Pentagon Press Secretary John Kirby appears at a briefing on January 28, 2021. (Photo: Yasin Ozturk/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images)
Groups Urge Voters to Call Lawmakers and Demand Cuts to Bloated Pentagon Budget
"We have an opportunity right now to cut the military's sky-high budget and invest in our communities," said the National Priorities Project.
Progressive campaigners on Wednesday urged members of the U.S. public to contact their representatives and demand their support for a pair of amendments that would reduce the country's military spending, a call that comes as the House is set to vote on legislation that would hand the Pentagon more than $800 billion in the coming fiscal year.
"Call your Representative directly TODAY, or call the U.S. Capitol Switchboard at 202-224-3121."
"That's almost a trillion dollars--approaching the highest historical levels for U.S. military funding since World War II," the National Priorities Project (NPP) noted in an email. "That dwarfs spending on many other agencies responsible for social spending, combined."
NPP is calling on the House, narrowly controlled by Democrats, to attach two separate amendments to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), sprawling legislation that could receive a vote in the lower chamber as soon as this week.
The first amendment, led by Reps. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) and Mark Pocan (D-Wis.), would claw back the $37 billion that the House Armed Services Committee recently voted to add to President Joe Biden's historically high military budget request for fiscal year 2023.
In its current form, the NDAA topline is $839 billion--a figure that includes $808.4 billion for the Pentagon and $30.5 billion for the Department of Energy, which oversees the country's nuclear arsenal.
Lee and Pocan are also spearheading a second NDAA amendment that, if approved, would cut $100 billion from the current topline military spending level of $782 billion.
"Call your representative directly TODAY, or call the U.S. Capitol Switchboard at 202-224-3121," NPP wrote in its email. "Urge them to vote 'yes' on both amendments."
\u201cThis week let\u2019s keep an eye on which leaders are continuing to bloat the Pentagon budget, and which want to put money towards meeting people\u2019s actual needs. Thank you Rep. Pocan for being one of the leaders working to #CutThePentagon!\u201d— CODEPINK (@CODEPINK) 1657732016
On Tuesday, the House Rules Committee agreed to allow the two Lee-Pocan amendments--along with hundreds of others--to receive votes on the House floor in the coming days.
Last year, as Common Dreams reported, similar efforts to rein in U.S. military spending during the NDAA process fell short as Republican and Democratic lawmakers--some funded by the weapons makers that benefit from ever-larger Pentagon budgets--teamed up to ensure their defeat.
But while progressives in Congress have yet to garner enough support from their colleagues to cut military spending, recent surveys indicate that their efforts are popular with the public.
A February poll showed that a majority of U.S. adults support cuts to military spending. Last month, the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen released a survey showing that 60% of likely voters want to keep military funding at the level Biden requested earlier this year.
"We have an opportunity right now to cut the military's sky-high budget and invest in our communities," NPP declared Wednesday, "but it can't happen without your help."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. The final deadline for our crucial Summer Campaign fundraising drive is just days away, and we’re falling short of our must-hit goal. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Progressive campaigners on Wednesday urged members of the U.S. public to contact their representatives and demand their support for a pair of amendments that would reduce the country's military spending, a call that comes as the House is set to vote on legislation that would hand the Pentagon more than $800 billion in the coming fiscal year.
"Call your Representative directly TODAY, or call the U.S. Capitol Switchboard at 202-224-3121."
"That's almost a trillion dollars--approaching the highest historical levels for U.S. military funding since World War II," the National Priorities Project (NPP) noted in an email. "That dwarfs spending on many other agencies responsible for social spending, combined."
NPP is calling on the House, narrowly controlled by Democrats, to attach two separate amendments to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), sprawling legislation that could receive a vote in the lower chamber as soon as this week.
The first amendment, led by Reps. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) and Mark Pocan (D-Wis.), would claw back the $37 billion that the House Armed Services Committee recently voted to add to President Joe Biden's historically high military budget request for fiscal year 2023.
In its current form, the NDAA topline is $839 billion--a figure that includes $808.4 billion for the Pentagon and $30.5 billion for the Department of Energy, which oversees the country's nuclear arsenal.
Lee and Pocan are also spearheading a second NDAA amendment that, if approved, would cut $100 billion from the current topline military spending level of $782 billion.
"Call your representative directly TODAY, or call the U.S. Capitol Switchboard at 202-224-3121," NPP wrote in its email. "Urge them to vote 'yes' on both amendments."
\u201cThis week let\u2019s keep an eye on which leaders are continuing to bloat the Pentagon budget, and which want to put money towards meeting people\u2019s actual needs. Thank you Rep. Pocan for being one of the leaders working to #CutThePentagon!\u201d— CODEPINK (@CODEPINK) 1657732016
On Tuesday, the House Rules Committee agreed to allow the two Lee-Pocan amendments--along with hundreds of others--to receive votes on the House floor in the coming days.
Last year, as Common Dreams reported, similar efforts to rein in U.S. military spending during the NDAA process fell short as Republican and Democratic lawmakers--some funded by the weapons makers that benefit from ever-larger Pentagon budgets--teamed up to ensure their defeat.
But while progressives in Congress have yet to garner enough support from their colleagues to cut military spending, recent surveys indicate that their efforts are popular with the public.
A February poll showed that a majority of U.S. adults support cuts to military spending. Last month, the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen released a survey showing that 60% of likely voters want to keep military funding at the level Biden requested earlier this year.
"We have an opportunity right now to cut the military's sky-high budget and invest in our communities," NPP declared Wednesday, "but it can't happen without your help."
Progressive campaigners on Wednesday urged members of the U.S. public to contact their representatives and demand their support for a pair of amendments that would reduce the country's military spending, a call that comes as the House is set to vote on legislation that would hand the Pentagon more than $800 billion in the coming fiscal year.
"Call your Representative directly TODAY, or call the U.S. Capitol Switchboard at 202-224-3121."
"That's almost a trillion dollars--approaching the highest historical levels for U.S. military funding since World War II," the National Priorities Project (NPP) noted in an email. "That dwarfs spending on many other agencies responsible for social spending, combined."
NPP is calling on the House, narrowly controlled by Democrats, to attach two separate amendments to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), sprawling legislation that could receive a vote in the lower chamber as soon as this week.
The first amendment, led by Reps. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) and Mark Pocan (D-Wis.), would claw back the $37 billion that the House Armed Services Committee recently voted to add to President Joe Biden's historically high military budget request for fiscal year 2023.
In its current form, the NDAA topline is $839 billion--a figure that includes $808.4 billion for the Pentagon and $30.5 billion for the Department of Energy, which oversees the country's nuclear arsenal.
Lee and Pocan are also spearheading a second NDAA amendment that, if approved, would cut $100 billion from the current topline military spending level of $782 billion.
"Call your representative directly TODAY, or call the U.S. Capitol Switchboard at 202-224-3121," NPP wrote in its email. "Urge them to vote 'yes' on both amendments."
\u201cThis week let\u2019s keep an eye on which leaders are continuing to bloat the Pentagon budget, and which want to put money towards meeting people\u2019s actual needs. Thank you Rep. Pocan for being one of the leaders working to #CutThePentagon!\u201d— CODEPINK (@CODEPINK) 1657732016
On Tuesday, the House Rules Committee agreed to allow the two Lee-Pocan amendments--along with hundreds of others--to receive votes on the House floor in the coming days.
Last year, as Common Dreams reported, similar efforts to rein in U.S. military spending during the NDAA process fell short as Republican and Democratic lawmakers--some funded by the weapons makers that benefit from ever-larger Pentagon budgets--teamed up to ensure their defeat.
But while progressives in Congress have yet to garner enough support from their colleagues to cut military spending, recent surveys indicate that their efforts are popular with the public.
A February poll showed that a majority of U.S. adults support cuts to military spending. Last month, the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen released a survey showing that 60% of likely voters want to keep military funding at the level Biden requested earlier this year.
"We have an opportunity right now to cut the military's sky-high budget and invest in our communities," NPP declared Wednesday, "but it can't happen without your help."