September, 15 2008, 03:58pm EDT

For Immediate Release
Contact:
Elizabeth Heyd, NRDC, 202/289-2424 or 202/725-0648 (cell)
Federal Court Rules Clean Air, Wildlife, Quiet Must Come First in America's Oldest National Park
Court ruling will ensure safe, enjoyable experiences for all visitors to Yellowstone
WASHINGTON
A federal court ruled today that the Bush Administration's
decision authorizing snowmobile use in Yellowstone National Park
violates the fundamental legal responsibility of the National Park
Service to protect the clean air, wildlife, and natural quiet of
national parks, including Yellowstone, for the benefit of all visitors.
The court found that the Administration authorized snowmobile use
despite scientific conclusions by the National Park Service that its
decision would result in significant increases in noise and unhealthy
exhaust, which disrupt the experiences of visitors, and traffic that
harms Yellowstone's wildlife, including bison.
The
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia today invalidated the
Bush decision and directed that the National Park Service's substitute
plan ensures all visitors can safely experience the park, and uphold
laws that require stronger protection of Yellowstone's air quality,
wildlife, and natural sounds.
In a 63-page ruling, Judge Emmett Sullivan stated:
"The
Organic Act clearly states...that the fundamental purpose of the national
park system is to conserve park resources and values." page 18
"NPS
fails to explain how increasing snowmobile usage over current
conditions, where adaptive management thresholds are already being
exceeded, complies with the conservation mandate of the Organic Act."
Page 61-62
"...the Court finds that NPS has failed to articulate why a plan that will admittedly worsen air quality complies with the conservation mandate."
Page 60
"...the
Plan clearly elevates use over conservation of park resources and
values and fails to articulate why the Plan's 'major adverse impacts'
are 'necessary and appropriate to fulfill the purposes of the park.'"
Page 61
"According to NPS's
own data, the WUP [Winter Use Plan] will increase air pollution, exceed
the use levels recommended by NPS biologists to protect wildlife, and
cause major adverse impacts to the natural soundscapes in Yellowstone."
Page 62
The ruling is available at www.greateryellowstone.org.
"I'm
thrilled that this ruling will restore Yellowstone's profound winter
quiet," said Tom Murphy of Livingston, Montana, a Yellowstone guide and
photographer since 1979 and author of three books about the Park.
"Yellowstone's values have been diminished by snowmobiles. There's no
excuse for it when visitors are increasingly choosing modern
snowcoaches that are less expensive and much less disruptive of the
park and other visitors' enjoyment."
"This
is an important victory for Yellowstone and all of America's national
parks," said Sean Helle, attorney with Earthjustice. "Yellowstone is an
embodiment of one of America's great ideas - that our cherished lands
must be conserved and protected. The Court's opinion reaffirms this
principle."
"Beyond
Yellowstone, the court's ruling reaffirms that a cornerstone purpose of
our national parks is to provide opportunities to enjoy nature and
these opportunities must not be compromised, particularly when
protective alternatives are readily available," said Bob Rosenbaum,
attorney with Arnold & Porter.
Because
it has already studied a range of options for providing broad public
access to Yellowstone during winter, the National Park Service is in a
position to develop a plan promptly that enables visitors to continue
enjoying the park this winter in compliance with the court's order. To
ensure visitor experiences remain safe and enjoyable, and the local
economy strong, the Park Service should ensure that the number of
snowmobiles accessing the park remains this year at the daily average
of the past five seasons-approximately 260 snowmobiles per day.
Following that, the Park Service should work with local gateway
communities and businesses to begin phasing down the number of
snowmobiles in the winter of 2009-2010 while promoting expanded visitor
access on modern snowcoaches.
The
public is increasingly demanding the opportunity to enjoy Yellowstone
via snowcoach. Snowcoach use has grown 89 percent since 2002 due to
increasing visitor demand for comfortable and educational park tours.
Businesses have responded with significant investments in modern
coaches that feature guides knowledgeable about Yellowstone's geology,
wildlife and history.
