

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Hundreds of young climate activists rally in Lafayette Square on the north side of the White House to demand that U.S. President Joe Biden work to make the Green New Deal into law on June 28, 2021 in Washington, D.C. Organized by the Sunrise Movement, the 'No Climate, No Deal' marchers demanded a meeting with Biden to insist on an "infrastructure package that truly invests in job creation and acts to combat the climate crisis." (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Stressing that every stage of gas production pollutes the Earth's air and water, a coalition of climate and social justice groups on Wednesday launched an initiative aimed at strengthening a proposed federal energy policy by ensuring that it excludes the fossil fuel.
"The science is clear: There is nothing clean about gas."
--Lauren Maunus, Sunrise Movement
Sunrise Movement, Greenpeace USA, Oil Change U.S., and other partners launched the Gas Is Not Clean campaign, an effort to ensure that the federal Clean Energy Standard (CES)--a policy proposal requiring a mininum share of electricity to be generated from clean sources--does not include gas.
According to Sunrise Movement, the new campaign "will build pressure on politicians to commit to prioritizing truly clean, renewable energy... by making clear that gas is not clean, and that every stage of its production--extraction, processing, transport, and combustion--generates toxic air and water pollution."
The initiative's website will track which federal lawmakers support excluding a gas carve-out from the CES, while serving as a resource for lawmakers and their staffers. The campaign also says it will be "engaging members of Congress through digital amplification, Hill blasts, and local organizing efforts."
On August 24, the Democrat-controlled U.S. House of Representatives voted along party lines in favor of a $3.5 trillion budget reconciliation blueprint that includes federal tax incentives of around $150 billion to $200 billion for CES implementation. In the absence of a universal definition of what constitutes "clean" energy, the fossil fuel industry has been lobbying for the inclusion of gas in the CES.
Republican and right-wing Democratic U.S. lawmakers have also pushed for what they call a "technology-neutral" approach to meeting the Biden administration's goal of generating 80% clean power by 2035. In June, Reps. David B. McKinley (R-W.Va.) and Kurt Schrader (D-Ore.) introduced an industry-backed bill that would extend partial credit to gas generation as part of a plan to reduce carbon emissions 80% by 2050.
Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D-N.Y.), on the other hand, says there is absolutely no room for gas in the CES.
"With climate disasters coming at us from every direction, the stakes of the reconciliation bill could not be higher," Bowman said in a statement. "This is our moment to turbocharge the transition to a green, just economy, and the Clean Energy Standard can play a key role--but it needs to be as ambitious as possible on renewables, and it needs to exclude gas."
"This is not complicated, and we can't allow the gas industry to confuse the issue," he added. "No fossil fuels, period."
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) stands with his party's progressive wing in staunchly opposing gas inclusion in the CES, asserting in July that it is "an imperative, not just an option... to stop all of the expansion of coal, oil, and gas throughout our country and, frankly, throughout our world."
"You've gotta get to the 80%," Schumer told The New Republic, referring to the White House's 2035 clean power goal. "Gas doesn't help us get there... The number one goal is to get to the 80%, period."
Climate advocates are pushing for a Renewable Energy Standard (RES)--a policy adopted by at least 28 states, Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico--that would ideally achieve a 100% renewable energy portfolio for the U.S. electrical grid by the end of the decade. Such a policy would include renewable energy technologies like solar and wind, while excluding gas, carbon capture and storage, biomass, nuclear, and other false climate "solutions."
"We need a Clean Energy Standard that centers the health of the planet, communities, and people," tweeted Greenpeace USA. "We cannot continue using harmful energy sources, like natural gas, that pollute our air, water, and human health."
Sunrise Movement advocacy director Lauren Maunus said in a statement announcing the new campaign that "we're making our politicians pick a side--are you with us or fossil fuel executives?"
"The science is clear: There is nothing clean about gas," Maunus continued. "It's a potent fossil fuel that pollutes the air we breathe, the water we drink, and is the reason Hurricane Ida intensified to the point of fatality and utter destruction. A CES that includes investments towards gas does not meet the scale of the climate crisis, and is a slap in the face to communities across the country who are facing climate disasters."
"We deserve a liveable future free of toxic pollution and catastrophic climate disasters," she added. "We will continue to pressure members of Congress until they exclude gas from the CES."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Stressing that every stage of gas production pollutes the Earth's air and water, a coalition of climate and social justice groups on Wednesday launched an initiative aimed at strengthening a proposed federal energy policy by ensuring that it excludes the fossil fuel.
"The science is clear: There is nothing clean about gas."
--Lauren Maunus, Sunrise Movement
Sunrise Movement, Greenpeace USA, Oil Change U.S., and other partners launched the Gas Is Not Clean campaign, an effort to ensure that the federal Clean Energy Standard (CES)--a policy proposal requiring a mininum share of electricity to be generated from clean sources--does not include gas.
According to Sunrise Movement, the new campaign "will build pressure on politicians to commit to prioritizing truly clean, renewable energy... by making clear that gas is not clean, and that every stage of its production--extraction, processing, transport, and combustion--generates toxic air and water pollution."
The initiative's website will track which federal lawmakers support excluding a gas carve-out from the CES, while serving as a resource for lawmakers and their staffers. The campaign also says it will be "engaging members of Congress through digital amplification, Hill blasts, and local organizing efforts."
On August 24, the Democrat-controlled U.S. House of Representatives voted along party lines in favor of a $3.5 trillion budget reconciliation blueprint that includes federal tax incentives of around $150 billion to $200 billion for CES implementation. In the absence of a universal definition of what constitutes "clean" energy, the fossil fuel industry has been lobbying for the inclusion of gas in the CES.
Republican and right-wing Democratic U.S. lawmakers have also pushed for what they call a "technology-neutral" approach to meeting the Biden administration's goal of generating 80% clean power by 2035. In June, Reps. David B. McKinley (R-W.Va.) and Kurt Schrader (D-Ore.) introduced an industry-backed bill that would extend partial credit to gas generation as part of a plan to reduce carbon emissions 80% by 2050.
Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D-N.Y.), on the other hand, says there is absolutely no room for gas in the CES.
"With climate disasters coming at us from every direction, the stakes of the reconciliation bill could not be higher," Bowman said in a statement. "This is our moment to turbocharge the transition to a green, just economy, and the Clean Energy Standard can play a key role--but it needs to be as ambitious as possible on renewables, and it needs to exclude gas."
"This is not complicated, and we can't allow the gas industry to confuse the issue," he added. "No fossil fuels, period."
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) stands with his party's progressive wing in staunchly opposing gas inclusion in the CES, asserting in July that it is "an imperative, not just an option... to stop all of the expansion of coal, oil, and gas throughout our country and, frankly, throughout our world."
"You've gotta get to the 80%," Schumer told The New Republic, referring to the White House's 2035 clean power goal. "Gas doesn't help us get there... The number one goal is to get to the 80%, period."
Climate advocates are pushing for a Renewable Energy Standard (RES)--a policy adopted by at least 28 states, Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico--that would ideally achieve a 100% renewable energy portfolio for the U.S. electrical grid by the end of the decade. Such a policy would include renewable energy technologies like solar and wind, while excluding gas, carbon capture and storage, biomass, nuclear, and other false climate "solutions."
"We need a Clean Energy Standard that centers the health of the planet, communities, and people," tweeted Greenpeace USA. "We cannot continue using harmful energy sources, like natural gas, that pollute our air, water, and human health."
Sunrise Movement advocacy director Lauren Maunus said in a statement announcing the new campaign that "we're making our politicians pick a side--are you with us or fossil fuel executives?"
"The science is clear: There is nothing clean about gas," Maunus continued. "It's a potent fossil fuel that pollutes the air we breathe, the water we drink, and is the reason Hurricane Ida intensified to the point of fatality and utter destruction. A CES that includes investments towards gas does not meet the scale of the climate crisis, and is a slap in the face to communities across the country who are facing climate disasters."
