May 09, 2022
U.S. lawmakers should "reject the notion that Congress must choose between antitrust and privacy reforms" when seeking to rein in Big Tech's anti-competitive behavior, a letter from 26 public interest organizations to Democratic legislators asserted Monday.
"Voters from both parties support breaking up monopolies and imposing stronger regulations on the largest tech companies."
"Recent remarks by Big Tech corporate leadership and its advocates have presented Congress with a false choice: fix corporate concentration or fix privacy. There is no reason that Congress should be so limited," the letter, which was led by the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, states.
"Big Tech cannot, and should not, choose how it will be held accountable in a time when its damaging effects are becoming clearer by the day," the signers--who also include Demand Progress, Fight for the Future, RootsAction, and UltraViolet Action--continue. "Only elected officials, empowered by their constituents, should decide the policy solutions to the persistent problems in Americans' digital lives--not the corporations responsible for those problems."
\u201cCompanies owned by Amazon:\nRing\nWhole Foods\nTwitch\nMGM\nGoodreads\nAudible\nZappos\nEero\nIMDb\n\nCompanies owned by Google:\nYoutube\nAndroid\nNest\nFitbit\nWaze\nreCAPTCHA\n\nCompanies owned by Facebook:\nInstagram\nWhatsApp\nOculus VR\n\nThis is what monopoly power looks like. Break up Big Tech.\u201d— Public Citizen (@Public Citizen) 1652107501
The letter accuses tech companies of "attempting to deflect from the momentum behind legislation that will cut into their profit-making foundation of surveillance and anti-competitive gatekeeping," largely by highlighting "polling that shows favorable public attitudes towards laws protecting user privacy online as proof that Americans do not want antitrust reform."
"The truth is that people want true accountability, which requires action across the digital economy," the groups assert. "Public opinion polling consistently shows that the public knows Big Tech is bad for small business and has outsized influence on the government. Voters from both parties support breaking up monopolies and imposing stronger regulations on the largest tech companies."
"The need to hold Big Tech accountable for its harms goes beyond privacy and antitrust," the letter continues, citing a March letter from 60 health, safety, privacy, and education groups contending that the tech industry's business model is "fundamentally at odds with children's well-being."
Earlier this month, more than 100 groups including some of the new letter's signatories joined forces with smaller Silicon Valley tech companies in holding an Antitrust Day of Action to pressure members of Congress to pass two pieces of legislation aimed at reining in Big Tech's anti-competitive and anti-democratic practices.
Related Content
Antitrust Day of Action Takes Aim at Power of Tech Giants
One of the bills, the Open App Markets Act, would empower application developers to reach customers without using online stores run by tech giants, ban major online sellers from requiring specific in-app payments, and establish privacy and security protections for consumers.
The other proposed legislation, the American Innovation and Choice Online Act, would block leading online platforms from favoring their own products and services, discriminating against businesses and harming competition, or requiring companies to buy their platform's goods or services for preferred placement.
\u201cThere is enormous momentum to get Big Tech #antitrust bills S. 2992 & S. 2710 across the finish line. More than 100 organizations participated in this day of action. We're gonna keep the pressure on.\n\nForget Elon Musk. Join the fight for a better Internet! https://t.co/jVvM6bgTv1\u201d— Evan Greer is on Mastodon (@Evan Greer is on Mastodon) 1649946499
Warning that "the window for reining in Big Tech's dominance may soon be closing," Demand Progress communications director Maria Langholz said on the Antitrust Day of Action that "Congress has a critical role to play in modernizing antitrust enforcement to rein in the power of modern-day monopolies like Amazon and Facebook/Meta."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
privacyrights & justiceus congressdemand progresspoliticsultravioletpublic citizentechnologyfight for the futureantitrustcorporate power
U.S. lawmakers should "reject the notion that Congress must choose between antitrust and privacy reforms" when seeking to rein in Big Tech's anti-competitive behavior, a letter from 26 public interest organizations to Democratic legislators asserted Monday.
"Voters from both parties support breaking up monopolies and imposing stronger regulations on the largest tech companies."
"Recent remarks by Big Tech corporate leadership and its advocates have presented Congress with a false choice: fix corporate concentration or fix privacy. There is no reason that Congress should be so limited," the letter, which was led by the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, states.
"Big Tech cannot, and should not, choose how it will be held accountable in a time when its damaging effects are becoming clearer by the day," the signers--who also include Demand Progress, Fight for the Future, RootsAction, and UltraViolet Action--continue. "Only elected officials, empowered by their constituents, should decide the policy solutions to the persistent problems in Americans' digital lives--not the corporations responsible for those problems."
\u201cCompanies owned by Amazon:\nRing\nWhole Foods\nTwitch\nMGM\nGoodreads\nAudible\nZappos\nEero\nIMDb\n\nCompanies owned by Google:\nYoutube\nAndroid\nNest\nFitbit\nWaze\nreCAPTCHA\n\nCompanies owned by Facebook:\nInstagram\nWhatsApp\nOculus VR\n\nThis is what monopoly power looks like. Break up Big Tech.\u201d— Public Citizen (@Public Citizen) 1652107501
The letter accuses tech companies of "attempting to deflect from the momentum behind legislation that will cut into their profit-making foundation of surveillance and anti-competitive gatekeeping," largely by highlighting "polling that shows favorable public attitudes towards laws protecting user privacy online as proof that Americans do not want antitrust reform."