The
court's ruling is consistent with research conducted by the National
Park Service that indicated the need for greater protection for the
park's wildlife, natural quiet, and clean air:
- Even
with an average of 263 snowmobiles per day during the past five
winters, snowmobile impacts have exceeded Yellowstone's noise
thresholds; - Biologists studying traffic-related
impacts to wildlife during these years recommended capping or further
reducing vehicle numbers in order to protect bison, elk and other
animals often weakened by Yellowstone's harsh winters; - The
number of snowmobiles authorized by the Administration-540 per
day-would represent a doubling of current snowmobile use that has
already been problematic and result in: - A tripling
of the area in Yellowstone where visitors would hear motorized noise
for half or more of the visiting day (63 square miles instead of 21
square miles currently); - Degradation of
Yellowstone's air quality with increases in snowmobile exhaust (carbon
monoxide, hydrocarbons, particulates, benzene and formaldehyde) of
between 18 and 100 percent; and - More animals being pushed from preferred habitat, impacting their health and increasing mortality.
"This
ruling reaffirms the idea at the heart of our National Park System-that
the duty of Yellowstone's managers is to preserve the Park for the sake
of all visitors, and to place the highest value on protection of
Yellowstone's unique natural treasures," said Tim Stevens, senior
Yellowstone Program Manager for the National Parks Conservation
Association.
"This ruling
will ensure that visitors are not disappointed by air and noise
pollution when they make the one winter trip to Yellowstone of their
lives," said Amy McNamara, National Parks Program Director for the
Greater Yellowstone Coalition. "We take our hats off to the tour
businesses that didn't wait for this ruling. Their increasing
investments in modern snowcoaches are already making it possible for
winter visitors to access and enjoy Yellowstone while protecting it."
During
the past ten years, over half a million Americans sent comments to the
National Park Service concerning Yellowstone's winter management,
making it the most publicly-commented-on issue in the history of the
national parks. A consistent 4-to-1 majority has favored accessing the
park by snowcoach instead of snowmobile.
The
Greater Yellowstone Coalition, National Parks Conservation Association,
Natural Resources Defense Council, Sierra Club, The Wilderness Society,
and Winter Wildlands Alliance collectively represent over two million
members and challenged the Bush Administration's failure to protect
Yellowstone's resources and values. The organizations were represented
by Earthjustice, a public interest environmental law firm in Bozeman,
Montana, and the firm of Arnold & Porter in Washington D.C.
NRDC works to safeguard the earth--its people, its plants and animals, and the natural systems on which all life depends. We combine the power of more than three million members and online activists with the expertise of some 700 scientists, lawyers, and policy advocates across the globe to ensure the rights of all people to the air, the water, and the wild.
(212) 727-2700LATEST NEWS
AOC Won't Seek Oversight Role: 'Underlying Dynamics in the Caucus Have Not Shifted'
"I believe I'll be staying put at Energy and Commerce," the progressive congresswoman said.
May 05, 2025
This is a breaking story… Please check back for possible updates...
Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez ended a week of speculation on Monday by announcing that she will not seek the ranking member position on the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
The New York Democrat, who last year ran for ranking member and lost to Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.), told reporters, "It's actually clear to me that the underlying dynamics in the caucus have not shifted with respect to seniority as much as I think would be necessary, so I believe I'll be staying put at Energy and Commerce."
Ocasio-Cortez has recently been crisscrossing the country with U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) for his Fighting Oligarchy Tour. Nationally, the 35-year-old progressive is seen as a possible primary challenger to Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and even a potential future presidential candidate.
Politico's Nicholas Wu noted last week that if Ocasio-Cortez declined to run for the committee post, "a number of young, ambitious members could mount bids, including Reps. Jasmine Crockett of Texas, Ro Khanna of California, Maxwell Frost of Florida, and Robert Garcia of California."
Connolly, now 75, sought the House leadership role despite an esophageal cancer diagnosis he disclosed in November. Last Monday, he said in a letter to constituents that "I want to begin by thanking you for your good wishes and compassion as I continue to tackle my diagnosis. Your outpouring of love and support has given me strength in my fights—both against cancer and in our collective defense of democracy."
"When I announced my diagnosis six months ago, I promised transparency," Connolly continued. "After grueling treatments, we've learned that the cancer, while initially beaten back, has now returned. I'll do everything possible to continue to represent you and thank you for your grace."