"We deserve a liveable future free of toxic pollution and catastrophic climate disasters," she added. "We will continue to pressure members of Congress until they exclude gas from the CES."
Stressing that every stage of gas production pollutes the Earth's air and water, a coalition of climate and social justice groups on Wednesday launched an initiative aimed at strengthening a proposed federal energy policy by ensuring that it excludes the fossil fuel.
"The science is clear: There is nothing clean about gas."
--Lauren Maunus, Sunrise Movement
Sunrise Movement, Greenpeace USA, Oil Change U.S., and other partners launched the Gas Is Not Clean campaign, an effort to ensure that the federal Clean Energy Standard (CES)--a policy proposal requiring a mininum share of electricity to be generated from clean sources--does not include gas.
According to Sunrise Movement, the new campaign "will build pressure on politicians to commit to prioritizing truly clean, renewable energy... by making clear that gas is not clean, and that every stage of its production--extraction, processing, transport, and combustion--generates toxic air and water pollution."
The initiative's website will track which federal lawmakers support excluding a gas carve-out from the CES, while serving as a resource for lawmakers and their staffers. The campaign also says it will be "engaging members of Congress through digital amplification, Hill blasts, and local organizing efforts."
On August 24, the Democrat-controlled U.S. House of Representatives voted along party lines in favor of a $3.5 trillion budget reconciliation blueprint that includes federal tax incentives of around $150 billion to $200 billion for CES implementation. In the absence of a universal definition of what constitutes "clean" energy, the fossil fuel industry has been lobbying for the inclusion of gas in the CES.
Republican and right-wing Democratic U.S. lawmakers have also pushed for what they call a "technology-neutral" approach to meeting the Biden administration's goal of generating 80% clean power by 2035. In June, Reps. David B. McKinley (R-W.Va.) and Kurt Schrader (D-Ore.) introduced an industry-backed bill that would extend partial credit to gas generation as part of a plan to reduce carbon emissions 80% by 2050.
Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D-N.Y.), on the other hand, says there is absolutely no room for gas in the CES.
"With climate disasters coming at us from every direction, the stakes of the reconciliation bill could not be higher," Bowman said in a statement. "This is our moment to turbocharge the transition to a green, just economy, and the Clean Energy Standard can play a key role--but it needs to be as ambitious as possible on renewables, and it needs to exclude gas."
"This is not complicated, and we can't allow the gas industry to confuse the issue," he added. "No fossil fuels, period."
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) stands with his party's progressive wing in staunchly opposing gas inclusion in the CES, asserting in July that it is "an imperative, not just an option... to stop all of the expansion of coal, oil, and gas throughout our country and, frankly, throughout our world."
"You've gotta get to the 80%," Schumer told The New Republic, referring to the White House's 2035 clean power goal. "Gas doesn't help us get there... The number one goal is to get to the 80%, period."
Climate advocates are pushing for a Renewable Energy Standard (RES)--a policy adopted by at least 28 states, Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico--that would ideally achieve a 100% renewable energy portfolio for the U.S. electrical grid by the end of the decade. Such a policy would include renewable energy technologies like solar and wind, while excluding gas, carbon capture and storage, biomass, nuclear, and other false climate "solutions."
"We need a Clean Energy Standard that centers the health of the planet, communities, and people," tweeted Greenpeace USA. "We cannot continue using harmful energy sources, like natural gas, that pollute our air, water, and human health."
Sunrise Movement advocacy director Lauren Maunus said in a statement announcing the new campaign that "we're making our politicians pick a side--are you with us or fossil fuel executives?"
"The science is clear: There is nothing clean about gas," Maunus continued. "It's a potent fossil fuel that pollutes the air we breathe, the water we drink, and is the reason Hurricane Ida intensified to the point of fatality and utter destruction. A CES that includes investments towards gas does not meet the scale of the climate crisis, and is a slap in the face to communities across the country who are facing climate disasters."
"We deserve a liveable future free of toxic pollution and catastrophic climate disasters," she added. "We will continue to pressure members of Congress until they exclude gas from the CES."