Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg announces the plan to make Facebook more private at the company's Developer Conference on April 30, 2019. (Photo: Anthony Quintano/Flickr/cc)
Oct 20, 2021
Digital rights advocates on Wednesday shrugged off reports that Facebook is planning to change its name by accusing the company of attempting to divert attention from its failure to address problems plaguing the platform and calling for meaningful regulation of--and in some cases, breaking up--the social media giant.
"Like Big Tobacco and Big Oil rebranded to deflect attention for their crimes, Facebook thinks that a rebrand can help them change the subject."
According to The Verge, Facebook will be rebranded next week "to reflect its focus on building the metaverse," a shared digital environment enhanced by virtual and augmented reality. The new name remains a secret.
Earlier this year, Facebook CEO and co-founder Mark Zuckerberg toldThe Verge that the metaverse "is going to be a big focus, and I think that this is just going to be a big part of the next chapter for the way that the internet evolves after the mobile internet."
Critics were quick to deride the potential name change, which comes on the heels of whistleblower testimony accusing the company of threatening children and democracy, as well as a "How to Stop Facebook" campaign launched last week by a coalition of over 40 advocacy groups.
"Just to be clear Facebook, our problem with you is not your name," tweeted the progressive political action committee MeidasTouch.
In a statement, the Real Facebook Oversight Board (RFOB) said, "Like Big Tobacco and Big Oil rebranded to deflect attention for their crimes, Facebook thinks that a rebrand can help them change the subject."
Some observers responded to the news of the possible rebrand with tongue-in-cheek tweets:
\u201cDear Facebook:\n\nWe've received your request to change your name. However, due to our real names policy, you will first need to fax us a copy of your court order and new driver's license....\u201d— Ina Fried (@Ina Fried) 1634700225
\u201cDear Facebook- have you thought about the name Phillip Morris? I think it\u2019s available.\nYour welcome\u201d— Jon Stewart (@Jon Stewart) 1634743208
Others wondered how a name change would help reduce the dissemination of misinformation and hate speech on Facebook.
"When are you going to profiting off hate?" tweeted the NAACP. "Our advice: Keep the name, change the policy!"
"It's easy to dismiss this as a joke or think Nick Clegg has snapped a tether," RFOB said, referring to the company's vice president for global affairs and communications, "but this is a sign Facebook will go to any length to distract from their failure to keep hate off of their platforms."
"Whatever they call themselves, the issue remains," the group added. "Facebook, Instagram, and Whatsapp, under any parent brand or name, need real and independent regulation and oversight now."
\u201cYou can change the name, but if you don\u2019t change the policy you\u2019re still putting millions of Americans at risk with the hatred you allow to fester on your platform. #StopHateForProfit\u201d— Derrick Johnson (@Derrick Johnson) 1634735839
Still others renewed calls for more aggressive measures against the social media giant.
"Now would be a great time to break up Facebook," tweeted the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Digital rights advocates on Wednesday shrugged off reports that Facebook is planning to change its name by accusing the company of attempting to divert attention from its failure to address problems plaguing the platform and calling for meaningful regulation of--and in some cases, breaking up--the social media giant.
"Like Big Tobacco and Big Oil rebranded to deflect attention for their crimes, Facebook thinks that a rebrand can help them change the subject."
According to The Verge, Facebook will be rebranded next week "to reflect its focus on building the metaverse," a shared digital environment enhanced by virtual and augmented reality. The new name remains a secret.
Earlier this year, Facebook CEO and co-founder Mark Zuckerberg toldThe Verge that the metaverse "is going to be a big focus, and I think that this is just going to be a big part of the next chapter for the way that the internet evolves after the mobile internet."
Critics were quick to deride the potential name change, which comes on the heels of whistleblower testimony accusing the company of threatening children and democracy, as well as a "How to Stop Facebook" campaign launched last week by a coalition of over 40 advocacy groups.
"Just to be clear Facebook, our problem with you is not your name," tweeted the progressive political action committee MeidasTouch.
In a statement, the Real Facebook Oversight Board (RFOB) said, "Like Big Tobacco and Big Oil rebranded to deflect attention for their crimes, Facebook thinks that a rebrand can help them change the subject."
