

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

The sun sets over container ships and oil platforms off the coast of Huntington Beach, California on January 12, 2021. (Photo: Leonard Ortiz/MediaNews Group/Orange County Register via Getty Images)
Declaring that "cash comes from our legacy business," the CEO of Royal Dutch Shell has asserted that continuing the company's oil operations is necessary to help it transition away from non-oil energy operations.
Ben van Beurden made the remarks in an interview with the BBC published online Thursday.
"If we have to build a hydrogen plant from a wind farm that we build in the North Sea for a billion dollars, that is not going to be funded by a hydrogen business--it will be funded by the oil and gas business," van Beurden told the outlet.
The executive also pushed back against climate activists' demands, as well as scientific studies and international warnings, against pursuing new oil fields--like the proposed extraction in the Cambo oilfield off the coast of Scotland.
"Why would you say: Let's not get our oil and gas demands from our own resources but let's import from somewhere else, probably with a larger carbon footprint," he said, adding that such a move "also will not help the carbon footprint of the world."
Van Beurden made similar comments at an energy conference last month.
"Upstream, integrated gas, and the mature businesses like marketing and chemicals, they have to provide the cash for the future," he said at the online Energy Intelligence Forum.
"Investing in these businesses is going to be needed to keep them the strong cash engines that they currently are," he said, adding that "upstream needs to be a strong cash engine into, and probably through, the 2030s, and we need to invest to keep it there."
Related Content

Those remarks came just a week before he was confronted at the TED Countdown forum in Edinburgh, Scotland by a local climate activist over his company's links to human rights abuses in Nigeria, pursuit of new fossil fuel operations, and its appeal of a May court ruling that said Shell must decrease its carbon emissions 45% by 2030.
"I hope you know that as the climate crisis gets more and more deadly, you will be to blame," said activist Lauren MacDonald.
BBC noted in its reporting that Shell "plans to spend four times as much on oil and gas development as on renewables next year." The company announced plans earlier this year to hit net zero emissions by 2050, with a reliance "heavily on carbon offsets"--a scheme climate activists denounce as harmful greenwashing.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Declaring that "cash comes from our legacy business," the CEO of Royal Dutch Shell has asserted that continuing the company's oil operations is necessary to help it transition away from non-oil energy operations.
Ben van Beurden made the remarks in an interview with the BBC published online Thursday.
"If we have to build a hydrogen plant from a wind farm that we build in the North Sea for a billion dollars, that is not going to be funded by a hydrogen business--it will be funded by the oil and gas business," van Beurden told the outlet.
The executive also pushed back against climate activists' demands, as well as scientific studies and international warnings, against pursuing new oil fields--like the proposed extraction in the Cambo oilfield off the coast of Scotland.
"Why would you say: Let's not get our oil and gas demands from our own resources but let's import from somewhere else, probably with a larger carbon footprint," he said, adding that such a move "also will not help the carbon footprint of the world."
Van Beurden made similar comments at an energy conference last month.
"Upstream, integrated gas, and the mature businesses like marketing and chemicals, they have to provide the cash for the future," he said at the online Energy Intelligence Forum.
"Investing in these businesses is going to be needed to keep them the strong cash engines that they currently are," he said, adding that "upstream needs to be a strong cash engine into, and probably through, the 2030s, and we need to invest to keep it there."
Related Content

Those remarks came just a week before he was confronted at the TED Countdown forum in Edinburgh, Scotland by a local climate activist over his company's links to human rights abuses in Nigeria, pursuit of new fossil fuel operations, and its appeal of a May court ruling that said Shell must decrease its carbon emissions 45% by 2030.
"I hope you know that as the climate crisis gets more and more deadly, you will be to blame," said activist Lauren MacDonald.
BBC noted in its reporting that Shell "plans to spend four times as much on oil and gas development as on renewables next year." The company announced plans earlier this year to hit net zero emissions by 2050, with a reliance "heavily on carbon offsets"--a scheme climate activists denounce as harmful greenwashing.
Declaring that "cash comes from our legacy business," the CEO of Royal Dutch Shell has asserted that continuing the company's oil operations is necessary to help it transition away from non-oil energy operations.
Ben van Beurden made the remarks in an interview with the BBC published online Thursday.
"If we have to build a hydrogen plant from a wind farm that we build in the North Sea for a billion dollars, that is not going to be funded by a hydrogen business--it will be funded by the oil and gas business," van Beurden told the outlet.
The executive also pushed back against climate activists' demands, as well as scientific studies and international warnings, against pursuing new oil fields--like the proposed extraction in the Cambo oilfield off the coast of Scotland.
"Why would you say: Let's not get our oil and gas demands from our own resources but let's import from somewhere else, probably with a larger carbon footprint," he said, adding that such a move "also will not help the carbon footprint of the world."
Van Beurden made similar comments at an energy conference last month.
"Upstream, integrated gas, and the mature businesses like marketing and chemicals, they have to provide the cash for the future," he said at the online Energy Intelligence Forum.
"Investing in these businesses is going to be needed to keep them the strong cash engines that they currently are," he said, adding that "upstream needs to be a strong cash engine into, and probably through, the 2030s, and we need to invest to keep it there."
Related Content

Those remarks came just a week before he was confronted at the TED Countdown forum in Edinburgh, Scotland by a local climate activist over his company's links to human rights abuses in Nigeria, pursuit of new fossil fuel operations, and its appeal of a May court ruling that said Shell must decrease its carbon emissions 45% by 2030.
"I hope you know that as the climate crisis gets more and more deadly, you will be to blame," said activist Lauren MacDonald.
BBC noted in its reporting that Shell "plans to spend four times as much on oil and gas development as on renewables next year." The company announced plans earlier this year to hit net zero emissions by 2050, with a reliance "heavily on carbon offsets"--a scheme climate activists denounce as harmful greenwashing.