Demonstrators hold signs while protesting in front of a Starbucks shop on April 14, 2022 in New York City. (Photo: Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images)
With Trumpian Claims of Cheating, Starbucks Demands Halt to Union Elections
"Unfortunately, it's now in vogue for the losers of some elections nationwide to attempt to reverse elections by any means they think are necessary," said Starbucks Workers United.
Starbucks management on Monday demanded a temporary suspension of all mail-in union elections at its U.S. stores, alleging that National Labor Relations Board personnel and union officials "secretly colluded" to influence the outcome of a contest at a shop in Overland Park, Kansas.
"Starbucks is simultaneously claiming to stand for voter protections, and then asking that all elections be suspended nationwide."
Starbucks Workers United, the campaign working to unionize Starbucks locations across the country, rejected the company's accusations and called its demand "Starbucks' latest attempt to manipulate the legal process for their own means and prevent workers from exercising their fundamental right to organize."
"Unfortunately, it's now in vogue for the losers of some elections nationwide to attempt to reverse elections by any means they think are necessary, and Starbucks is taking a page out of that playbook," the group said in a statement, alluding to former President Donald Trump's attacks on the electoral process.
Starbucks, which is facing hundreds of unfair labor practice charges stemming from its campaign to crush worker organizing, alleges in a 16-page letter to the NLRB that a whistleblower from the labor board approached the company with evidence of "a concerted effort to tip the scales in voting to favor the union in a Kansas City area (Overland Park) store election."
\u201c.@HowardSchultz attempting to overturn elections he lost and now spreading blatant lies? \n\nSounds just like another egotistical businessman who ran for President\u2026\u201d— Starbucks Workers United (@Starbucks Workers United) 1660579519
Specifically, the company's letter accuses NLRB officials of making "secret arrangements with union representatives for particular voters to vote 'in-person' in NLRB offices, with no party observers present, during what the parties agreed would be a 'mail-ballot' election."
Suggesting without concrete evidence that such misconduct has also taken place in other elections, Starbucks called on the NLRB to "suspend all mail-ballot Starbucks elections nationwide" pending an investigation. The company also demanded that "all pending and future elections involving Starbucks be conducted manually with in-person voting in the presence of observers from both sides."
"Starbucks is simultaneously claiming to stand for voter protections, and then asking that all elections be suspended nationwide. This is hypocrisy at its finest," said Michelle Eisen, a barista at the Elmwood Starbucks location in Buffalo, New York.
More than 220 Starbucks locations in the U.S. have voted to unionize since late last year, defying Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz's efforts to beat back the movement with threats and other anti-union activities that have drawn legal action from the NLRB.
In response to management's letter, Starbucks Workers United said in a statement to NPR that "this is Starbucks yet again attempting to distract attention away from their unprecedented anti-union campaign, including firing over 75 union leaders across the country, while simultaneously trying to halt all union elections."
"Workers have spoken loud and clear by winning 82% of union elections," the group added.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. The final deadline for our crucial Summer Campaign fundraising drive is just days away, and we’re falling short of our must-hit goal. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Starbucks management on Monday demanded a temporary suspension of all mail-in union elections at its U.S. stores, alleging that National Labor Relations Board personnel and union officials "secretly colluded" to influence the outcome of a contest at a shop in Overland Park, Kansas.
"Starbucks is simultaneously claiming to stand for voter protections, and then asking that all elections be suspended nationwide."
Starbucks Workers United, the campaign working to unionize Starbucks locations across the country, rejected the company's accusations and called its demand "Starbucks' latest attempt to manipulate the legal process for their own means and prevent workers from exercising their fundamental right to organize."
"Unfortunately, it's now in vogue for the losers of some elections nationwide to attempt to reverse elections by any means they think are necessary, and Starbucks is taking a page out of that playbook," the group said in a statement, alluding to former President Donald Trump's attacks on the electoral process.
Starbucks, which is facing hundreds of unfair labor practice charges stemming from its campaign to crush worker organizing, alleges in a 16-page letter to the NLRB that a whistleblower from the labor board approached the company with evidence of "a concerted effort to tip the scales in voting to favor the union in a Kansas City area (Overland Park) store election."