Some observers responded to the news of the possible rebrand with tongue-in-cheek tweets:
\u201cDear Facebook:\n\nWe've received your request to change your name. However, due to our real names policy, you will first need to fax us a copy of your court order and new driver's license....\u201d— Ina Fried (@Ina Fried) 1634700225
\u201cDear Facebook- have you thought about the name Phillip Morris? I think it\u2019s available.\nYour welcome\u201d— Jon Stewart (@Jon Stewart) 1634743208
Others wondered how a name change would help reduce the dissemination of misinformation and hate speech on Facebook.
"When are you going to profiting off hate?" tweeted the NAACP. "Our advice: Keep the name, change the policy!"
"It's easy to dismiss this as a joke or think Nick Clegg has snapped a tether," RFOB said, referring to the company's vice president for global affairs and communications, "but this is a sign Facebook will go to any length to distract from their failure to keep hate off of their platforms."
"Whatever they call themselves, the issue remains," the group added. "Facebook, Instagram, and Whatsapp, under any parent brand or name, need real and independent regulation and oversight now."
\u201cYou can change the name, but if you don\u2019t change the policy you\u2019re still putting millions of Americans at risk with the hatred you allow to fester on your platform. #StopHateForProfit\u201d— Derrick Johnson (@Derrick Johnson) 1634735839
Still others renewed calls for more aggressive measures against the social media giant.
"Now would be a great time to break up Facebook," tweeted the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen.
Digital rights advocates on Wednesday shrugged off reports that Facebook is planning to change its name by accusing the company of attempting to divert attention from its failure to address problems plaguing the platform and calling for meaningful regulation of--and in some cases, breaking up--the social media giant.
"Like Big Tobacco and Big Oil rebranded to deflect attention for their crimes, Facebook thinks that a rebrand can help them change the subject."
According to The Verge, Facebook will be rebranded next week "to reflect its focus on building the metaverse," a shared digital environment enhanced by virtual and augmented reality. The new name remains a secret.
Earlier this year, Facebook CEO and co-founder Mark Zuckerberg toldThe Verge that the metaverse "is going to be a big focus, and I think that this is just going to be a big part of the next chapter for the way that the internet evolves after the mobile internet."
Critics were quick to deride the potential name change, which comes on the heels of whistleblower testimony accusing the company of threatening children and democracy, as well as a "How to Stop Facebook" campaign launched last week by a coalition of over 40 advocacy groups.
"Just to be clear Facebook, our problem with you is not your name," tweeted the progressive political action committee MeidasTouch.
In a statement, the Real Facebook Oversight Board (RFOB) said, "Like Big Tobacco and Big Oil rebranded to deflect attention for their crimes, Facebook thinks that a rebrand can help them change the subject."
Some observers responded to the news of the possible rebrand with tongue-in-cheek tweets:
\u201cDear Facebook:\n\nWe've received your request to change your name. However, due to our real names policy, you will first need to fax us a copy of your court order and new driver's license....\u201d— Ina Fried (@Ina Fried) 1634700225
\u201cDear Facebook- have you thought about the name Phillip Morris? I think it\u2019s available.\nYour welcome\u201d— Jon Stewart (@Jon Stewart) 1634743208
Others wondered how a name change would help reduce the dissemination of misinformation and hate speech on Facebook.
"When are you going to profiting off hate?" tweeted the NAACP. "Our advice: Keep the name, change the policy!"
"It's easy to dismiss this as a joke or think Nick Clegg has snapped a tether," RFOB said, referring to the company's vice president for global affairs and communications, "but this is a sign Facebook will go to any length to distract from their failure to keep hate off of their platforms."
"Whatever they call themselves, the issue remains," the group added. "Facebook, Instagram, and Whatsapp, under any parent brand or name, need real and independent regulation and oversight now."
\u201cYou can change the name, but if you don\u2019t change the policy you\u2019re still putting millions of Americans at risk with the hatred you allow to fester on your platform. #StopHateForProfit\u201d— Derrick Johnson (@Derrick Johnson) 1634735839
Still others renewed calls for more aggressive measures against the social media giant.
"Now would be a great time to break up Facebook," tweeted the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.