September, 15 2008, 03:58pm EDT
![Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC)](https://assets.rbl.ms/32012690/origin.jpg)
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Elizabeth Heyd, NRDC, 202/289-2424 or 202/725-0648 (cell)
Federal Court Rules Clean Air, Wildlife, Quiet Must Come First in America's Oldest National Park
Court ruling will ensure safe, enjoyable experiences for all visitors to Yellowstone
WASHINGTON
A federal court ruled today that the Bush Administration's
decision authorizing snowmobile use in Yellowstone National Park
violates the fundamental legal responsibility of the National Park
Service to protect the clean air, wildlife, and natural quiet of
national parks, including Yellowstone, for the benefit of all visitors.
The court found that the Administration authorized snowmobile use
despite scientific conclusions by the National Park Service that its
decision would result in significant increases in noise and unhealthy
exhaust, which disrupt the experiences of visitors, and traffic that
harms Yellowstone's wildlife, including bison.
The
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia today invalidated the
Bush decision and directed that the National Park Service's substitute
plan ensures all visitors can safely experience the park, and uphold
laws that require stronger protection of Yellowstone's air quality,
wildlife, and natural sounds.
In a 63-page ruling, Judge Emmett Sullivan stated:
"The
Organic Act clearly states...that the fundamental purpose of the national
park system is to conserve park resources and values." page 18
"NPS
fails to explain how increasing snowmobile usage over current
conditions, where adaptive management thresholds are already being
exceeded, complies with the conservation mandate of the Organic Act."
Page 61-62
"...the Court finds that NPS has failed to articulate why a plan that will admittedly worsen air quality complies with the conservation mandate."
Page 60
"...the
Plan clearly elevates use over conservation of park resources and
values and fails to articulate why the Plan's 'major adverse impacts'
are 'necessary and appropriate to fulfill the purposes of the park.'"
Page 61
"According to NPS's
own data, the WUP [Winter Use Plan] will increase air pollution, exceed
the use levels recommended by NPS biologists to protect wildlife, and
cause major adverse impacts to the natural soundscapes in Yellowstone."
Page 62
The ruling is available at www.greateryellowstone.org.
"I'm
thrilled that this ruling will restore Yellowstone's profound winter
quiet," said Tom Murphy of Livingston, Montana, a Yellowstone guide and
photographer since 1979 and author of three books about the Park.
"Yellowstone's values have been diminished by snowmobiles. There's no
excuse for it when visitors are increasingly choosing modern
snowcoaches that are less expensive and much less disruptive of the
park and other visitors' enjoyment."
"This
is an important victory for Yellowstone and all of America's national
parks," said Sean Helle, attorney with Earthjustice. "Yellowstone is an
embodiment of one of America's great ideas - that our cherished lands
must be conserved and protected. The Court's opinion reaffirms this
principle."
"Beyond
Yellowstone, the court's ruling reaffirms that a cornerstone purpose of
our national parks is to provide opportunities to enjoy nature and
these opportunities must not be compromised, particularly when
protective alternatives are readily available," said Bob Rosenbaum,
attorney with Arnold & Porter.
Because
it has already studied a range of options for providing broad public
access to Yellowstone during winter, the National Park Service is in a
position to develop a plan promptly that enables visitors to continue
enjoying the park this winter in compliance with the court's order. To
ensure visitor experiences remain safe and enjoyable, and the local
economy strong, the Park Service should ensure that the number of
snowmobiles accessing the park remains this year at the daily average
of the past five seasons-approximately 260 snowmobiles per day.
Following that, the Park Service should work with local gateway
communities and businesses to begin phasing down the number of
snowmobiles in the winter of 2009-2010 while promoting expanded visitor
access on modern snowcoaches.
The
public is increasingly demanding the opportunity to enjoy Yellowstone
via snowcoach. Snowcoach use has grown 89 percent since 2002 due to
increasing visitor demand for comfortable and educational park tours.
Businesses have responded with significant investments in modern
coaches that feature guides knowledgeable about Yellowstone's geology,
wildlife and history.
