SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Climate activists and Indigenous community members hold signs during a rally and march in Solway, Minnesota on June 7, 2021. (Photo: Kerem Yucel/AFP via Getty Images)
Dozens of Democrats to Biden: Revoke Permits for Line 3 Pipeline
The U.S. lawmakers warned construction of the Enbridge-owned tar sands pipeline has "grave implications" for nearby ecosystems.
Aug 18, 2021
A bicameral group of Democratic lawmakers this week joined Indigenous leaders, healthcare professionals, and environmentalists in calling on the Biden administration to revoke federal permits for the construction of Line 3, a pipeline project that would have the equivalent climate impact of 50 new coal-fired power plants.
In a letter sent to President Joe Biden on Monday and obtained by HuffPost Wednesday, eight Democratic senators and nearly two dozen House members rebuked the administration for standing behind the tar sands project, which was approved during the tenure of former President Donald Trump.
"The Trump administration aggressively expanded fossil fuel infrastructure projects under a new policy of 'energy dominance' and severely limited public scrutiny on those projects."
--Letter
In June, as Common Dreams reported, the Biden Justice Department filed a brief defending the Trump administration's approval of the pipeline from a legal challenge filed by Indigenous and climate groups. Critics said the Justice Department's filing flies directly in the face of Biden's stated promise to treat the climate crisis as an "existential threat."
If completed, the Enbridge-owned pipeline would carry around 750,000 barrels of tar sands oil each day from Alberta, Canada to Wisconsin, crossing hundreds of bodies of water and wetlands along the way. Indigenous leaders who have organized on-the-ground resistance actions against Line 3 have warned that the project would violate treaty rights and--given the risk of spills--potentially devastate tribal lands and waters.
"The Trump administration aggressively expanded fossil fuel infrastructure projects under a new policy of 'energy dominance' and severely limited public scrutiny on those projects," the Democratic lawmakers wrote in their letter Monday, noting that the Army Corps of Engineers under Trump dismissed as trivial the greenhouse gas emissions that would result from construction and operation of the Line 3 pipeline.
The Army Corps also conducted "almost no independent evaluation of the risk of oil spills at the crossings it authorized, despite the fact that the route for Line 3 crosses 227 lakes and rivers, including the headwaters of the Mississippi River and rivers that feed directly into Lake Superior," the letter continued.
The Democratic members of Congress are urging the Biden administration to suspend federal permits for the Line 3 pipeline until the Army Corps of Engineers carries out a more complete analysis of the project's potential climate impacts.
The letter was organized by Reps. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) and Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.)--two leading members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus--and Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), a member of the Senate's Environment and Public Works Committee.
In addition to condemning the Army Corps' failure to adequately consider the potential climate impacts of the pipeline, the agency also neglected to consult local tribes about the pipeline project, which has drawn fierce grassroots opposition in Minnesota. More than 600 people have been arrested protesting the pipeline thus far, and some have been attacked by police during demonstrations.
" Water protectors at Line 3 were subjected to pepper spray and rubber bullets during a series of arrests" last month, The Guardian recently reported. "Protesters who've been jailed have reported mistreatment from officers such as lack of proper food, solitary confinement, and denial of medications."
In their letter, the Democratic lawmakers specifically raised alarm over Enbridge's effort to pump nearly 10 times more groundwater away from the pipeline corridor than originally planned. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources granted Enbridge permission to do so in June.
"The magnitude of this transfer will have grave implications for the ecosystems near the pipeline, including the wild rice beds that are a staple food for the Anishinaabe people and core to the way of life," the lawmakers wrote. "It is our understanding that the Red Lake and White Earth tribes were not consulted on this dramatic increase, despite the fact that it will directly impact them."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A bicameral group of Democratic lawmakers this week joined Indigenous leaders, healthcare professionals, and environmentalists in calling on the Biden administration to revoke federal permits for the construction of Line 3, a pipeline project that would have the equivalent climate impact of 50 new coal-fired power plants.
In a letter sent to President Joe Biden on Monday and obtained by HuffPost Wednesday, eight Democratic senators and nearly two dozen House members rebuked the administration for standing behind the tar sands project, which was approved during the tenure of former President Donald Trump.
"The Trump administration aggressively expanded fossil fuel infrastructure projects under a new policy of 'energy dominance' and severely limited public scrutiny on those projects."
--Letter
In June, as Common Dreams reported, the Biden Justice Department filed a brief defending the Trump administration's approval of the pipeline from a legal challenge filed by Indigenous and climate groups. Critics said the Justice Department's filing flies directly in the face of Biden's stated promise to treat the climate crisis as an "existential threat."
If completed, the Enbridge-owned pipeline would carry around 750,000 barrels of tar sands oil each day from Alberta, Canada to Wisconsin, crossing hundreds of bodies of water and wetlands along the way. Indigenous leaders who have organized on-the-ground resistance actions against Line 3 have warned that the project would violate treaty rights and--given the risk of spills--potentially devastate tribal lands and waters.
"The Trump administration aggressively expanded fossil fuel infrastructure projects under a new policy of 'energy dominance' and severely limited public scrutiny on those projects," the Democratic lawmakers wrote in their letter Monday, noting that the Army Corps of Engineers under Trump dismissed as trivial the greenhouse gas emissions that would result from construction and operation of the Line 3 pipeline.
The Army Corps also conducted "almost no independent evaluation of the risk of oil spills at the crossings it authorized, despite the fact that the route for Line 3 crosses 227 lakes and rivers, including the headwaters of the Mississippi River and rivers that feed directly into Lake Superior," the letter continued.
The Democratic members of Congress are urging the Biden administration to suspend federal permits for the Line 3 pipeline until the Army Corps of Engineers carries out a more complete analysis of the project's potential climate impacts.
The letter was organized by Reps. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) and Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.)--two leading members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus--and Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), a member of the Senate's Environment and Public Works Committee.
In addition to condemning the Army Corps' failure to adequately consider the potential climate impacts of the pipeline, the agency also neglected to consult local tribes about the pipeline project, which has drawn fierce grassroots opposition in Minnesota. More than 600 people have been arrested protesting the pipeline thus far, and some have been attacked by police during demonstrations.
" Water protectors at Line 3 were subjected to pepper spray and rubber bullets during a series of arrests" last month, The Guardian recently reported. "Protesters who've been jailed have reported mistreatment from officers such as lack of proper food, solitary confinement, and denial of medications."
In their letter, the Democratic lawmakers specifically raised alarm over Enbridge's effort to pump nearly 10 times more groundwater away from the pipeline corridor than originally planned. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources granted Enbridge permission to do so in June.
"The magnitude of this transfer will have grave implications for the ecosystems near the pipeline, including the wild rice beds that are a staple food for the Anishinaabe people and core to the way of life," the lawmakers wrote. "It is our understanding that the Red Lake and White Earth tribes were not consulted on this dramatic increase, despite the fact that it will directly impact them."
A bicameral group of Democratic lawmakers this week joined Indigenous leaders, healthcare professionals, and environmentalists in calling on the Biden administration to revoke federal permits for the construction of Line 3, a pipeline project that would have the equivalent climate impact of 50 new coal-fired power plants.
In a letter sent to President Joe Biden on Monday and obtained by HuffPost Wednesday, eight Democratic senators and nearly two dozen House members rebuked the administration for standing behind the tar sands project, which was approved during the tenure of former President Donald Trump.
"The Trump administration aggressively expanded fossil fuel infrastructure projects under a new policy of 'energy dominance' and severely limited public scrutiny on those projects."
--Letter
In June, as Common Dreams reported, the Biden Justice Department filed a brief defending the Trump administration's approval of the pipeline from a legal challenge filed by Indigenous and climate groups. Critics said the Justice Department's filing flies directly in the face of Biden's stated promise to treat the climate crisis as an "existential threat."
If completed, the Enbridge-owned pipeline would carry around 750,000 barrels of tar sands oil each day from Alberta, Canada to Wisconsin, crossing hundreds of bodies of water and wetlands along the way. Indigenous leaders who have organized on-the-ground resistance actions against Line 3 have warned that the project would violate treaty rights and--given the risk of spills--potentially devastate tribal lands and waters.
"The Trump administration aggressively expanded fossil fuel infrastructure projects under a new policy of 'energy dominance' and severely limited public scrutiny on those projects," the Democratic lawmakers wrote in their letter Monday, noting that the Army Corps of Engineers under Trump dismissed as trivial the greenhouse gas emissions that would result from construction and operation of the Line 3 pipeline.
The Army Corps also conducted "almost no independent evaluation of the risk of oil spills at the crossings it authorized, despite the fact that the route for Line 3 crosses 227 lakes and rivers, including the headwaters of the Mississippi River and rivers that feed directly into Lake Superior," the letter continued.
The Democratic members of Congress are urging the Biden administration to suspend federal permits for the Line 3 pipeline until the Army Corps of Engineers carries out a more complete analysis of the project's potential climate impacts.
The letter was organized by Reps. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) and Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.)--two leading members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus--and Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), a member of the Senate's Environment and Public Works Committee.
In addition to condemning the Army Corps' failure to adequately consider the potential climate impacts of the pipeline, the agency also neglected to consult local tribes about the pipeline project, which has drawn fierce grassroots opposition in Minnesota. More than 600 people have been arrested protesting the pipeline thus far, and some have been attacked by police during demonstrations.
" Water protectors at Line 3 were subjected to pepper spray and rubber bullets during a series of arrests" last month, The Guardian recently reported. "Protesters who've been jailed have reported mistreatment from officers such as lack of proper food, solitary confinement, and denial of medications."
In their letter, the Democratic lawmakers specifically raised alarm over Enbridge's effort to pump nearly 10 times more groundwater away from the pipeline corridor than originally planned. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources granted Enbridge permission to do so in June.
"The magnitude of this transfer will have grave implications for the ecosystems near the pipeline, including the wild rice beds that are a staple food for the Anishinaabe people and core to the way of life," the lawmakers wrote. "It is our understanding that the Red Lake and White Earth tribes were not consulted on this dramatic increase, despite the fact that it will directly impact them."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.