Aug 12, 2021
After losing two rounds in lower federal courts, a group of Indiana University students challenging the school's coronavirus vaccine were dealt a final blow Thursday as the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the college's vaccination requirement.
In the first coronavirus vaccine mandate challenge of its kind before the nation's highest court, the eight Indiana University (I.U.) students requested an emergency order, arguing that they are adults who are "entitled to make their own medical treatment decisions, and have a constitutional right to bodily integrity, autonomy, and of medical treatment choice in the context of a vaccination mandate."
"I.U., however, is treating its students as children who cannot be trusted to make mature decisions," they said, accusing university officials of substituting themselves "for both the student and her attending physician, mandating a choice which is the student's to make, based on her physician's advice."
Justice Amy Coney Barrett--who handles emergency appeals from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit--chose not to bring the matter before the full Supreme Court. She provided no explanation for her decision.
\u201cBREAKING: The Supreme Court refuses grant Indiana University students\u2019 request to block the school\u2019s vaccine mandate. Justice Amy Coney Barrett rejected the request without referring it to the full court.\u201d— SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) 1628803370
Earlier this month, an all-Republican panel of judges on the 7th Circuit Court denied (pdf) a request to issue an injunction against I.U.'s vaccine mandate, upholding a lower federal court's ruling.
The panel citedJacobson v. Massachusetts, a 1905 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that states can require all members of the public to be vaccinated against smallpox--a disease with a 30% mortality rate that killed millions of people each year until it was eradicated in the late 20th century following a worldwide vaccination campaign.
Given Jacobson, the 7th Circuit ruled, "there can't be a constitutional problem with vaccination against SARS-CoV-2," the coronavirus that causes Covid-19.
Furthermore, the court said that "this case is easier than Jacobson," because unlike Massachusetts' universal vaccine mandate at issue in that case, I.U. offers students medical and religious exemptions from vaccination.
The 7th Circuit judges also noted that students "who do not want to be vaccinated may go elsewhere" for schooling.
"Many universities require vaccination against SARS-CoV-2, but many others do not," they said. "Plaintiffs have ample educational opportunities."
According to the Chronicle of Higher Education, over 700 of the more than 5,000 accredited U.S. institutions of higher learning currently require students to be inoculated against the coronavirus.
Thursday's Supreme Court move comes a day after California became the first state to require all school staff members to prove they are vaccinated against the coronavirus or submit to weekly Covid-19 testing, an approach endorsed by U.S. Education Secretary Miguel Cardona, American Federation of Teachers president Randi Weingarten, and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Dr. Anthony Fauci.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
After losing two rounds in lower federal courts, a group of Indiana University students challenging the school's coronavirus vaccine were dealt a final blow Thursday as the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the college's vaccination requirement.
In the first coronavirus vaccine mandate challenge of its kind before the nation's highest court, the eight Indiana University (I.U.) students requested an emergency order, arguing that they are adults who are "entitled to make their own medical treatment decisions, and have a constitutional right to bodily integrity, autonomy, and of medical treatment choice in the context of a vaccination mandate."
"I.U., however, is treating its students as children who cannot be trusted to make mature decisions," they said, accusing university officials of substituting themselves "for both the student and her attending physician, mandating a choice which is the student's to make, based on her physician's advice."
Justice Amy Coney Barrett--who handles emergency appeals from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit--chose not to bring the matter before the full Supreme Court. She provided no explanation for her decision.
\u201cBREAKING: The Supreme Court refuses grant Indiana University students\u2019 request to block the school\u2019s vaccine mandate. Justice Amy Coney Barrett rejected the request without referring it to the full court.\u201d— SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) 1628803370
Earlier this month, an all-Republican panel of judges on the 7th Circuit Court denied (pdf) a request to issue an injunction against I.U.'s vaccine mandate, upholding a lower federal court's ruling.
The panel citedJacobson v. Massachusetts, a 1905 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that states can require all members of the public to be vaccinated against smallpox--a disease with a 30% mortality rate that killed millions of people each year until it was eradicated in the late 20th century following a worldwide vaccination campaign.
Given Jacobson, the 7th Circuit ruled, "there can't be a constitutional problem with vaccination against SARS-CoV-2," the coronavirus that causes Covid-19.
Furthermore, the court said that "this case is easier than Jacobson," because unlike Massachusetts' universal vaccine mandate at issue in that case, I.U. offers students medical and religious exemptions from vaccination.
The 7th Circuit judges also noted that students "who do not want to be vaccinated may go elsewhere" for schooling.
"Many universities require vaccination against SARS-CoV-2, but many others do not," they said. "Plaintiffs have ample educational opportunities."
According to the Chronicle of Higher Education, over 700 of the more than 5,000 accredited U.S. institutions of higher learning currently require students to be inoculated against the coronavirus.
Thursday's Supreme Court move comes a day after California became the first state to require all school staff members to prove they are vaccinated against the coronavirus or submit to weekly Covid-19 testing, an approach endorsed by U.S. Education Secretary Miguel Cardona, American Federation of Teachers president Randi Weingarten, and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Dr. Anthony Fauci.
After losing two rounds in lower federal courts, a group of Indiana University students challenging the school's coronavirus vaccine were dealt a final blow Thursday as the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the college's vaccination requirement.
In the first coronavirus vaccine mandate challenge of its kind before the nation's highest court, the eight Indiana University (I.U.) students requested an emergency order, arguing that they are adults who are "entitled to make their own medical treatment decisions, and have a constitutional right to bodily integrity, autonomy, and of medical treatment choice in the context of a vaccination mandate."
"I.U., however, is treating its students as children who cannot be trusted to make mature decisions," they said, accusing university officials of substituting themselves "for both the student and her attending physician, mandating a choice which is the student's to make, based on her physician's advice."
Justice Amy Coney Barrett--who handles emergency appeals from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit--chose not to bring the matter before the full Supreme Court. She provided no explanation for her decision.
\u201cBREAKING: The Supreme Court refuses grant Indiana University students\u2019 request to block the school\u2019s vaccine mandate. Justice Amy Coney Barrett rejected the request without referring it to the full court.\u201d— SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) 1628803370
Earlier this month, an all-Republican panel of judges on the 7th Circuit Court denied (pdf) a request to issue an injunction against I.U.'s vaccine mandate, upholding a lower federal court's ruling.
The panel citedJacobson v. Massachusetts, a 1905 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that states can require all members of the public to be vaccinated against smallpox--a disease with a 30% mortality rate that killed millions of people each year until it was eradicated in the late 20th century following a worldwide vaccination campaign.
Given Jacobson, the 7th Circuit ruled, "there can't be a constitutional problem with vaccination against SARS-CoV-2," the coronavirus that causes Covid-19.
Furthermore, the court said that "this case is easier than Jacobson," because unlike Massachusetts' universal vaccine mandate at issue in that case, I.U. offers students medical and religious exemptions from vaccination.
The 7th Circuit judges also noted that students "who do not want to be vaccinated may go elsewhere" for schooling.
"Many universities require vaccination against SARS-CoV-2, but many others do not," they said. "Plaintiffs have ample educational opportunities."
According to the Chronicle of Higher Education, over 700 of the more than 5,000 accredited U.S. institutions of higher learning currently require students to be inoculated against the coronavirus.
Thursday's Supreme Court move comes a day after California became the first state to require all school staff members to prove they are vaccinated against the coronavirus or submit to weekly Covid-19 testing, an approach endorsed by U.S. Education Secretary Miguel Cardona, American Federation of Teachers president Randi Weingarten, and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Dr. Anthony Fauci.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.