The
court's ruling is consistent with research conducted by the National
Park Service that indicated the need for greater protection for the
park's wildlife, natural quiet, and clean air:
- Even
with an average of 263 snowmobiles per day during the past five
winters, snowmobile impacts have exceeded Yellowstone's noise
thresholds; - Biologists studying traffic-related
impacts to wildlife during these years recommended capping or further
reducing vehicle numbers in order to protect bison, elk and other
animals often weakened by Yellowstone's harsh winters; - The
number of snowmobiles authorized by the Administration-540 per
day-would represent a doubling of current snowmobile use that has
already been problematic and result in: - A tripling
of the area in Yellowstone where visitors would hear motorized noise
for half or more of the visiting day (63 square miles instead of 21
square miles currently); - Degradation of
Yellowstone's air quality with increases in snowmobile exhaust (carbon
monoxide, hydrocarbons, particulates, benzene and formaldehyde) of
between 18 and 100 percent; and - More animals being pushed from preferred habitat, impacting their health and increasing mortality.
"This
ruling reaffirms the idea at the heart of our National Park System-that
the duty of Yellowstone's managers is to preserve the Park for the sake
of all visitors, and to place the highest value on protection of
Yellowstone's unique natural treasures," said Tim Stevens, senior
Yellowstone Program Manager for the National Parks Conservation
Association.
"This ruling
will ensure that visitors are not disappointed by air and noise
pollution when they make the one winter trip to Yellowstone of their
lives," said Amy McNamara, National Parks Program Director for the
Greater Yellowstone Coalition. "We take our hats off to the tour
businesses that didn't wait for this ruling. Their increasing
investments in modern snowcoaches are already making it possible for
winter visitors to access and enjoy Yellowstone while protecting it."
During
the past ten years, over half a million Americans sent comments to the
National Park Service concerning Yellowstone's winter management,
making it the most publicly-commented-on issue in the history of the
national parks. A consistent 4-to-1 majority has favored accessing the
park by snowcoach instead of snowmobile.
The
Greater Yellowstone Coalition, National Parks Conservation Association,
Natural Resources Defense Council, Sierra Club, The Wilderness Society,
and Winter Wildlands Alliance collectively represent over two million
members and challenged the Bush Administration's failure to protect
Yellowstone's resources and values. The organizations were represented
by Earthjustice, a public interest environmental law firm in Bozeman,
Montana, and the firm of Arnold & Porter in Washington D.C.
NRDC works to safeguard the earth--its people, its plants and animals, and the natural systems on which all life depends. We combine the power of more than three million members and online activists with the expertise of some 700 scientists, lawyers, and policy advocates across the globe to ensure the rights of all people to the air, the water, and the wild.
(212) 727-2700LATEST NEWS
'Tragic Outcome' for Gig Workers as California Supreme Court Hands Win to Uber, DoorDash
"Today's ruling only strengthens our demand for the right to join together in a union so that we can begin improving the gig economy for workers and our customers," the case plaintiff said.
Jul 25, 2024
Labor advocates on Thursday decried a ruling by the California Supreme Court upholding a lower court's affirmation of a state ballot measure allowing app-based ride and delivery companies to classify their drivers as independent contractors, limiting their worker rights.
The court's seven justices ruled unanimously in Castellanos v. State of California that Proposition 22, which was approved by 58% of California voters in 2020, complies with the state constitution. Prop 22—which was overturned in 2021 by an Alameda County Superior Court judge in 2021—was upheld in March 2023 by the state's 1st District Court of Appeals.
The business models of app-based companies including DoorDash, Instacart, Lyft, and Uber rely upon minimizing frontline worker compensation by categorizing drivers as independent contractors instead of employees. Independent contractors are not entitled to unemployment insurance, health insurance, or compensation for business expenses.
There are approximately 1.4 million app-based gig workers in California, according to industry estimates.
While DoorDash hailed Thursday's ruling as "not only a victory for Dashers, but also for democracy itself," gig worker advocates condemned the decision.
"Over the last three years, gig workers across California have experienced firsthand that Prop 22 is nothing more than a bait-and-switch meant to enrich global corporations at the expense of the Black, brown, and immigrant workers who power their earnings," plaintiff Hector Castellanos, who drives for Uber and Lyft, said in a statement.
"Prop 22 has allowed gig companies like Uber, Lyft, and DoorDash to deprive us of a living wage, access to workers compensation, paid sick leave, and meaningful healthcare coverage," Castellanos added. "Today's ruling only strengthens our demand for the right to join together in a union so that we can begin improving the gig economy for workers and our customers."
Lorena Gonzalez, president of the California Federation of Labor Unions, AFL-CIO, said that "we are deeply disappointed that the state Supreme Court has allowed tech corporations to buy their way out of basic labor laws despite Proposition 22's inconsistencies with our state constitution."
