

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
As former Iowa Governor Tom Vilsack begins his confirmation hearings in
Congress, a controversy is brewing in the organic food and farming industry
concerning his appointment.
For the last eight years, Bush administration officials at the USDA
have been widely criticized for "monkeywrenching" the National
Organic Program. They have been accused of not enforcing the law and,
among other improprieties, allowing giant factory farms to produce organic
milk, meat, and eggs.
Understandably, the industry viewed Barack Obama's election as a likely
turning point. "We were and still are optimistic that when Mr. Obama
talked about 'change' during his campaign, that he included a shift
away from corporate agribusiness domination at the USDA," said Mark Kastel, Senior Farm Policy Analyst at The
Cornucopia Institute.
Over 130,000 petition signatures have been collected by two advocacy
groups, urging the Obama transition team to appoint a USDA secretary who would
embody that change. When Obama tapped former Governor Tom Vilsack, an Iowa lawyer with strong
past backing for genetic engineering and a close relationship with corporate
agribusiness interests, some organic proponents expressed their opposition.
The Organic Consumers Association, the largest group of its nature, is
now in the midst of a pressure campaign, backed by 40,000 signatures, calling on Congress to reject the
Vilsack nomination.
The success of the Organic Consumer Association's outreach prompted a
group of the organic industry's corporate CEOs to launch their own
counter petition drive in support of the Obama nominee.
Officers of some of the largest corporate entities like Whole Foods,
Stonyfield and United Natural Foods Inc., the nation's near-monopoly organic
and natural foods distributor, have signed on in support of Mr. Vilsack.
Their petition, totaling about 500 signatories, includes many Iowa residents who personally worked with
Mr. Vilsack when he was governor.
"We hate to see what appears to be the grassroots lining up in
opposition of this nominee and corporate investors breaking with their most
dedicated customers. This split is not healthy for the organic
community," Kastel added.
Although The Cornucopia Institute is not endorsing either petition
drive, they have not given up hope
that the election of Barack Obama will usher in material changes at the USDA's
National Organic Program.
"Mr. Obama has made it clear that he will be the CEO of the new executive
branch management team," Kastel added. We fully expect, whether or
not Mr. Vilsack is confirmed, which appears likely, that the White House will
reinstate transparency and a sense of dedication to serving the public at what
Lincoln called the 'People's Department.'"
President-Elect Obama, and his family, will be the first residents of
the White House with a history of eating, and support for, organic food.
In a candid communique to the Obama transition team, The Cornucopia
Institute described the USDA's National Organic Program (NOP) as
"dysfunctional" and experiencing a "crisis in confidence"
and asked for the Obama administration to make its rehabilitation a priority.
Their letter described the NOP's long-standing adversarial
relationship with the majority of organic farmers and consumers and the groups
that represent them. It said, based on information gathered from freedom
of information documents: "Senior management, with oversight of the NOP,
has treated industry stakeholders arrogantly and disrespectfully and has
overridden NOP career staff when their findings might have been unfavorable to
corporations with interests in the organic industry."
"We would strongly recommend, as many public corporations do when
trying to regain shareholder and Wall Street confidence, that the Department
bring in a highly respected and skilled individual from the outside to run this
program," added Kastel.
Cornucopia has backed a widely circulated list of progressive
agricultural policy experts as potential sub-Cabinet level appointees including
Kathleen Merrigan, Ph.D.,
a food policy professor at Tufts University as well as a former top
USDA administrator, and James Riddle, currently with the University of
Minnesota, who is an organic farming and certification expert and former
chairman of the USDA's National Organic Standards Board (NOSB).
"We expect that the new Obama leadership at the USDA will fully
respect the intent of Congress by vigorously enforcing the organic regulations,
protecting ethical farmers and the nation's consumers," said Will Fantle,
Cornucopia's Research Director and cofounder of the Wisconsin-based farm policy
research group.
In addition to having a program staff devoid of professional or
academic backgrounds in organic agriculture, the USDA has been sharply
criticized for "stacking" the NOSB, the expert advisory panel set up
by Congress, with corporate interests.
Audits prepared by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and
the Inspector General's office were damning in their criticism of the program's
failure to respect the NOSB's Congressionally mandated purview over policy and
the program's failure to carry out its most fundamental
responsibility-oversight and accreditation of the nation's network of
independent organic certifiers.
"If confirmed by Congress, we stand ready to work with former
Governor Vilsack to create an organic program within the USDA that the Obama
administration can truly be proud of and that will help grow a segment of the
agricultural industry that shows so much promise for our rural economies and
the health of our citizenry," stated Kastel.
