Prescription pills are shown with $20 bills. (Photo: www.ccPixs.com/Flickr/cc)
Sep 14, 2021
Three corporate Democrats on the House Energy and Commerce Committee drew condemnation from progressives on Tuesday after announcing they plan to stand in the way of passing President Joe Biden's Build Back Better legislation if it includes a key provision to allow the federal government to negotiate drug prices--a broadly popular reform that could help millions of Americans save on the medications they need each year.
Reps. Kathleen Rice (D-N.Y.), Scott Peters (D-Calif.), and Kurt Schrader (D-Ore.) reportedly claimed as the committee was marking up the $3.5 trillion Build Back Better plan, which would invest in human infrastructure, that including Medicare drug price negotiations in the package would keep the legislation from ultimately passing--despite polls showing the provision has widespread support.
"Without this key reform, we'll continue to pay unsustainable amounts for prescription drugs, and have less money for key investments like expanding Medicare benefits, fighting climate change, and more."
--Indivisible
"I do not support advancing policies that are not fiscally responsible and jeopardize the bill's final passage," said Rice, while Peters said he had proposed his own drug pricing negotiation scheme.
As Biden said last month in remarks about the Build Back Better plan, Americans currently pay two to three times more than people in other wealthy countries for prescription drugs. One in four struggle to afford prescriptions and 30% of Americans report having cut pills in half or skipping doses to save money.
"Right now, drug companies will set a price at whatever the market will bear," said the president. "But that often means a significant number of people can't afford it under any circumstance and they'll die without it. That's unacceptable."
"What we're proposing is that we'll negotiate a base--negotiate with the company based on a fair price, one that reflects the costs of the research and development and the need for... a profit, but that's still affordable for consumers," Biden added.
As research conducted in August by progressive think tank Data for Progress, Patients for Affordable Drugs Now, and Protect Our Care shows, majorities of voters in all 435 congressional districts support allowing Medicare to negotiate drug prices.
\u201c\ud83d\udea8 NEW MODEL: As Congress negotiates a budget to include giving Medicare the power to negotiate prescription drug prices, our new project with @P4ADNOW + @ProtectOurCare maps support for drug reform in all 435 congressional districts and 50 states.\n\n\ud83d\uddfa\ufe0f\ud83d\udc47\nhttps://t.co/27Xebsw7s1\u201d— Data for Progress (@Data for Progress) 1631637365
Ninety percent of Rice's constituents support the provision, while only 18% believe the argument long made by pharmaceutical companies that allowing negotiation by Medicare will "harm innovation."
Similar poll results were found in Peters' and Schrader's districts, Protect Our Care reported on Tuesday.
"Any lawmaker that tries to stand in the way is on the wrong side of this issue and on the wrong side of their constituents," the group tweeted.
\u201cIt\u2019s imperative that Congress give #Medicare the power to negotiate for #LowerDrugPrices for all Americans \u2014 any lawmaker that tries to stand in the way is on the wrong side of this issue and on the wrong side of their constituents. #LowerDrugPricesNOW\u201d— Protect Our Care (@Protect Our Care) 1631628671
"Without this key reform, we'll continue to pay unsustainable amounts for prescription drugs, and have less money for key investments like expanding Medicare benefits, fighting climate change, and more," said Indivisible.
According to the Center for Responsive Politics, all three lawmakers have accepted campaign contributions from the pharmaceutical industry. Peters and Schrader have both accepted tens of thousands of dollars in donations from the pharmaceutical industry this election cycle. Pharmaceutical companies are the top contributors to Peters' campaign in the 2021-22 cycle, donating more than $88,000 so far.
The three lawmakers' decision to side with corporations that aim to protect their profits at the expense of millions of Americans was called "unacceptable" by the healthcare advocacy coalition Lower Drug Prices Now.
\u201c\ud83d\udea8 UNACCEPTABLE \ud83d\udea8: @RepKathleenRice is putting #BigPharma profits before the 90% of her constituents in favor of reform by REFUSING to support HR3 as part of the #BuildBackBetter agenda.\n\nIt\u2019s time to allow Medicare to negotiate so EVERYONE can have #LowerDrugPricesNow.\u201d— Lower Drug Prices Now (@Lower Drug Prices Now) 1631645001
"Rep. Kathleen Rice is putting Big Pharma profits before the 90% of her constituents in favor of reform by REFUSING to support H.R. 3 as part of the Build Back Better agenda," said the coalition.
Advocates called on constituents to demand that the three lawmakers support the popular provision, known as H.R. 3 or the Elijah Cummings Lower Drug Costs Now Act, in the reconciliation package.
\u201c\ud83d\udea8\ud83d\udea8\ud83d\udea8 @ScottPetersCA52 @KathleenRice and @RepSchrader may vote TODAY to block Medicare\u2019s ability to negotiate drug pricing! \n\n\u260e\ufe0f Tell them to stand with the people, not Big Pharma! We need affordable prescriptions! Vote YES on the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation provision! \u2b07\ufe0f\u201d— CPD Action \ud83d\udca5 (@CPD Action \ud83d\udca5) 1631635834
"Tell them to stand with the people, not Big Pharma," said Center for Popular Democracy Action.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. The final deadline for our crucial Summer Campaign fundraising drive is just days away, and we’re falling short of our must-hit goal. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Three corporate Democrats on the House Energy and Commerce Committee drew condemnation from progressives on Tuesday after announcing they plan to stand in the way of passing President Joe Biden's Build Back Better legislation if it includes a key provision to allow the federal government to negotiate drug prices--a broadly popular reform that could help millions of Americans save on the medications they need each year.
