SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg announces the plan to make Facebook more private at the company's Developer Conference on April 30, 2019. (Photo: Anthony Quintano/Flickr/cc)
Don't Be Distracted by Possible Facebook Rebrand, Say Critics of Tech Behemoth
"Just to be clear, Facebook, our problem with you is not your name."
Oct 20, 2021
Digital rights advocates on Wednesday shrugged off reports that Facebook is planning to change its name by accusing the company of attempting to divert attention from its failure to address problems plaguing the platform and calling for meaningful regulation of--and in some cases, breaking up--the social media giant.
"Like Big Tobacco and Big Oil rebranded to deflect attention for their crimes, Facebook thinks that a rebrand can help them change the subject."
According to The Verge, Facebook will be rebranded next week "to reflect its focus on building the metaverse," a shared digital environment enhanced by virtual and augmented reality. The new name remains a secret.
Earlier this year, Facebook CEO and co-founder Mark Zuckerberg told The Verge that the metaverse "is going to be a big focus, and I think that this is just going to be a big part of the next chapter for the way that the internet evolves after the mobile internet."
Critics were quick to deride the potential name change, which comes on the heels of whistleblower testimony accusing the company of threatening children and democracy, as well as a "How to Stop Facebook" campaign launched last week by a coalition of over 40 advocacy groups.
"Just to be clear Facebook, our problem with you is not your name," tweeted the progressive political action committee MeidasTouch.
In a statement, the Real Facebook Oversight Board (RFOB) said, "Like Big Tobacco and Big Oil rebranded to deflect attention for their crimes, Facebook thinks that a rebrand can help them change the subject."
Some observers responded to the news of the possible rebrand with tongue-in-cheek tweets:
Others wondered how a name change would help reduce the dissemination of misinformation and hate speech on Facebook.
"When are you going to profiting off hate?" tweeted the NAACP. "Our advice: Keep the name, change the policy!"
"It's easy to dismiss this as a joke or think Nick Clegg has snapped a tether," RFOB said, referring to the company's vice president for global affairs and communications, "but this is a sign Facebook will go to any length to distract from their failure to keep hate off of their platforms."
"Whatever they call themselves, the issue remains," the group added. "Facebook, Instagram, and Whatsapp, under any parent brand or name, need real and independent regulation and oversight now."
Still others renewed calls for more aggressive measures against the social media giant.
"Now would be a great time to break up Facebook," tweeted the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Digital rights advocates on Wednesday shrugged off reports that Facebook is planning to change its name by accusing the company of attempting to divert attention from its failure to address problems plaguing the platform and calling for meaningful regulation of--and in some cases, breaking up--the social media giant.
"Like Big Tobacco and Big Oil rebranded to deflect attention for their crimes, Facebook thinks that a rebrand can help them change the subject."
According to The Verge, Facebook will be rebranded next week "to reflect its focus on building the metaverse," a shared digital environment enhanced by virtual and augmented reality. The new name remains a secret.
Earlier this year, Facebook CEO and co-founder Mark Zuckerberg told The Verge that the metaverse "is going to be a big focus, and I think that this is just going to be a big part of the next chapter for the way that the internet evolves after the mobile internet."
Critics were quick to deride the potential name change, which comes on the heels of whistleblower testimony accusing the company of threatening children and democracy, as well as a "How to Stop Facebook" campaign launched last week by a coalition of over 40 advocacy groups.
"Just to be clear Facebook, our problem with you is not your name," tweeted the progressive political action committee MeidasTouch.
In a statement, the Real Facebook Oversight Board (RFOB) said, "Like Big Tobacco and Big Oil rebranded to deflect attention for their crimes, Facebook thinks that a rebrand can help them change the subject."
Some observers responded to the news of the possible rebrand with tongue-in-cheek tweets:
Others wondered how a name change would help reduce the dissemination of misinformation and hate speech on Facebook.
"When are you going to profiting off hate?" tweeted the NAACP. "Our advice: Keep the name, change the policy!"
"It's easy to dismiss this as a joke or think Nick Clegg has snapped a tether," RFOB said, referring to the company's vice president for global affairs and communications, "but this is a sign Facebook will go to any length to distract from their failure to keep hate off of their platforms."
"Whatever they call themselves, the issue remains," the group added. "Facebook, Instagram, and Whatsapp, under any parent brand or name, need real and independent regulation and oversight now."
Still others renewed calls for more aggressive measures against the social media giant.
"Now would be a great time to break up Facebook," tweeted the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen.
Digital rights advocates on Wednesday shrugged off reports that Facebook is planning to change its name by accusing the company of attempting to divert attention from its failure to address problems plaguing the platform and calling for meaningful regulation of--and in some cases, breaking up--the social media giant.
"Like Big Tobacco and Big Oil rebranded to deflect attention for their crimes, Facebook thinks that a rebrand can help them change the subject."
According to The Verge, Facebook will be rebranded next week "to reflect its focus on building the metaverse," a shared digital environment enhanced by virtual and augmented reality. The new name remains a secret.
Earlier this year, Facebook CEO and co-founder Mark Zuckerberg told The Verge that the metaverse "is going to be a big focus, and I think that this is just going to be a big part of the next chapter for the way that the internet evolves after the mobile internet."
Critics were quick to deride the potential name change, which comes on the heels of whistleblower testimony accusing the company of threatening children and democracy, as well as a "How to Stop Facebook" campaign launched last week by a coalition of over 40 advocacy groups.
"Just to be clear Facebook, our problem with you is not your name," tweeted the progressive political action committee MeidasTouch.
In a statement, the Real Facebook Oversight Board (RFOB) said, "Like Big Tobacco and Big Oil rebranded to deflect attention for their crimes, Facebook thinks that a rebrand can help them change the subject."
Some observers responded to the news of the possible rebrand with tongue-in-cheek tweets:
Others wondered how a name change would help reduce the dissemination of misinformation and hate speech on Facebook.
"When are you going to profiting off hate?" tweeted the NAACP. "Our advice: Keep the name, change the policy!"
"It's easy to dismiss this as a joke or think Nick Clegg has snapped a tether," RFOB said, referring to the company's vice president for global affairs and communications, "but this is a sign Facebook will go to any length to distract from their failure to keep hate off of their platforms."
"Whatever they call themselves, the issue remains," the group added. "Facebook, Instagram, and Whatsapp, under any parent brand or name, need real and independent regulation and oversight now."
Still others renewed calls for more aggressive measures against the social media giant.
"Now would be a great time to break up Facebook," tweeted the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.