A glimpse into the Harvard University campus on May 24, 2025 in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Trump Admin Poised to Terminate Remaining Federal Contracts With Harvard
"This is all so wildly lawless," wrote one observer.
The Trump administration is moving to identify and terminate remaining federal contracts with Harvard University, a fresh blow in the White House's effort to undercut the Ivy League school.
The planned contract cuts, which tally an estimated $100 million, are outlined in a draft letter dated Tuesday from the U.S. General Services Administration (GSA), which was obtained by The New York Times. The letter is being sent on Tuesday to federal agencies, per the Times, and states that the GSA is "assisting all federal agencies in a review for termination or transition of their federal government contracts with Harvard University and affiliates."
"Going forward, we also encourage your agency to seek alternative vendors for future services where you had previously considered Harvard," according to the letter, which is signed by Federal Acquisition Service Commissioner Josh Gruenbaum. Agencies must report back to Gruenbaum about the actions they plan to take with the contracts by June 6.
An administration official who spoke anonymously to the Times said that the move constitutes a total severing of the federal government's financial relationship with Harvard. An example of a contract that would be impacted is a U.S. National Institutes of Health grant worth $49,858 to study the effects of drinking coffee.
"This is all so wildly lawless," wrote Garrett M. Graff, a journalist and author, on Tuesday in response to the news.
Laurence Tribe, a constitutional law scholar and professor emeritus at Harvard Law School, wrote Tuesday: "Trump's latest retaliatory cancellation of all of Harvard's federal contracts (whatever the harm to national security!) erases any doubt that he is trying to punish Harvard with a Bill of Attainder that the Constitution would forbid as a usurpation of judicial power even if Congress went along."
A bill of attainder permits the government to punish a party for an alleged crime without first going through a judicial trial. In the U.S., they are unconstitutional.
The letter from the GSA follows the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's decision last week to bar the school from enrolling foreign students and forcing international students already enrolled at Harvard to transfer elsewhere. On Friday, U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs handed down a temporary restraining order, halting the ban on international students while litigation proceeds.
DHS rationalized the decision by alleging that Harvard's leaders have failed to create a safe environment and allowed "anti-American, pro-terrorist agitators" to harass people, including Jewish students. The assertion that Harvard is not doing enough to protect Jewish students also featured in the letter from GSA.
The letter states that The Harvard Law Review gave a $65,000 fellowship to a law student who was accused of assaulting a Jewish student during a 2023 action in support of Palestine. That student did not admit wrongdoing and avoided criminal prosecution, per the Times. The student agreed to perform community service.
Also, according to the letter, "GSA understands that Harvard continues to engage in race discrimination, including in its admissions process and other areas of student life."
Since April, the federal government has frozen billions in funding to Harvard, per the Times. The university has sued in response.
Meanwhile, Trump wrote on Truth Social on Monday that he is mulling taking $3 billion from Harvard and giving it to trade schools.
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
The Trump administration is moving to identify and terminate remaining federal contracts with Harvard University, a fresh blow in the White House's effort to undercut the Ivy League school.
The planned contract cuts, which tally an estimated $100 million, are outlined in a draft letter dated Tuesday from the U.S. General Services Administration (GSA), which was obtained by The New York Times. The letter is being sent on Tuesday to federal agencies, per the Times, and states that the GSA is "assisting all federal agencies in a review for termination or transition of their federal government contracts with Harvard University and affiliates."
"Going forward, we also encourage your agency to seek alternative vendors for future services where you had previously considered Harvard," according to the letter, which is signed by Federal Acquisition Service Commissioner Josh Gruenbaum. Agencies must report back to Gruenbaum about the actions they plan to take with the contracts by June 6.
An administration official who spoke anonymously to the Times said that the move constitutes a total severing of the federal government's financial relationship with Harvard. An example of a contract that would be impacted is a U.S. National Institutes of Health grant worth $49,858 to study the effects of drinking coffee.
"This is all so wildly lawless," wrote Garrett M. Graff, a journalist and author, on Tuesday in response to the news.
