

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Rep. Jared Golden (D-Maine) is seen during a House Armed Services Committee hearing March 6, 2019. (Photo: Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call)
Congressmen Jared Golden of Maine and Kurt Schrader of Oregon were the only two House Democrats on Wednesday to vote against a package of gun control measures framed by party leadership as "commonsense measures that will make an enormous difference to save lives."
"Who wouldn't vote to raise the age to take weapons of war out of the hands of teenagers?"
The Protecting Our Kids Act passed the U.S. House in a 223-204 vote, which came after a House panel heard survivors and eye-witnesses to recent mass shootings plead for federal action on gun safety, including the mother of Uvalde, Texas victim "Lexi" Rubio who told lawmakers that "as her voice, we demand action."
The package includes seven provisions, which were also voted on individually. The measures included banning bump stocks, banning high-capacity magazines, raising the age for purchasing semi-automatic rifles--like the AR-15 used in Uvalde--from 18 to 21, and strengthening federal criminal offenses for gun trafficking.
According to The Hill, Golden, who previously called the package "too sweeping," voted against the latter three of those provisions. He additionally rejected ones on "bolstering storage of guns in homes where minors could access the weapons, and requiring that untraceable guns and firearms without serial numbers--known as ghost guns--undergo background checks and receive serial numbers."
Schrader, for his part, also voted against the individual bills on banning high-capacity magazines and the increased age minimum for semi-automatic rifles. Both Golden and Schrader voted against the total legislative package.
"Who wouldn't vote to raise the age from 18 to 21 for a person to have a weapon of war?" House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said in her remarks on the House floor ahead of the vote.
"Who wouldn't vote to raise the age to take weapons of war out of the hands of teenagers?" Pelosi continued. "Who wouldn't vote to get illegal guns off our streets by cracking down gun trafficking, which is a danger to people but also to law enforcement? Who wouldn't vote for background checks on ghost gun purchases, which our law enforcement tells us is a major concern out there? Who wouldn't vote to protect children from stolen weapons or accidental shootings with safe storage requirements?"
Related Content

Five Republicans voted yes on the total package: Reps. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.), Anthony Gonzalez (R-Ohio), Chris Jacobs (N.Y.), Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.), and Fred Upton (R-Mich.). As such, they ran afoul of the directive from House GOP leadership, which stressed to its members the National Rifle Association's opposition and their jeopardizing future endorsements from the gun group.
The legislative package's success in the Senate, however, is likely doomed given the filibuster and Republicans' stiff opposition to gun safety legislation.
"As this bill heads to the Senate, the entire country is watching," said Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus. "Will Senate Republicans finally join with Democrats to prevent further mass slaughter of our constituents, or will they remain beholden to the gun lobby and moneyed interests that would allow the devastation on our streets to continue?"
"After Buffalo, Tree of Life, and El Paso, after Uvalde and Sandy Hook, after Pulse and Aurora and Columbine, will they finally heed the calls of the majority of Americans from across the political spectrum and act?" asked Jayapal. "Or will they simply throw up their hands and allow the carnage to continue?"
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Congressmen Jared Golden of Maine and Kurt Schrader of Oregon were the only two House Democrats on Wednesday to vote against a package of gun control measures framed by party leadership as "commonsense measures that will make an enormous difference to save lives."
"Who wouldn't vote to raise the age to take weapons of war out of the hands of teenagers?"
The Protecting Our Kids Act passed the U.S. House in a 223-204 vote, which came after a House panel heard survivors and eye-witnesses to recent mass shootings plead for federal action on gun safety, including the mother of Uvalde, Texas victim "Lexi" Rubio who told lawmakers that "as her voice, we demand action."
The package includes seven provisions, which were also voted on individually. The measures included banning bump stocks, banning high-capacity magazines, raising the age for purchasing semi-automatic rifles--like the AR-15 used in Uvalde--from 18 to 21, and strengthening federal criminal offenses for gun trafficking.
According to The Hill, Golden, who previously called the package "too sweeping," voted against the latter three of those provisions. He additionally rejected ones on "bolstering storage of guns in homes where minors could access the weapons, and requiring that untraceable guns and firearms without serial numbers--known as ghost guns--undergo background checks and receive serial numbers."
Schrader, for his part, also voted against the individual bills on banning high-capacity magazines and the increased age minimum for semi-automatic rifles. Both Golden and Schrader voted against the total legislative package.
"Who wouldn't vote to raise the age from 18 to 21 for a person to have a weapon of war?" House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said in her remarks on the House floor ahead of the vote.
"Who wouldn't vote to raise the age to take weapons of war out of the hands of teenagers?" Pelosi continued. "Who wouldn't vote to get illegal guns off our streets by cracking down gun trafficking, which is a danger to people but also to law enforcement? Who wouldn't vote for background checks on ghost gun purchases, which our law enforcement tells us is a major concern out there? Who wouldn't vote to protect children from stolen weapons or accidental shootings with safe storage requirements?"
Related Content

