SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
U.S. Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee on March 8, 2022 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)
DOJ Sues to Prevent Arizona's 'Onerous' Proof of Citizenship Voting Law
Assistant U.S. Attorney General for Civil Rights Kristen Clarke said the law "constitutes a textbook violation of the National Voter Registration Act."
Jul 05, 2022
The U.S. Department of Justice on Tuesday sued Arizona in a bid to block a recently enacted law forcing residents to show proof of citizenship in order to vote in federal elections.
"Arizona is a repeat offender when it comes to attempts to make it harder to register to vote."
Assistant U.S. Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division Kristen Clarke said in a statement that the "onerous documentary proof of citizenship requirement" in the Arizona law, H.B. 2492, "constitutes a textbook violation of the National Voter Registration Act."
As Common Dreams reported, voting rights advocates have sounded the alarm over the law, which is set to go into effect in January, and which People for the American Way warned could prompt "the most extreme voter purge in the country."
According to one estimate, as many as 192,000 Arizonans could be stricken from the state's voter rolls if the law takes effect.
In a press call, Clarke said that "Arizona is a repeat offender when it comes to attempts to make it harder to register to vote."
"For nearly three decades, the National Voter Registration Act has helped to move states in the right direction by eliminating unnecessary requirements that have historically made it harder for eligible voters to access the registration rolls," she continued. "Arizona has passed a law that turns the clock back on progress by imposing unlawful and unnecessary requirements that would block eligible voters from the registration rolls for certain federal elections."
"This lawsuit reflects our deep commitment to using every available tool to protect all Americans' right to vote," Clarke added, "and to ensure that their voices are heard in our democracy."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The U.S. Department of Justice on Tuesday sued Arizona in a bid to block a recently enacted law forcing residents to show proof of citizenship in order to vote in federal elections.
"Arizona is a repeat offender when it comes to attempts to make it harder to register to vote."
Assistant U.S. Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division Kristen Clarke said in a statement that the "onerous documentary proof of citizenship requirement" in the Arizona law, H.B. 2492, "constitutes a textbook violation of the National Voter Registration Act."
As Common Dreams reported, voting rights advocates have sounded the alarm over the law, which is set to go into effect in January, and which People for the American Way warned could prompt "the most extreme voter purge in the country."
According to one estimate, as many as 192,000 Arizonans could be stricken from the state's voter rolls if the law takes effect.
In a press call, Clarke said that "Arizona is a repeat offender when it comes to attempts to make it harder to register to vote."
"For nearly three decades, the National Voter Registration Act has helped to move states in the right direction by eliminating unnecessary requirements that have historically made it harder for eligible voters to access the registration rolls," she continued. "Arizona has passed a law that turns the clock back on progress by imposing unlawful and unnecessary requirements that would block eligible voters from the registration rolls for certain federal elections."
"This lawsuit reflects our deep commitment to using every available tool to protect all Americans' right to vote," Clarke added, "and to ensure that their voices are heard in our democracy."
The U.S. Department of Justice on Tuesday sued Arizona in a bid to block a recently enacted law forcing residents to show proof of citizenship in order to vote in federal elections.
"Arizona is a repeat offender when it comes to attempts to make it harder to register to vote."
Assistant U.S. Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division Kristen Clarke said in a statement that the "onerous documentary proof of citizenship requirement" in the Arizona law, H.B. 2492, "constitutes a textbook violation of the National Voter Registration Act."
As Common Dreams reported, voting rights advocates have sounded the alarm over the law, which is set to go into effect in January, and which People for the American Way warned could prompt "the most extreme voter purge in the country."
According to one estimate, as many as 192,000 Arizonans could be stricken from the state's voter rolls if the law takes effect.
In a press call, Clarke said that "Arizona is a repeat offender when it comes to attempts to make it harder to register to vote."
"For nearly three decades, the National Voter Registration Act has helped to move states in the right direction by eliminating unnecessary requirements that have historically made it harder for eligible voters to access the registration rolls," she continued. "Arizona has passed a law that turns the clock back on progress by imposing unlawful and unnecessary requirements that would block eligible voters from the registration rolls for certain federal elections."
"This lawsuit reflects our deep commitment to using every available tool to protect all Americans' right to vote," Clarke added, "and to ensure that their voices are heard in our democracy."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.