- 30 -
MORE:
Copies of the audits of the National Organic Program by the American
National Standards Institute and the office of the Inspector General at the
USDA are available upon request: kastel@cornucopia.org
An organizing campaign, by Food Democracy Now, supporting a dozen
"progressive" candidates for sub-Cabinet appointments at the USDA
(originally the list was circulated as suggestions to the Obama transition team
for Secretary), and now including over 69,000 electronic signatures, can be
found at: https://www.fooddemocracynow.org/
The Organic Consumers Association petition, currently with over 40,000
names, opposing the confirmation of former Governor Tom Vilsack, can be viewed
at:
https://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/642/petition.jsp?petition_KEY=1783
The petition, and signatories, organized by corporate officials of a
number of the nation's leading organic brands can be viewed at:
https://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/support-vilsack-for-secretary-of-agriculture/
Although the organizers of the industry-backed petition include many
corporate officers, and a few nonprofit advocacy groups, some that get the
majority of their financial backing from corporate interests in the organic
industry, the list includes many respected individuals, including farmers from Iowa, and even relatives
of the former Governor. Their petition drive states a goal of 10,000
electronic signatures. The list stands currently at 539 (PM/CST on
1-13-09).
"Because of the blowback that the Vilsack nomination has garnered
in the organic and sustainable farming communities, it would be an astute
political move to come right out of the
blocks with a strong affirmation, on the record, in support of the
wholesale housecleaning at the USDA's organic program," stated
Kastel. "A positive statement on organics now, by Mr. Vilsack,
should satisfy both the corporate and grassroots factions now competing in the
(organic) marketplace of ideas.
"During Governor Vilsack's tenure in office, Iowa was one of the
early states investing in an organic program at their department of
agriculture, and its land grant university started addressing the needs of
organic farmers," added Kastel. "We hope that history is
representative of how the nominee will balance competing interests within the
department."
Even though a handful of giant industrial-scale farms are producing a
growing share of the nation's organic milk, meat, and eggs, the majority of all
organic brands still get their produce and commodities from ethical,
family-scale farmers.
A scorecard, listing the nation's 110+ organic dairy brands, can be
found on The Cornucopia Institute website: www.cornucopia.org.
The Cornucopia Institute, a Wisconsin-based nonprofit farm policy research group, is dedicated to the fight for economic justice for the family-scale farming community. Their Organic Integrity Project acts as a corporate and governmental watchdog assuring that no compromises to the credibility of organic farming methods and the food it produces are made in the pursuit of profit.
"Israel built AI targeting systems in Gaza—approved kills in 20 seconds, 10% error rate accepted," said one expert. "Now those same systems are running over Iran... and there’s an arms industry IPO-ing off the back of it."
After Israel's unprecedented use of artificial intelligence to select bombing targets in Gaza, experts are now sounding the alarm regarding what one analyst on Thursday called a lack of human supervision over Israeli AI targeting in Iran.
"Similarities between Israel's bombing of Gaza and Tehran are growing stronger," Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft executive vice president Trita Parsi said Thursday on X. "In both cases, it appears Israel is using AI without any human oversight."
"For instance, Israel has bombed a park in Tehran called 'Police Park,'" Parsi added. "It has nothing to do with the police. But it appears AI identified it as a target since Israel is bombing all government-related buildings. No one in Israel bothered to check and find out that it is just a park."
Borrowing from startup vernacular, tech journalist Jacob Ward calls Israel's use and export of AI technology in the post-Gaza era "lethal beta."
"Gaza was the prototype," Ward explained in a video posted this week on Bluesky. "Iran is the launch."
"[It's] a live-fire, live-ordnance lab experiment on people, killing people, that creates a pipeline of exportable products to the rest of the world, and it has become a big industry in Israel—and it's something that we in the United States have been dealing with and doing business with for some time as well."
Israel built AI targeting systems in Gaza — approved kills in 20 seconds, 10% error rate accepted. Now those same systems are running over Iran and being exported all over the world. I’m calling this “lethal beta,” and there’s an arms industry IPO-ing off the back of it. Full breakdown at
[image or embed]
— Jacob Ward (@byjacobward.bsky.social) March 3, 2026 at 4:45 PM
Previous investigations have detailed how the IDF uses Habsora, an Israeli AI system that can automatically select airstrike targets at an exponentially faster rate than ever before. One Israeli intelligence source asserted that the technology has transformed the IDF into a “mass assassination factory” in which the “emphasis is on quantity and not quality” of kills.
Mistakes were all but inevitable, but expert critics argue Israeli policy has made matters worse. In the tense hours following the Hamas-led attack of October 7, 2023, mid-ranking IDF officers were empowered to order attacks on not only senior Hamas commanders but any fighter in the resistance group, no matter how low-ranking.
According to a New York Times investigation, IDF officers were also permitted to risk up to 20 civilian lives in each airstrike, and up to 500 noncombatant lives per day. Even that limit was lifted after just a few days. Officers could order any number of strikes as they believed were legal, with no limits on civilian harm.
Senior IDF commanders sometimes approved strikes they knew could kill more than 100 civilians if the target was considered high-value. In one AI-aided airstrike targeting one senior Hamas commander, the IDF dropped multiple US-supplied 2,000-pound bombs, which can level an entire city block, on the Jabalia refugee camp in October 2023.
That bombing killed at least 126 people, 68 of them children, and wounded 280 others. Hamas said four Israeli and three international hostages were also killed in the attack.
The Washington Post reported Wednesday that the US military in Iran has "leveraged the most advanced artificial intelligence it’s ever used in warfare, a tool that could be difficult for the Pentagon to give up even as it severs ties with the company that created it."
According to the Post, Palantir's Maven Smart System—which contains Anthropic's Claude AI language model—reportedly helped US commanders select 1,000 Iranian targets during the war's first 24 hours alone.
Experts are urging a more cautious approach to military AI use. Paul Scharre, executive vice president at the Center for a New American Security, told the Post that “AI gets it wrong... We need humans to check the output of generative AI when the stakes are life and death.”
It is not publicly known whether AI was used in connection with any of the deadliest massacres of the current war on Iran, which has left more than 1,000 Iranians dead, including around 175 children and others who were killed by what first responders and victims' relatives said was a double-tap strike on a girls' school last Saturday in the southern city of Minab.
Last week, Trump ordered all federal agencies including the Department of Defense to stop using all Anthropic products in apparent retaliation for the San Francisco-based company's refusal to allow unrestricted government and military use of its technology over fears it could be used for mass surveillance of Americans and in automated weapons systems, also known as "killer robots."
Trump gave the Pentagon six months to phase out Anthropic products, allowing their continued use in the Iran war pending replacements.
Project Nimbus—a $1.2 billion cloud-computing and AI contract signed in 2021 between the Israeli government and Amazon Web Services and Google Cloud—provides cloud infrastructure, AI tools, and data storage for the IDF and other agencies. The deal prohibits Google or Amazon from refusing service to Israeli government, military, or intelligence agencies.
Academics and jurists are gathered this week in Geneva, Switzerland—with a second four-day round of talks starting August 31—for a United Nations-sponsored conference on lethal autonomous weapons systems.
Attendees are examining the risks posed by killer robots that can select and engage targets without meaningful human control. They are also studying the legal, military, and technological implications of autonomous weapons systems and working to build international consensus on regulation.
“The current failure to regulate AI warfare, or to pause its usage until there is some agreement on lawful usage, seems to suggest potential proliferation of AI warfare is imminent,” Craig Jones, a political geographer at Newcastle University in England who researches military targeting, told Nature's Nicola Jones on Thursday.
While some proponents of AI weapons systems have claimed their use will reduce civilian harm, Jones stressed that "there is no evidence that AI lowers civilian deaths or wrongful targeting decisions—and it may be that the opposite is true."
"If the United States is at war, then Pete Hegseth is a war criminal. If the United States is not at war, then Pete Hegseth is a murderer."
US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Thursday was condemned for his boasts on Wednesday about sinking an Iranian military ship after allegations emerged that it was "defenseless" at the time it was torpedoed in international waters by a US submarine.
Military.com reported Thursday that the Iranian ship had been departing from a biennial multinational naval training exercise that it had been invited to participate in by the Indian government.
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has so far remained silent on the US attack on the ship, but other politicians in India delivering sharp condemnations.
According to the Times of India, opposition leader Rahul Gandhi tore into Modi for not speaking up after the US torpedoed a boat that his government had invited into its waters.
"The conflict has reached our backyard, with an Iranian warship sunk in the Indian Ocean," Gandhi said. "Yet the PM has said nothing. At a moment like this, we need a steady hand at the wheel. Instead, India has a compromised PM who has surrendered our strategic autonomy."
In a social media post, former Indian Foreign Secretary Kanwal Sibal said there was no way that the Iranian ship could have been perceived as any kind of military threat.
"I am told that as per protocol for this exercise ships cannot carry any ammunition," he wrote. "It was defenseless... The attack by the US submarine was premeditated as the US was aware of the Iranian ship's presence in the exercise to which the US navy was invited but withdrew from participation at the last minute, presumably with this operation in mind."
Drop Site News reporter Ryan Grim noted that, in addition to striking what appears to have been a defenseless boat, the US also didn't help rescue any of the shipwrecked men who were aboard the vessel.
"The Sri Lanka Navy was left to pull the dead bodies from the water," Grim commented. "I am hard pressed to think of any other nation throughout history that would do something so cowardly and despicable. We are genuinely in a league of our own, and American media—mostly shrugging off the bombing of a girls school and acting as if carpet bombing Tehran is a normal military tactic—is deeply complicit."
Author Bruno Maçães also pointed to the decision to leave the shipwrecked crew at sea as an act of historic depravity.
"Really quite extraordinary that the US bombed an Iranian ship and then left the surviving sailors to drown," Maçães wrote. "There are many many accounts of the Nazis or Imperial Japan saving survivors at sea. I see we have now dropped below that level."
Mohamad Safa, executive director of PVA Patriotic Vision, an international multilateral organization with special consultative status at the United Nations Economic and Social Council, said that the US attack on the Iranian ship constituted either a war crime or straight-up murder.
"What Pete Hegseth ordered the military to do violates international law," he wrote. "The Iranian ship was near Sri Lanka, in international waters outside the combat zone and on a training exercise. Under the Geneva Conventions, you are obligated to rescue the crew of a ship that you sink during war. Abandoned any survivors and leaving them to drown is illegal and a war crime."
"This kind of quota system mirrors the kind of policies that white supremacist groups, including the Klan, pushed for 100 years ago."
Not a single refugee who isn't a white South African has been legally resettled in the United States since October, according to the State Department's most recent arrivals report.
The report, published last month, shows that from the start of October 2025 and the end of January 2026, just 1,651 people were admitted under the US Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP), which allows those fearing persecution based on race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or social group to apply for refuge in the United States.
Aside from just three, every single one of them was from South Africa.
Three Afghan refugees were also reported to have been settled in Colorado in November. But since then, their admission has been indefinitely suspended, and those who have entered may be at risk of deportation.
During that same period a year earlier—the final months of the Biden administration—a total of 37,596 refugees arrived in the US, with the greatest numbers coming from the Middle East, South Asia, and Africa.
The Trump administration dramatically curbed refugee admissions during its first year in power. On his first day back in office last January, President Donald Trump suspended USRAP processing, leaving around 600,000 people in the pipeline suddenly stranded, including roughly 10,000 who'd already booked flights.
Around 130,000 of those refugees had already been through the State Department's meticulous and taxing vetting process, and were instead "left to languish in refugee camps around the world after being given the promise of safety and a new life in America,” as a group of Democrats in Congress put it.
The next month, however, Trump carved out an exception to the suspension exclusively for white South Africans, who he has falsely claimed face a "genocide," and severe "discrimination" from land redistribution policies intended to correct extreme apartheid-era inequalities.
After previously discussing a cap of 40,000 refugee admissions for the fiscal year 2026---already a reduction by over two-thirds from the Biden administration---Trump announced on September 30 that he would lower admissions to just 7,500, a historic low.
He announced the change without consultation with Congress, which is required under the 1980 Refugee Act, leading Democrats to accuse him of acting in "open defiance of the law."
But in late February, Reuters reported on an internal State Department document showing that the administration was planning to welcome as many as 4,500 white South Africans to the US per month and detailed plans to install trailers on US Embassy property in the country to expedite more immigrant approvals.
All the while, refugees fleeing war, government oppression, and genocide in countries including Syria, Sudan, Ukraine, Afghanistan, and others have been locked out or face threats of arrest by the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) under a new policy requiring them to be reinspected to determine their ability for “assimilation.”
Many critics have pointed out the dramatic gulf in treatment between white immigrants from South Africa and members of other, largely nonwhite groups of immigrants, whom it has undertaken extreme measures to remove from the country with expediency.
Last month, a Rohingya refugee, who fled genocide in Myanmar and legally entered the US as a refugee, was found dead on the streets of Buffalo, New York, after being detained and then left outdoors in the freezing cold by immigration agents.
The policy was revealed as part of a case in which a federal judge halted a DHS effort to detain thousands of refugees in Minnesota who did not seek green cards after their first year of residency in the United States.
"While the Trump administration is trying to convert warehouses at home into massive prisons to jail and deport immigrants swept up in its racist crackdown, it is also working to build trailers in Pretoria so it can rapidly increase the number of white South Africans," wrote Ja'han Jones in an opinion piece for MS NOW.
Likening it to the 1924 Immigration Act, which created strict ethnic quotas for entry into the US, Jones said: "It’s the kind of immigration policy the Ku Klux Klan dreamed of. Literally. This kind of quota system mirrors the kind of policies that white supremacist groups, including the Klan, pushed for 100 years ago."