"The truth is that people want true accountability, which requires action across the digital economy," the groups assert. "Public opinion polling consistently shows that the public knows Big Tech is bad for small business and has outsized influence on the government. Voters from both parties support breaking up monopolies and imposing stronger regulations on the largest tech companies."
"The need to hold Big Tech accountable for its harms goes beyond privacy and antitrust," the letter continues, citing a March letter from 60 health, safety, privacy, and education groups contending that the tech industry's business model is "fundamentally at odds with children's well-being."
Earlier this month, more than 100 groups including some of the new letter's signatories joined forces with smaller Silicon Valley tech companies in holding an Antitrust Day of Action to pressure members of Congress to pass two pieces of legislation aimed at reining in Big Tech's anti-competitive and anti-democratic practices.
Related Content
Antitrust Day of Action Takes Aim at Power of Tech Giants
One of the bills, the Open App Markets Act, would empower application developers to reach customers without using online stores run by tech giants, ban major online sellers from requiring specific in-app payments, and establish privacy and security protections for consumers.
The other proposed legislation, the American Innovation and Choice Online Act, would block leading online platforms from favoring their own products and services, discriminating against businesses and harming competition, or requiring companies to buy their platform's goods or services for preferred placement.
\u201cThere is enormous momentum to get Big Tech #antitrust bills S. 2992 & S. 2710 across the finish line. More than 100 organizations participated in this day of action. We're gonna keep the pressure on.\n\nForget Elon Musk. Join the fight for a better Internet! https://t.co/jVvM6bgTv1\u201d— Evan Greer is on Mastodon (@Evan Greer is on Mastodon) 1649946499
Warning that "the window for reining in Big Tech's dominance may soon be closing," Demand Progress communications director Maria Langholz said on the Antitrust Day of Action that "Congress has a critical role to play in modernizing antitrust enforcement to rein in the power of modern-day monopolies like Amazon and Facebook/Meta."
From Your Site Articles
U.S. lawmakers should "reject the notion that Congress must choose between antitrust and privacy reforms" when seeking to rein in Big Tech's anti-competitive behavior, a letter from 26 public interest organizations to Democratic legislators asserted Monday.
"Voters from both parties support breaking up monopolies and imposing stronger regulations on the largest tech companies."
"Recent remarks by Big Tech corporate leadership and its advocates have presented Congress with a false choice: fix corporate concentration or fix privacy. There is no reason that Congress should be so limited," the letter, which was led by the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, states.
"Big Tech cannot, and should not, choose how it will be held accountable in a time when its damaging effects are becoming clearer by the day," the signers--who also include Demand Progress, Fight for the Future, RootsAction, and UltraViolet Action--continue. "Only elected officials, empowered by their constituents, should decide the policy solutions to the persistent problems in Americans' digital lives--not the corporations responsible for those problems."
\u201cCompanies owned by Amazon:\nRing\nWhole Foods\nTwitch\nMGM\nGoodreads\nAudible\nZappos\nEero\nIMDb\n\nCompanies owned by Google:\nYoutube\nAndroid\nNest\nFitbit\nWaze\nreCAPTCHA\n\nCompanies owned by Facebook:\nInstagram\nWhatsApp\nOculus VR\n\nThis is what monopoly power looks like. Break up Big Tech.\u201d— Public Citizen (@Public Citizen) 1652107501
The letter accuses tech companies of "attempting to deflect from the momentum behind legislation that will cut into their profit-making foundation of surveillance and anti-competitive gatekeeping," largely by highlighting "polling that shows favorable public attitudes towards laws protecting user privacy online as proof that Americans do not want antitrust reform."
"The truth is that people want true accountability, which requires action across the digital economy," the groups assert. "Public opinion polling consistently shows that the public knows Big Tech is bad for small business and has outsized influence on the government. Voters from both parties support breaking up monopolies and imposing stronger regulations on the largest tech companies."
"The need to hold Big Tech accountable for its harms goes beyond privacy and antitrust," the letter continues, citing a March letter from 60 health, safety, privacy, and education groups contending that the tech industry's business model is "fundamentally at odds with children's well-being."
Earlier this month, more than 100 groups including some of the new letter's signatories joined forces with smaller Silicon Valley tech companies in holding an Antitrust Day of Action to pressure members of Congress to pass two pieces of legislation aimed at reining in Big Tech's anti-competitive and anti-democratic practices.
Related Content
Antitrust Day of Action Takes Aim at Power of Tech Giants
One of the bills, the Open App Markets Act, would empower application developers to reach customers without using online stores run by tech giants, ban major online sellers from requiring specific in-app payments, and establish privacy and security protections for consumers.
The other proposed legislation, the American Innovation and Choice Online Act, would block leading online platforms from favoring their own products and services, discriminating against businesses and harming competition, or requiring companies to buy their platform's goods or services for preferred placement.
\u201cThere is enormous momentum to get Big Tech #antitrust bills S. 2992 & S. 2710 across the finish line. More than 100 organizations participated in this day of action. We're gonna keep the pressure on.\n\nForget Elon Musk. Join the fight for a better Internet! https://t.co/jVvM6bgTv1\u201d— Evan Greer is on Mastodon (@Evan Greer is on Mastodon) 1649946499
Warning that "the window for reining in Big Tech's dominance may soon be closing," Demand Progress communications director Maria Langholz said on the Antitrust Day of Action that "Congress has a critical role to play in modernizing antitrust enforcement to rein in the power of modern-day monopolies like Amazon and Facebook/Meta."
From Your Site Articles
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.