SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Julie Rikelman, senior litigation director at the Center for Reproductive Rights, speaks to the media after arguing before the U.S. Supreme Court in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health on December 1, 2021 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Biden Applauded for Nominating 'Distinguished' Abortion Rights Lawyer to Federal Court
"At a time when reproductive rights are under attack, Julie Rikelman is an exceptional nominee for this moment," said Sen. Elizabeth Warren. "She will be a welcome addition to the 1st Circuit Court of Appeals."
Jul 29, 2022
Reproductive freedom advocates on Friday praised President Joe Biden's nomination of an abortion rights attorney to the federal bench in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court reversing Roe v. Wade.
"This important nomination... could not come at a more important time in the fight for reproductive freedom."
Julie Rikelman, the senior director of U.S. litigation at the Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR), was among several federal judiciary candidates announced by the White House.
The president nominated Rikelman to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit; the Senate must confirm her nomination. The Harvard Law School graduate previously worked for NBCUniversal and multiple law firms. She also clerked for a federal appellate judge and an Alaska Supreme Court justice.
As Rikelman's CRR biography highlights, in December, "Julie argued the most important abortion rights case in 30 years at the United States Supreme Court," Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, which challenged Mississippi's 15-week ban on behalf of the state's only remaining clinic.
The right-wing justices issued their widely anticipated Dobbs decision in late June, overturning Roe, ending the constitutional right to abortion nationwide, and fueling demands for congressional Democrats to protect reproductive freedom with federal legislation before this year's midterm elections.
"In March 2020, Julie successfully argued another abortion rights case at the U.S. Supreme Court, June Medical Services v. Russo," CRR notes. "In addition to challenging bans and clinic closing laws around the country, Julie's other litigation work at the center has included leading the center's efforts against invasive ultrasound laws, fighting to preserve access to medication abortion, and defending the rights of young people in Florida and Alaska to make their own reproductive health decisions."
Sens. Ed Markey and Elizabeth Warren, both Massachusetts Democrats, said in a joint statement Friday that "Julie Rikelman is a distinguished lawyer who has spent nearly half of her 25-year career as the lead litigator for one of America's premier women's reproductive rights institutions."
"Rikelman has a keen intellect, extensive experience protecting individual rights, and a familiarity with our Constitution and laws that will contribute invaluable experience to the 1st Circuit Court of Appeals," they continued. "Rikelman and her family, who immigrated to Boston from Ukraine in the late 1970s as refugees fleeing religious persecution, are a reflection of America at its best."
"We were enthusiastic to recommend Rikelman as a candidate for the First Circuit," the pair added. "We applaud President Biden for her appointment and strongly support her nomination."
NARAL Pro-Choice America president Mini Timmaraju said that "we commend the Biden administration on this important nomination, which could not come at a more important time in the fight for reproductive freedom."
"Having experts with demonstrable records of standing up for abortion rights like Julie Rikelman in the judicial branch will serve as a critical defense against future attacks on our rights," she added. "We look forward to continuing our work with the administration to further the fight for reproductive freedom."
Biden on Friday also nominated Maria Araujo Kahn to the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and announced six district court candidates: Judge Daniel Calabretta, Jeffery P. Hopkins, Justice Myong J. Joun, Julia Kobick, Judge Rita F. Lin, and Araceli Martinez-Olguin. He also revealed his intent to nominate Todd E. Edelman to a district court seat.
While welcoming the full slate of Biden nominees, Christopher Kang, chief counsel at the group Demand Justice, singled out Rikelman.
"The former public defenders, union-side labor lawyers, and civil rights lawyers in this group of nominees show the Biden administration building on its important commitment to professional diversity," Kang said. "In the wake of the Supreme Court's decision overturning Roe v. Wade, Julie Rikelman brings exactly the kind of experience with reproductive rights we desperately need on the courts."
Kang declared that "the pressure is squarely on" Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) "to announce a plan to hold enough hearings to consider these nominees, as well as allow the White House to continue making new nominations."