"The sun is setting on my time in public service, and this will be my last term in Congress," he added. "I will be stepping back as ranking member of the Oversight Committee soon. With no rancor and a full heart, I move into this final chapter full of pride in what we've accomplished together over 30 years. My loving family and staff sustain me. My extended family—you all have been a joy to serve."
The panel's far-right chair, James Comer (R-Ky.), said in response to last week's announcement that "I'm saddened to hear that Ranking Member Connolly's cancer has returned. He is a steadfast public servant who has spent his career serving Northern Virginians with honor and integrity. It's an honor to serve the American people alongside him and I am rooting for him as he battles cancer once again. Our prayers are with Ranking Member Connolly and his family."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Trump Ally Bukele Reportedly Set to Arrest Journalists Who Revealed His Secret Pact With Gangs
One critic said the Salvadoran president "wants to silence" the acclaimed digital news site El Faro "because they're shattering the myths of the Bukele administration."
May 05, 2025
An internationally acclaimed digital news outlet in El Salvador said Monday that the administration of Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele is preparing to arrest a number of its journalists following the publication of an interview with two former gang leaders who shed new light on a power-sharing agreement with the U.S.-backed leader and self-described "world's coolest dictator."
"A reliable source in El Salvador told El Faro that the Bukele-controlled Attorney General's Office is preparing at least seven arrest warrants for members of El Faro," the outlet reported. "The source reached out following the publication of an interview with two former leaders of the 18th Street Revolucionarios on Bukele's yearslong relationship to gangs."
"If carried out, the warrants are the first time in decades that prosecutors seek to press charges against individual journalists for their journalistic labors," El Faro added.
Bukele responded to the interview in a Friday evening post on the social media site X that read in part, "It's clear that a country at peace, without deaths, without extortion, without bloodshed, without corpses every day, without mothers mourning their children, is not profitable for human rights NGOs, nor for the globalist media, nor for the elites, nor for [George] Soros."
While the pact between Bukele and gang leaders is well-known in El Salvador, El Faro—which has long been a thorn in the president's side—was the first media outlet to air video of gangsters acknowledging the agreement.
As El Faro reported:
At the heart of the threat of arrests is irony: El Faro was only able to interview the two Revolucionarios because they escaped El Salvador with the complicity of Bukele.
One, who goes by "Liro Man," recounts that he was taken to Guatemala, through a blind spot in the Salvadoran border, by Bukele gang negotiator Carlos Marroquín; the other, Carlos Cartagena, or "Charli," was arrested on a warrant in April 2022, early in the state of exception, but quickly released after the police received a call at the station and backed off.
Meanwhile, tens of thousands of Salvadorans were being rounded up without due process, on charges of belonging to gangs.
The video interview explains the dichotomy: For years, Salvadoran gang leaders cut covert deals with the entourage of Nayib Bukele. In their interview with El Faro, the two Revolucionarios say the FMLN party, to which the now-president belonged a decade ago, paid a quarter of a million dollars to the gangs during the 2014 campaign in exchange for vote coercion in gang-controlled communities, on behalf of Bukele for San Salvador mayor and Salvador Sánchez Cerén as president.
"This support, the sources say, was key to Bukele's ascent to power," El Faro noted. "'You're going to tell your mom and your wife's family that they have to vote for Nayib. If you don't do it, we'll kill them,' Liro Man says the gang members told their communities in that election. Of Bukele, he added, 'he knew he had to get to the gangs in order to get to where he is.'"
Part of the deal was a tacit "no body, no crime" policy under which gang leaders agreed to hide their victims' corpses as Bukele boasted of a historic reduction in homicides in a country once known as the world's murder capital.
"We've wanted to talk about this for a long time, for the simple reason that the government beats their chests and says, 'We're anti-gang, we don't want this scourge,'" Liro Man told El Faro. "But they forgot that they made a deal with us, and you were the first to get this out."
In an ironic twist, the Trump administration deported gang members from the U.S. to El Salvador's notorious Terrorism Confinement Center prison who faced federal indictments that could have resulted in their testifying in court about the pact with Bukele.
Responding to the possible arrest warrants for El Faro staffers, Argentinian journalist Eliezer Budasoff said on social media Sunday that "it's clear" that El Salvador's leader "wants to silence" the outlet "because they're shattering the myths of the Bukele administration, simply with more journalism."
The Bukele administration's attacks on El Faro include falsely accusing the outlet of money laundering and tax evasion, banning its reporters from press briefings, and surveilling its staffers with Pegasus spyware. El Faro has remained steadfast in the face of these and other actions.
"Every citizen must decide for themselves whether they want to be informed, or whether they prefer the blind loyalty this administration has demanded of its supporters since its first day in power," the outlet's editors wrote in 2022. "We don't have that choice. Our job is to report. We can't change the news, and we never will."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Michigan AG Drops Charges Against Pro-Palestinian Campus Protesters
"Our First Amendment rights should never be criminalized. Speaking up against genocide should be lifted up, not slammed with felony charges. Palestinians deserve safety and dignity," said Rep. Rashida Tlaib.
May 05, 2025
Advocates for student protesters and other critics of the U.S.-backed Israeli assault on the Gaza Strip celebrated on Monday after Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel dropped all charges against seven people arrested last year at the University of Michigan amid allegations of bias that the Democrat rejected.
"When my office made the decision to issue charges of trespassing, and resisting and obstructing a police officer, in this matter, we did so based on the evidence and facts of the case. I stand by those charges and that determination," Nessel said in a statement. She then took aim at Ann Arbor District Judge Cedric Simpson.
"Despite months and months of court hearings, the court has yet to make a determination on whether probable cause was demonstrated that the defendants committed these crimes, and if so, to bind the case over to circuit court for trial, which is the primary obligation of the district court for any felony offense," she said. "During this time, the case has become a lightning rod of contention."
Nessel is Jewish, and on May 2, the Jewish Federation of Greater Ann Arbor submitted to the court a letter defending her against accusations of bias. The attorney general cited the letter in her new statement.
"Baseless and absurd allegations of bias have only furthered this divide," Nessel said. "The motion for recusal has been a diversionary tactic which has only served to further delay the proceedings. And now, we have learned that a public statement in support of my office from a local nonprofit has been directly communicated to the court. The impropriety of this action has led us to the difficult decision to drop these charges."
"These distractions and ongoing delays have created a circus-like atmosphere to these proceedings," she continued. "While I stand by my charging decisions, and believe, based on the evidence, a reasonable jury would find the defendants guilty of the crimes alleged, I no longer believe these cases to be a prudent use of my department's resources, and, as such, I have decided to dismiss the cases."
The defendants—Oliver Kozler, Samantha Lewis, Henry MacKeen-Shapiro, Michael Mueller, Asad Siddiqui, Avi Tachna-Fram, and Rhiannon Willow—had pleaded not guilty. The Detroit Free Pressreported that one of Nessel's deputies, Robyn Liddell, made the motion to dismiss the case and the defendants "hugged each other, smiled, and posed for a photo with their attorneys in the courtroom."
According to the newspaper:
The courtroom was packed with spectators, many of them wearing keffiyehs. They burst into applause at the decision and began chants of "Free Palestine."
Amir Makled, who represented Lewis, said the charges never should have been brought.
"This was not about trespass, this was not about a felony conduct," Makled said. "This was the criminalization of free speech, and today, the state of Michigan agrees."
State Rep. Dylan Wegela (D-26) said on social media Monday: "This is great news. It takes courage to stand up for what is right. The charges should have never been pursued in the first place. I'm glad the students maintained their innocence and didn't accept a plea deal."
Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) similarly declared, "Good news for our university student communities!"
"Our First Amendment rights should never be criminalized," added Tlaib, the only Palestinian American in Congress. "Speaking up against genocide should be lifted up, not slammed with felony charges. Palestinians deserve safety and dignity."
Union organizer Anne Elias said that "this prosecution was wrong and I think public pressure on Dana Nessel worked. I feel such relief for our students and community members, as this was a complete surprise for them today."
"[Democrats] largely own this mess, and we must identify the political entanglements—[especially] with President Ono resigning," Elias added, referring to Santa Ono, who is on track to leave his post at the University of Michigan to lead the University of Florida.
In addition to coming under fire for this case, Nessel was criticized late last month for raids of pro-Palestine student organizers' homes that her office said were "not related to protest activity on the campus of the University of Michigan," but "in furtherance of our investigation into multijurisdictional acts of vandalism."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular