

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) speak to reporters on April 28, 2022. (Photo: Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc. via Getty Images)
A coalition of watchdog organizations on Tuesday urged Democratic congressional leaders to "expeditiously" bring a ban on lawmaker stock trading up for a vote, warning that a proposal with broad support from the U.S. public is at growing risk of dying as the Senate prepares for August recess and the midterms loom.
"We fear that without your strong leadership and advocacy, this critical good government reform will stall," reads a letter that 22 groups, including Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington and Public Citizen, sent to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif) on Tuesday.
"This crisis of institutional legitimacy requires a swift and comprehensive response."
"Each day that passes increases the chance that Congress will not have time to take up and pass this legislation. That must not happen," the letter continues. "We would like to be entirely clear: this is not a problem that will go away as long as members are allowed to own or trade individual financial instruments. There will always be new reports of members who own stock in companies they regulate or to which they appropriate taxpayer dollars."
"Revelations that members unscrupulously purchased or sold stock in companies at deeply suspicious moments will continue as long as this goes unaddressed," the groups add. "And every new story will further erode public trust in our government and undermine Congress' legitimacy."
Democratic senators have been working for months on compromise legislation that would ban or severely limit individual stock trading by lawmakers and their immediate family members. As long as the legislative filibuster remains intact in the Senate, such a bill would need at least 10 Republican supporters to pass.
The Senate is unlikely to vote on stock trading legislation before adjourning for August recess, given that Democrats are focused primarily on getting a reconciliation package over the finish line in time.
Lawmakers in the House, meanwhile, are reportedly planning to release a proposal this month that would prohibit members of Congress as well as their spouses and senior staff from trading stocks. According to Punchbowl News, the House Democrats' plan would "force members of Congress, their spouses, and senior staff to choose between putting their assets in a qualified blind trust or completely divesting their investment portfolios."
Pelosi, whose husband is a prolific trader, initially dismissed calls for a ban, calling stock trading part of the "free market economy" in which lawmakers should be able to take part.
The speaker later reversed course in the face of widespread backlash.
Related Content

As proposed bans and restrictions on stock trading await votes in both chambers, Republican and Democratic lawmakers and their spouses have continued buying and selling shares of individual companies, often with timing that has raised eyebrows.
Business Insider, which has been closely tracking lawmakers' stock trades in recent months, noted last week that it and other news outlets have identified 66 members of Congress who have "recently failed to properly report their financial trades as mandated by the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act of 2012," a largely toothless law aimed at preventing insider trading.
In their letter to Schumer and Pelosi on Tuesday, the watchdog groups argued that "our country is at an inflection point: the reports of members' suspicious stock trades at the beginning of the pandemic and the routine and bipartisan failures to comply with the STOCK Act have severely harmed public confidence in Congress."
"This crisis of institutional legitimacy requires a swift and comprehensive response," they wrote. "We therefore urge you to pass legislation that addresses the full scope of the problem by eliminating a significant source of potential conflicts for members... This cannot wait any longer--the American people deserve to know that the needs of the public, not members of Congress' stock portfolios, come first."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
A coalition of watchdog organizations on Tuesday urged Democratic congressional leaders to "expeditiously" bring a ban on lawmaker stock trading up for a vote, warning that a proposal with broad support from the U.S. public is at growing risk of dying as the Senate prepares for August recess and the midterms loom.
"We fear that without your strong leadership and advocacy, this critical good government reform will stall," reads a letter that 22 groups, including Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington and Public Citizen, sent to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif) on Tuesday.
"This crisis of institutional legitimacy requires a swift and comprehensive response."
"Each day that passes increases the chance that Congress will not have time to take up and pass this legislation. That must not happen," the letter continues. "We would like to be entirely clear: this is not a problem that will go away as long as members are allowed to own or trade individual financial instruments. There will always be new reports of members who own stock in companies they regulate or to which they appropriate taxpayer dollars."
"Revelations that members unscrupulously purchased or sold stock in companies at deeply suspicious moments will continue as long as this goes unaddressed," the groups add. "And every new story will further erode public trust in our government and undermine Congress' legitimacy."
Democratic senators have been working for months on compromise legislation that would ban or severely limit individual stock trading by lawmakers and their immediate family members. As long as the legislative filibuster remains intact in the Senate, such a bill would need at least 10 Republican supporters to pass.
The Senate is unlikely to vote on stock trading legislation before adjourning for August recess, given that Democrats are focused primarily on getting a reconciliation package over the finish line in time.
Lawmakers in the House, meanwhile, are reportedly planning to release a proposal this month that would prohibit members of Congress as well as their spouses and senior staff from trading stocks. According to Punchbowl News, the House Democrats' plan would "force members of Congress, their spouses, and senior staff to choose between putting their assets in a qualified blind trust or completely divesting their investment portfolios."
Pelosi, whose husband is a prolific trader, initially dismissed calls for a ban, calling stock trading part of the "free market economy" in which lawmakers should be able to take part.
The speaker later reversed course in the face of widespread backlash.
Related Content

As proposed bans and restrictions on stock trading await votes in both chambers, Republican and Democratic lawmakers and their spouses have continued buying and selling shares of individual companies, often with timing that has raised eyebrows.
Business Insider, which has been closely tracking lawmakers' stock trades in recent months, noted last week that it and other news outlets have identified 66 members of Congress who have "recently failed to properly report their financial trades as mandated by the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act of 2012," a largely toothless law aimed at preventing insider trading.
In their letter to Schumer and Pelosi on Tuesday, the watchdog groups argued that "our country is at an inflection point: the reports of members' suspicious stock trades at the beginning of the pandemic and the routine and bipartisan failures to comply with the STOCK Act have severely harmed public confidence in Congress."
"This crisis of institutional legitimacy requires a swift and comprehensive response," they wrote. "We therefore urge you to pass legislation that addresses the full scope of the problem by eliminating a significant source of potential conflicts for members... This cannot wait any longer--the American people deserve to know that the needs of the public, not members of Congress' stock portfolios, come first."
A coalition of watchdog organizations on Tuesday urged Democratic congressional leaders to "expeditiously" bring a ban on lawmaker stock trading up for a vote, warning that a proposal with broad support from the U.S. public is at growing risk of dying as the Senate prepares for August recess and the midterms loom.
"We fear that without your strong leadership and advocacy, this critical good government reform will stall," reads a letter that 22 groups, including Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington and Public Citizen, sent to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif) on Tuesday.
"This crisis of institutional legitimacy requires a swift and comprehensive response."
"Each day that passes increases the chance that Congress will not have time to take up and pass this legislation. That must not happen," the letter continues. "We would like to be entirely clear: this is not a problem that will go away as long as members are allowed to own or trade individual financial instruments. There will always be new reports of members who own stock in companies they regulate or to which they appropriate taxpayer dollars."
"Revelations that members unscrupulously purchased or sold stock in companies at deeply suspicious moments will continue as long as this goes unaddressed," the groups add. "And every new story will further erode public trust in our government and undermine Congress' legitimacy."
Democratic senators have been working for months on compromise legislation that would ban or severely limit individual stock trading by lawmakers and their immediate family members. As long as the legislative filibuster remains intact in the Senate, such a bill would need at least 10 Republican supporters to pass.
The Senate is unlikely to vote on stock trading legislation before adjourning for August recess, given that Democrats are focused primarily on getting a reconciliation package over the finish line in time.
Lawmakers in the House, meanwhile, are reportedly planning to release a proposal this month that would prohibit members of Congress as well as their spouses and senior staff from trading stocks. According to Punchbowl News, the House Democrats' plan would "force members of Congress, their spouses, and senior staff to choose between putting their assets in a qualified blind trust or completely divesting their investment portfolios."
Pelosi, whose husband is a prolific trader, initially dismissed calls for a ban, calling stock trading part of the "free market economy" in which lawmakers should be able to take part.
The speaker later reversed course in the face of widespread backlash.
Related Content

As proposed bans and restrictions on stock trading await votes in both chambers, Republican and Democratic lawmakers and their spouses have continued buying and selling shares of individual companies, often with timing that has raised eyebrows.
Business Insider, which has been closely tracking lawmakers' stock trades in recent months, noted last week that it and other news outlets have identified 66 members of Congress who have "recently failed to properly report their financial trades as mandated by the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act of 2012," a largely toothless law aimed at preventing insider trading.
In their letter to Schumer and Pelosi on Tuesday, the watchdog groups argued that "our country is at an inflection point: the reports of members' suspicious stock trades at the beginning of the pandemic and the routine and bipartisan failures to comply with the STOCK Act have severely harmed public confidence in Congress."
"This crisis of institutional legitimacy requires a swift and comprehensive response," they wrote. "We therefore urge you to pass legislation that addresses the full scope of the problem by eliminating a significant source of potential conflicts for members... This cannot wait any longer--the American people deserve to know that the needs of the public, not members of Congress' stock portfolios, come first."