Civil libertarians on Friday applauded as a federal judge blocked enforcement of an Arizona law restricting how people can film police officers after agreeing that the legislation is unconstitutional.\r\n\r\n\u0022Recording law enforcement interactions is one of the best tools to hold police accountable.\u0022\r\n\r\nU.S. District Judge John Tuchi granted a preliminary injunction sought by the ACLU of Arizona and media outlets on the grounds that H.B. 2319 violates their First Amendment rights.\r\n\r\nThe law—which was passed by Arizona\u0026#039;s Republican-controlled Legislature and signed by GOP Gov. Doug Ducey in July—outlaws recording police at a distance of closer than eight feet if the officer verbally objects. It also empowers police officers to order people to stop filming them on private property, even if the property owner consents to the recording.\u0026nbsp;\r\n\r\n\u0022Today\u0026#039;s ruling is an incredible win for our First Amendment rights and will allow Arizonans to continue to hold police accountable,\u0022 ACLU of Arizona staff attorney K.M. Bell said in a statement.\r\n\r\n\u0022At a time when recording law enforcement interactions is one of the best tools to hold police accountable, we should be working to protect this vital right—not undermine it,\u0022 they added. \u0022H.B. 2319 is a blatant attempt to prohibit people from exercising their constitutional right to record police in public and we\u0026#039;re glad to see the court take action to stop it from going into effect.\u0022\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nThe national ACLU said: \u0022We have a First Amendment right to film police—and we will use it.\u0022\r\n\r\nH.B. 2319 comes at a time when citizens are increasingly empowered by the ability to record and broadcast footage of officer misconduct that is sometimes used to bring perpetrators to justice. Video of former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin kneeling on George Floyd\u0026#039;s neck for over eight minutes was a key piece of evidence used to secure a murder conviction in the case.\r\n\r\nThe police department in Phoenix, the nation\u0026#039;s fifth-largest city, is currently under federal investigation not only for alleged excessive use of deadly force and racial discrimination but also for how it handles constitutionally protected protests and the journalists covering them.\r\n\r\nNone of the defendants in the ACLU-led lawsuit—Maricopa County Attorney Rachel Mitchell, Maricopa County Sheriff Paul Penzone, and Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich—opposed the injunction, according to the Phoenix New Times.\r\n\r\nThe paper reports:\r\n\r\n\r\nSo, Arizonans can still film police officers freely—for now. Tuchi set a September 16 deadline for anyone else to intervene in the suit.\r\n\r\nWhile Brnovich, Mitchell, and Penzone have no interest in defending the law, Arizona lawmakers—or other agencies—might. Arizona Senate President Karen Fann [R-1] has said lawmakers are considering this.\r\n\r\n\r\nCivil libertarians would then likely seek a permanent injunction to block the law once and for all.\r\n\r\n\u0022We\u0026#039;ll respond accordingly,\u0022 ACLU of Arizona staff attorney Benjamin Rundall told the New Times.