An abortion rights activist holds a placard saying, "Abortion bans replace freedom with force," in Bloomington, Indiana on September 15, 2022.
After Texas Abortion Ruling, 'Make No Mistake—This Is the America the GOP Wants'
The case of a woman who had to flee Texas to get abortion care "has shown the world that abortion bans are dangerous for pregnant people," said one advocate.
The Texas Supreme Court's ruling late Monday, in which the all-Republican panel said Dallas resident Kate Cox could not obtain an abortion despite a lethal fetal diagnosis, did not stop the 31-year-old woman from getting care outside the state. But the ruling, said rights advocates on Tuesday, carries major implications for other Texans and people across the United States.
The state Supreme Court handed down a seven-page ruling saying that Travis County District Judge Maya Guerra Gamble was wrong to issue a temporary restraining order last week, which had barred the state from prosecuting Cox's physician for providing abortion care.
Cox learned earlier this month at about 20 weeks pregnant that her fetus had trisomy 18, a condition that results in miscarriage, stillbirth, or the death of a newborn in the days or weeks after birth.
Under Texas' near-total abortion ban, which ostensibly allows exceptions in cases in which an abortion is medically necessary to protect the pregnant person's life or to prevent unspecified "substantial impairment," Cox's physician said she would have to carry the pregnancy and have a Caesarean section, which could have resulted in uterine rupture and threatened her future fertility.
Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton appealed Gamble's ruling to the state Supreme Court, which said in its decision Monday: "A woman who meets the medical-necessity exception need not seek a court order to obtain an abortion. Under the law, it is a doctor who must decide that a woman is suffering from a life-threatening condition during a pregnancy, raising the necessity for an abortion to save her life or to prevent impairment of a major bodily function."
In other words, said Politico healthcare reporter Alice Miranda Ollstein, "the court views the lawsuit itself as evidence Cox does not qualify for relief from the state's ban."
The Republican justices, like the state abortion ban, did not provide guidance to help physicians determine situations in which they could provide abortion care without fearing prosecution and a potential life prison sentence.
Molly Duane, a senior staff attorney at the Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR) who has represented Cox in the case, said on Tuesday that Cox's ordeal offers the latest proof that so-called "exceptions" don't work, and it's dangerous to be pregnant in any state with an abortion ban."
"This ruling should enrage every Texan to their core. If Kate can't get an abortion in Texas, who can?" said Duane. "Doctors still don't know what the exception means, and the Texas Medical Board remains silent. If the highest court in Texas can't figure out what this law means, I'm not sure how a doctor could. Meanwhile, the lives of Texans hang in the balance.”
The court's ruling and its vague reasoning about co-called "exceptions" to abortion bans, said Mini Timmaraju, president and CEO of Reproductive Freedom for All, represents "the America the GOP wants."
For many Texans, said Nancy Northrup, president and CEO of CRR, a pregnancy complication like Cox's "could be a death sentence" under the state's laws.
"Kate's case has shown the world that abortion bans are dangerous for pregnant people," Northup said. "She desperately wanted to be able to get care where she lives and recover at home surrounded by family. While Kate had the ability to leave the state, most people do not."
Meanwhile, said author and advocate Jessica Valenti, Republicans are still pushing for a nationwide 15-week abortion ban. Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, a major group that supports forced pregnancy, has said it will not endorse a 2024 GOP candidate who doesn't back the proposal.
"What if there was no other state to go to? What if instead of being forced to travel to a neighboring state—an already-impossible hurdle for many Americans—Cox had to travel to a nearby country?" wrote Valenti on Monday. "That is not some hyperbolic hypothetical: It's exactly what life would look like under Republicans' 15-week national ban. And we can't let voters forget it."
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just three days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The Texas Supreme Court's ruling late Monday, in which the all-Republican panel said Dallas resident Kate Cox could not obtain an abortion despite a lethal fetal diagnosis, did not stop the 31-year-old woman from getting care outside the state. But the ruling, said rights advocates on Tuesday, carries major implications for other Texans and people across the United States.
The state Supreme Court handed down a seven-page ruling saying that Travis County District Judge Maya Guerra Gamble was wrong to issue a temporary restraining order last week, which had barred the state from prosecuting Cox's physician for providing abortion care.
Cox learned earlier this month at about 20 weeks pregnant that her fetus had trisomy 18, a condition that results in miscarriage, stillbirth, or the death of a newborn in the days or weeks after birth.
Under Texas' near-total abortion ban, which ostensibly allows exceptions in cases in which an abortion is medically necessary to protect the pregnant person's life or to prevent unspecified "substantial impairment," Cox's physician said she would have to carry the pregnancy and have a Caesarean section, which could have resulted in uterine rupture and threatened her future fertility.
Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton appealed Gamble's ruling to the state Supreme Court, which said in its decision Monday: "A woman who meets the medical-necessity exception need not seek a court order to obtain an abortion. Under the law, it is a doctor who must decide that a woman is suffering from a life-threatening condition during a pregnancy, raising the necessity for an abortion to save her life or to prevent impairment of a major bodily function."
In other words, said Politico healthcare reporter Alice Miranda Ollstein, "the court views the lawsuit itself as evidence Cox does not qualify for relief from the state's ban."
The Republican justices, like the state abortion ban, did not provide guidance to help physicians determine situations in which they could provide abortion care without fearing prosecution and a potential life prison sentence.
Molly Duane, a senior staff attorney at the Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR) who has represented Cox in the case, said on Tuesday that Cox's ordeal offers the latest proof that so-called "exceptions" don't work, and it's dangerous to be pregnant in any state with an abortion ban."