Reps. Kathleen Rice (D-N.Y.), Scott Peters (D-Calif.), and Kurt Schrader (D-Ore.) reportedly claimed as the committee was marking up the $3.5 trillion Build Back Better plan, which would invest in human infrastructure, that including Medicare drug price negotiations in the package would keep the legislation from ultimately passing--despite polls showing the provision has widespread support.
"Without this key reform, we'll continue to pay unsustainable amounts for prescription drugs, and have less money for key investments like expanding Medicare benefits, fighting climate change, and more."
--Indivisible
"I do not support advancing policies that are not fiscally responsible and jeopardize the bill's final passage," said Rice, while Peters said he had proposed his own drug pricing negotiation scheme.
As Biden said last month in remarks about the Build Back Better plan, Americans currently pay two to three times more than people in other wealthy countries for prescription drugs. One in four struggle to afford prescriptions and 30% of Americans report having cut pills in half or skipping doses to save money.
"Right now, drug companies will set a price at whatever the market will bear," said the president. "But that often means a significant number of people can't afford it under any circumstance and they'll die without it. That's unacceptable."
"What we're proposing is that we'll negotiate a base--negotiate with the company based on a fair price, one that reflects the costs of the research and development and the need for... a profit, but that's still affordable for consumers," Biden added.
As research conducted in August by progressive think tank Data for Progress, Patients for Affordable Drugs Now, and Protect Our Care shows, majorities of voters in all 435 congressional districts support allowing Medicare to negotiate drug prices.
\u201c\ud83d\udea8 NEW MODEL: As Congress negotiates a budget to include giving Medicare the power to negotiate prescription drug prices, our new project with @P4ADNOW + @ProtectOurCare maps support for drug reform in all 435 congressional districts and 50 states.\n\n\ud83d\uddfa\ufe0f\ud83d\udc47\nhttps://t.co/27Xebsw7s1\u201d— Data for Progress (@Data for Progress) 1631637365
Ninety percent of Rice's constituents support the provision, while only 18% believe the argument long made by pharmaceutical companies that allowing negotiation by Medicare will "harm innovation."
Similar poll results were found in Peters' and Schrader's districts, Protect Our Care reported on Tuesday.
"Any lawmaker that tries to stand in the way is on the wrong side of this issue and on the wrong side of their constituents," the group tweeted.
\u201cIt\u2019s imperative that Congress give #Medicare the power to negotiate for #LowerDrugPrices for all Americans \u2014 any lawmaker that tries to stand in the way is on the wrong side of this issue and on the wrong side of their constituents. #LowerDrugPricesNOW\u201d— Protect Our Care (@Protect Our Care) 1631628671
"Without this key reform, we'll continue to pay unsustainable amounts for prescription drugs, and have less money for key investments like expanding Medicare benefits, fighting climate change, and more," said Indivisible.
According to the Center for Responsive Politics, all three lawmakers have accepted campaign contributions from the pharmaceutical industry. Peters and Schrader have both accepted tens of thousands of dollars in donations from the pharmaceutical industry this election cycle. Pharmaceutical companies are the top contributors to Peters' campaign in the 2021-22 cycle, donating more than $88,000 so far.
The three lawmakers' decision to side with corporations that aim to protect their profits at the expense of millions of Americans was called "unacceptable" by the healthcare advocacy coalition Lower Drug Prices Now.
\u201c\ud83d\udea8 UNACCEPTABLE \ud83d\udea8: @RepKathleenRice is putting #BigPharma profits before the 90% of her constituents in favor of reform by REFUSING to support HR3 as part of the #BuildBackBetter agenda.\n\nIt\u2019s time to allow Medicare to negotiate so EVERYONE can have #LowerDrugPricesNow.\u201d— Lower Drug Prices Now (@Lower Drug Prices Now) 1631645001
"Rep. Kathleen Rice is putting Big Pharma profits before the 90% of her constituents in favor of reform by REFUSING to support H.R. 3 as part of the Build Back Better agenda," said the coalition.
Advocates called on constituents to demand that the three lawmakers support the popular provision, known as H.R. 3 or the Elijah Cummings Lower Drug Costs Now Act, in the reconciliation package.
\u201c\ud83d\udea8\ud83d\udea8\ud83d\udea8 @ScottPetersCA52 @KathleenRice and @RepSchrader may vote TODAY to block Medicare\u2019s ability to negotiate drug pricing! \n\n\u260e\ufe0f Tell them to stand with the people, not Big Pharma! We need affordable prescriptions! Vote YES on the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation provision! \u2b07\ufe0f\u201d— CPD Action \ud83d\udca5 (@CPD Action \ud83d\udca5) 1631635834
"Tell them to stand with the people, not Big Pharma," said Center for Popular Democracy Action.
