Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

Dear Common Dreams Readers:
Corporations and billionaires have their own media. Shouldn't we? When you “follow the money” that funds our independent journalism, it all leads back to this: people like you. Our supporters are what allows us to produce journalism in the public interest that is beholden only to people, our planet, and the common good. Please support our Mid-Year Campaign so that we always have a newsroom for the people that is funded by the people. Thank you for your support. --Jon Queally, managing editor

Join the small group of generous readers who donate, keeping Common Dreams free for millions of people each year. Without your help, we won’t survive.

Demonstrators take part in a march against Line 3

Climate activists and Indigenous community members hold signs during a rally and march in Solway, Minnesota on June 7, 2021. (Photo: Kerem Yucel/AFP via Getty Images)

Dozens of Democrats to Biden: Revoke Permits for Line 3 Pipeline

The U.S. lawmakers warned construction of the Enbridge-owned tar sands pipeline has "grave implications" for nearby ecosystems.

Jake Johnson

A bicameral group of Democratic lawmakers this week joined Indigenous leaders, healthcare professionals, and environmentalists in calling on the Biden administration to revoke federal permits for the construction of Line 3, a pipeline project that would have the equivalent climate impact of 50 new coal-fired power plants.

In a letter sent to President Joe Biden on Monday and obtained by HuffPost Wednesday, eight Democratic senators and nearly two dozen House members rebuked the administration for standing behind the tar sands project, which was approved during the tenure of former President Donald Trump.

"The Trump administration aggressively expanded fossil fuel infrastructure projects under a new policy of 'energy dominance' and severely limited public scrutiny on those projects."

In June, as Common Dreams reported, the Biden Justice Department filed a brief defending the Trump administration's approval of the pipeline from a legal challenge filed by Indigenous and climate groups. Critics said the Justice Department's filing flies directly in the face of Biden's stated promise to treat the climate crisis as an "existential threat."

If completed, the Enbridge-owned pipeline would carry around 750,000 barrels of tar sands oil each day from Alberta, Canada to Wisconsin, crossing hundreds of bodies of water and wetlands along the way. Indigenous leaders who have organized on-the-ground resistance actions against Line 3 have warned that the project would violate treaty rights and—given the risk of spills—potentially devastate tribal lands and waters.

"The Trump administration aggressively expanded fossil fuel infrastructure projects under a new policy of 'energy dominance' and severely limited public scrutiny on those projects," the Democratic lawmakers wrote in their letter Monday, noting that the Army Corps of Engineers under Trump dismissed as trivial the greenhouse gas emissions that would result from construction and operation of the Line 3 pipeline.

The Army Corps also conducted "almost no independent evaluation of the risk of oil spills at the crossings it authorized, despite the fact that the route for Line 3 crosses 227 lakes and rivers, including the headwaters of the Mississippi River and rivers that feed directly into Lake Superior," the letter continued.

The Democratic members of Congress are urging the Biden administration to suspend federal permits for the Line 3 pipeline until the Army Corps of Engineers carries out a more complete analysis of the project's potential climate impacts.

The letter was organized by Reps. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) and Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.)—two leading members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus—and Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), a member of the Senate's Environment and Public Works Committee.

In addition to condemning the Army Corps' failure to adequately consider the potential climate impacts of the pipeline, the agency also neglected to consult local tribes about the pipeline project, which has drawn fierce grassroots opposition in Minnesota. More than 600 people have been arrested protesting the pipeline thus far, and some have been attacked by police during demonstrations.

"Water protectors at Line 3 were subjected to pepper spray and rubber bullets during a series of arrests" last month, The Guardian recently reported. "Protesters who've been jailed have reported mistreatment from officers such as lack of proper food, solitary confinement, and denial of medications."

In their letter, the Democratic lawmakers specifically raised alarm over Enbridge's effort to pump nearly 10 times more groundwater away from the pipeline corridor than originally planned. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources granted Enbridge permission to do so in June.

"The magnitude of this transfer will have grave implications for the ecosystems near the pipeline, including the wild rice beds that are a staple food for the Anishinaabe people and core to the way of life," the lawmakers wrote. "It is our understanding that the Red Lake and White Earth tribes were not consulted on this dramatic increase, despite the fact that it will directly impact them."

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

Just a few days left in our crucial Mid-Year Campaign and we might not make it without your help.
Who funds our independent journalism? Readers like you who believe in our mission: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. No corporate advertisers. No billionaire founder. Our non-partisan, nonprofit media model has only one source of revenue: The people who read and value this work and our mission. That's it.
And the model is simple: If everyone just gives whatever amount they can afford and think is reasonable—$3, $9, $29, or more—we can continue. If not enough do, we go dark.

All the small gifts add up to something otherwise impossible. Please join us today. Donate to Common Dreams. This is crunch time. We need you now.

'Witness Intimidation. Clear as Day': Jan. 6 Panel Teases Evidence of Cover-Up Effort

"Add witness tampering to the laundry list of crimes Trump and his allies must be charged with," said professor Robert Reich.

Jessica Corbett ·

'Bombshell After Bombshell' Dropped as Jan. 6 Testimony Homes In On Trump Guilt

"Hutchinson's testimony of the deeply detailed plans of January 6 and the inaction of those in the White House in response to the violence show just how close we came to a coup," said one pro-democracy organizer.

Brett Wilkins ·

Mark Meadows 'Did Seek That Pardon, Yes Ma'am,' Hutchinson Testifies

The former aide confirmed that attorney Rudy Giuliani also sought a presidential pardon related to the January 6 attack.

Jessica Corbett ·

UN Chief Warns of 'Ocean Emergency' as Leaders Confront Biodiversity Loss, Pollution

"We must turn the tide," said Secretary-General António Guterres. "A healthy and productive ocean is vital to our shared future."

Julia Conley ·

'I Don't F—ing Care That They Have Weapons': Trump Wanted Security to Let Armed Supporters March on Capitol

"They're not here to hurt me," Trump said on the day of the January 6 insurrection, testified a former aide to ex-White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows.

Jake Johnson ·

Common Dreams Logo