SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
South Dakota's Republican Gov. Kristi Noem speaks during the National Rifle Association convention on May 27, 2022 in Houston, Texas. (Photo: Brandon Bell/Getty Images)
'The Right Thing to Do': Voters in Deep Red South Dakota Approve Medicaid Expansion
"There is still ideological opposition among many red state politicians to expanding Medicaid," noted one expert. "When voters have been able to weigh in directly like in South Dakota, the results are different."
Nov 09, 2022
Defying their right-wing political leaders, South Dakota voters on Tuesday approved a constitutional amendment to expand the state's Medicaid program under the Affordable Care Act, a move that will extend public health insurance coverage to around 45,000 low-income people.
With Tuesday's vote, which currently sits at 56% in favor of the amendment and 44% against, South Dakota is set to become the seventh state to expand Medicaid through a ballot measure, keeping the undefeated streak for Medicaid initiatives intact.
"We're glad that South Dakota voters saw that helping our neighbors get healthcare is the right thing to do."
"We're glad that South Dakota voters saw that helping our neighbors get healthcare is the right thing to do," Dave Kapaska, a retired hospital executive and co-chair of the American Heart Association's volunteer cabinet for Medicaid expansion, said in a statement sent out by South Dakotans Decide Healthcare, the group that led the ballot campaign.
Approval of the ballot measure came months after South Dakotans rejected a GOP-backed constitutional amendment that raised the threshold for passage of most ballot initiatives from a simple majority to 60%, which would have spelled defeat for Medicaid expansion.
Prior to Tuesday, South Dakota was among the dozen Republican-controlled states that refused to expand Medicaid coverage under the ACA, depriving millions of people across the U.S. of lifesaving care. Under current South Dakota law, as Vox's Dylan Scott explained Wednesday, "childless adults of working age cannot qualify for coverage at all."
"Pregnant women, children, and the elderly can currently receive Medicaid benefits, but working parents must have a very low income--less than 63% of the federal poverty level, about $17,500 for a family of four--to enroll," Scott added.
Zach Marcus, the campaign manager for South Dakotans Decide Healthcare, said in a statement that "there are thousands of people in South Dakota who are stuck in the middle."
"They're people who are making too much money to qualify for Medicaid, but still don't make enough money to qualify for insurance on their own," said Marcus.
Once Medicaid is expanded in South Dakota despite opposition from the state's Republican legislature and GOP Gov. Kristi Noem, people between the ages of 18 and 65 who earn less than 133% of the federal poverty line--roughly $37,000 a year--will be eligible for coverage under the program.
"A dozen years after passage of Obamacare, there is still ideological opposition among many red state politicians to expanding Medicaid," noted Larry Levitt, executive vice president for health policy at the Kaiser Family Foundation. "When voters have been able to weigh in directly like in South Dakota, the results are different."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Defying their right-wing political leaders, South Dakota voters on Tuesday approved a constitutional amendment to expand the state's Medicaid program under the Affordable Care Act, a move that will extend public health insurance coverage to around 45,000 low-income people.
With Tuesday's vote, which currently sits at 56% in favor of the amendment and 44% against, South Dakota is set to become the seventh state to expand Medicaid through a ballot measure, keeping the undefeated streak for Medicaid initiatives intact.
"We're glad that South Dakota voters saw that helping our neighbors get healthcare is the right thing to do."
"We're glad that South Dakota voters saw that helping our neighbors get healthcare is the right thing to do," Dave Kapaska, a retired hospital executive and co-chair of the American Heart Association's volunteer cabinet for Medicaid expansion, said in a statement sent out by South Dakotans Decide Healthcare, the group that led the ballot campaign.
Approval of the ballot measure came months after South Dakotans rejected a GOP-backed constitutional amendment that raised the threshold for passage of most ballot initiatives from a simple majority to 60%, which would have spelled defeat for Medicaid expansion.
Prior to Tuesday, South Dakota was among the dozen Republican-controlled states that refused to expand Medicaid coverage under the ACA, depriving millions of people across the U.S. of lifesaving care. Under current South Dakota law, as Vox's Dylan Scott explained Wednesday, "childless adults of working age cannot qualify for coverage at all."
"Pregnant women, children, and the elderly can currently receive Medicaid benefits, but working parents must have a very low income--less than 63% of the federal poverty level, about $17,500 for a family of four--to enroll," Scott added.
Zach Marcus, the campaign manager for South Dakotans Decide Healthcare, said in a statement that "there are thousands of people in South Dakota who are stuck in the middle."
"They're people who are making too much money to qualify for Medicaid, but still don't make enough money to qualify for insurance on their own," said Marcus.
Once Medicaid is expanded in South Dakota despite opposition from the state's Republican legislature and GOP Gov. Kristi Noem, people between the ages of 18 and 65 who earn less than 133% of the federal poverty line--roughly $37,000 a year--will be eligible for coverage under the program.
"A dozen years after passage of Obamacare, there is still ideological opposition among many red state politicians to expanding Medicaid," noted Larry Levitt, executive vice president for health policy at the Kaiser Family Foundation. "When voters have been able to weigh in directly like in South Dakota, the results are different."
Defying their right-wing political leaders, South Dakota voters on Tuesday approved a constitutional amendment to expand the state's Medicaid program under the Affordable Care Act, a move that will extend public health insurance coverage to around 45,000 low-income people.
With Tuesday's vote, which currently sits at 56% in favor of the amendment and 44% against, South Dakota is set to become the seventh state to expand Medicaid through a ballot measure, keeping the undefeated streak for Medicaid initiatives intact.
"We're glad that South Dakota voters saw that helping our neighbors get healthcare is the right thing to do."
"We're glad that South Dakota voters saw that helping our neighbors get healthcare is the right thing to do," Dave Kapaska, a retired hospital executive and co-chair of the American Heart Association's volunteer cabinet for Medicaid expansion, said in a statement sent out by South Dakotans Decide Healthcare, the group that led the ballot campaign.
Approval of the ballot measure came months after South Dakotans rejected a GOP-backed constitutional amendment that raised the threshold for passage of most ballot initiatives from a simple majority to 60%, which would have spelled defeat for Medicaid expansion.
Prior to Tuesday, South Dakota was among the dozen Republican-controlled states that refused to expand Medicaid coverage under the ACA, depriving millions of people across the U.S. of lifesaving care. Under current South Dakota law, as Vox's Dylan Scott explained Wednesday, "childless adults of working age cannot qualify for coverage at all."
"Pregnant women, children, and the elderly can currently receive Medicaid benefits, but working parents must have a very low income--less than 63% of the federal poverty level, about $17,500 for a family of four--to enroll," Scott added.
Zach Marcus, the campaign manager for South Dakotans Decide Healthcare, said in a statement that "there are thousands of people in South Dakota who are stuck in the middle."
"They're people who are making too much money to qualify for Medicaid, but still don't make enough money to qualify for insurance on their own," said Marcus.
Once Medicaid is expanded in South Dakota despite opposition from the state's Republican legislature and GOP Gov. Kristi Noem, people between the ages of 18 and 65 who earn less than 133% of the federal poverty line--roughly $37,000 a year--will be eligible for coverage under the program.
"A dozen years after passage of Obamacare, there is still ideological opposition among many red state politicians to expanding Medicaid," noted Larry Levitt, executive vice president for health policy at the Kaiser Family Foundation. "When voters have been able to weigh in directly like in South Dakota, the results are different."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.