SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A watchdog group on Thursday filed a complaint with the FEC against 23 super PACs.(Photo: Krisanapong Detraphiphat/Getty Images)
Targeting Dark Money Attacking Democracy, Watchdog Files FEC Complaint Against 23 Super PACs
"Voters have a right to know when big money is flowing into their elections from D.C.-based groups hiding their agendas and funding behind fake names."
Jul 15, 2021
A complaint filed Thursday with the Federal Election Commission accuses 18 super PACs--which dumped over $200 million into races from 2017 to 2020--of deliberately misleading voters by concealing their connections to the major party political action committees that financed them.
"Voters have a right to know when big money is flowing into their elections from D.C.-based groups hiding their agendas and funding behind fake names," said Adav Noti, senior director of trial litigation and chief of staff at Campaign Legal Center (CLC) Action, and former associate general counsel of the FEC, in a statement.
"The vast scope of this illegal concealment should prompt swift investigation and a firm crackdown by the FEC," he added.
In addition to the 18 "shell super PACs" that "falsely presented themselves to voters as independent," CLC's complaint asserts that the five super PACs that established and financed them violated the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) in failing to report committees with which they were or are affiliated.
FECA requires disclosure of political committees' basic information including name and address as well as any "connected organization" or affiliated committee within 10 days of its establishment.
"The 18 super PACs falsely presented themselves to voters as independent, often with names that suggested local ties--like 'Keep Kentucky Great,' 'The Maine Way,' or 'Texas Forever'--despite receiving all or nearly all of their funding from established D.C.-based super PACs like Senate Leadership Fund or Senate Majority PAC," the complaint states.
\u201cThis morning, @CampaignLegal filed a complaint against a group of super PACs, tied to both Democrats & Republicans, that misled voters while spending millions. Voters have a right to know who is spending big money in attempt to influence their vote.\nhttps://t.co/xP33sYYheX\u201d— Trevor Potter (@Trevor Potter) 1626366557
Super PACs connected to both major U.S. political parties are accused in the complaint.
Groups including Peachtree PAC, the Maine Way PAC, and American Crossroads, for example, got "all or nearly all" of their funding from the national Republican super PAC Senate Leadership Fund. The GOP's Congressional Leadership Fund provided all or nearly all of the funding to groups including Illinois Conservatives PAC and Lone Star Values PAC.
The national Democrats' Senate Majority PAC, meanwhile, was a significant or sole funder for shell PACs including Sunflower State, Carolina Blue, and Texas Forever.
The complaint further notes:
In some instances, the shell super PAC suddenly formed in the final weeks of competitive congressional races, poured millions of dollars into those races under seemingly local names, and strategically timed their spending such that the public did not learn the true source of the mystery group's communications until after the election. The failure to disclose these affiliations as required by law deprived voters of important information about who was spending to influence their votes.
In a Thursday Twitter thread, CLC joked that while "most things with the name 'pop-up' are delightful, pop-up super PACs are anything but. They spend big to mislead voters."
"If this trend of 'pop-up' super PACs continues," the watchdog group warned, "the burden on American voters will only get worse."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A complaint filed Thursday with the Federal Election Commission accuses 18 super PACs--which dumped over $200 million into races from 2017 to 2020--of deliberately misleading voters by concealing their connections to the major party political action committees that financed them.
"Voters have a right to know when big money is flowing into their elections from D.C.-based groups hiding their agendas and funding behind fake names," said Adav Noti, senior director of trial litigation and chief of staff at Campaign Legal Center (CLC) Action, and former associate general counsel of the FEC, in a statement.
"The vast scope of this illegal concealment should prompt swift investigation and a firm crackdown by the FEC," he added.
In addition to the 18 "shell super PACs" that "falsely presented themselves to voters as independent," CLC's complaint asserts that the five super PACs that established and financed them violated the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) in failing to report committees with which they were or are affiliated.
FECA requires disclosure of political committees' basic information including name and address as well as any "connected organization" or affiliated committee within 10 days of its establishment.
"The 18 super PACs falsely presented themselves to voters as independent, often with names that suggested local ties--like 'Keep Kentucky Great,' 'The Maine Way,' or 'Texas Forever'--despite receiving all or nearly all of their funding from established D.C.-based super PACs like Senate Leadership Fund or Senate Majority PAC," the complaint states.
\u201cThis morning, @CampaignLegal filed a complaint against a group of super PACs, tied to both Democrats & Republicans, that misled voters while spending millions. Voters have a right to know who is spending big money in attempt to influence their vote.\nhttps://t.co/xP33sYYheX\u201d— Trevor Potter (@Trevor Potter) 1626366557
Super PACs connected to both major U.S. political parties are accused in the complaint.
Groups including Peachtree PAC, the Maine Way PAC, and American Crossroads, for example, got "all or nearly all" of their funding from the national Republican super PAC Senate Leadership Fund. The GOP's Congressional Leadership Fund provided all or nearly all of the funding to groups including Illinois Conservatives PAC and Lone Star Values PAC.
The national Democrats' Senate Majority PAC, meanwhile, was a significant or sole funder for shell PACs including Sunflower State, Carolina Blue, and Texas Forever.
The complaint further notes:
In some instances, the shell super PAC suddenly formed in the final weeks of competitive congressional races, poured millions of dollars into those races under seemingly local names, and strategically timed their spending such that the public did not learn the true source of the mystery group's communications until after the election. The failure to disclose these affiliations as required by law deprived voters of important information about who was spending to influence their votes.
In a Thursday Twitter thread, CLC joked that while "most things with the name 'pop-up' are delightful, pop-up super PACs are anything but. They spend big to mislead voters."
"If this trend of 'pop-up' super PACs continues," the watchdog group warned, "the burden on American voters will only get worse."
A complaint filed Thursday with the Federal Election Commission accuses 18 super PACs--which dumped over $200 million into races from 2017 to 2020--of deliberately misleading voters by concealing their connections to the major party political action committees that financed them.
"Voters have a right to know when big money is flowing into their elections from D.C.-based groups hiding their agendas and funding behind fake names," said Adav Noti, senior director of trial litigation and chief of staff at Campaign Legal Center (CLC) Action, and former associate general counsel of the FEC, in a statement.
"The vast scope of this illegal concealment should prompt swift investigation and a firm crackdown by the FEC," he added.
In addition to the 18 "shell super PACs" that "falsely presented themselves to voters as independent," CLC's complaint asserts that the five super PACs that established and financed them violated the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) in failing to report committees with which they were or are affiliated.
FECA requires disclosure of political committees' basic information including name and address as well as any "connected organization" or affiliated committee within 10 days of its establishment.
"The 18 super PACs falsely presented themselves to voters as independent, often with names that suggested local ties--like 'Keep Kentucky Great,' 'The Maine Way,' or 'Texas Forever'--despite receiving all or nearly all of their funding from established D.C.-based super PACs like Senate Leadership Fund or Senate Majority PAC," the complaint states.
\u201cThis morning, @CampaignLegal filed a complaint against a group of super PACs, tied to both Democrats & Republicans, that misled voters while spending millions. Voters have a right to know who is spending big money in attempt to influence their vote.\nhttps://t.co/xP33sYYheX\u201d— Trevor Potter (@Trevor Potter) 1626366557
Super PACs connected to both major U.S. political parties are accused in the complaint.
Groups including Peachtree PAC, the Maine Way PAC, and American Crossroads, for example, got "all or nearly all" of their funding from the national Republican super PAC Senate Leadership Fund. The GOP's Congressional Leadership Fund provided all or nearly all of the funding to groups including Illinois Conservatives PAC and Lone Star Values PAC.
The national Democrats' Senate Majority PAC, meanwhile, was a significant or sole funder for shell PACs including Sunflower State, Carolina Blue, and Texas Forever.
The complaint further notes:
In some instances, the shell super PAC suddenly formed in the final weeks of competitive congressional races, poured millions of dollars into those races under seemingly local names, and strategically timed their spending such that the public did not learn the true source of the mystery group's communications until after the election. The failure to disclose these affiliations as required by law deprived voters of important information about who was spending to influence their votes.
In a Thursday Twitter thread, CLC joked that while "most things with the name 'pop-up' are delightful, pop-up super PACs are anything but. They spend big to mislead voters."
"If this trend of 'pop-up' super PACs continues," the watchdog group warned, "the burden on American voters will only get worse."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.