SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Medical professionals, students, ACTUP New York, and their supporters protested outside Pfizer's global headquarters in New York City on March 2, 2019. (Photo: Erik McGregor/Pacific Press/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Amid Corporate Dems' Threats, New Poll Shows 83% of Voters Back Drug Pricing Reform
"The Democrats must stand with the people," said Sen. Bernie Sanders, "not fold."
Oct 12, 2021
Further poking holes in reports that the lawmakers currently standing in the way of passing President Joe Biden's agenda are "moderates," new polling out Tuesday showed that large majorities of voters want the federal government to be empowered to negotiate for lower drug prices--a proposal long championed by Democrats which has now become a sticking point in the Build Back Better Act.
"Even with PhRMA spending millions on scare tactics and lies--voters know the truth."
According to the Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF) survey taken between September 23 and October 4, 83% of respondents said the government should be able to secure lower drug prices for patients who use both Medicare plans and private health insurance plans.
"We didn't poll on baseball, motherhood, and apple pie, but I'm not sure they would score much higher," tweeted Larry Levitt, executive vice president for health policy at KFF.
The survey results illustrated the personal nature of the issue for millions of Americans, with eight in 10 respondents saying they felt the cost of prescription medications has become "unreasonable" and one in five senior citizens saying they struggle to afford their prescriptions--including 17% who have prescription drug coverage as part of their insurance plans.
Democrats have long run on promises of lowering prescription drug costs, but with the provision within striking distance as part of the Build Back Better Act--the "human infrastructure" spending plan that would invest $3.5 trillion over a decade in the well-being of lower- and middle-income Americans--a small group of conservative party members have threatened to tank the package if the provision is included.
As Common Dreams reported last month, Reps. Kathleen Rice (D-N.Y.), Scott Peters (D-Calif.), and Kurt Schrader (D-Ore.) voted against including federal drug price negotiating power in the package. The latter two lawmakers have accepted tens of thousands of dollars from the pharmaceutical industry this election cycle.
Rice claimed last month that she would not support the provision because it was not "fiscally responsible" and would "jeopardize the bill's final passage," while Schrader and Peters repeated an industry claim that allowing negotiations for lower drug prices would harm innovation in the pharmaceutical sector and prevent new drugs from being developed.
Respondents to the KFF survey rejected that claim; even after being presented with the argument, 82% of voters still supported allowing the government to negotiate prices. More than 70% of Republicans still supported the measure as well as 82% of independents.
\u201cEven with PhRMA spending millions on scare tactics and lies \u2013 voters know the truth. \n\nNow it\u2019s time for Congress to listen: Allow Medicare to negotiate drug prices.\n\nThis is not a partisan issue. This is a commonsense solution.\u201d— AARP Advocates (@AARP Advocates) 1634047207
"Even with [lobbying group] PhRMA spending millions on scare tactics and lies, voters know the truth," tweeted AARP, the national group that represents 38 million members over the age of 50.
Noting the wide swath of the electorate that backs the proposal, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.)--who has played a key role in negotiating the Build Back Better Act as chairman of the Senate Budget Committee--called on lawmakers to "finally have the courage to stand up to the greed of Big Pharma."
\u201cWho wants Medicare to negotiate lower drug prices? Oh just...\n \n91% of Democrats\n85% of Independents\n76% of Republicans \n84% of seniors \n \nNow is the time for Congress to finally have the courage to stand up to the greed of Big Pharma.\u201d— Bernie Sanders (@Bernie Sanders) 1634061369
In a call with reporters Tuesday, Sanders said that adding dental, hearing, and vision benefits to Medicare through the Build Back Better Act--also popular with the public--is similarly "not negotiable."
"The Democrats must stand with the people," added Sanders, "not fold."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Further poking holes in reports that the lawmakers currently standing in the way of passing President Joe Biden's agenda are "moderates," new polling out Tuesday showed that large majorities of voters want the federal government to be empowered to negotiate for lower drug prices--a proposal long championed by Democrats which has now become a sticking point in the Build Back Better Act.
"Even with PhRMA spending millions on scare tactics and lies--voters know the truth."
According to the Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF) survey taken between September 23 and October 4, 83% of respondents said the government should be able to secure lower drug prices for patients who use both Medicare plans and private health insurance plans.
"We didn't poll on baseball, motherhood, and apple pie, but I'm not sure they would score much higher," tweeted Larry Levitt, executive vice president for health policy at KFF.
The survey results illustrated the personal nature of the issue for millions of Americans, with eight in 10 respondents saying they felt the cost of prescription medications has become "unreasonable" and one in five senior citizens saying they struggle to afford their prescriptions--including 17% who have prescription drug coverage as part of their insurance plans.
Democrats have long run on promises of lowering prescription drug costs, but with the provision within striking distance as part of the Build Back Better Act--the "human infrastructure" spending plan that would invest $3.5 trillion over a decade in the well-being of lower- and middle-income Americans--a small group of conservative party members have threatened to tank the package if the provision is included.
As Common Dreams reported last month, Reps. Kathleen Rice (D-N.Y.), Scott Peters (D-Calif.), and Kurt Schrader (D-Ore.) voted against including federal drug price negotiating power in the package. The latter two lawmakers have accepted tens of thousands of dollars from the pharmaceutical industry this election cycle.