Laurence Tribe, a constitutional law scholar and professor emeritus at Harvard Law School, wrote Tuesday: "Trump's latest retaliatory cancellation of all of Harvard's federal contracts (whatever the harm to national security!) erases any doubt that he is trying to punish Harvard with a Bill of Attainder that the Constitution would forbid as a usurpation of judicial power even if Congress went along."
A bill of attainder permits the government to punish a party for an alleged crime without first going through a judicial trial. In the U.S., they are unconstitutional.
The letter from the GSA follows the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's decision last week to bar the school from enrolling foreign students and forcing international students already enrolled at Harvard to transfer elsewhere. On Friday, U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs handed down a temporary restraining order, halting the ban on international students while litigation proceeds.
DHS rationalized the decision by alleging that Harvard's leaders have failed to create a safe environment and allowed "anti-American, pro-terrorist agitators" to harass people, including Jewish students. The assertion that Harvard is not doing enough to protect Jewish students also featured in the letter from GSA.
The letter states that The Harvard Law Review gave a $65,000 fellowship to a law student who was accused of assaulting a Jewish student during a 2023 action in support of Palestine. That student did not admit wrongdoing and avoided criminal prosecution, per the Times. The student agreed to perform community service.
Also, according to the letter, "GSA understands that Harvard continues to engage in race discrimination, including in its admissions process and other areas of student life."
Since April, the federal government has frozen billions in funding to Harvard, per the Times. The university has sued in response.
Meanwhile, Trump wrote on Truth Social on Monday that he is mulling taking $3 billion from Harvard and giving it to trade schools.
The Trump administration is moving to identify and terminate remaining federal contracts with Harvard University, a fresh blow in the White House's effort to undercut the Ivy League school.
The planned contract cuts, which tally an estimated $100 million, are outlined in a draft letter dated Tuesday from the U.S. General Services Administration (GSA), which was obtained by The New York Times. The letter is being sent on Tuesday to federal agencies, per the Times, and states that the GSA is "assisting all federal agencies in a review for termination or transition of their federal government contracts with Harvard University and affiliates."
"Going forward, we also encourage your agency to seek alternative vendors for future services where you had previously considered Harvard," according to the letter, which is signed by Federal Acquisition Service Commissioner Josh Gruenbaum. Agencies must report back to Gruenbaum about the actions they plan to take with the contracts by June 6.
An administration official who spoke anonymously to the Times said that the move constitutes a total severing of the federal government's financial relationship with Harvard. An example of a contract that would be impacted is a U.S. National Institutes of Health grant worth $49,858 to study the effects of drinking coffee.
"This is all so wildly lawless," wrote Garrett M. Graff, a journalist and author, on Tuesday in response to the news.
Laurence Tribe, a constitutional law scholar and professor emeritus at Harvard Law School, wrote Tuesday: "Trump's latest retaliatory cancellation of all of Harvard's federal contracts (whatever the harm to national security!) erases any doubt that he is trying to punish Harvard with a Bill of Attainder that the Constitution would forbid as a usurpation of judicial power even if Congress went along."
A bill of attainder permits the government to punish a party for an alleged crime without first going through a judicial trial. In the U.S., they are unconstitutional.
The letter from the GSA follows the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's decision last week to bar the school from enrolling foreign students and forcing international students already enrolled at Harvard to transfer elsewhere. On Friday, U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs handed down a temporary restraining order, halting the ban on international students while litigation proceeds.
DHS rationalized the decision by alleging that Harvard's leaders have failed to create a safe environment and allowed "anti-American, pro-terrorist agitators" to harass people, including Jewish students. The assertion that Harvard is not doing enough to protect Jewish students also featured in the letter from GSA.
The letter states that The Harvard Law Review gave a $65,000 fellowship to a law student who was accused of assaulting a Jewish student during a 2023 action in support of Palestine. That student did not admit wrongdoing and avoided criminal prosecution, per the Times. The student agreed to perform community service.
Also, according to the letter, "GSA understands that Harvard continues to engage in race discrimination, including in its admissions process and other areas of student life."
Since April, the federal government has frozen billions in funding to Harvard, per the Times. The university has sued in response.
Meanwhile, Trump wrote on Truth Social on Monday that he is mulling taking $3 billion from Harvard and giving it to trade schools.