

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Taliban patrol in Herat city after they took control in Herat, Afghanistan, on August 18, 2021. (Photo: Mir Ahmad Firooz Mashoof/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images)
The Taliban are now in effective control of billions of dollars in U.S. weaponry--from thousands of grenades and machine guns to Black Hawk helicopters--American forces poured into Afghanistan over the past two decades.
The equipment amassment follows months of surrenders by U.S.-backed Afghan security forces that "failed to defend district centers," the Associated Press reported.
"Bigger gains followed," AP added, "including combat aircraft, when the Taliban rolled up provincial capitals and military bases with stunning speed, topped by capturing the biggest prize, Kabul, over the weekend."
Over the past 20 years the U.S. spent over $83 billion in weaponry and equipment for Afghan security forces, whose "collapse was years in the making," as a Washington Post headline put it.
"It really should raise a lot of concerns about what is the wider enterprise that is going on every single day, whether that's in the Middle East, Sub-Saharan Africa, East Asia."
As the Taliban gained further control over territory this summer, the group showed off the weapons they gained from government-backed forces who surrendered. And this week, reported Agence France-Presse, "the Taliban's social media is awash with videos of Taliban fighters seizing weapons caches--the majority supplied by Western powers."
The White House acknowledged the extremist group's weapons gains on Tuesday.
"We don't have a complete picture, obviously, of where every article of defense materials has gone, but certainly a fair amount of it has fallen into the hands of the Taliban," White House National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan told reporters. "And obviously, we don't have a sense that they are going to readily hand it over to us at the airport."
A day earlier, a Pentagon official declined to say what efforts were underway to stop further weapons gains.
Asked by a reporter if the U.S. was "taking any sort of steps to prevent aircraft or other military equipment from falling into the hands of the Taliban," Army Maj. Gen. Hank Taylor responded, "I don't have the answer to that question."
Elias Yousif, deputy director of the Center for International Policy's Security Assistance Monitor, said the Taliban's weapons gains deserve scrutiny.
"Clearly, this is an indictment of the U.S. security cooperation enterprise broadly," he told The Hill. "It really should raise a lot of concerns about what is the wider enterprise that is going on every single day, whether that's in the Middle East, Sub-Saharan Africa, East Asia."
"The concern for all small arms is that they are durable goods and they can be transferred, sold," said Yousif. "We've seen this before where a conflict ends and the arms that stay there make their way to all parts of the world."
Also seized by Taliban, The Intercept reported this week, citing information from current and former U.S. military officials, are American military biometrics devices. These Handheld Interagency Identity Detection Equipment (HIIDE) devices could have biographical information on Afghans who helped U.S. forces, and it's possible the Taliban could seek help from Pakistan's spy agency to process the data.
The reporting on the weapons gains came the same week as the latest assessment from the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR), the Congress-created watchdog.
"If the goal was to rebuild and leave behind a country that can sustain itself and pose little threat to U.S. national security interests, the overall picture is bleak," wrote John Sopko, the head of the agency.
Among the key conclusions in the rpeort was that "the U.S. government did not understand the Afghan context and therefore failed to tailor its efforts accordingly" and that "U.S. government agencies rarely conducted sufficient monitoring and evaluation to understand the impact of their efforts."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The Taliban are now in effective control of billions of dollars in U.S. weaponry--from thousands of grenades and machine guns to Black Hawk helicopters--American forces poured into Afghanistan over the past two decades.
The equipment amassment follows months of surrenders by U.S.-backed Afghan security forces that "failed to defend district centers," the Associated Press reported.
"Bigger gains followed," AP added, "including combat aircraft, when the Taliban rolled up provincial capitals and military bases with stunning speed, topped by capturing the biggest prize, Kabul, over the weekend."
Over the past 20 years the U.S. spent over $83 billion in weaponry and equipment for Afghan security forces, whose "collapse was years in the making," as a Washington Post headline put it.
"It really should raise a lot of concerns about what is the wider enterprise that is going on every single day, whether that's in the Middle East, Sub-Saharan Africa, East Asia."
As the Taliban gained further control over territory this summer, the group showed off the weapons they gained from government-backed forces who surrendered. And this week, reported Agence France-Presse, "the Taliban's social media is awash with videos of Taliban fighters seizing weapons caches--the majority supplied by Western powers."
The White House acknowledged the extremist group's weapons gains on Tuesday.
"We don't have a complete picture, obviously, of where every article of defense materials has gone, but certainly a fair amount of it has fallen into the hands of the Taliban," White House National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan told reporters. "And obviously, we don't have a sense that they are going to readily hand it over to us at the airport."
A day earlier, a Pentagon official declined to say what efforts were underway to stop further weapons gains.