"These companies have upended our social contract, forcing workers and the public to take on the inherent risk created by this work, while they profit," she continued. "A.B. 5 granted virtually all California workers the right to be paid for all hours worked, health and safety standards, unemployment insurance, workers compensation, and the right to organize."
"Rideshare and delivery drivers deserve those rights as well," Gonzalez stressed.
The Gig Workers Rising campaign said on social media that "Uber and other app corporations spent $220 million to buy this law, and they did it by tricking Californians."
Prop 22's passage in November 2020 with nearly 59% of the vote was the culmination of what was by far the most expensive ballot measure in California history. App-based companies and their backers outspent labor and progressive groups by more than 10 to 1, with proponents pouring a staggering $204.5 million into the "yes" campaign's coffers against just $19 million for the "no" side.
"Voters were told the initiative would provide us with 'historic new benefits' and guaranteed earnings," said Gig Workers Rising. "But since it went into effect, drivers have seen our pay go down, learned the benefits are a sham, and have to accept unsafe rides because of the constant threat of being 'deactivated,' kicked off the app with little explanation or warning."
"If Uber really cared about good benefits and fair wages, it could make that happen tomorrow," the campaign added. "Instead, it has shown it would rather slash pay, bamboozle voters, and put drivers' lives and livelihoods in danger—all while promising $7 billion in stock buybacks to banks and billionaires."
Veena Dubal, a law professor at the University of California, Irvine who focuses on labor and inequality, toldCalMatters that Thursday's ruling was "a really tragic outcome," but "it's not the end of the road."
Dubal's sentiment was echoed by some California state legislators, who said the ruling presents an opportunity to act.
"While this decision is frustrating, it must also be motivating," said state Senate Labor Committee Chair Lola Smallwood-Cuevas (D-28). "I'm more determined than ever to ensure that all workers—including our diverse and Black, Indigenous, and people of color-led gig workforce—have the basic protections of workers compensation, paid sick leave, family leave, disability insurance, and the right to form a union."
Prop 22 has served as a template for lawmakers in other states seeking to deny or limit basic worker rights, benefits, and protections.
In Massachusetts, app-based companies have been fighting for years to get a measure to classify drivers as contractors on the state ballot. In 2022, Lyft made the largest political donation in state history—$14.4 million—to a coalition funding one such proposal.
Last month, Uber and Lyft reached an agreement with the office of Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Campbell, a Democrat, to pay $175 million to settle a lawsuit filed in 2020. As part of the deal, the companies also agreed to increase driver pay and provide paid sick leave, accident insurance, and some health benefits. The agreement does not address how app-based gig workers should be classified.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Young Voters Tell Kamala Harris to 'Fight for Our Future'
"This is your chance to energize young people and our communities to vote, mount one of the greatest political comebacks in decades, and deliver a resounding defeat to the far-right agenda of Trump and Vance."
Jul 25, 2024
Four youth-led groups on Thursday urged Vice President Kamala Harris, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, to "fight for our future" by pursuing a policy agenda the coalition unveiled in a March letter to U.S. President Joe Biden.
It's been less than a week since Biden left the race and endorsed Harris, who is expected to face former Republican Donald Trump and his running mate, U.S. Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio), in the November election. Since then, she's racked up endorsements from Democratic members of Congress and progressive groups focused on issues including climate, labor, and reproductive rights.
March for Our Lives, which was launched after the 2018 mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, honored Harris with the group's first-ever endorsement on Wednesday, calling her "the right person to stand up for us and fight for the country we deserve."
"To defeat Trump, you must rebuild support and enthusiasm among young voters."
The gun violence prevention organization is part of the youth-led coalition behind the new letter, which also includes the climate-focused Sunrise Movement; Gen-Z for Change, which advocates on a range of issues; and the national immigrant network United We Dream Action.
"You have an urgent and important task. To defeat Trump, you must rebuild support and enthusiasm among young voters," the coalition told Harris on Thursday, noting that she sought the Democratic nomination during the last cycle. "You should build on your 2020 campaign platform where you put forward a strong vision to make the economy work for everyday people and ensure a livable future for us all."
The groups urged Harris to support the Green New Deal, Medicare for All, and the Reverse Mass Incarceration Act. They pushed her to expand pathways to citizenship, keep families together, end fossil fuel subsidies, and create good, union jobs. They also called on her to prioritize gun violence prevention and investments in public health solutions and green, affordable housing.