\u201c.@HowardSchultz attempting to overturn elections he lost and now spreading blatant lies? \n\nSounds just like another egotistical businessman who ran for President\u2026\u201d— Starbucks Workers United (@Starbucks Workers United) 1660579519
Specifically, the company's letter accuses NLRB officials of making "secret arrangements with union representatives for particular voters to vote 'in-person' in NLRB offices, with no party observers present, during what the parties agreed would be a 'mail-ballot' election."
Suggesting without concrete evidence that such misconduct has also taken place in other elections, Starbucks called on the NLRB to "suspend all mail-ballot Starbucks elections nationwide" pending an investigation. The company also demanded that "all pending and future elections involving Starbucks be conducted manually with in-person voting in the presence of observers from both sides."
"Starbucks is simultaneously claiming to stand for voter protections, and then asking that all elections be suspended nationwide. This is hypocrisy at its finest," said Michelle Eisen, a barista at the Elmwood Starbucks location in Buffalo, New York.
More than 220 Starbucks locations in the U.S. have voted to unionize since late last year, defying Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz's efforts to beat back the movement with threats and other anti-union activities that have drawn legal action from the NLRB.
In response to management's letter, Starbucks Workers United said in a statement to NPR that "this is Starbucks yet again attempting to distract attention away from their unprecedented anti-union campaign, including firing over 75 union leaders across the country, while simultaneously trying to halt all union elections."
"Workers have spoken loud and clear by winning 82% of union elections," the group added.
Starbucks management on Monday demanded a temporary suspension of all mail-in union elections at its U.S. stores, alleging that National Labor Relations Board personnel and union officials "secretly colluded" to influence the outcome of a contest at a shop in Overland Park, Kansas.
"Starbucks is simultaneously claiming to stand for voter protections, and then asking that all elections be suspended nationwide."
Starbucks Workers United, the campaign working to unionize Starbucks locations across the country, rejected the company's accusations and called its demand "Starbucks' latest attempt to manipulate the legal process for their own means and prevent workers from exercising their fundamental right to organize."
"Unfortunately, it's now in vogue for the losers of some elections nationwide to attempt to reverse elections by any means they think are necessary, and Starbucks is taking a page out of that playbook," the group said in a statement, alluding to former President Donald Trump's attacks on the electoral process.
Starbucks, which is facing hundreds of unfair labor practice charges stemming from its campaign to crush worker organizing, alleges in a 16-page letter to the NLRB that a whistleblower from the labor board approached the company with evidence of "a concerted effort to tip the scales in voting to favor the union in a Kansas City area (Overland Park) store election."
\u201c.@HowardSchultz attempting to overturn elections he lost and now spreading blatant lies? \n\nSounds just like another egotistical businessman who ran for President\u2026\u201d— Starbucks Workers United (@Starbucks Workers United) 1660579519
Specifically, the company's letter accuses NLRB officials of making "secret arrangements with union representatives for particular voters to vote 'in-person' in NLRB offices, with no party observers present, during what the parties agreed would be a 'mail-ballot' election."
Suggesting without concrete evidence that such misconduct has also taken place in other elections, Starbucks called on the NLRB to "suspend all mail-ballot Starbucks elections nationwide" pending an investigation. The company also demanded that "all pending and future elections involving Starbucks be conducted manually with in-person voting in the presence of observers from both sides."
"Starbucks is simultaneously claiming to stand for voter protections, and then asking that all elections be suspended nationwide. This is hypocrisy at its finest," said Michelle Eisen, a barista at the Elmwood Starbucks location in Buffalo, New York.
More than 220 Starbucks locations in the U.S. have voted to unionize since late last year, defying Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz's efforts to beat back the movement with threats and other anti-union activities that have drawn legal action from the NLRB.
In response to management's letter, Starbucks Workers United said in a statement to NPR that "this is Starbucks yet again attempting to distract attention away from their unprecedented anti-union campaign, including firing over 75 union leaders across the country, while simultaneously trying to halt all union elections."
"Workers have spoken loud and clear by winning 82% of union elections," the group added.