Rice claimed last month that she would not support the provision because it was not "fiscally responsible" and would "jeopardize the bill's final passage," while Schrader and Peters repeated an industry claim that allowing negotiations for lower drug prices would harm innovation in the pharmaceutical sector and prevent new drugs from being developed.
Respondents to the KFF survey rejected that claim; even after being presented with the argument, 82% of voters still supported allowing the government to negotiate prices. More than 70% of Republicans still supported the measure as well as 82% of independents.
\u201cEven with PhRMA spending millions on scare tactics and lies \u2013 voters know the truth. \n\nNow it\u2019s time for Congress to listen: Allow Medicare to negotiate drug prices.\n\nThis is not a partisan issue. This is a commonsense solution.\u201d— AARP Advocates (@AARP Advocates) 1634047207
"Even with [lobbying group] PhRMA spending millions on scare tactics and lies, voters know the truth," tweeted AARP, the national group that represents 38 million members over the age of 50.
Noting the wide swath of the electorate that backs the proposal, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.)--who has played a key role in negotiating the Build Back Better Act as chairman of the Senate Budget Committee--called on lawmakers to "finally have the courage to stand up to the greed of Big Pharma."
\u201cWho wants Medicare to negotiate lower drug prices? Oh just...\n \n91% of Democrats\n85% of Independents\n76% of Republicans \n84% of seniors \n \nNow is the time for Congress to finally have the courage to stand up to the greed of Big Pharma.\u201d— Bernie Sanders (@Bernie Sanders) 1634061369
In a call with reporters Tuesday, Sanders said that adding dental, hearing, and vision benefits to Medicare through the Build Back Better Act--also popular with the public--is similarly "not negotiable."
"The Democrats must stand with the people," added Sanders, "not fold."
From Your Site Articles
Further poking holes in reports that the lawmakers currently standing in the way of passing President Joe Biden's agenda are "moderates," new polling out Tuesday showed that large majorities of voters want the federal government to be empowered to negotiate for lower drug prices--a proposal long championed by Democrats which has now become a sticking point in the Build Back Better Act.
"Even with PhRMA spending millions on scare tactics and lies--voters know the truth."
According to the Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF) survey taken between September 23 and October 4, 83% of respondents said the government should be able to secure lower drug prices for patients who use both Medicare plans and private health insurance plans.
"We didn't poll on baseball, motherhood, and apple pie, but I'm not sure they would score much higher," tweeted Larry Levitt, executive vice president for health policy at KFF.
The survey results illustrated the personal nature of the issue for millions of Americans, with eight in 10 respondents saying they felt the cost of prescription medications has become "unreasonable" and one in five senior citizens saying they struggle to afford their prescriptions--including 17% who have prescription drug coverage as part of their insurance plans.
Democrats have long run on promises of lowering prescription drug costs, but with the provision within striking distance as part of the Build Back Better Act--the "human infrastructure" spending plan that would invest $3.5 trillion over a decade in the well-being of lower- and middle-income Americans--a small group of conservative party members have threatened to tank the package if the provision is included.
As Common Dreams reported last month, Reps. Kathleen Rice (D-N.Y.), Scott Peters (D-Calif.), and Kurt Schrader (D-Ore.) voted against including federal drug price negotiating power in the package. The latter two lawmakers have accepted tens of thousands of dollars from the pharmaceutical industry this election cycle.
Rice claimed last month that she would not support the provision because it was not "fiscally responsible" and would "jeopardize the bill's final passage," while Schrader and Peters repeated an industry claim that allowing negotiations for lower drug prices would harm innovation in the pharmaceutical sector and prevent new drugs from being developed.
Respondents to the KFF survey rejected that claim; even after being presented with the argument, 82% of voters still supported allowing the government to negotiate prices. More than 70% of Republicans still supported the measure as well as 82% of independents.
\u201cEven with PhRMA spending millions on scare tactics and lies \u2013 voters know the truth. \n\nNow it\u2019s time for Congress to listen: Allow Medicare to negotiate drug prices.\n\nThis is not a partisan issue. This is a commonsense solution.\u201d— AARP Advocates (@AARP Advocates) 1634047207
"Even with [lobbying group] PhRMA spending millions on scare tactics and lies, voters know the truth," tweeted AARP, the national group that represents 38 million members over the age of 50.
Noting the wide swath of the electorate that backs the proposal, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.)--who has played a key role in negotiating the Build Back Better Act as chairman of the Senate Budget Committee--called on lawmakers to "finally have the courage to stand up to the greed of Big Pharma."
\u201cWho wants Medicare to negotiate lower drug prices? Oh just...\n \n91% of Democrats\n85% of Independents\n76% of Republicans \n84% of seniors \n \nNow is the time for Congress to finally have the courage to stand up to the greed of Big Pharma.\u201d— Bernie Sanders (@Bernie Sanders) 1634061369
In a call with reporters Tuesday, Sanders said that adding dental, hearing, and vision benefits to Medicare through the Build Back Better Act--also popular with the public--is similarly "not negotiable."
"The Democrats must stand with the people," added Sanders, "not fold."
From Your Site Articles
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.