SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Then-U.S. Supreme Court nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett sits for a meeting with Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) in the United States Capitol in Washington, D.C. on September 30, 2020. (Photo: Nicholas Kamm/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)
Barrett Boots 'Nothingburger' Right-Wing Challenge to Biden Student Loan Cancellation
"Under any reading of precedent," said one legal reporter, "the Republican activists who brought this lawsuit have absolutely no right to challenge a single dollar of debt forgiveness."
Oct 20, 2022
U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett on Thursday rejected a challenge to the Biden administration's student debt cancellation plan, a move anticipated by jurists and journalists alike.
Barrett declined to consider an appeal by Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty (WILL)--a conservative law firm that previously drew attention for investigating claims of widespread voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election and coming up empty--on behalf of Brown County Taxpayers Association, a right-wing advocacy group.
Numerous right-wing groups have claimed that President Joe Biden lacks the legal authority to implement his plan, under which between $10,000 and $20,000 in federal student loan debt per borrower can be canceled. The official online portal to apply for forgiveness went live on Monday.
Predicting Wednesday that WILL's challenge "will fail," Slate senior writer Mark Joseph Stern asserted that "the reason why is simple."
"For decades, the conservative justices have tightened the rules around who's entitled to sue in federal court," he explained. "And under any reading of precedent, the Republican activists who brought this lawsuit have absolutely no right to challenge a single dollar of debt forgiveness."
"The group opposes voting rights, unions, Covid restrictions, Medicaid expansion--it exploits the courts to combat pretty much every democratically enacted progressive policy," Stern noted. "So it was probably inevitable that it would mount a challenge to student debt relief."
Stern continued:
But WILL faces the same problem that every other Republican lawyer attacking the program has encountered: They are not directly harmed by debt cancellation, so they don't have standing to sue. The Supreme Court has consistently held that, under the Constitution, a plaintiff lacks standing unless they can identify a "concrete and particularized" injury, and show how a ruling in their favor would redress that injury. If a plaintiff flunks this test, there's no actual "controversy," so the federal judiciary has no authority to hear the case.
Or, as University of Texas School of Law professor Steve Vladeck succinctly said, "This one was always a nothingburger."
Other challenges to the Biden administration's plan could still reach the Supreme Court. On Friday, U.S. District Judge Edward Autrey dismissed a lawsuit by six Republican-led states seeking to block the plan.
"Today, a federal judge confirmed what lawyers in and out of government have long known: Joe Biden can cancel student debt broadly and immediately," Mike Pierce, executive director of the advocacy group Student Borrower Protection Center, said in a statement.
"As right-wing politicians and corrupt corporations fight against this historic effort to deliver life-changing debt relief to tens of millions of families," he added, "borrowers have their clearest sign yet that the law is on their side."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett on Thursday rejected a challenge to the Biden administration's student debt cancellation plan, a move anticipated by jurists and journalists alike.
Barrett declined to consider an appeal by Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty (WILL)--a conservative law firm that previously drew attention for investigating claims of widespread voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election and coming up empty--on behalf of Brown County Taxpayers Association, a right-wing advocacy group.
Numerous right-wing groups have claimed that President Joe Biden lacks the legal authority to implement his plan, under which between $10,000 and $20,000 in federal student loan debt per borrower can be canceled. The official online portal to apply for forgiveness went live on Monday.
Predicting Wednesday that WILL's challenge "will fail," Slate senior writer Mark Joseph Stern asserted that "the reason why is simple."
"For decades, the conservative justices have tightened the rules around who's entitled to sue in federal court," he explained. "And under any reading of precedent, the Republican activists who brought this lawsuit have absolutely no right to challenge a single dollar of debt forgiveness."
"The group opposes voting rights, unions, Covid restrictions, Medicaid expansion--it exploits the courts to combat pretty much every democratically enacted progressive policy," Stern noted. "So it was probably inevitable that it would mount a challenge to student debt relief."
Stern continued:
But WILL faces the same problem that every other Republican lawyer attacking the program has encountered: They are not directly harmed by debt cancellation, so they don't have standing to sue. The Supreme Court has consistently held that, under the Constitution, a plaintiff lacks standing unless they can identify a "concrete and particularized" injury, and show how a ruling in their favor would redress that injury. If a plaintiff flunks this test, there's no actual "controversy," so the federal judiciary has no authority to hear the case.
Or, as University of Texas School of Law professor Steve Vladeck succinctly said, "This one was always a nothingburger."
Other challenges to the Biden administration's plan could still reach the Supreme Court. On Friday, U.S. District Judge Edward Autrey dismissed a lawsuit by six Republican-led states seeking to block the plan.
"Today, a federal judge confirmed what lawyers in and out of government have long known: Joe Biden can cancel student debt broadly and immediately," Mike Pierce, executive director of the advocacy group Student Borrower Protection Center, said in a statement.
"As right-wing politicians and corrupt corporations fight against this historic effort to deliver life-changing debt relief to tens of millions of families," he added, "borrowers have their clearest sign yet that the law is on their side."
From Your Site Articles
U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett on Thursday rejected a challenge to the Biden administration's student debt cancellation plan, a move anticipated by jurists and journalists alike.
Barrett declined to consider an appeal by Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty (WILL)--a conservative law firm that previously drew attention for investigating claims of widespread voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election and coming up empty--on behalf of Brown County Taxpayers Association, a right-wing advocacy group.
Numerous right-wing groups have claimed that President Joe Biden lacks the legal authority to implement his plan, under which between $10,000 and $20,000 in federal student loan debt per borrower can be canceled. The official online portal to apply for forgiveness went live on Monday.
Predicting Wednesday that WILL's challenge "will fail," Slate senior writer Mark Joseph Stern asserted that "the reason why is simple."
"For decades, the conservative justices have tightened the rules around who's entitled to sue in federal court," he explained. "And under any reading of precedent, the Republican activists who brought this lawsuit have absolutely no right to challenge a single dollar of debt forgiveness."
"The group opposes voting rights, unions, Covid restrictions, Medicaid expansion--it exploits the courts to combat pretty much every democratically enacted progressive policy," Stern noted. "So it was probably inevitable that it would mount a challenge to student debt relief."
Stern continued:
But WILL faces the same problem that every other Republican lawyer attacking the program has encountered: They are not directly harmed by debt cancellation, so they don't have standing to sue. The Supreme Court has consistently held that, under the Constitution, a plaintiff lacks standing unless they can identify a "concrete and particularized" injury, and show how a ruling in their favor would redress that injury. If a plaintiff flunks this test, there's no actual "controversy," so the federal judiciary has no authority to hear the case.
Or, as University of Texas School of Law professor Steve Vladeck succinctly said, "This one was always a nothingburger."
Other challenges to the Biden administration's plan could still reach the Supreme Court. On Friday, U.S. District Judge Edward Autrey dismissed a lawsuit by six Republican-led states seeking to block the plan.
"Today, a federal judge confirmed what lawyers in and out of government have long known: Joe Biden can cancel student debt broadly and immediately," Mike Pierce, executive director of the advocacy group Student Borrower Protection Center, said in a statement.
"As right-wing politicians and corrupt corporations fight against this historic effort to deliver life-changing debt relief to tens of millions of families," he added, "borrowers have their clearest sign yet that the law is on their side."
From Your Site Articles
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.