"This ruling should enrage every Texan to their core. If Kate can't get an abortion in Texas, who can?" said Duane. "Doctors still don't know what the exception means, and the Texas Medical Board remains silent. If the highest court in Texas can't figure out what this law means, I'm not sure how a doctor could. Meanwhile, the lives of Texans hang in the balance.”
The court's ruling and its vague reasoning about co-called "exceptions" to abortion bans, said Mini Timmaraju, president and CEO of Reproductive Freedom for All, represents "the America the GOP wants."
For many Texans, said Nancy Northrup, president and CEO of CRR, a pregnancy complication like Cox's "could be a death sentence" under the state's laws.
"Kate's case has shown the world that abortion bans are dangerous for pregnant people," Northup said. "She desperately wanted to be able to get care where she lives and recover at home surrounded by family. While Kate had the ability to leave the state, most people do not."
Meanwhile, said author and advocate Jessica Valenti, Republicans are still pushing for a nationwide 15-week abortion ban. Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, a major group that supports forced pregnancy, has said it will not endorse a 2024 GOP candidate who doesn't back the proposal.
"What if there was no other state to go to? What if instead of being forced to travel to a neighboring state—an already-impossible hurdle for many Americans—Cox had to travel to a nearby country?" wrote Valenti on Monday. "That is not some hyperbolic hypothetical: It's exactly what life would look like under Republicans' 15-week national ban. And we can't let voters forget it."
- Texas Woman's Near-Death Experience Is What GOP 'Hopes to See Nationwide' ›
- 'Tip of the Iceberg': GOP-Led States Eye Texas Model to Attack Abortion Rights ›
- Critics Say Texas GOP's New Exception to Abortion Ban Is Meant to 'Deceive Voters' ›
- Opinion | Returning to Draconian Abortion Bans Doesn’t Make America Great | Common Dreams ›
- Texas GOP Wish List Includes Death Penalty for Abortion Patients | Common Dreams ›
The Texas Supreme Court's ruling late Monday, in which the all-Republican panel said Dallas resident Kate Cox could not obtain an abortion despite a lethal fetal diagnosis, did not stop the 31-year-old woman from getting care outside the state. But the ruling, said rights advocates on Tuesday, carries major implications for other Texans and people across the United States.
The state Supreme Court handed down a seven-page ruling saying that Travis County District Judge Maya Guerra Gamble was wrong to issue a temporary restraining order last week, which had barred the state from prosecuting Cox's physician for providing abortion care.
Cox learned earlier this month at about 20 weeks pregnant that her fetus had trisomy 18, a condition that results in miscarriage, stillbirth, or the death of a newborn in the days or weeks after birth.
Under Texas' near-total abortion ban, which ostensibly allows exceptions in cases in which an abortion is medically necessary to protect the pregnant person's life or to prevent unspecified "substantial impairment," Cox's physician said she would have to carry the pregnancy and have a Caesarean section, which could have resulted in uterine rupture and threatened her future fertility.
Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton appealed Gamble's ruling to the state Supreme Court, which said in its decision Monday: "A woman who meets the medical-necessity exception need not seek a court order to obtain an abortion. Under the law, it is a doctor who must decide that a woman is suffering from a life-threatening condition during a pregnancy, raising the necessity for an abortion to save her life or to prevent impairment of a major bodily function."
In other words, said Politico healthcare reporter Alice Miranda Ollstein, "the court views the lawsuit itself as evidence Cox does not qualify for relief from the state's ban."
The Republican justices, like the state abortion ban, did not provide guidance to help physicians determine situations in which they could provide abortion care without fearing prosecution and a potential life prison sentence.
Molly Duane, a senior staff attorney at the Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR) who has represented Cox in the case, said on Tuesday that Cox's ordeal offers the latest proof that so-called "exceptions" don't work, and it's dangerous to be pregnant in any state with an abortion ban."
"This ruling should enrage every Texan to their core. If Kate can't get an abortion in Texas, who can?" said Duane. "Doctors still don't know what the exception means, and the Texas Medical Board remains silent. If the highest court in Texas can't figure out what this law means, I'm not sure how a doctor could. Meanwhile, the lives of Texans hang in the balance.”
The court's ruling and its vague reasoning about co-called "exceptions" to abortion bans, said Mini Timmaraju, president and CEO of Reproductive Freedom for All, represents "the America the GOP wants."
For many Texans, said Nancy Northrup, president and CEO of CRR, a pregnancy complication like Cox's "could be a death sentence" under the state's laws.
"Kate's case has shown the world that abortion bans are dangerous for pregnant people," Northup said. "She desperately wanted to be able to get care where she lives and recover at home surrounded by family. While Kate had the ability to leave the state, most people do not."
Meanwhile, said author and advocate Jessica Valenti, Republicans are still pushing for a nationwide 15-week abortion ban. Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, a major group that supports forced pregnancy, has said it will not endorse a 2024 GOP candidate who doesn't back the proposal.
"What if there was no other state to go to? What if instead of being forced to travel to a neighboring state—an already-impossible hurdle for many Americans—Cox had to travel to a nearby country?" wrote Valenti on Monday. "That is not some hyperbolic hypothetical: It's exactly what life would look like under Republicans' 15-week national ban. And we can't let voters forget it."
- Texas Woman's Near-Death Experience Is What GOP 'Hopes to See Nationwide' ›
- 'Tip of the Iceberg': GOP-Led States Eye Texas Model to Attack Abortion Rights ›
- Critics Say Texas GOP's New Exception to Abortion Ban Is Meant to 'Deceive Voters' ›
- Opinion | Returning to Draconian Abortion Bans Doesn’t Make America Great | Common Dreams ›
- Texas GOP Wish List Includes Death Penalty for Abortion Patients | Common Dreams ›