"Democrats are at a critical crossroads with young people," the coalition wrote to Harris on Thursday. "Polls showed Biden and Trump neck-and-neck among young voters."
ANew York Times/Siena College poll conducted July 22-24 shows Trump leading Harris 48% to 47% among likely voters and 48% to 46% among registered voters—differences that fall within the margin of error.
Forbesnoted Thursday that "Democrats are far more enthusiastic about Harris than they were Biden, the Times/Siena survey found, with nearly 80% of voters who lean Democrat saying they would like Harris to be the nominee, compared to 48% of Democrats who said the same about Biden three weeks ago."
The outlet also pointed to two other polls conducted by Morning Consult and Reuters/Ipsos since Biden dropped out, which both show Harris with a narrow lead over Trump.
"You have an opportunity to win the youth vote by turning the page and differentiating yourself from Biden policies that are deeply unpopular with us, such as approving new oil and gas projects, denying people their right to seek refuge and asylum, and funding the Israeli government's killing of civilians in Gaza," the youth coalition highlighted Thursday. "You must speak to the economic pain young people are facing from crushing student debt and skyrocketing housing and food prices."
Looking beyond November, the groups told Harris—who could be the first Black woman and person of Asian descent elected to the country's highest office—that "you could be a historic president. Not just because of who you are, but what you can accomplish."
"Young people are energized and ready to organize against fascism and for the future we deserve," they concluded. "This is your chance to energize young people and our communities to vote, mount one of the greatest political comebacks in decades, and deliver a resounding defeat to the far-right agenda of Trump and Vance."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Video Game Actors Strike for AI Protections
"The video game industry generates billions of dollars in profit annually," said one union leader. "The driving force behind that success is the creative people who design and create those games."
Jul 25, 2024
After nearly two years of negotiations with video game giants and no deal that would protect performers from artificial intelligence, unionized voice and motion capture actors who work in video game development announced Thursday that they will go on strike starting at 12:01 am on Friday, July 26.
The performers are represented by Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (SAG-AFTRA), which last year won a contract for TV and film actors that included "unprecedented provisions for consent and compensation that will protect members from the threat of AI," after the union went on strike for four months.
The union has been negotiating on behalf of video game actors with major production companies including Disney Character Voices Inc., Activision Productions Inc., and WB Games Inc., and has won concessions over wages and job safety—but "AI protections remain the sticking point," said SAG-AFTRA on Thursday as the impending strike was announced.
Unionized actors want protections that would stop video game companies from training AI to replicate actors' voices or likeness without their consent and without compensating them.
"The video game industry generates billions of dollars in profit annually," said Duncan Crabtree-Ireland, national executive director and chief negotiator for SAG-AFTRA. "The driving force behind that success is the creative people who design and create those games. That includes the SAG-AFTRA members who bring memorable and beloved game characters to life, and they deserve and demand the same fundamental protections as performers in film, television, streaming, and music: fair compensation and the right of informed consent for the AI use of their faces, voices, and bodies."
"Frankly, it's stunning that these video game studios haven't learned anything from the lessons of last year—that our members can and will stand up and demand fair and equitable treatment with respect to AI, and the public supports us in that," he added.
Sarah Elmaleh, negotiating committee chair for the union's interactive media agreement, said the negotiations have shown the companies "are not interested in fair, reasonable AI protections, but rather flagrant exploitation."
"We look forward to collaborating with teams on our interim and independent contracts, which provide AI transparency, consent, and compensation to all performers, and to continuing to negotiate in good faith with this bargaining group when they are ready to join us in the world we all deserve," said Elmaleh.
The unionized actors voted in favor of the strike authorization with a 98.32% yes vote, said SAG-AFTRA.
The strike was announced as more than 500 workers who help develop the popular World of Warcraft video game franchise voted to join the Communications Workers of America (CWA), with the games publisher, Blizzard Entertainment, recognizing the bargaining unit.
CWA noted that the workers' journey to union representation began with a walkout in 2021 at Activision Blizzard, which was later bought by Microsoft, over sexual harassment and discrimination.
"What we've accomplished at World of Warcraft is just the beginning," Eric Lanham, a World of Warcraft test analyst, said in a statement. "We know that when workers have a protected voice, it's a win-win for employee standards, the studio, and World of Warcraft fans looking for the best gaming experience."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular