Then-U.S. Supreme Court nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett sits for a meeting with Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) in the United States Capitol in Washington, D.C. on September 30, 2020. (Photo: Nicholas Kamm/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)
Oct 20, 2022
U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett on Thursday rejected a challenge to the Biden administration's student debt cancellation plan, a move anticipated by jurists and journalists alike.
Barrett declined to consider an appeal by Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty (WILL)--a conservative law firm that previously drew attention for investigating claims of widespread voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election and coming up empty--on behalf of Brown County Taxpayers Association, a right-wing advocacy group.
Numerous right-wing groups have claimed that President Joe Biden lacks the legal authority to implement his plan, under which between $10,000 and $20,000 in federal student loan debt per borrower can be canceled. The official online portal to apply for forgiveness went live on Monday.
\u201cAmy Coney Barrett made a sound legal decision instead of pandering to partisan hacks and religious zealots.\n\nI will not praise her for doing her job. Nor will I foolishly think that this decision makes her any less of a threat to the rule of law.\u201d— Adrienne Lawrence, Esq. (@Adrienne Lawrence, Esq.) 1666302296
Predicting Wednesday that WILL's challenge "will fail," Slate senior writer Mark Joseph Stern asserted that "the reason why is simple."
"For decades, the conservative justices have tightened the rules around who's entitled to sue in federal court," he explained. "And under any reading of precedent, the Republican activists who brought this lawsuit have absolutely no right to challenge a single dollar of debt forgiveness."
"The group opposes voting rights, unions, Covid restrictions, Medicaid expansion--it exploits the courts to combat pretty much every democratically enacted progressive policy," Stern noted. "So it was probably inevitable that it would mount a challenge to student debt relief."
\u201cIt took Barrett a bit more than 24 hours to shoot down this embarrassingly dumb effort to halt Biden\u2019s student debt relief. @WILawLiberty debased itself for nothing. https://t.co/3UNjLMdHq3\u201d— Mark Joseph Stern (@Mark Joseph Stern) 1666301515
\u201c@stevenmazie @WILawLiberty Honestly, these humiliating lawsuits probably burnish their authors\u2019 reputations within the conservative legal movement. How honorable to take a noble stand against government tyranny knowing it\u2019s doomed! They\u2019re making James Madison proud!\u201d— Mark Joseph Stern (@Mark Joseph Stern) 1666301515
Stern continued:
But WILL faces the same problem that every other Republican lawyer attacking the program has encountered: They are not directly harmed by debt cancellation, so they don't have standing to sue. The Supreme Court has consistently held that, under the Constitution, a plaintiff lacks standing unless they can identify a "concrete and particularized" injury, and show how a ruling in their favor would redress that injury. If a plaintiff flunks this test, there's no actual "controversy," so the federal judiciary has no authority to hear the case.
Or, as University of Texas School of Law professor Steve Vladeck succinctly said, "This one was always a nothingburger."
Other challenges to the Biden administration's plan could still reach the Supreme Court. On Friday, U.S. District Judge Edward Autrey dismissed a lawsuit by six Republican-led states seeking to block the plan.
"Today, a federal judge confirmed what lawyers in and out of government have long known: Joe Biden can cancel student debt broadly and immediately," Mike Pierce, executive director of the advocacy group Student Borrower Protection Center, said in a statement.
"As right-wing politicians and corrupt corporations fight against this historic effort to deliver life-changing debt relief to tens of millions of families," he added, "borrowers have their clearest sign yet that the law is on their side."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett on Thursday rejected a challenge to the Biden administration's student debt cancellation plan, a move anticipated by jurists and journalists alike.
Barrett declined to consider an appeal by Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty (WILL)--a conservative law firm that previously drew attention for investigating claims of widespread voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election and coming up empty--on behalf of Brown County Taxpayers Association, a right-wing advocacy group.
Numerous right-wing groups have claimed that President Joe Biden lacks the legal authority to implement his plan, under which between $10,000 and $20,000 in federal student loan debt per borrower can be canceled. The official online portal to apply for forgiveness went live on Monday.
\u201cAmy Coney Barrett made a sound legal decision instead of pandering to partisan hacks and religious zealots.\n\nI will not praise her for doing her job. Nor will I foolishly think that this decision makes her any less of a threat to the rule of law.\u201d— Adrienne Lawrence, Esq. (@Adrienne Lawrence, Esq.) 1666302296
Predicting Wednesday that WILL's challenge "will fail," Slate senior writer Mark Joseph Stern asserted that "the reason why is simple."
"For decades, the conservative justices have tightened the rules around who's entitled to sue in federal court," he explained. "And under any reading of precedent, the Republican activists who brought this lawsuit have absolutely no right to challenge a single dollar of debt forgiveness."
"The group opposes voting rights, unions, Covid restrictions, Medicaid expansion--it exploits the courts to combat pretty much every democratically enacted progressive policy," Stern noted. "So it was probably inevitable that it would mount a challenge to student debt relief."
