January, 13 2009, 06:26pm EDT
USDA Secretary Nominee Causes Dustup in Organic Industry
Obama Administration Challenged to Clean up Bush's Organic Mess
WASHINGTON
As former Iowa Governor Tom Vilsack begins his confirmation hearings in
Congress, a controversy is brewing in the organic food and farming industry
concerning his appointment.
For the last eight years, Bush administration officials at the USDA
have been widely criticized for "monkeywrenching" the National
Organic Program. They have been accused of not enforcing the law and,
among other improprieties, allowing giant factory farms to produce organic
milk, meat, and eggs.
Understandably, the industry viewed Barack Obama's election as a likely
turning point. "We were and still are optimistic that when Mr. Obama
talked about 'change' during his campaign, that he included a shift
away from corporate agribusiness domination at the USDA," said Mark Kastel, Senior Farm Policy Analyst at The
Cornucopia Institute.
Over 130,000 petition signatures have been collected by two advocacy
groups, urging the Obama transition team to appoint a USDA secretary who would
embody that change. When Obama tapped former Governor Tom Vilsack, an Iowa lawyer with strong
past backing for genetic engineering and a close relationship with corporate
agribusiness interests, some organic proponents expressed their opposition.
The Organic Consumers Association, the largest group of its nature, is
now in the midst of a pressure campaign, backed by 40,000 signatures, calling on Congress to reject the
Vilsack nomination.
The success of the Organic Consumer Association's outreach prompted a
group of the organic industry's corporate CEOs to launch their own
counter petition drive in support of the Obama nominee.
Officers of some of the largest corporate entities like Whole Foods,
Stonyfield and United Natural Foods Inc., the nation's near-monopoly organic
and natural foods distributor, have signed on in support of Mr. Vilsack.
Their petition, totaling about 500 signatories, includes many Iowa residents who personally worked with
Mr. Vilsack when he was governor.
"We hate to see what appears to be the grassroots lining up in
opposition of this nominee and corporate investors breaking with their most
dedicated customers. This split is not healthy for the organic
community," Kastel added.
Although The Cornucopia Institute is not endorsing either petition
drive, they have not given up hope
that the election of Barack Obama will usher in material changes at the USDA's
National Organic Program.
"Mr. Obama has made it clear that he will be the CEO of the new executive
branch management team," Kastel added. We fully expect, whether or
not Mr. Vilsack is confirmed, which appears likely, that the White House will
reinstate transparency and a sense of dedication to serving the public at what
Lincoln called the 'People's Department.'"
President-Elect Obama, and his family, will be the first residents of
the White House with a history of eating, and support for, organic food.
In a candid communique to the Obama transition team, The Cornucopia
Institute described the USDA's National Organic Program (NOP) as
"dysfunctional" and experiencing a "crisis in confidence"
and asked for the Obama administration to make its rehabilitation a priority.
Their letter described the NOP's long-standing adversarial
relationship with the majority of organic farmers and consumers and the groups
that represent them. It said, based on information gathered from freedom
of information documents: "Senior management, with oversight of the NOP,
has treated industry stakeholders arrogantly and disrespectfully and has
overridden NOP career staff when their findings might have been unfavorable to
corporations with interests in the organic industry."
"We would strongly recommend, as many public corporations do when
trying to regain shareholder and Wall Street confidence, that the Department
bring in a highly respected and skilled individual from the outside to run this
program," added Kastel.
Cornucopia has backed a widely circulated list of progressive
agricultural policy experts as potential sub-Cabinet level appointees including
Kathleen Merrigan, Ph.D.,
a food policy professor at Tufts University as well as a former top
USDA administrator, and James Riddle, currently with the University of
Minnesota, who is an organic farming and certification expert and former
chairman of the USDA's National Organic Standards Board (NOSB).
"We expect that the new Obama leadership at the USDA will fully
respect the intent of Congress by vigorously enforcing the organic regulations,
protecting ethical farmers and the nation's consumers," said Will Fantle,
Cornucopia's Research Director and cofounder of the Wisconsin-based farm policy
research group.
In addition to having a program staff devoid of professional or
academic backgrounds in organic agriculture, the USDA has been sharply
criticized for "stacking" the NOSB, the expert advisory panel set up
by Congress, with corporate interests.
Audits prepared by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and
the Inspector General's office were damning in their criticism of the program's
failure to respect the NOSB's Congressionally mandated purview over policy and
the program's failure to carry out its most fundamental
responsibility-oversight and accreditation of the nation's network of
independent organic certifiers.
"If confirmed by Congress, we stand ready to work with former
Governor Vilsack to create an organic program within the USDA that the Obama
administration can truly be proud of and that will help grow a segment of the
agricultural industry that shows so much promise for our rural economies and
the health of our citizenry," stated Kastel.
- 30 -
MORE:
Copies of the audits of the National Organic Program by the American
National Standards Institute and the office of the Inspector General at the
USDA are available upon request: kastel@cornucopia.org
An organizing campaign, by Food Democracy Now, supporting a dozen
"progressive" candidates for sub-Cabinet appointments at the USDA
(originally the list was circulated as suggestions to the Obama transition team
for Secretary), and now including over 69,000 electronic signatures, can be
found at: https://www.fooddemocracynow.org/
The Organic Consumers Association petition, currently with over 40,000
names, opposing the confirmation of former Governor Tom Vilsack, can be viewed
at:
https://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/642/petition.jsp?petition_KEY=1783
The petition, and signatories, organized by corporate officials of a
number of the nation's leading organic brands can be viewed at:
https://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/support-vilsack-for-secretary-of-agriculture/
Although the organizers of the industry-backed petition include many
corporate officers, and a few nonprofit advocacy groups, some that get the
majority of their financial backing from corporate interests in the organic
industry, the list includes many respected individuals, including farmers from Iowa, and even relatives
of the former Governor. Their petition drive states a goal of 10,000
electronic signatures. The list stands currently at 539 (PM/CST on
1-13-09).
"Because of the blowback that the Vilsack nomination has garnered
in the organic and sustainable farming communities, it would be an astute
political move to come right out of the
blocks with a strong affirmation, on the record, in support of the
wholesale housecleaning at the USDA's organic program," stated
Kastel. "A positive statement on organics now, by Mr. Vilsack,
should satisfy both the corporate and grassroots factions now competing in the
(organic) marketplace of ideas.
"During Governor Vilsack's tenure in office, Iowa was one of the
early states investing in an organic program at their department of
agriculture, and its land grant university started addressing the needs of
organic farmers," added Kastel. "We hope that history is
representative of how the nominee will balance competing interests within the
department."
Even though a handful of giant industrial-scale farms are producing a
growing share of the nation's organic milk, meat, and eggs, the majority of all
organic brands still get their produce and commodities from ethical,
family-scale farmers.
A scorecard, listing the nation's 110+ organic dairy brands, can be
found on The Cornucopia Institute website: www.cornucopia.org.
The Cornucopia Institute, a Wisconsin-based nonprofit farm policy research group, is dedicated to the fight for economic justice for the family-scale farming community. Their Organic Integrity Project acts as a corporate and governmental watchdog assuring that no compromises to the credibility of organic farming methods and the food it produces are made in the pursuit of profit.
LATEST NEWS
Alcatraz Push 'No More Than a Sensational Distraction' From Trump's Attack on Public Safety
Less than two weeks ago, Trump's DOJ slashed nearly $1 billion from existing public safety grants that experts warn will "imperil public safety, not promote it."
May 05, 2025
Add "distraction" to the list of words being used to describe President Donald Trump's "psychotic," "deluded," and "unbefuckinglievable" talk about reopening the island prison of Alcatraz in California's San Francisco Bay.
In a statement to reporters on the White House lawn Sunday night, Trump said the idea for reopening Alcatraz—which he first floated in a social media post—was "just an idea I had" and that the prison was a "symbol of law and order."
But less than two weeks ago, the Trump administration ordered the cancellation of an estimated $811 million in grants$811 million in grants for public safety from the Justice Department that experts and advocates say were proving successful at reducing crime and curbing harm in communities nationwide—all with bipartisan support.
"Alcatraz," said civil rights attorney Scott Hechinger in response to Trump's social media post—which sparked no shortage of headlines across the news media—is "no more than a sensational distraction from this: Trump just cut nearly $1 billion from bipartisan, proven, successful anti-crime, violence prevention programs around the country."
The various programs impacted by the grant cuts—including gun violence prevention and law enforcement trainings—said Hechinger, were designed to prevent crime "before people were ever harmed."
Arguing that Trump has made the country less safe, not more, by his policies, Hechinger added, "now he's stomping and parading around with big words and sensational capital letters about a wasteful reopening of a domestic torture complex that will never actually happen and do nothing to keep America safer. All while claiming to care about violence prevention. What a dangerous joke."
Lamenting the public safety grant cuts in a blog post last week, the Brennan Center for Justice's Rosemary Nidiry, senior counsel in the group's justice program, detailed how the grant funding slashed by Trump "filled critical gaps" in the nation's public safety infrastructure.