"There are now nearly twice as many district court nominees awaiting a hearing as there are scheduled hearing slots," he noted, adding that the panel "will be a bottleneck that will severely limit the Biden judicial legacy unless Durbin announces new hearings, starting with working through August."
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
ed markeyjoe bidenelizabeth warrencenter for reproductive rightsus supreme courtroe v. wadereproductive rightsnaraldemand justice
Reproductive freedom advocates on Friday praised President Joe Biden's nomination of an abortion rights attorney to the federal bench in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court reversing Roe v. Wade.
"This important nomination... could not come at a more important time in the fight for reproductive freedom."
Julie Rikelman, the senior director of U.S. litigation at the Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR), was among several federal judiciary candidates announced by the White House.
The president nominated Rikelman to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit; the Senate must confirm her nomination. The Harvard Law School graduate previously worked for NBCUniversal and multiple law firms. She also clerked for a federal appellate judge and an Alaska Supreme Court justice.
As Rikelman's CRR biography highlights, in December, "Julie argued the most important abortion rights case in 30 years at the United States Supreme Court," Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, which challenged Mississippi's 15-week ban on behalf of the state's only remaining clinic.
The right-wing justices issued their widely anticipated Dobbs decision in late June, overturning Roe, ending the constitutional right to abortion nationwide, and fueling demands for congressional Democrats to protect reproductive freedom with federal legislation before this year's midterm elections.
"In March 2020, Julie successfully argued another abortion rights case at the U.S. Supreme Court, June Medical Services v. Russo," CRR notes. "In addition to challenging bans and clinic closing laws around the country, Julie's other litigation work at the center has included leading the center's efforts against invasive ultrasound laws, fighting to preserve access to medication abortion, and defending the rights of young people in Florida and Alaska to make their own reproductive health decisions."
Sens. Ed Markey and Elizabeth Warren, both Massachusetts Democrats, said in a joint statement Friday that "Julie Rikelman is a distinguished lawyer who has spent nearly half of her 25-year career as the lead litigator for one of America's premier women's reproductive rights institutions."
"Rikelman has a keen intellect, extensive experience protecting individual rights, and a familiarity with our Constitution and laws that will contribute invaluable experience to the 1st Circuit Court of Appeals," they continued. "Rikelman and her family, who immigrated to Boston from Ukraine in the late 1970s as refugees fleeing religious persecution, are a reflection of America at its best."
"We were enthusiastic to recommend Rikelman as a candidate for the First Circuit," the pair added. "We applaud President Biden for her appointment and strongly support her nomination."
NARAL Pro-Choice America president Mini Timmaraju said that "we commend the Biden administration on this important nomination, which could not come at a more important time in the fight for reproductive freedom."
"Having experts with demonstrable records of standing up for abortion rights like Julie Rikelman in the judicial branch will serve as a critical defense against future attacks on our rights," she added. "We look forward to continuing our work with the administration to further the fight for reproductive freedom."
Biden on Friday also nominated Maria Araujo Kahn to the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and announced six district court candidates: Judge Daniel Calabretta, Jeffery P. Hopkins, Justice Myong J. Joun, Julia Kobick, Judge Rita F. Lin, and Araceli Martinez-Olguin. He also revealed his intent to nominate Todd E. Edelman to a district court seat.
While welcoming the full slate of Biden nominees, Christopher Kang, chief counsel at the group Demand Justice, singled out Rikelman.
"The former public defenders, union-side labor lawyers, and civil rights lawyers in this group of nominees show the Biden administration building on its important commitment to professional diversity," Kang said. "In the wake of the Supreme Court's decision overturning Roe v. Wade, Julie Rikelman brings exactly the kind of experience with reproductive rights we desperately need on the courts."
Kang declared that "the pressure is squarely on" Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) "to announce a plan to hold enough hearings to consider these nominees, as well as allow the White House to continue making new nominations."
"There are now nearly twice as many district court nominees awaiting a hearing as there are scheduled hearing slots," he noted, adding that the panel "will be a bottleneck that will severely limit the Biden judicial legacy unless Durbin announces new hearings, starting with working through August."
Reproductive freedom advocates on Friday praised President Joe Biden's nomination of an abortion rights attorney to the federal bench in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court reversing Roe v. Wade.
"This important nomination... could not come at a more important time in the fight for reproductive freedom."
Julie Rikelman, the senior director of U.S. litigation at the Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR), was among several federal judiciary candidates announced by the White House.
The president nominated Rikelman to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit; the Senate must confirm her nomination. The Harvard Law School graduate previously worked for NBCUniversal and multiple law firms. She also clerked for a federal appellate judge and an Alaska Supreme Court justice.
As Rikelman's CRR biography highlights, in December, "Julie argued the most important abortion rights case in 30 years at the United States Supreme Court," Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, which challenged Mississippi's 15-week ban on behalf of the state's only remaining clinic.
The right-wing justices issued their widely anticipated Dobbs decision in late June, overturning Roe, ending the constitutional right to abortion nationwide, and fueling demands for congressional Democrats to protect reproductive freedom with federal legislation before this year's midterm elections.
"In March 2020, Julie successfully argued another abortion rights case at the U.S. Supreme Court, June Medical Services v. Russo," CRR notes. "In addition to challenging bans and clinic closing laws around the country, Julie's other litigation work at the center has included leading the center's efforts against invasive ultrasound laws, fighting to preserve access to medication abortion, and defending the rights of young people in Florida and Alaska to make their own reproductive health decisions."
Sens. Ed Markey and Elizabeth Warren, both Massachusetts Democrats, said in a joint statement Friday that "Julie Rikelman is a distinguished lawyer who has spent nearly half of her 25-year career as the lead litigator for one of America's premier women's reproductive rights institutions."
"Rikelman has a keen intellect, extensive experience protecting individual rights, and a familiarity with our Constitution and laws that will contribute invaluable experience to the 1st Circuit Court of Appeals," they continued. "Rikelman and her family, who immigrated to Boston from Ukraine in the late 1970s as refugees fleeing religious persecution, are a reflection of America at its best."
"We were enthusiastic to recommend Rikelman as a candidate for the First Circuit," the pair added. "We applaud President Biden for her appointment and strongly support her nomination."
NARAL Pro-Choice America president Mini Timmaraju said that "we commend the Biden administration on this important nomination, which could not come at a more important time in the fight for reproductive freedom."
"Having experts with demonstrable records of standing up for abortion rights like Julie Rikelman in the judicial branch will serve as a critical defense against future attacks on our rights," she added. "We look forward to continuing our work with the administration to further the fight for reproductive freedom."
Biden on Friday also nominated Maria Araujo Kahn to the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and announced six district court candidates: Judge Daniel Calabretta, Jeffery P. Hopkins, Justice Myong J. Joun, Julia Kobick, Judge Rita F. Lin, and Araceli Martinez-Olguin. He also revealed his intent to nominate Todd E. Edelman to a district court seat.
While welcoming the full slate of Biden nominees, Christopher Kang, chief counsel at the group Demand Justice, singled out Rikelman.
"The former public defenders, union-side labor lawyers, and civil rights lawyers in this group of nominees show the Biden administration building on its important commitment to professional diversity," Kang said. "In the wake of the Supreme Court's decision overturning Roe v. Wade, Julie Rikelman brings exactly the kind of experience with reproductive rights we desperately need on the courts."
Kang declared that "the pressure is squarely on" Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) "to announce a plan to hold enough hearings to consider these nominees, as well as allow the White House to continue making new nominations."
"There are now nearly twice as many district court nominees awaiting a hearing as there are scheduled hearing slots," he noted, adding that the panel "will be a bottleneck that will severely limit the Biden judicial legacy unless Durbin announces new hearings, starting with working through August."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy