To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) speaks during a press conference following a Senate Democratic Caucus meeting about voting rights and the filibuster on January 18, 2022 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Kent Nishimura/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images)
U.S. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer confirmed Tuesday evening that if Republicans continue to obstruct a long-delayed voting rights package, he will move to bring back the talking filibuster for just that legislation.
"Now that they have found a way to open debate, under the current rules, Democrats can and must force a public debate that ends with a majority vote."
Schumer (D-N.Y.), flanked by other top Senate Democrats, announced the plan during a press conference after a caucus meeting that followed a floor debate on the House-approved bill, the Freedom to Vote: John R. Lewis Act.
The strategy was welcomed by progressives, including Christina Harvey, executive director of the advocacy group Stand Up America.
"Senate Democrats are on the Senate floor right now embracing a rare opportunity to substantively debate voting rights," Harvey said. "But they have an even rarer opportunity to pass the Freedom to Vote: John R. Lewis Act at the end of this debate, if they are willing to stand together and do it."
"Now that they have found a way to open debate, under the current rules, Democrats can and must force a public debate that ends with a majority vote after every senator has exhausted their time," she said. "It may take weeks, but if Senate Democrats can find the political courage this moment requires, they have the tools right now to pass voting rights legislation and save our democracy."
Throughout the current congressional session, voting rights legislation has been blocked by Senate Republicans as well as two Democrats--Sens. Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona--who have so far opposed abolishing or reforming the filibuster.
\u201cMake Republicans start a talking filibuster. Then we can ask Senator Sinema and Senator Manchin: what was the point of the filibuster? To debate? Is this enough debate? There is no limit to what we need to do right now to save our democracy.\u201d— Rep. Andy Levin (@Rep. Andy Levin) 1642540658
"The Senate spent an entire year drafting, considering, and debating voting rights legislation," Schumer said during the press conference. "Senate Republicans have spent the same amount of time refusing to negotiate with our members, including Sen. Manchin, or even debate this legislation."
The Democratic leader highlighted that over the past year--in the wake of former President Donald Trump's "Big Lie" about the 2020 election--GOP state legislators have enacted voter suppression laws in key states across the country, sparking demands for Congress to fight back.
"If the Senate cannot protect the right to vote, which is the cornerstone of our democracy, then the Senate rules must be reformed," Schumer declared. "If the Republicans block cloture on the legislation before us, I will put forward a proposal to change the rules to allow for a talking filibuster on this legislation."
"We feel, very simply, on something as important as voting rights, if Senate Republicans are gonna oppose it, they should not be allowed to sit in their office," he added. "They gotta come down on the floor and defend their opposition to voting rights, the wellspring of our democracy."
\u201cThe GOP shouldn't be allowed to sit in their offices and block voting rights\n\nThey should have to come to the floor and defend anti-voting rights positions\n\nThe Senate has an opportunity this week to do that\u2014a vote to change Senate rules to promote public debate on voting rights\u201d— Chuck Schumer (@Chuck Schumer) 1642552444
While Democratic Sens. Tim Kaine (Va.), Amy Klobuchar (Minn.), Jeff Merkley (Ore.), and Raphael Warnock (Ga.) all spoke after Schumer, whether the rule change happens will ultimately depend on Manchin and Sinema.
After Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), the majority whip, suggested the talking filibuster approach to journalists earlier Tuesday, Manchin signaled that he would not support the change.
Politico's Burgess Everett tweeted that "Manchin says he doesn't support a talking filibuster that goes around [the] 60-vote threshold and won't support the nuclear option to change rules," adding that the senator "says he's fine with a primary challenge over this."
According to the reporter, Manchin specifically said: "I've been primaried my entire life. That would not be anything new for me... It's rough and tumble. We're used to that. Bring it on."
\u201cMANCHIN told @christianjhall and other reporters he\u2019s against this new talking filibuster plan. NOT willing to go nuclear, as he has said consistently over the last few months\u201d— Jake Sherman (@Jake Sherman) 1642543858
Though Schumer refused to indicate whether he would support 2024 primary challenges to Democrats who don't get onboard with filibuster reform, only saying that "I'm not getting into the politics," earlier in the day Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) told journalists that he would back such efforts.
"What's at stake is the future of American democracy," said Sanders. "And the fact that all over this country, Republican governors and legislators are moving aggressively to suppress the vote and to impose extreme gerrymandering, among many other things."
"Anybody who believes in American democracy has got to vote to enable us to go forward with 50 votes to suspend the filibuster, at least on this vote," he added.
\u201cAt meeting, Manchin stood his ground and defended his view to maintain the 60-vote threshold on the filibuster, per another attendee. He maintained that changing the rules had never been done like this before, and several members pushed back.\u201d— Manu Raju (@Manu Raju) 1642547945
As Common Dreams reported earlier Tuesday, the progressive advocacy group Indivisible found that 94% of its members in Arizona said they would support primarying Sinema when she is up for reelection in two years if she sinks voting rights legislation.
Indivisible and Stand Up America are among the organizations urging Senate Democrats to hold the Senate floor for "as long as it takes" to pass their voting rights package.
As Megan Hatcher-Mays, Indivisible's director of democracy policy, put it: "We want a full airing of the ways Republicans are undermining our right to vote across the country--on a partisan basis, for the record--and how the Freedom to Vote: John R. Lewis Act would save our democracy from these attacks."
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
U.S. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer confirmed Tuesday evening that if Republicans continue to obstruct a long-delayed voting rights package, he will move to bring back the talking filibuster for just that legislation.
"Now that they have found a way to open debate, under the current rules, Democrats can and must force a public debate that ends with a majority vote."
Schumer (D-N.Y.), flanked by other top Senate Democrats, announced the plan during a press conference after a caucus meeting that followed a floor debate on the House-approved bill, the Freedom to Vote: John R. Lewis Act.
The strategy was welcomed by progressives, including Christina Harvey, executive director of the advocacy group Stand Up America.
"Senate Democrats are on the Senate floor right now embracing a rare opportunity to substantively debate voting rights," Harvey said. "But they have an even rarer opportunity to pass the Freedom to Vote: John R. Lewis Act at the end of this debate, if they are willing to stand together and do it."
"Now that they have found a way to open debate, under the current rules, Democrats can and must force a public debate that ends with a majority vote after every senator has exhausted their time," she said. "It may take weeks, but if Senate Democrats can find the political courage this moment requires, they have the tools right now to pass voting rights legislation and save our democracy."
Throughout the current congressional session, voting rights legislation has been blocked by Senate Republicans as well as two Democrats--Sens. Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona--who have so far opposed abolishing or reforming the filibuster.
\u201cMake Republicans start a talking filibuster. Then we can ask Senator Sinema and Senator Manchin: what was the point of the filibuster? To debate? Is this enough debate? There is no limit to what we need to do right now to save our democracy.\u201d— Rep. Andy Levin (@Rep. Andy Levin) 1642540658
"The Senate spent an entire year drafting, considering, and debating voting rights legislation," Schumer said during the press conference. "Senate Republicans have spent the same amount of time refusing to negotiate with our members, including Sen. Manchin, or even debate this legislation."
The Democratic leader highlighted that over the past year--in the wake of former President Donald Trump's "Big Lie" about the 2020 election--GOP state legislators have enacted voter suppression laws in key states across the country, sparking demands for Congress to fight back.
"If the Senate cannot protect the right to vote, which is the cornerstone of our democracy, then the Senate rules must be reformed," Schumer declared. "If the Republicans block cloture on the legislation before us, I will put forward a proposal to change the rules to allow for a talking filibuster on this legislation."
"We feel, very simply, on something as important as voting rights, if Senate Republicans are gonna oppose it, they should not be allowed to sit in their office," he added. "They gotta come down on the floor and defend their opposition to voting rights, the wellspring of our democracy."
\u201cThe GOP shouldn't be allowed to sit in their offices and block voting rights\n\nThey should have to come to the floor and defend anti-voting rights positions\n\nThe Senate has an opportunity this week to do that\u2014a vote to change Senate rules to promote public debate on voting rights\u201d— Chuck Schumer (@Chuck Schumer) 1642552444
While Democratic Sens. Tim Kaine (Va.), Amy Klobuchar (Minn.), Jeff Merkley (Ore.), and Raphael Warnock (Ga.) all spoke after Schumer, whether the rule change happens will ultimately depend on Manchin and Sinema.
After Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), the majority whip, suggested the talking filibuster approach to journalists earlier Tuesday, Manchin signaled that he would not support the change.
Politico's Burgess Everett tweeted that "Manchin says he doesn't support a talking filibuster that goes around [the] 60-vote threshold and won't support the nuclear option to change rules," adding that the senator "says he's fine with a primary challenge over this."
According to the reporter, Manchin specifically said: "I've been primaried my entire life. That would not be anything new for me... It's rough and tumble. We're used to that. Bring it on."
\u201cMANCHIN told @christianjhall and other reporters he\u2019s against this new talking filibuster plan. NOT willing to go nuclear, as he has said consistently over the last few months\u201d— Jake Sherman (@Jake Sherman) 1642543858
Though Schumer refused to indicate whether he would support 2024 primary challenges to Democrats who don't get onboard with filibuster reform, only saying that "I'm not getting into the politics," earlier in the day Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) told journalists that he would back such efforts.
"What's at stake is the future of American democracy," said Sanders. "And the fact that all over this country, Republican governors and legislators are moving aggressively to suppress the vote and to impose extreme gerrymandering, among many other things."
"Anybody who believes in American democracy has got to vote to enable us to go forward with 50 votes to suspend the filibuster, at least on this vote," he added.
\u201cAt meeting, Manchin stood his ground and defended his view to maintain the 60-vote threshold on the filibuster, per another attendee. He maintained that changing the rules had never been done like this before, and several members pushed back.\u201d— Manu Raju (@Manu Raju) 1642547945
As Common Dreams reported earlier Tuesday, the progressive advocacy group Indivisible found that 94% of its members in Arizona said they would support primarying Sinema when she is up for reelection in two years if she sinks voting rights legislation.
Indivisible and Stand Up America are among the organizations urging Senate Democrats to hold the Senate floor for "as long as it takes" to pass their voting rights package.
As Megan Hatcher-Mays, Indivisible's director of democracy policy, put it: "We want a full airing of the ways Republicans are undermining our right to vote across the country--on a partisan basis, for the record--and how the Freedom to Vote: John R. Lewis Act would save our democracy from these attacks."
U.S. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer confirmed Tuesday evening that if Republicans continue to obstruct a long-delayed voting rights package, he will move to bring back the talking filibuster for just that legislation.
"Now that they have found a way to open debate, under the current rules, Democrats can and must force a public debate that ends with a majority vote."
Schumer (D-N.Y.), flanked by other top Senate Democrats, announced the plan during a press conference after a caucus meeting that followed a floor debate on the House-approved bill, the Freedom to Vote: John R. Lewis Act.
The strategy was welcomed by progressives, including Christina Harvey, executive director of the advocacy group Stand Up America.
"Senate Democrats are on the Senate floor right now embracing a rare opportunity to substantively debate voting rights," Harvey said. "But they have an even rarer opportunity to pass the Freedom to Vote: John R. Lewis Act at the end of this debate, if they are willing to stand together and do it."
"Now that they have found a way to open debate, under the current rules, Democrats can and must force a public debate that ends with a majority vote after every senator has exhausted their time," she said. "It may take weeks, but if Senate Democrats can find the political courage this moment requires, they have the tools right now to pass voting rights legislation and save our democracy."
Throughout the current congressional session, voting rights legislation has been blocked by Senate Republicans as well as two Democrats--Sens. Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona--who have so far opposed abolishing or reforming the filibuster.
\u201cMake Republicans start a talking filibuster. Then we can ask Senator Sinema and Senator Manchin: what was the point of the filibuster? To debate? Is this enough debate? There is no limit to what we need to do right now to save our democracy.\u201d— Rep. Andy Levin (@Rep. Andy Levin) 1642540658
"The Senate spent an entire year drafting, considering, and debating voting rights legislation," Schumer said during the press conference. "Senate Republicans have spent the same amount of time refusing to negotiate with our members, including Sen. Manchin, or even debate this legislation."
The Democratic leader highlighted that over the past year--in the wake of former President Donald Trump's "Big Lie" about the 2020 election--GOP state legislators have enacted voter suppression laws in key states across the country, sparking demands for Congress to fight back.
"If the Senate cannot protect the right to vote, which is the cornerstone of our democracy, then the Senate rules must be reformed," Schumer declared. "If the Republicans block cloture on the legislation before us, I will put forward a proposal to change the rules to allow for a talking filibuster on this legislation."
"We feel, very simply, on something as important as voting rights, if Senate Republicans are gonna oppose it, they should not be allowed to sit in their office," he added. "They gotta come down on the floor and defend their opposition to voting rights, the wellspring of our democracy."
\u201cThe GOP shouldn't be allowed to sit in their offices and block voting rights\n\nThey should have to come to the floor and defend anti-voting rights positions\n\nThe Senate has an opportunity this week to do that\u2014a vote to change Senate rules to promote public debate on voting rights\u201d— Chuck Schumer (@Chuck Schumer) 1642552444
While Democratic Sens. Tim Kaine (Va.), Amy Klobuchar (Minn.), Jeff Merkley (Ore.), and Raphael Warnock (Ga.) all spoke after Schumer, whether the rule change happens will ultimately depend on Manchin and Sinema.
After Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), the majority whip, suggested the talking filibuster approach to journalists earlier Tuesday, Manchin signaled that he would not support the change.
Politico's Burgess Everett tweeted that "Manchin says he doesn't support a talking filibuster that goes around [the] 60-vote threshold and won't support the nuclear option to change rules," adding that the senator "says he's fine with a primary challenge over this."
According to the reporter, Manchin specifically said: "I've been primaried my entire life. That would not be anything new for me... It's rough and tumble. We're used to that. Bring it on."
\u201cMANCHIN told @christianjhall and other reporters he\u2019s against this new talking filibuster plan. NOT willing to go nuclear, as he has said consistently over the last few months\u201d— Jake Sherman (@Jake Sherman) 1642543858
Though Schumer refused to indicate whether he would support 2024 primary challenges to Democrats who don't get onboard with filibuster reform, only saying that "I'm not getting into the politics," earlier in the day Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) told journalists that he would back such efforts.
"What's at stake is the future of American democracy," said Sanders. "And the fact that all over this country, Republican governors and legislators are moving aggressively to suppress the vote and to impose extreme gerrymandering, among many other things."
"Anybody who believes in American democracy has got to vote to enable us to go forward with 50 votes to suspend the filibuster, at least on this vote," he added.
\u201cAt meeting, Manchin stood his ground and defended his view to maintain the 60-vote threshold on the filibuster, per another attendee. He maintained that changing the rules had never been done like this before, and several members pushed back.\u201d— Manu Raju (@Manu Raju) 1642547945
As Common Dreams reported earlier Tuesday, the progressive advocacy group Indivisible found that 94% of its members in Arizona said they would support primarying Sinema when she is up for reelection in two years if she sinks voting rights legislation.
Indivisible and Stand Up America are among the organizations urging Senate Democrats to hold the Senate floor for "as long as it takes" to pass their voting rights package.
As Megan Hatcher-Mays, Indivisible's director of democracy policy, put it: "We want a full airing of the ways Republicans are undermining our right to vote across the country--on a partisan basis, for the record--and how the Freedom to Vote: John R. Lewis Act would save our democracy from these attacks."