The grants, she noted, "supported victims of crime, trained law enforcement, offered treatment to people with behavioral health and substance issues, and helped people reintegrate into society after incarceration. They also promoted research used to create and guide effective policies. Many if not all were ended immediately and without warning, in the middle of a typical 3-year grant period, disrupting programs and creating financial strain for nonprofits."
"The slashed programs have been proven to make communities safer," wrote Nidiry, "and their end will in fact imperil public safety, not promote it."
When Alcatraz was closed by the Bureau of Prisons in 1963, the cost of running the crumbling facility was the primary driver of that decision.
As Newsweek reports, "Operating Alcatraz proved to be significantly more expensive than other federal prisons. In 1959, the daily per capita cost at Alcatraz was $10.10, compared with $3.00 at the U.S. Penitentiary in Atlanta, making it nearly three times more costly to operate. This high expense was largely due to the island's isolation, which necessitated that all supplies, including food, water, and fuel, be transported by boat. For instance, nearly one million gallons of fresh water had to be barged to the island each week."
In a letter on Friday, over three dozen Democratic lawmakers called on the Justice Department to reinstate $150 million in grants awarded for gun violence prevention.
"This funding, appropriated by Congress, directly contributes to making communities safer," the lawmakers stated in a letter. "We urge you to honor the grants already awarded and to implement this funding as Congress directed."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Mockery' of Humanitarian Law: Israel Wants US Mercenaries for Aid Relief in Gaza
What the Israeli government is planning is "not an aid plan," said one legal scholar, but rather "an aid denial plan."
May 05, 2025
Despite global outcry to end the "genocidal" assault on the people of Gaza, Israeli cabinet ministers early Monday approved a plan that could lead to the capture of the "entire Gaza Strip," prompting fresh warnings of a complete ethnic cleansing of the enclave coupled with outrage over a proposal to use U.S.-based mercenaries to be part of distribution of humanitarian aid.
One Israeli official familiar with the shift in military tactics toldHaaretz that Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made clear to his Security Cabinet that the new approach in Gaza will be different from what's been going over the previous 18 months in that it will shift from what were described as "raid-based operations" to "the occupation of territory and a sustained Israeli presence in Gaza."
Another unnamed Israeli official told Agence France-Press that the plan "will include, among other things, the conquest of the Gaza Strip and the holding of the territories, moving the Gaza population south for their protection."
"It is dangerous, driving civilians into militarized zones to collect rations, threatening lives, including those of humanitarian workers, while further entrenching forced displacement."
To support the occupation plan, the Israeli army, with the approval of the Security Cabinet, will be calling up tens of thousands of reservist soldiers, in the words of the IDF, to "intensify the pressure" on Hamas and "expand and intensify" operations in Gaza.
According to the Associated Press:
The new plan, which the officials said was meant to help Israel achieve its war aims of defeating Hamas and freeing hostages held in Gaza, also would push hundreds of thousands of Palestinians to southern Gaza, what would likely exacerbate an already dire humanitarian crisis.
Since a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas collapsed in mid-March, Israel has unleashed fierce strikes on the territory that have killed hundreds. It has captured swathes of territory and now controls roughly 50% of Gaza. Before the truce ended, Israel halted all humanitarian aid into Gaza, including food, fuel and water, setting off what is believed to the be the worst humanitarian crisis in nearly 19 months of war.
The ban on aid has prompted widespread hunger and shortages have set off looting.
In addition to expanded military operations, the Israelis also presented a new approach to distribution of aid on Sunday that would include the use of private military contractors, also known as mercenaries. By relocating the civilian population to the south and forcing people to travel for food, water, and medicine only to designated "hubs" for relief, humanitarians said the plan violates all principles of human rights and the laws of war.
The Washington Postreports Monday that "American contractors" would be used to carry out the plan, which was presented to officials in the Trump administration on Friday.
According to the Post, "two U.S. security companies are expected to be contracted to handle logistics and provide security along initial distribution corridors and in and around the hubs."
The companies, Safe Reach Solutions and UG Solutions, organized and staffed a vehicle checkpoint along a major north-south road through Gaza during the ceasefire.
SRS, which is to handle planning and logistics, is headed by Phil Reilly, a former CIA senior intelligence officer with extensive overseas service who has held senior positions in other private security companies. SRS is to subcontract on-the-ground security operations to UG Solutions, headed by Jameson Govoni, a former Green Beret whose service from 2004 to 2015 included tours in Iraq and Afghanistan. The security contractors are to be armed and have their own force protection. They will not have detention authority.