Three corporate Democrats on the House Energy and Commerce Committee drew condemnation from progressives on Tuesday after announcing they plan to stand in the way of passing President Joe Biden's Build Back Better legislation if it includes a key provision to allow the federal government to negotiate drug prices--a broadly popular reform that could help millions of Americans save on the medications they need each year.
Reps. Kathleen Rice (D-N.Y.), Scott Peters (D-Calif.), and Kurt Schrader (D-Ore.) reportedly claimed as the committee was marking up the $3.5 trillion Build Back Better plan, which would invest in human infrastructure, that including Medicare drug price negotiations in the package would keep the legislation from ultimately passing--despite polls showing the provision has widespread support.
"Without this key reform, we'll continue to pay unsustainable amounts for prescription drugs, and have less money for key investments like expanding Medicare benefits, fighting climate change, and more."
--Indivisible
"I do not support advancing policies that are not fiscally responsible and jeopardize the bill's final passage," said Rice, while Peters said he had proposed his own drug pricing negotiation scheme.
As Biden said last month in remarks about the Build Back Better plan, Americans currently pay two to three times more than people in other wealthy countries for prescription drugs. One in four struggle to afford prescriptions and 30% of Americans report having cut pills in half or skipping doses to save money.
"Right now, drug companies will set a price at whatever the market will bear," said the president. "But that often means a significant number of people can't afford it under any circumstance and they'll die without it. That's unacceptable."
"What we're proposing is that we'll negotiate a base--negotiate with the company based on a fair price, one that reflects the costs of the research and development and the need for... a profit, but that's still affordable for consumers," Biden added.
As research conducted in August by progressive think tank Data for Progress, Patients for Affordable Drugs Now, and Protect Our Care shows, majorities of voters in all 435 congressional districts support allowing Medicare to negotiate drug prices.
\u201c\ud83d\udea8 NEW MODEL: As Congress negotiates a budget to include giving Medicare the power to negotiate prescription drug prices, our new project with @P4ADNOW + @ProtectOurCare maps support for drug reform in all 435 congressional districts and 50 states.\n\n\ud83d\uddfa\ufe0f\ud83d\udc47\nhttps://t.co/27Xebsw7s1\u201d— Data for Progress (@Data for Progress) 1631637365
Ninety percent of Rice's constituents support the provision, while only 18% believe the argument long made by pharmaceutical companies that allowing negotiation by Medicare will "harm innovation."
Similar poll results were found in Peters' and Schrader's districts, Protect Our Care reported on Tuesday.
"Any lawmaker that tries to stand in the way is on the wrong side of this issue and on the wrong side of their constituents," the group tweeted.
\u201cIt\u2019s imperative that Congress give #Medicare the power to negotiate for #LowerDrugPrices for all Americans \u2014 any lawmaker that tries to stand in the way is on the wrong side of this issue and on the wrong side of their constituents. #LowerDrugPricesNOW\u201d— Protect Our Care (@Protect Our Care) 1631628671
"Without this key reform, we'll continue to pay unsustainable amounts for prescription drugs, and have less money for key investments like expanding Medicare benefits, fighting climate change, and more," said Indivisible.
According to the Center for Responsive Politics, all three lawmakers have accepted campaign contributions from the pharmaceutical industry. Peters and Schrader have both accepted tens of thousands of dollars in donations from the pharmaceutical industry this election cycle. Pharmaceutical companies are the top contributors to Peters' campaign in the 2021-22 cycle, donating more than $88,000 so far.
The three lawmakers' decision to side with corporations that aim to protect their profits at the expense of millions of Americans was called "unacceptable" by the healthcare advocacy coalition Lower Drug Prices Now.
\u201c\ud83d\udea8 UNACCEPTABLE \ud83d\udea8: @RepKathleenRice is putting #BigPharma profits before the 90% of her constituents in favor of reform by REFUSING to support HR3 as part of the #BuildBackBetter agenda.\n\nIt\u2019s time to allow Medicare to negotiate so EVERYONE can have #LowerDrugPricesNow.\u201d— Lower Drug Prices Now (@Lower Drug Prices Now) 1631645001
"Rep. Kathleen Rice is putting Big Pharma profits before the 90% of her constituents in favor of reform by REFUSING to support H.R. 3 as part of the Build Back Better agenda," said the coalition.
Advocates called on constituents to demand that the three lawmakers support the popular provision, known as H.R. 3 or the Elijah Cummings Lower Drug Costs Now Act, in the reconciliation package.
\u201c\ud83d\udea8\ud83d\udea8\ud83d\udea8 @ScottPetersCA52 @KathleenRice and @RepSchrader may vote TODAY to block Medicare\u2019s ability to negotiate drug pricing! \n\n\u260e\ufe0f Tell them to stand with the people, not Big Pharma! We need affordable prescriptions! Vote YES on the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation provision! \u2b07\ufe0f\u201d— CPD Action \ud83d\udca5 (@CPD Action \ud83d\udca5) 1631635834
"Tell them to stand with the people, not Big Pharma," said Center for Popular Democracy Action.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.