kill the memory of the living. The occupation must end."
Police vehicles including motorcycles, trucks, and forklifts entered the compound, while communications were cut and furniture, computer equipment, and other property were seized from the facility, according to UNRWA Commissioner-General Philippe Lazzarini.
"This latest action represents a blatant disregard of Israel’s obligation as a United Nations member state to protect and respect the inviolability of UN premises," Lazzarini said in a statement.
"To allow this represents a new challenge to international law, one that creates a dangerous precedent anywhere else the UN is present across the world," he added.
Secretary-General António Guterres was among the other senior UN officials who condemned Monday's raid.
“This compound remains United Nations premises and is inviolable and immune from any other form of interference,” he said.
“I urge Israel to immediately take all necessary steps to restore, preserve, and uphold the inviolability of UNRWA premises and to refrain from taking any further action with regard to UNRWA premises, in line with its obligations under the charter of the United Nations and its other obligations under international law," Guterres added.
In late 2024, Israeli lawmakers approved a ban on UNRWA in Israel over disproven allegations that some of its staffers were Hamas members who took part in the October 7, 2023 attack. Those accusations led to numerous nations suspending financial support for UNRWA, although most of the countries have since restored funding. Israel has also sought to ban UNRWA from Gaza since early 2024.
Israeli forces have killed more than 370 UNRWA staff members since October 2023 and destroyed or damaged over 300 of the agency's facilities in Gaza. Lazzarini and others have also accused Israeli forces of torturing UNRWA staffers in a bid to force false confessions of Hamas involvement.
In October, the International Court of Justice—which is currently weighing a genocide case against Israel—found that UNRWA has not been infiltrated by Hamas as claimed by Israeli leaders.
Others also condemned Monday's raid, including Human Rights Watch (HRW), which called the action part of an effort "to undermine and ultimately eliminate a United Nations agency providing vital services to millions of Palestinian refugees."
"Governments should condemn Israel's unlawful moves against UNRWA and urgently act to stop further abuses," HRW added.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Report Tracks Trump 'War on Free Speech' and Urges Systemic Resistance
“Trump’s censorship playbook," said the report's author, "is to lie, distort reality for the public, and deploy a cadre of henchmen to carry out Trump’s threats of reprisal.”
Dec 08, 2025
The US advocacy group Free Press on Monday released a report examining how President Donald Trump and "his political enablers have worked to undermine and chill the most basic freedoms protected under the First Amendment" since the Republican returned to the Oval Office in January, and called on all Americans to fight back.
For Chokehold: Donald Trump's War on Free Speech & the Need for Systemic Resistance, Free Press analysed "more than 500 reports of verbal threats, executive orders, presidential memoranda, statements from the White House, actions by regulators and agencies, military and law enforcement deployment and activities, litigation, removal of website language on .gov websites, removal of official history and information at national parks and museums, and discontinued data collection by the federal government."
"While the US government has made efforts throughout this nation's history to censor people's expression and association—be it the exercise of freedom of speech, religion, press, assembly, or the right to petition the government for redress—the Trump administration's incessant attacks on even the most tentatively oppositional speech are uniquely aggressive, pervasive, and escalating," the report states.
The five recurring attack methods that Free Press identified are: making threats of retribution against would-be opponents; emboldening regulators to exact penalties; supercharging the militarized police state; leveraging heavyweight corporate capitulation; and ignoring facts, removing information, rewriting history, and lying on the record.
"Trump's censorship playbook is responsible for the administration's central retaliatory ethos and inspires a set of strategies that loyal actors in government use to silence dissent and chill free expression," said the report's author, Free Press senior counsel Nora Benavidez, in a statement. "This playbook is to lie, distort reality for the public, and deploy a cadre of henchmen to carry out Trump’s threats of reprisal."
Big new report out today @freepress.bsky.social chronicling the Trump regime's war on free speech and free expression. Heroic and harrowing work by @attorneynora.bsky.social and the team. Seeing all of the attacks together is astounding.
[image or embed]
— Craig Aaron (@notaaroncraig.bsky.social) December 8, 2025 at 11:12 AM
Free Press compiled a timeline of "nearly 200 of the most potent examples," including Trump's blanket pardon for the January 6, 2021, insurrectionists shortly after beginning his second term, the White House taking control of the presidential press pool in February, the president's alarming speech to the US Department of Justice in March, and the administration blocking the Associated Press from the Oval Office in April over its refusal to refer to the Gulf of Mexico as the Gulf of America.
In May, Trump, among other things, signed an executive order to defund National Public Radio and Public Broadcasting Service. In June, he deployed the National Guard in Los Angeles. In July, he sued Rupert Murdoch and the Wall Street Journal for $10 billion over reporting on the president's ties to deceased sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. In August, he deployed the National Guard in Washington, DC.
In September, under pressure from Brendan Carr, Trump's Federal Communications Commission chair, ABC temporarily suspended late-night host Jimmy Kimmel. In October, the Pentagon's new press policy—which journalists across the political spectrum refused to sign—took effect (the New York Times, which faces a defamation lawsuit from Trump, sued over it last week). In November, Trump threatened to sue to BBC over its documentary about January 6, 2021.
The administration has also targeted foreign scholars and journalists for criticizing US policy, from federal support for Israel's genocidal assault on Palestinians in the Gaza Strip to the president's pursuit of mass deportations. The report stresses that "no one is safe from attack in Trump’s quest to control the message, though the administration targets the press most of all."
Today Free Press released a report examining the Trump's efforts to weaken the First Amendment.Analyzing nearly 200 attacks on free speech, it's sobering. But the report also charts a path to resist the censorship campaign w/ collective action. Our statement: www.freepress.net/news/report-...
[image or embed]
— Free Press (@freepress.bsky.social) December 8, 2025 at 2:45 PM
The publication also pushes back against "Trump's claims that he's protecting people and defending free speech," and acknowledges that "the administration's censorial tactics are amassing tremendous resistance across political and geographic lines, with a majority of people worried about the government's attacks on free speech."
Benavidez emphasized that "if only one person speaks out against injustice, their speech is notable, but it is also more vulnerable to attack and subversion under this administration."
"If more people speak out against injustice, the collective drumbeat can more easily withstand government reprisals," she continued. "Democracies erode little by little; would-be dictators need to scare only some of us, and the rest will follow. The very reason we must speak out together is so we can leverage our collective power."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Trump Envoy Ripped for Claim That 'Benevolent Monarchy' Is Best for Middle East
"The US labels dictators and monarchies benevolent when their behavior is aligned with US interest and when their behavior isn’t aligned with US interest they are despots," said one critic.
Dec 08, 2025
Tom Barrack, President Donald Trump's ambassador to Turkey and special envoy for Syria, faced backlash Monday after arguing that US-backed Middle Eastern monarchies—most of which are ruled by prolific human rights violators—offer the best model for governing nations in the tumultuous region.
Speaking at the Doha Forum in Qatar on Sunday, Barrack, who is also a billionaire real estate investor, cautioned against trying to impose democratic governance on the Middle East, noting that efforts to do so—sometimes by war or other military action—have failed.
“Every time we intervene, whether it's in Libya, Iraq, or any of the other places where we've tried to create a colonized mandate, it has not been successful," he said. "We end up with paralysis."
"I don’t see a democracy," Barrack said of the Middle East. "Israel can claim to be a democracy, but in this region, whether you like it or not, what has worked best is, in fact, a benevolent monarchy."
Addressing Syria's yearlong transition from longtime authoritarian rule under the Assad dynasty, Barrack added that the Syrian people must determine their political path "without going in with Western expectations of, 'We want a democracy in 12 months.'"
While Barrack's rejection of efforts to force democracy upon Middle Eastern countries drew praise, some Israelis bristled at what they claimed is the suggestion that their country is not a democracy, while other observers pushed back on the envoy's assertion regarding regional monarchies and use of what one Palestinian digital media platform called "classic colonial rhetoric."
"The reality on the ground is the opposite of his claim: It is the absence of democratic rights, accountable governance, and inclusive federal structures that has fueled Syria’s fragmentation, empowered militias, and pushed communities toward separatism," Syrian Kurdish journalist Ronahi Hasan said on social media.
Ronahi continued:
When an American official undermines the universal principles the US itself claims to defend, it sends a dangerous message: that Syrians do not deserve the same political rights as others and that minority communities should simply accept centralized authoritarianism as their fate.
Syria doesn’t need another foreign lecture romanticizing monarchy. It needs a political system that protects all its people—Druze, Alawite, Kurdish, Sunni, Christian—through genuine power-sharing, decentralization, and guarantees of equality.
"Federalism is not the problem," Ronahi added. "The problem is denying Syrians the right to shape their own future."
Abdirizak Mohamed, a lawmaker and former foreign minister in Somalia, said on social media: "Tom Barrack made public what is already known. The US labels dictators and monarchies benevolent when their behavior is aligned with US interest, and when their behavior isn’t aligned with US interest they are despots. Labeling dictators benevolent is [an] oxymoron that shows US hypocrisy."
For nearly a century, the US has supported Middle Eastern monarchies as successive administrations sought to gain and maintain control over the region's vast oil resources. This has often meant propping up monarchs in countries such as Saudi Arabia, Iran (before 1979), the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, and Qatar—regardless of their often horrific human rights records.
While nothing new in terms of US policy and practice in the region, the Trump administration's recently published National Security Strategy prioritizes "flexible realism" over human rights and democracy and uses more candid language than past presidents have in explaining Washington's support for repressive monarchs.
"The [US] State Department will likely need to clarify whether Barrack’s comments represent official policy or personal opinion," argued an editorial in Middle East 24. "Regardless, his words have exposed an uncomfortable truth about US foreign policy in the Middle East: the persistent gap between democratic ideals and strategic realities."
"Perhaps the most troubling aspect of this episode is what it reveals about American confidence in its own values," the editorial added. "If US diplomats no longer believe democracy can work in challenging environments, what does this say about America’s faith in the universal appeal of its founding principles?"
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