\u201cIt took Barrett a bit more than 24 hours to shoot down this embarrassingly dumb effort to halt Biden\u2019s student debt relief. @WILawLiberty debased itself for nothing. https://t.co/3UNjLMdHq3\u201d— Mark Joseph Stern (@Mark Joseph Stern) 1666301515
\u201c@stevenmazie @WILawLiberty Honestly, these humiliating lawsuits probably burnish their authors\u2019 reputations within the conservative legal movement. How honorable to take a noble stand against government tyranny knowing it\u2019s doomed! They\u2019re making James Madison proud!\u201d— Mark Joseph Stern (@Mark Joseph Stern) 1666301515
Stern continued:
But WILL faces the same problem that every other Republican lawyer attacking the program has encountered: They are not directly harmed by debt cancellation, so they don't have standing to sue. The Supreme Court has consistently held that, under the Constitution, a plaintiff lacks standing unless they can identify a "concrete and particularized" injury, and show how a ruling in their favor would redress that injury. If a plaintiff flunks this test, there's no actual "controversy," so the federal judiciary has no authority to hear the case.
Or, as University of Texas School of Law professor Steve Vladeck succinctly said, "This one was always a nothingburger."
Other challenges to the Biden administration's plan could still reach the Supreme Court. On Friday, U.S. District Judge Edward Autrey dismissed a lawsuit by six Republican-led states seeking to block the plan.
"Today, a federal judge confirmed what lawyers in and out of government have long known: Joe Biden can cancel student debt broadly and immediately," Mike Pierce, executive director of the advocacy group Student Borrower Protection Center, said in a statement.
"As right-wing politicians and corrupt corporations fight against this historic effort to deliver life-changing debt relief to tens of millions of families," he added, "borrowers have their clearest sign yet that the law is on their side."
From Your Site Articles
U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett on Thursday rejected a challenge to the Biden administration's student debt cancellation plan, a move anticipated by jurists and journalists alike.
Barrett declined to consider an appeal by Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty (WILL)--a conservative law firm that previously drew attention for investigating claims of widespread voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election and coming up empty--on behalf of Brown County Taxpayers Association, a right-wing advocacy group.
Numerous right-wing groups have claimed that President Joe Biden lacks the legal authority to implement his plan, under which between $10,000 and $20,000 in federal student loan debt per borrower can be canceled. The official online portal to apply for forgiveness went live on Monday.
\u201cAmy Coney Barrett made a sound legal decision instead of pandering to partisan hacks and religious zealots.\n\nI will not praise her for doing her job. Nor will I foolishly think that this decision makes her any less of a threat to the rule of law.\u201d— Adrienne Lawrence, Esq. (@Adrienne Lawrence, Esq.) 1666302296
Predicting Wednesday that WILL's challenge "will fail," Slate senior writer Mark Joseph Stern asserted that "the reason why is simple."
"For decades, the conservative justices have tightened the rules around who's entitled to sue in federal court," he explained. "And under any reading of precedent, the Republican activists who brought this lawsuit have absolutely no right to challenge a single dollar of debt forgiveness."
"The group opposes voting rights, unions, Covid restrictions, Medicaid expansion--it exploits the courts to combat pretty much every democratically enacted progressive policy," Stern noted. "So it was probably inevitable that it would mount a challenge to student debt relief."
\u201cIt took Barrett a bit more than 24 hours to shoot down this embarrassingly dumb effort to halt Biden\u2019s student debt relief. @WILawLiberty debased itself for nothing. https://t.co/3UNjLMdHq3\u201d— Mark Joseph Stern (@Mark Joseph Stern) 1666301515
\u201c@stevenmazie @WILawLiberty Honestly, these humiliating lawsuits probably burnish their authors\u2019 reputations within the conservative legal movement. How honorable to take a noble stand against government tyranny knowing it\u2019s doomed! They\u2019re making James Madison proud!\u201d— Mark Joseph Stern (@Mark Joseph Stern) 1666301515
Stern continued:
But WILL faces the same problem that every other Republican lawyer attacking the program has encountered: They are not directly harmed by debt cancellation, so they don't have standing to sue. The Supreme Court has consistently held that, under the Constitution, a plaintiff lacks standing unless they can identify a "concrete and particularized" injury, and show how a ruling in their favor would redress that injury. If a plaintiff flunks this test, there's no actual "controversy," so the federal judiciary has no authority to hear the case.
Or, as University of Texas School of Law professor Steve Vladeck succinctly said, "This one was always a nothingburger."
Other challenges to the Biden administration's plan could still reach the Supreme Court. On Friday, U.S. District Judge Edward Autrey dismissed a lawsuit by six Republican-led states seeking to block the plan.
"Today, a federal judge confirmed what lawyers in and out of government have long known: Joe Biden can cancel student debt broadly and immediately," Mike Pierce, executive director of the advocacy group Student Borrower Protection Center, said in a statement.
"As right-wing politicians and corrupt corporations fight against this historic effort to deliver life-changing debt relief to tens of millions of families," he added, "borrowers have their clearest sign yet that the law is on their side."
From Your Site Articles
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.