Republican U.S. President-elect Donald Trump—who has repeatedly called the media the "enemy of the people"—speaks during a September 25, 2024 campaign rally in Mint Hill, North Carolina.
In 'Chilling' Attack on Press, Trump Sues Des Moines Register Over Preelection Polling
One expert said that while the lawsuit has little chance of success, Trump's "true motivation is to intimidate the press and journalists."
Free press advocates voiced alarm Tuesday over what one commentator called the "chilling effect" of a lawsuit filed by U.S. President-elect Donald Trump against a prominent pollster, her firm, and an Iowa newspaper that published a preelection poll showing Vice Kamala Harris leading the Republican nominee in the state which he ultimately won by double digits.
Trump sued pollster J. Ann Selzer, her polling firm Selzer & Company, The Des Moines Register, and the paper's parent company, Gannett, alleging fraud and "brazen election interference" over a November 2 poll showing Harris, the Democratic nominee, ahead of Trump by 3 points. Trump won Iowa by 13 points.
"I'm doing this because I feel I have an obligation to," Trump explained after filing the suit on Monday. "I'm going to be bringing one against the people in Iowa, their newspaper, which had a very, very good pollster who got me right all the time, and then just before the election, she said I was going to lose by 3 or 4 points."
Trump's lawyers say the disparity between Selzer's polling and the election's actual outcome shows the defendants acted with "intentional" malice and engaged in "election-interfering fiction."
Unlike other Trump lawsuits including the one ABC News agreed Saturday to settle for $15 million plus $1 million in legal fees, the new suit does not accuse the defendants of defaming the president-elect. Instead, it alleges violations of the Iowa Consumer Fraud Act and related provisions.
Responding to the filing, a spokesperson for Gannett—which owns over 100 daily and 1,000 weekly newspapers in the United States and abroad—said that "we stand by our reporting on the matter and believe this lawsuit is without merit."
Media and legal experts said that although the new lawsuit has very little chance of success, Trump—who has called the press the "enemy of the people" and has even suggested that he would not mind if journalists were shot—is aiming to silence critical media through resource-sapping lawfare.
"The odds of success here are slim to none, but winning in court is not likely the real goal of this lawsuit," Clay Calvert, a media law expert and professor at the University of Florida's Levin College of Law, told NBC News. "The true motivation is to intimidate the press and journalists. I unfortunately suspect this lawsuit is just a harbinger of things to come."
Fox News commentator Howard Kurtz said on social media that while it is "very hard for a public figure to win" a lawsuit like the one Trump filed, "the chilling effect is clear."
Trump said today that he’s planning to sue the Des Moines Register, 60 Minutes, Bob Woodward, and even the Pulitzer Prizes, awarded by Columbia University. He claims the Justice Department should have done it for him. The weaponization of power is on full display.
— Voter Protection Project (@voterprotectpac.bsky.social) December 16, 2024 at 4:39 PM
Joel Simon, director of the City University of New York's Journalism Protection Initiative, told CNN that he "would not have imagined" that such tactics "would be deployed in the United States."
"I would also be concerned about the arbitrary, petty, and vindictive nature of these legal actions that President-elect Trump is pursuing," he said. "The possibility of legal victory is slim because under the 'actual malice' standard reporting done in good faith is protected in the U.S. But for a smaller or less-resourced news organization, mounting a legal defense can be a serious challenge."
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Free press advocates voiced alarm Tuesday over what one commentator called the "chilling effect" of a lawsuit filed by U.S. President-elect Donald Trump against a prominent pollster, her firm, and an Iowa newspaper that published a preelection poll showing Vice Kamala Harris leading the Republican nominee in the state which he ultimately won by double digits.
Trump sued pollster J. Ann Selzer, her polling firm Selzer & Company, The Des Moines Register, and the paper's parent company, Gannett, alleging fraud and "brazen election interference" over a November 2 poll showing Harris, the Democratic nominee, ahead of Trump by 3 points. Trump won Iowa by 13 points.
"I'm doing this because I feel I have an obligation to," Trump explained after filing the suit on Monday. "I'm going to be bringing one against the people in Iowa, their newspaper, which had a very, very good pollster who got me right all the time, and then just before the election, she said I was going to lose by 3 or 4 points."
Trump's lawyers say the disparity between Selzer's polling and the election's actual outcome shows the defendants acted with "intentional" malice and engaged in "election-interfering fiction."
Unlike other Trump lawsuits including the one ABC News agreed Saturday to settle for $15 million plus $1 million in legal fees, the new suit does not accuse the defendants of defaming the president-elect. Instead, it alleges violations of the Iowa Consumer Fraud Act and related provisions.
