SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Then-President Donald Trump spoke at a rally on January 6, 2021 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images)
Supreme Court Denies Trump Bid to Conceal Records From Jan. 6 Panel
One government watchdog group welcomed the decision as "a huge win for transparency."
Jan 19, 2022
The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday denied former President Donald Trump's attempt to block the release of White House records to a House of Representatives panel investigating last year's deadly Capitol attack.
The high court's 8-1 decision--Justice Clarence Thomas dissented--clears the way for the National Archives to share over 700 documents with the House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol.
"A huge win for transparency!" Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) declared of the decision, which the government watchdog group shared on Twitter.
\u201cBREAKING: The January 6 Committee is getting Trump administration records\u201d— Citizens for Ethics (@Citizens for Ethics) 1642634545
CREW president Noah Bookbinder similarly described the development as "hugely significant for accountability."
According to CNN:
The documents include activity logs, schedules, speech notes, and three pages of handwritten notes from then-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows--paperwork that could reveal goings-on inside the West Wing as Trump supporters gathered in Washington and then overran the Capitol, disrupting the certification of the 2020 vote.
Trump is also seeking to keep secret a draft proclamation honoring two police officers who died in the siege and memos and other documents about supposed election fraud and efforts to overturn Trump's loss of the presidency, the National Archives has said in court documents.
The House committee wants the records to better understand Trump's role in the January 6 attack. The former president's "Big Lie" about the 2020 election, including at a rally just before a mob of his supporters stormed the Capitol, led to Trump's historic second impeachment.
The panel had warned the high court that granting Trump's request "would cause irreparable harm to the select committee by denying it the records it urgently needs to inform its ongoing investigation, including upcoming interviews of scores of witnesses."
While Trump tried to use executive privilege to prevent the documents from reaching the panel, President Joe Biden declined to invoke the same doctrine, concluding that doing so "is not in the best interests of the United States."
\u201cThe Supreme Court's order rests on the D.C. Circuit's determination that Trump's attempt to block the documents would fail "even if he were the incumbent." So SCOTUS declined to draw a distinction between the privilege of former and current presidents. https://t.co/DHvv9VcrxX\u201d— Mark Joseph Stern (@Mark Joseph Stern) 1642634158
Justice Brett Kavanaugh concurred with the majority opinion on Wednesday but also made clear that he disagrees with a federal appeals court's suggestion that a former president may not invoke privilege for communications during their tenure if the current president does not support the claim--though the Trump appointee added that allowing ex-leaders to use the power does not mean that it "is absolute or cannot be overcome."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday denied former President Donald Trump's attempt to block the release of White House records to a House of Representatives panel investigating last year's deadly Capitol attack.
The high court's 8-1 decision--Justice Clarence Thomas dissented--clears the way for the National Archives to share over 700 documents with the House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol.
"A huge win for transparency!" Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) declared of the decision, which the government watchdog group shared on Twitter.
\u201cBREAKING: The January 6 Committee is getting Trump administration records\u201d— Citizens for Ethics (@Citizens for Ethics) 1642634545
CREW president Noah Bookbinder similarly described the development as "hugely significant for accountability."
According to CNN:
The documents include activity logs, schedules, speech notes, and three pages of handwritten notes from then-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows--paperwork that could reveal goings-on inside the West Wing as Trump supporters gathered in Washington and then overran the Capitol, disrupting the certification of the 2020 vote.
Trump is also seeking to keep secret a draft proclamation honoring two police officers who died in the siege and memos and other documents about supposed election fraud and efforts to overturn Trump's loss of the presidency, the National Archives has said in court documents.
The House committee wants the records to better understand Trump's role in the January 6 attack. The former president's "Big Lie" about the 2020 election, including at a rally just before a mob of his supporters stormed the Capitol, led to Trump's historic second impeachment.
The panel had warned the high court that granting Trump's request "would cause irreparable harm to the select committee by denying it the records it urgently needs to inform its ongoing investigation, including upcoming interviews of scores of witnesses."
While Trump tried to use executive privilege to prevent the documents from reaching the panel, President Joe Biden declined to invoke the same doctrine, concluding that doing so "is not in the best interests of the United States."
\u201cThe Supreme Court's order rests on the D.C. Circuit's determination that Trump's attempt to block the documents would fail "even if he were the incumbent." So SCOTUS declined to draw a distinction between the privilege of former and current presidents. https://t.co/DHvv9VcrxX\u201d— Mark Joseph Stern (@Mark Joseph Stern) 1642634158
Justice Brett Kavanaugh concurred with the majority opinion on Wednesday but also made clear that he disagrees with a federal appeals court's suggestion that a former president may not invoke privilege for communications during their tenure if the current president does not support the claim--though the Trump appointee added that allowing ex-leaders to use the power does not mean that it "is absolute or cannot be overcome."
From Your Site Articles
The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday denied former President Donald Trump's attempt to block the release of White House records to a House of Representatives panel investigating last year's deadly Capitol attack.
The high court's 8-1 decision--Justice Clarence Thomas dissented--clears the way for the National Archives to share over 700 documents with the House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol.
"A huge win for transparency!" Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) declared of the decision, which the government watchdog group shared on Twitter.
\u201cBREAKING: The January 6 Committee is getting Trump administration records\u201d— Citizens for Ethics (@Citizens for Ethics) 1642634545
CREW president Noah Bookbinder similarly described the development as "hugely significant for accountability."
According to CNN:
The documents include activity logs, schedules, speech notes, and three pages of handwritten notes from then-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows--paperwork that could reveal goings-on inside the West Wing as Trump supporters gathered in Washington and then overran the Capitol, disrupting the certification of the 2020 vote.
Trump is also seeking to keep secret a draft proclamation honoring two police officers who died in the siege and memos and other documents about supposed election fraud and efforts to overturn Trump's loss of the presidency, the National Archives has said in court documents.
The House committee wants the records to better understand Trump's role in the January 6 attack. The former president's "Big Lie" about the 2020 election, including at a rally just before a mob of his supporters stormed the Capitol, led to Trump's historic second impeachment.
The panel had warned the high court that granting Trump's request "would cause irreparable harm to the select committee by denying it the records it urgently needs to inform its ongoing investigation, including upcoming interviews of scores of witnesses."
While Trump tried to use executive privilege to prevent the documents from reaching the panel, President Joe Biden declined to invoke the same doctrine, concluding that doing so "is not in the best interests of the United States."
\u201cThe Supreme Court's order rests on the D.C. Circuit's determination that Trump's attempt to block the documents would fail "even if he were the incumbent." So SCOTUS declined to draw a distinction between the privilege of former and current presidents. https://t.co/DHvv9VcrxX\u201d— Mark Joseph Stern (@Mark Joseph Stern) 1642634158
Justice Brett Kavanaugh concurred with the majority opinion on Wednesday but also made clear that he disagrees with a federal appeals court's suggestion that a former president may not invoke privilege for communications during their tenure if the current president does not support the claim--though the Trump appointee added that allowing ex-leaders to use the power does not mean that it "is absolute or cannot be overcome."
From Your Site Articles
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.