Asked by a reporter if the U.S. was "taking any sort of steps to prevent aircraft or other military equipment from falling into the hands of the Taliban," Army Maj. Gen. Hank Taylor responded, "I don't have the answer to that question."
Elias Yousif, deputy director of the Center for International Policy's Security Assistance Monitor, said the Taliban's weapons gains deserve scrutiny.
"Clearly, this is an indictment of the U.S. security cooperation enterprise broadly," he told The Hill. "It really should raise a lot of concerns about what is the wider enterprise that is going on every single day, whether that's in the Middle East, Sub-Saharan Africa, East Asia."
"The concern for all small arms is that they are durable goods and they can be transferred, sold," said Yousif. "We've seen this before where a conflict ends and the arms that stay there make their way to all parts of the world."
Also seized by Taliban, The Intercept reported this week, citing information from current and former U.S. military officials, are American military biometrics devices. These Handheld Interagency Identity Detection Equipment (HIIDE) devices could have biographical information on Afghans who helped U.S. forces, and it's possible the Taliban could seek help from Pakistan's spy agency to process the data.
The reporting on the weapons gains came the same week as the latest assessment from the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR), the Congress-created watchdog.
"If the goal was to rebuild and leave behind a country that can sustain itself and pose little threat to U.S. national security interests, the overall picture is bleak," wrote John Sopko, the head of the agency.
Among the key conclusions in the rpeort was that "the U.S. government did not understand the Afghan context and therefore failed to tailor its efforts accordingly" and that "U.S. government agencies rarely conducted sufficient monitoring and evaluation to understand the impact of their efforts."
The Taliban are now in effective control of billions of dollars in U.S. weaponry--from thousands of grenades and machine guns to Black Hawk helicopters--American forces poured into Afghanistan over the past two decades.
The equipment amassment follows months of surrenders by U.S.-backed Afghan security forces that "failed to defend district centers," the Associated Press reported.
"Bigger gains followed," AP added, "including combat aircraft, when the Taliban rolled up provincial capitals and military bases with stunning speed, topped by capturing the biggest prize, Kabul, over the weekend."
Over the past 20 years the U.S. spent over $83 billion in weaponry and equipment for Afghan security forces, whose "collapse was years in the making," as a Washington Post headline put it.
"It really should raise a lot of concerns about what is the wider enterprise that is going on every single day, whether that's in the Middle East, Sub-Saharan Africa, East Asia."
As the Taliban gained further control over territory this summer, the group showed off the weapons they gained from government-backed forces who surrendered. And this week, reported Agence France-Presse, "the Taliban's social media is awash with videos of Taliban fighters seizing weapons caches--the majority supplied by Western powers."
The White House acknowledged the extremist group's weapons gains on Tuesday.
"We don't have a complete picture, obviously, of where every article of defense materials has gone, but certainly a fair amount of it has fallen into the hands of the Taliban," White House National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan told reporters. "And obviously, we don't have a sense that they are going to readily hand it over to us at the airport."
A day earlier, a Pentagon official declined to say what efforts were underway to stop further weapons gains.
Asked by a reporter if the U.S. was "taking any sort of steps to prevent aircraft or other military equipment from falling into the hands of the Taliban," Army Maj. Gen. Hank Taylor responded, "I don't have the answer to that question."
Elias Yousif, deputy director of the Center for International Policy's Security Assistance Monitor, said the Taliban's weapons gains deserve scrutiny.
"Clearly, this is an indictment of the U.S. security cooperation enterprise broadly," he told The Hill. "It really should raise a lot of concerns about what is the wider enterprise that is going on every single day, whether that's in the Middle East, Sub-Saharan Africa, East Asia."
"The concern for all small arms is that they are durable goods and they can be transferred, sold," said Yousif. "We've seen this before where a conflict ends and the arms that stay there make their way to all parts of the world."
Also seized by Taliban, The Intercept reported this week, citing information from current and former U.S. military officials, are American military biometrics devices. These Handheld Interagency Identity Detection Equipment (HIIDE) devices could have biographical information on Afghans who helped U.S. forces, and it's possible the Taliban could seek help from Pakistan's spy agency to process the data.
The reporting on the weapons gains came the same week as the latest assessment from the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR), the Congress-created watchdog.
"If the goal was to rebuild and leave behind a country that can sustain itself and pose little threat to U.S. national security interests, the overall picture is bleak," wrote John Sopko, the head of the agency.
Among the key conclusions in the rpeort was that "the U.S. government did not understand the Afghan context and therefore failed to tailor its efforts accordingly" and that "U.S. government agencies rarely conducted sufficient monitoring and evaluation to understand the impact of their efforts."