Responding to the filing, a spokesperson for Gannett—which owns over 100 daily and 1,000 weekly newspapers in the United States and abroad—said that "we stand by our reporting on the matter and believe this lawsuit is without merit."
Media and legal experts said that although the new lawsuit has very little chance of success, Trump—who has called the press the "enemy of the people" and has even suggested that he would not mind if journalists were shot—is aiming to silence critical media through resource-sapping lawfare.
"The odds of success here are slim to none, but winning in court is not likely the real goal of this lawsuit," Clay Calvert, a media law expert and professor at the University of Florida's Levin College of Law, told NBC News. "The true motivation is to intimidate the press and journalists. I unfortunately suspect this lawsuit is just a harbinger of things to come."
Fox News commentator Howard Kurtz said on social media that while it is "very hard for a public figure to win" a lawsuit like the one Trump filed, "the chilling effect is clear."
Trump said today that he’s planning to sue the Des Moines Register, 60 Minutes, Bob Woodward, and even the Pulitzer Prizes, awarded by Columbia University. He claims the Justice Department should have done it for him. The weaponization of power is on full display.
— Voter Protection Project (@voterprotectpac.bsky.social) December 16, 2024 at 4:39 PM
Joel Simon, director of the City University of New York's Journalism Protection Initiative, told CNN that he "would not have imagined" that such tactics "would be deployed in the United States."
"I would also be concerned about the arbitrary, petty, and vindictive nature of these legal actions that President-elect Trump is pursuing," he said. "The possibility of legal victory is slim because under the 'actual malice' standard reporting done in good faith is protected in the U.S. But for a smaller or less-resourced news organization, mounting a legal defense can be a serious challenge."
Free press advocates voiced alarm Tuesday over what one commentator called the "chilling effect" of a lawsuit filed by U.S. President-elect Donald Trump against a prominent pollster, her firm, and an Iowa newspaper that published a preelection poll showing Vice Kamala Harris leading the Republican nominee in the state which he ultimately won by double digits.
Trump sued pollster J. Ann Selzer, her polling firm Selzer & Company, The Des Moines Register, and the paper's parent company, Gannett, alleging fraud and "brazen election interference" over a November 2 poll showing Harris, the Democratic nominee, ahead of Trump by 3 points. Trump won Iowa by 13 points.
"I'm doing this because I feel I have an obligation to," Trump explained after filing the suit on Monday. "I'm going to be bringing one against the people in Iowa, their newspaper, which had a very, very good pollster who got me right all the time, and then just before the election, she said I was going to lose by 3 or 4 points."
Trump's lawyers say the disparity between Selzer's polling and the election's actual outcome shows the defendants acted with "intentional" malice and engaged in "election-interfering fiction."
Unlike other Trump lawsuits including the one ABC News agreed Saturday to settle for $15 million plus $1 million in legal fees, the new suit does not accuse the defendants of defaming the president-elect. Instead, it alleges violations of the Iowa Consumer Fraud Act and related provisions.
Responding to the filing, a spokesperson for Gannett—which owns over 100 daily and 1,000 weekly newspapers in the United States and abroad—said that "we stand by our reporting on the matter and believe this lawsuit is without merit."
Media and legal experts said that although the new lawsuit has very little chance of success, Trump—who has called the press the "enemy of the people" and has even suggested that he would not mind if journalists were shot—is aiming to silence critical media through resource-sapping lawfare.
"The odds of success here are slim to none, but winning in court is not likely the real goal of this lawsuit," Clay Calvert, a media law expert and professor at the University of Florida's Levin College of Law, told NBC News. "The true motivation is to intimidate the press and journalists. I unfortunately suspect this lawsuit is just a harbinger of things to come."
Fox News commentator Howard Kurtz said on social media that while it is "very hard for a public figure to win" a lawsuit like the one Trump filed, "the chilling effect is clear."
Trump said today that he’s planning to sue the Des Moines Register, 60 Minutes, Bob Woodward, and even the Pulitzer Prizes, awarded by Columbia University. He claims the Justice Department should have done it for him. The weaponization of power is on full display.
— Voter Protection Project (@voterprotectpac.bsky.social) December 16, 2024 at 4:39 PM
Joel Simon, director of the City University of New York's Journalism Protection Initiative, told CNN that he "would not have imagined" that such tactics "would be deployed in the United States."
"I would also be concerned about the arbitrary, petty, and vindictive nature of these legal actions that President-elect Trump is pursuing," he said. "The possibility of legal victory is slim because under the 'actual malice' standard reporting done in good faith is protected in the U.S. But for a smaller or less-resourced news organization, mounting a legal defense can be a serious challenge."