January, 13 2009, 06:26pm EDT
USDA Secretary Nominee Causes Dustup in Organic Industry
Obama Administration Challenged to Clean up Bush's Organic Mess
WASHINGTON
As former Iowa Governor Tom Vilsack begins his confirmation hearings in
Congress, a controversy is brewing in the organic food and farming industry
concerning his appointment.
For the last eight years, Bush administration officials at the USDA
have been widely criticized for "monkeywrenching" the National
Organic Program. They have been accused of not enforcing the law and,
among other improprieties, allowing giant factory farms to produce organic
milk, meat, and eggs.
Understandably, the industry viewed Barack Obama's election as a likely
turning point. "We were and still are optimistic that when Mr. Obama
talked about 'change' during his campaign, that he included a shift
away from corporate agribusiness domination at the USDA," said Mark Kastel, Senior Farm Policy Analyst at The
Cornucopia Institute.
Over 130,000 petition signatures have been collected by two advocacy
groups, urging the Obama transition team to appoint a USDA secretary who would
embody that change. When Obama tapped former Governor Tom Vilsack, an Iowa lawyer with strong
past backing for genetic engineering and a close relationship with corporate
agribusiness interests, some organic proponents expressed their opposition.
The Organic Consumers Association, the largest group of its nature, is
now in the midst of a pressure campaign, backed by 40,000 signatures, calling on Congress to reject the
Vilsack nomination.
The success of the Organic Consumer Association's outreach prompted a
group of the organic industry's corporate CEOs to launch their own
counter petition drive in support of the Obama nominee.
Officers of some of the largest corporate entities like Whole Foods,
Stonyfield and United Natural Foods Inc., the nation's near-monopoly organic
and natural foods distributor, have signed on in support of Mr. Vilsack.
Their petition, totaling about 500 signatories, includes many Iowa residents who personally worked with
Mr. Vilsack when he was governor.
"We hate to see what appears to be the grassroots lining up in
opposition of this nominee and corporate investors breaking with their most
dedicated customers. This split is not healthy for the organic
community," Kastel added.
Although The Cornucopia Institute is not endorsing either petition
drive, they have not given up hope
that the election of Barack Obama will usher in material changes at the USDA's
National Organic Program.
"Mr. Obama has made it clear that he will be the CEO of the new executive
branch management team," Kastel added. We fully expect, whether or
not Mr. Vilsack is confirmed, which appears likely, that the White House will
reinstate transparency and a sense of dedication to serving the public at what
Lincoln called the 'People's Department.'"
President-Elect Obama, and his family, will be the first residents of
the White House with a history of eating, and support for, organic food.
In a candid communique to the Obama transition team, The Cornucopia
Institute described the USDA's National Organic Program (NOP) as
"dysfunctional" and experiencing a "crisis in confidence"
and asked for the Obama administration to make its rehabilitation a priority.
Their letter described the NOP's long-standing adversarial
relationship with the majority of organic farmers and consumers and the groups
that represent them. It said, based on information gathered from freedom
of information documents: "Senior management, with oversight of the NOP,
has treated industry stakeholders arrogantly and disrespectfully and has
overridden NOP career staff when their findings might have been unfavorable to
corporations with interests in the organic industry."
"We would strongly recommend, as many public corporations do when
trying to regain shareholder and Wall Street confidence, that the Department
bring in a highly respected and skilled individual from the outside to run this
program," added Kastel.
Cornucopia has backed a widely circulated list of progressive
agricultural policy experts as potential sub-Cabinet level appointees including
Kathleen Merrigan, Ph.D.,
a food policy professor at Tufts University as well as a former top
USDA administrator, and James Riddle, currently with the University of
Minnesota, who is an organic farming and certification expert and former
chairman of the USDA's National Organic Standards Board (NOSB).
"We expect that the new Obama leadership at the USDA will fully
respect the intent of Congress by vigorously enforcing the organic regulations,
protecting ethical farmers and the nation's consumers," said Will Fantle,
Cornucopia's Research Director and cofounder of the Wisconsin-based farm policy
research group.
In addition to having a program staff devoid of professional or
academic backgrounds in organic agriculture, the USDA has been sharply
criticized for "stacking" the NOSB, the expert advisory panel set up
by Congress, with corporate interests.
Audits prepared by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and
the Inspector General's office were damning in their criticism of the program's
failure to respect the NOSB's Congressionally mandated purview over policy and
the program's failure to carry out its most fundamental
responsibility-oversight and accreditation of the nation's network of
independent organic certifiers.
"If confirmed by Congress, we stand ready to work with former
Governor Vilsack to create an organic program within the USDA that the Obama
administration can truly be proud of and that will help grow a segment of the
agricultural industry that shows so much promise for our rural economies and
the health of our citizenry," stated Kastel.
- 30 -
MORE:
Copies of the audits of the National Organic Program by the American
National Standards Institute and the office of the Inspector General at the
USDA are available upon request: kastel@cornucopia.org
An organizing campaign, by Food Democracy Now, supporting a dozen
"progressive" candidates for sub-Cabinet appointments at the USDA
(originally the list was circulated as suggestions to the Obama transition team
for Secretary), and now including over 69,000 electronic signatures, can be
found at: https://www.fooddemocracynow.org/
The Organic Consumers Association petition, currently with over 40,000
names, opposing the confirmation of former Governor Tom Vilsack, can be viewed
at:
https://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/642/petition.jsp?petition_KEY=1783
The petition, and signatories, organized by corporate officials of a
number of the nation's leading organic brands can be viewed at:
https://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/support-vilsack-for-secretary-of-agriculture/
Although the organizers of the industry-backed petition include many
corporate officers, and a few nonprofit advocacy groups, some that get the
majority of their financial backing from corporate interests in the organic
industry, the list includes many respected individuals, including farmers from Iowa, and even relatives
of the former Governor. Their petition drive states a goal of 10,000
electronic signatures. The list stands currently at 539 (PM/CST on
1-13-09).
"Because of the blowback that the Vilsack nomination has garnered
in the organic and sustainable farming communities, it would be an astute
political move to come right out of the
blocks with a strong affirmation, on the record, in support of the
wholesale housecleaning at the USDA's organic program," stated
Kastel. "A positive statement on organics now, by Mr. Vilsack,
should satisfy both the corporate and grassroots factions now competing in the
(organic) marketplace of ideas.
"During Governor Vilsack's tenure in office, Iowa was one of the
early states investing in an organic program at their department of
agriculture, and its land grant university started addressing the needs of
organic farmers," added Kastel. "We hope that history is
representative of how the nominee will balance competing interests within the
department."
Even though a handful of giant industrial-scale farms are producing a
growing share of the nation's organic milk, meat, and eggs, the majority of all
organic brands still get their produce and commodities from ethical,
family-scale farmers.
A scorecard, listing the nation's 110+ organic dairy brands, can be
found on The Cornucopia Institute website: www.cornucopia.org.
The Cornucopia Institute, a Wisconsin-based nonprofit farm policy research group, is dedicated to the fight for economic justice for the family-scale farming community. Their Organic Integrity Project acts as a corporate and governmental watchdog assuring that no compromises to the credibility of organic farming methods and the food it produces are made in the pursuit of profit.
LATEST NEWS
Amid Spying Fight, House Passes Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act
"As FANFSA and the 702 reauthorization move to the Senate, lawmakers in that chamber need to take a stand for the rights of people in the United States," said one advocate.
Apr 17, 2024
While applauding the U.S. House of Representatives' bipartisan passage of a bill to ensure that "law enforcement and intelligence agencies can't do an end-run around the Constitution by buying information from data brokers" on Wednesday, privacy advocates highlighted that Congress is trying to extend and expand a long-abused government spying program.
The House voted 219-199 for Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act (FANFSA), which won support from 96 Democrats and 123 Republicans, including the lead sponsor, Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio). Named for the constitutional amendment that protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, H.R. 4639 would close what campaigners call the data broker loophole.
"The privacy violations that flow from law enforcement entities circumventing the Fourth Amendment undermine civil liberties, free expression, and our ability to control what happens to our data," said Free Press Action policy counsel Jenna Ruddock. "These impacts affect everyone who uses digital platforms that extract our personal information any time we open a browser or visit social media and other websites—even when we go to events like demonstrations and other places with our phones revealing our locations."
"We're grateful that the House passed these vital and popular protections," she added. "The bill would prevent flagrant abuses of our privacy by government authorities in league with unscrupulous third-party data brokers. Making this legislation into law with Senate passage too would be a decisive and long-overdue action against government misuse of this clandestine business sector that traffics in our personal data for profit."
Wednesday's vote followed the House sending the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act to the Senate. H.R. 7888 would reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which allows for warrantless spying on noncitizens abroad but also sweeps up Americans' data.
The House notably included an amendment forcing a wide range of individuals and businesses to cooperate with government spying operations but rejected an amendment that would have added a warrant requirement to the bill, which the Senate could vote on as soon as Thursday.
Noting those decisions on the FISA reauthorization legislation, Ruddock stressed that "today's vote is a victory but follows a recent loss and ongoing threat as that Section 702 bill moves to the Senate this week too."
"As FANFSA and the 702 reauthorization move to the Senate, lawmakers in that chamber need to take a stand for the rights of people in the United States," she argued. "That means passing FANFSA and reforming Section 702 authority—and prioritizing everyone's First and Fourth Amendment rights."
Jeramie Scott, senior counsel and director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center's Project on Surveillance Oversight, also praised the House's FANFSA passage on Wednesday.
"The passage of the Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale underscores the extent to which reining in abusive warrantless surveillance is a bipartisan issue," Scott said. "We urge the Senate to take up this measure and close the data broker loophole."
Kia Hamadanchy, senior policy counsel at ACLU, similarly said Wednesday that "the bipartisan passage of this bill is a flashing warning sign to the government that if it wants our data, it must get a warrant."
Hamadanchy added that "we hope this vote puts a fire under the Senate to protect their constituents and rein in the government's warrantless surveillance of Americans, once and for all."
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), a critic of the pending 702 bill and FANFSA's lead sponsor in the upper chamber, called the the House's Wednesday vote "a huge win for privacy" and said that "now it's time for the Senate to follow suit."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Leaked Cables Show Biden Pressuring Nations to Oppose Palestine's UN Membership
"This is the evidence that President Biden's talk about a two-state solution is nothing but idle talk," said one former Lebanese diplomat.
Apr 17, 2024
As the United Nations Security Council prepares to vote Thursday on Palestine's bid to become a full U.N. member, the Biden administration—which claims to support Palestinian statehood—is lobbying UNSC nations in an effort to wrangle enough "no" votes so that the United States can avoid resorting to a veto.
Leaked cables obtained by The Intercept show U.S. pressure on Security Council members including Malta—which currently presides over the body—and Ecuador.
While claiming that President Joe Biden backs "Palestinian aspirations for statehood," one of the cables asserts that "it remains the U.S. view that the most expeditious path toward a political horizon for the Palestinian people is in the context of a normalization agreement between Israel and its neighbors."
"We therefore urge you not to support any potential Security Council resolution recommending the admission of 'Palestine' as a U.N. member state, should such a resolution be presented to the Security Council for a decision in the coming days and weeks," the document advises.
The U.S. argument essentially is that the U.N. should not create an independent Palestinian state by fiat—even though that's precisely how the world body voted in 1947 to establish the modern state of Israel.
The renewed push for Palestine's U.N. membership comes as Israel wages a genocidal war on the Gaza Strip. The Palestinian Authority, which hasn't controlled Gaza for nearly two decades, rejected the Biden administration's requests to hold off on seeking full membership.
"We wanted the U.S. to provide a substantive alternative to U.N. recognition. They didn't," one unnamed Palestinian official toldAxios on Wednesday. "We believe full membership in the U.N. for Palestine is way overdue. We have waited more than 12 years since our initial request."
As The Intercept's Ken Klippenstein and Daniel Boguslaw noted:
Since 2011, the U.N. Security Council has rejected the Palestinian Authority's request for full member status. On April 2, the Palestinian Observer Mission to the U.N. requested that the council once again take up consideration of its membership application. According to the first State Department cable, U.N. meetings since the beginning of April suggest that Algeria, China, Guyana, Mozambique, Russia, Slovenia, Sierra Leone, and Malta support granting Palestine full membership to the U.N. It also says that France, Japan, and Korea are undecided, while the United Kingdom will likely abstain from a vote.
Along with the United States, China, France, Russia, and the United Kingdom are permanent members of the UNSC, so they also have veto power.
Ahead of Thursday's planned vote, Spain has been doing its own lobbying in Europe to build greater support for Palestinian statehood. At a joint Tuesday press conference with Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, Slovenian Prime Minister Robert Golob said the question is "when, not if, but when is the best moment to recognize Palestine."
Belgium—which is seeking economic sanctions against Israel in response to its genocidal war on Gaza—is expected to join Spain's push for Palestinian statehood after the country's European Union presidency expires in June.
Currently, 139 of the U.N.'s 193 member states recognize Palestine as an independent state.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu—who has also claimed to support a so-called "two-state solution"—has alternately boasted about thwarting Palestinian statehood.
Critics pointed to the leaked cables as more proof of U.S. duplicity and double standards on the Israel-Palestine issue.
"This is the evidence that President Biden's talk about a two-state solution is nothing but idle talk," Massoud Maalouf, a former Lebanese ambassador to Canada, Chile, and Poland, said on social media.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Database Exposes 'Illicit Network Undermining Democracy Around the World'
Yanis Varoufakis hailed the effort as "a treasure chest of well-researched reports on how the reactionaries of the world unite."
Apr 17, 2024
"Coups. Assassinations. Riots. Detentions. Disinformation. We know the tactics that have been deployed to undermine our democracies. But who is behind them?"
Progressive International (PI) asks and answers this and other questions with an extensive new database published Wednesday that connects the dots in what the leftist group calls the "Reactionary International"—a loose global network of right-wing leaders and organizations working to subvert democratic institutions.
PI calls it an "illicit network undermining democracy around the world."
"Today is a mask-off moment for the Reactionary International and the parties, politicians, judges, journalists, foundations, think tanks, tech platforms, NGOs, activists, financiers, and entrepreneurs that comprise it," PI said.
"After a year of preparation, we finally open the doors to our new research consortium, exposing the global network of reactionary forces that corrode our democracies, destroy our planet, and drive us closer to world war," the group added.
"The twin insurrections at the U.S. Capitol in 2021 and BrasÃlia's Three Powers Plaza in 2023 left no doubt about the international coordination of reactionary forces," PI argued. "Yet far too little is known about the entities of this network, their sources of financing, and their institutional allies operating inside our political systems."
Ultimately, PI aims to "support democratic systems to become more resilient to their insidious tactics."
From leaders like Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and former U.S. President Donald Trump—the presumptive 2024 Republican presidential nominee—to evangelical Christian groups influencing laws in African countries criminalizing LGBTQ+ people and tech companies empowering ubiquitous state surveillance, Reactionary International is a who's-who of the world's right-wing forces.
A cursory search of the database's contents shows users can:
- Learn about Israel's NSO, Rayzone, and Team Jorge, and how a team of Tel Aviv tech entrepreneurs fuel unrest in Latin America;
- Meet the Grey Wolves, Turkey's roving death squad with links to President Recep Tayyip ErdoÄŸan and the ethno-nationalists in his governing coalition; and
- Explore the global network of the Falun Gong, its Trump-connected media outlet The Epoch Times, and its traveling dance troupe known as Shen Yun.
Yanis Varoufakis, a PI member and secretary-general of the left-wing Democracy in Europe Movement 2025, called the database "a treasure chest of well-researched reports on how the reactionaries of the world unite."
PI invites the public to contribute to the database.
"Together, we will not only name, shame, and expose the forces of the far right—but also dismantle their network of complicity," the group said.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular