

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
WECF / Sabine Bock +49 176 2282 7465
(German, English)
IFG / Claire Greensfelder +1 510 917 5468
(English, French, Spanish)
Greenpeace / Jan Van De Putte +32 49 616 1584
(English, Dutch, German, French)
EcoDefense Russia / Vladimir Sliviak + 48 51 732 9054
(English, Russian)
WISE / Peer de Rijk + 31 6 20 000 626
(English, Dutch)
Three dozen environmental leaders from
16 countries braved icy cold weather on Wednesday morning in front of
the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Meeting in
Poznan, Poland where they called nuclear power "a Mickey Mouse
solution" to climate change. The activists were carrying banners and
posters with lively slogans including "Don't Nuke the Climate," "No
Nuclear Power in The Clean Development Mechanism (CDM)" and "Nuclear
Power, No Thanks!"
Three dozen environmental leaders from
16 countries braved icy cold weather on Wednesday morning in front of
the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Meeting in
Poznan, Poland where they called nuclear power "a Mickey Mouse
solution" to climate change. The activists were carrying banners and
posters with lively slogans including "Don't Nuke the Climate," "No
Nuclear Power in The Clean Development Mechanism (CDM)" and "Nuclear
Power, No Thanks!"
Most were wearing t-shirts with the familiar "Mickey Mouse ears"
emblazoned with the radiation symbol. The activists, representing
non-governmental organizations from nearby European countries and from
as far away as Taiwan, South Korea, Kyrgystan, Tajikistan and
California, announced the release of a global call for the elimination
of proposals to include nuclear power as an approved investment for
greenhouse gas mitigation in the 2nd commitment period of the Kyoto
Protocol of the UNFCCC.
In only one week, over 300 NGOs representing millions of individuals
from 50 countries in every corner of the planet signed on to the public
appeal to keep the nuclear power option out of the climate talks.
Spokespeople from the four organizers of today's action made their case
throughout the morning by talking one-on-one to hundreds of government
delegates and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) as they entered the
conference site for morning sessions.
Speaking to the press, Sabine Bock, coordinator of energy and climate
protection for Women in Europe for a Common Future (WECF) said:
"Nuclear energy has proven in the past that it is a threat not only to
our health and the environment, but also to human rights."
"In our work at WECF with local communities," Bock continued, "we have
encountered severe health problems and human rights abuses of
populations due to the harmful effects of nuclear energy and
radiation." Bock added: "We can't understand why governments still
promote this dangerous technology rather than taking the opportunity to
develop safe and sustainable new, renewable, and clean energy
solutions."
Jan Van de Putte, Nuclear Campaign Coordinator for Greenpeace described
nuclear power as an obstacle to effective climate protection saying
that money invested in nuclear power is not nearly as effective as
money invested in wind power, for example."
"Nuclear power is a dangerous and dirty energy source - it provides too
little energy for mitigation at too slow a pace and at too great a
cost." Van de Putte continued, "the cost per Kwh of nuclear power is
double that of wind energy. It just doesn't make sense to pursue this
outdated energy source."
Vladimir Slivyak, Co-Chair of Ecodefense Russia, called upon his
national government as well as other delegations to stop promoting
nuclear power into the Kyoto Protocol via provisions for Joint
Implementation and the Clean Development Mechanism. "78 % of Russians
are opposed to nuclear power," Slivyak said. "We demand that the
Russian delegation stop any plans to develop new nuclear plants." "We
further call on all governments to stop new nuclear development."
Claire Greensfelder, Deputy Director of the International Forum on
Globalization of San Francisco, California, said: "Despite year after
year of rejection by the state parties to the Convention, the nuclear
industry (and a small group of states) continues to promote the
economic and public health disaster of nuclear power." Greensfelder
continued: "We also have grave concerns about the health and
environmental impacts of increased uranium mining, milling and nuclear
waste storage, much of which is on indigenous peoples' lands, many of
whom are opposed to continued nuclear development. Indigenous peoples'
right to free prior and informed consent of development on their lands,
as established by the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous
Peoples, (passed in the UN General Assembly in September 2007), must be
taken into consideration."
Holding a colorful homemade banner proclaiming "No Fishy Nukes!,",
Gloria Hsu, Chair, of the Taiwan Environmental Protection Union (TEPU)
said: "Using nuclear power for CO2 reduction is the same as drinking
some poison to quench your thirst."
"We have managed thus far to keep nuclear power out of the Kyoto
Protocol," said Peer de Rijk, executive director of World Information
Service on Energy (WISE), speaking from Amsterdam. "We will continue to
do whatever we can to achieve the same for a much needed post-Kyoto
agreement. Nuclear energy is a deadlock, blocking real solutions. Don't
nuke the climate!
A copy of the statement can be found on NIRS' website at https://www.nirs.org/climate/background/pa_nuclearaction9dec17h1.pdf
A list of the organizational signers can be found on NIRS' website at https://www.nirs.org/climate/background/nonuclearcdm_signons_10dec08press-pdf.pdf
Nuclear Information and Resource Service is the information and networking center for people and organizations concerned about nuclear power, radioactive waste, radiation, and sustainable energy issues.
"Does anyone truly believe that caving in to Trump now will stop his unprecedented attacks on our democracy and working people?" asked Sen. Bernie Sanders.
US Sen. Bernie Sanders on Sunday implored his Democratic colleagues in Congress not to cave to President Donald Trump and Republicans in the ongoing government shutdown fight, warning that doing so would hasten the country's descent into authoritarianism.
In an op-ed for The Guardian, Sanders (I-Vt.) called Trump a "schoolyard bully" and argued that "anyone who thinks surrendering to him now will lead to better outcomes and cooperation in the future does not understand how a power-hungry demagogue operates."
"This is a man who threatens to arrest and jail his political opponents, deploys the US military into Democratic cities, and allows masked Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents to pick people up off the streets and throw them into vans without due process," Sanders wrote. "He has sued virtually every major media outlet because he does not tolerate criticism, has extorted funds from law firms and is withholding federal funding from states that voted against him."
If Democrats capitulate, Sanders warned, Trump "will utilize his victory to accelerate his movement toward authoritarianism."
"At a time when he already has no regard for our democratic system of checks and balances," the senator wrote, "he will be emboldened to continue decimating programs that protect elderly people, children, the sick and the poor while giving more tax breaks and other benefits to his fellow oligarchs."
Sanders' op-ed came as the shutdown continued with no end in sight, with Democrats standing by their demand for an extension of Affordable Care Act (ACA) tax credits as a necessary condition for any government funding deal. Republicans have so far refused to negotiate on the ACA subsidies even as health insurance premiums skyrocket nationwide.
The Trump administration, meanwhile, is illegally withholding Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) funding from tens of millions of Americans—including millions of children—despite court rulings ordering him to release the money.
In a "60 Minutes" interview that aired Sunday, Trump again urged Republicans to nuke the 60-vote filibuster in the Senate to remove the need for Democratic support to reopen the government and advance other elements of their agenda unilaterally. Under the status quo, Republicans need the support of at least seven Democratic senators to advance a government funding package.
"The Republicans have to get tougher," Trump said. "If we end the filibuster, we can do exactly what we want. We're not going to lose power."
Congressional Democrats have faced some pressure from allies, most notably the head of the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), to cut a deal with Republicans to end the shutdown and alleviate the suffering it has inflicted on federal workers and many others.
But Democrats appear unmoved by the AFGE president's demand, and other labor leaders have since voiced support for the minority party's effort to secure an extension of ACA subsidies.
"We're urging our Democratic friends to hold the line," said Jaime Contreras, executive vice president of the 185,000-member Service Employees International Union Local 32BJ.
In his op-ed on Sunday, Sanders asked, "Does anyone truly believe that caving in to Trump now will stop his unprecedented attacks on our democracy and working people?"
"If the Democrats cave now, it would be a betrayal of the millions of Americans who have fought and died for democracy and our Constitution," the senator wrote. "It would be a sellout of a working class that is struggling to survive in very difficult economic times. Democrats in Congress are the last remaining opposition to Trump's quest for absolute power. To surrender now would be an historic tragedy for our country, something that history will not look kindly upon."
"Can't follow the law when a judge says fund the program, but have to follow the rules exactly when they say don't help poor people afford food," one lawyer said.
As the Trump administration continued its illegal freeze on food assistance, the US Department of Agriculture sent a warning to grocery stores not to provide discounts to the more than 42 million Americans affected.
Several grocery chains and food delivery apps have announced in recent days that they would provide substantial discounts to those whose Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits have been delayed. More than 1 in 8 Americans rely on the program, and 39% of them are children.
But on Sunday, Catherine Rampell, a reporter at the Washington Post published an email from the USDA that was sent to grocery stores around the country, telling them they were prohibited from offering special discounts to those at greater risk of food insecurity due to the cuts.
"You must offer eligible foods at the same prices and on the same terms and conditions to SNAP-EBT customers as other customers, except that sales tax cannot be charged on SNAP purchases," the email said. "You cannot treat SNAP-EBT customers differently from any other customer. Offering discounts or services only to SNAP-eligible customers is a SNAP violation unless you have a SNAP equal treatment waiver."
The email referred to SNAP's "Equal Treatment Rule," which prohibits stores from discriminating against SNAP recipients by charging them higher prices or treating them more favorably than other customers by offering them specialized sales or incentives.
Rampell said she was "aware of at least two stores that had offered struggling customers a discount, then withdrew it after receiving this email."
She added that it was "understandable why grocery stores might be scared off" because "a store caught violating the prohibition could be denied the ability to accept SNAP benefits in the future. In low-income areas where the SNAP shutdown will have the biggest impact, getting thrown off SNAP could mean a store is no longer financially viable."
While the rule prohibits special treatment in either direction, legal analyst Jeffrey Evan Gold argues that it was a "perverted interpretation of a rule that stops grocers from price gouging SNAP recipients... charging them more when they use food stamps."
The government also notably allows retailers to request waivers for programs that incentivize SNAP recipients to purchase healthy food.
Others pointed out that SNAP is currently not paying out to Americans because President Donald Trump is defying multiple federal court rulings issued Friday, requiring him to tap a $6 billion contingency fund to ensure benefit payments go out. Both courts, in Massachusetts and Rhode Island, have said his administration's refusal to pay out benefits is against the law.
One labor movement lawyer summed up the administration's position on social media: "Can't follow the law when a judge says fund the program, but have to follow the rules exactly when they say don't help poor people afford food."
"You need to understand that he actually believes it is illegal to criticize him," wrote Sen. Chris Murphy.
After failing to use the government's might to bully Jimmy Kimmel off the air earlier this fall, President Donald Trump is once again threatening to bring the force of law down on comedians for the egregious crime of making fun of him.
This time, his target was NBC late-night host Seth Meyers, whom the president said, in a Truth Social post Saturday, "may be the least talented person to 'perform' live in the history of television."
On Thursday, the comedian hosted a segment mocking Trump's bizarre distaste for the electromagnetic catapults aboard Navy ships, which the president said he may sign an executive order to replace with older (and less efficient) steam-powered ones.
Trump did not take kindly to Meyers' barbs: "On and on he went, a truly deranged lunatic. Why does NBC waste its time and money on a guy like this??? - NO TALENT, NO RATINGS, 100% ANTI TRUMP, WHICH IS PROBABLY ILLEGAL!!!"
It is, of course, not "illegal" for a late-night comedian, or any other news reporter or commentator, for that matter, to be "anti-Trump." But it's not the first time the president has made such a suggestion. Amid the backlash against Kimmel's firing in September, Trump asserted that networks that give him "bad publicity or press" should have their licenses taken away.
"I read someplace that the networks were 97% against me... I mean, they’re getting a license, I would think maybe their license should be taken away,” Trump said. "All they do is hit Trump. They’re licensed. They’re not allowed to do that.”
His FCC director, Brendan Carr, used a similar logic to justify his pressure campaign to get Kimmel booted by ABC, which he said could be punished for airing what he determined was "distorted” content.
Before Kimmel, Carr suggested in April that Comcast may be violating its broadcast licenses after MSNBC declined to air a White House press briefing in which the administration defended its wrongful deportation of Salvadoran immigrant Kilmar Abrego Garcia.
"You need to understand that he actually believes it is illegal to criticize him," wrote Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) on social media following Trump's tirade against Meyers. "Why? Because Trump believes he—not the people—decides the law. This is why we are in the middle of, not on the verge of, a totalitarian takeover."