Five Republicans voted yes on the total package: Reps. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.), Anthony Gonzalez (R-Ohio), Chris Jacobs (N.Y.), Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.), and Fred Upton (R-Mich.). As such, they ran afoul of the directive from House GOP leadership, which stressed to its members the National Rifle Association's opposition and their jeopardizing future endorsements from the gun group.
The legislative package's success in the Senate, however, is likely doomed given the filibuster and Republicans' stiff opposition to gun safety legislation.
"As this bill heads to the Senate, the entire country is watching," said Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus. "Will Senate Republicans finally join with Democrats to prevent further mass slaughter of our constituents, or will they remain beholden to the gun lobby and moneyed interests that would allow the devastation on our streets to continue?"
"After Buffalo, Tree of Life, and El Paso, after Uvalde and Sandy Hook, after Pulse and Aurora and Columbine, will they finally heed the calls of the majority of Americans from across the political spectrum and act?" asked Jayapal. "Or will they simply throw up their hands and allow the carnage to continue?"
Congressmen Jared Golden of Maine and Kurt Schrader of Oregon were the only two House Democrats on Wednesday to vote against a package of gun control measures framed by party leadership as "commonsense measures that will make an enormous difference to save lives."
"Who wouldn't vote to raise the age to take weapons of war out of the hands of teenagers?"
The Protecting Our Kids Act passed the U.S. House in a 223-204 vote, which came after a House panel heard survivors and eye-witnesses to recent mass shootings plead for federal action on gun safety, including the mother of Uvalde, Texas victim "Lexi" Rubio who told lawmakers that "as her voice, we demand action."
The package includes seven provisions, which were also voted on individually. The measures included banning bump stocks, banning high-capacity magazines, raising the age for purchasing semi-automatic rifles--like the AR-15 used in Uvalde--from 18 to 21, and strengthening federal criminal offenses for gun trafficking.
According to The Hill, Golden, who previously called the package "too sweeping," voted against the latter three of those provisions. He additionally rejected ones on "bolstering storage of guns in homes where minors could access the weapons, and requiring that untraceable guns and firearms without serial numbers--known as ghost guns--undergo background checks and receive serial numbers."
Schrader, for his part, also voted against the individual bills on banning high-capacity magazines and the increased age minimum for semi-automatic rifles. Both Golden and Schrader voted against the total legislative package.
"Who wouldn't vote to raise the age from 18 to 21 for a person to have a weapon of war?" House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said in her remarks on the House floor ahead of the vote.
"Who wouldn't vote to raise the age to take weapons of war out of the hands of teenagers?" Pelosi continued. "Who wouldn't vote to get illegal guns off our streets by cracking down gun trafficking, which is a danger to people but also to law enforcement? Who wouldn't vote for background checks on ghost gun purchases, which our law enforcement tells us is a major concern out there? Who wouldn't vote to protect children from stolen weapons or accidental shootings with safe storage requirements?"
Related Content

Five Republicans voted yes on the total package: Reps. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.), Anthony Gonzalez (R-Ohio), Chris Jacobs (N.Y.), Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.), and Fred Upton (R-Mich.). As such, they ran afoul of the directive from House GOP leadership, which stressed to its members the National Rifle Association's opposition and their jeopardizing future endorsements from the gun group.
The legislative package's success in the Senate, however, is likely doomed given the filibuster and Republicans' stiff opposition to gun safety legislation.
"As this bill heads to the Senate, the entire country is watching," said Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus. "Will Senate Republicans finally join with Democrats to prevent further mass slaughter of our constituents, or will they remain beholden to the gun lobby and moneyed interests that would allow the devastation on our streets to continue?"
"After Buffalo, Tree of Life, and El Paso, after Uvalde and Sandy Hook, after Pulse and Aurora and Columbine, will they finally heed the calls of the majority of Americans from across the political spectrum and act?" asked Jayapal. "Or will they simply throw up their hands and allow the carnage to continue?"