In response to the new distribution plan, the coalition of United Nations and NGOs operating in Gaza, known as the Humanitarian Country Team (HCT), which operates within the U.N. Office of Coordination for Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), issued a harsh rebuke to the Israelis, saying that the proposal "contravenes fundamental humanitarian principles and appears designed to reinforce control over life-sustaining items as a pressure tactic–as part of a military strategy."
"The design of the plan presented to us will mean large parts of Gaza, including the less mobile and most vulnerable people, will continue to go without supplies," said the HCT in its statement. "It is dangerous, driving civilians into militarized zones to collect rations, threatening lives, including those of humanitarian workers, while further entrenching forced displacement."
The group added that both the U.N. Secretary-General and the Emergency Relief Coordinator in Gaza "have made clear that we will not participate in any scheme that does not adhere to the global humanitarian principles of humanity, impartiality, independence and neutrality." Instead of the plan presented by the Israelis, the HCT called for an end to the imposed blockade so that neutral relief agencies could bring in the necessary supplies to the suffering population in Gaza.
Jan Egeland, secretary general of the Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC), which helps distribute aid in Gaza and was presented with the plan, decried the proposal.
"After two months of devastating blockade and starvation of Gaza, Israeli officials demand that we shut down the universal aid distribution system run by the UN and NGOs like NRC," said Egeland. "They want to manipulate and militarize all aid to civilians, forcing us to deliver supplies through hubs designed by the Israeli military, once the government agrees to re-open crossings."
Adil Haque, law professor at Rutgers University and director of Just Security, said what the Israeli government is planning is "not an aid plan," but rather "an aid denial plan"—one that "makes a mockery of international humanitarian law."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Asked If He Must Uphold the US Constitution, Trump Says: 'I Don't Know'
"I'm not a lawyer," the president said in a newly aired interview.
May 04, 2025
U.S. President Donald Trump refused in an interview released Sunday to affirm that the nation's Constitution affords due process to citizens and noncitizens alike and that he, as president, must uphold that fundamental right.
"I don't know, I'm not a lawyer," Trump told NBC's Kristen Welker, who asked if the president agrees with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio's statement that everyone on U.S. soil is entitled to due process.
When Welker pointed to the Fifth Amendment—which states that "no person shall be... deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law"—Trump again replied that he's unsure and suggested granting due process to the undocumented immigrants he wants to deport would be too burdensome.
"We'd have to have a million or 2 million or 3 million trials," Trump said, echoing a sentiment that his vice president expressed last month.
Asked whether he needs to "uphold the Constitution of the United States as president," Trump replied, "I don't know."
Watch:
WELKER: The 5th Amendment says everyone deserves due process
TRUMP: It might say that, but if you're talking about that, then we'd have to have a million or two million or three million trials pic.twitter.com/FMZQ7O9mTP
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) May 4, 2025
Trump, who similarly deferred to "the lawyers" when asked recently about his refusal to bring home wrongly deported Maryland resident Kilmar Abrego Garcia, has unlawfully cited the Alien Enemies Act to swiftly remove undocumented immigrants from the U.S. without due process. Federal agents have also arrested and detained students, academics, and a current and former judge in recent weeks, heightening alarm over the administration's authoritarian tactics.
CNNreported Friday that the administration has "been examining whether it can label some suspected cartel and gang members inside the U.S. as 'enemy combatants' as a possible way to detain them more easily and limit their ability to challenge their imprisonment."
"Trump has expressed extreme frustration with federal courts halting many of those migrants' deportations, amid legal challenges questioning whether they were being afforded due process," the outlet added. "By labeling the migrants as enemy combatants, they would have fewer rights, the thinking goes."
Some top administration officials have publicly expressed disdain for the constitutional right to due process. Stephen Miller, the White House deputy chief of staff, wrote in a social media post last month that "the judicial process is for Americans" and "immediate deportation" is for undocumented immigrants.
The New Republic's Greg Sargent wrote in a column Saturday that "Miller appears to want Trump to have the power to declare undocumented immigrants to be terrorists and gang members by fiat; to have the power to absurdly decree them members of a hostile nation's invading army, again by fiat; and then to have quasi-unlimited power to remove them, unconstrained by any court."
"The more transparency we have gained into the rot of corruption and bad faith at the core of this whole saga, the worse it has come to look," Sargent continued. "Trump himself is exposing it all for what it truly is: the stuff of Mad Kings."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular