This picture taken on October, 5, 2020 shows logos of social networks Facebook, Instagram, and mobile messaging service WhatsApp on the screens of a smartphone and a tablet in Toulouse, southwestern France. (Photo: Lionel Bonaventure/AFP via Getty Images)
Court Ruling in Facebook's Favor Seen as Reason for Urgent Antitrust Reform
"Once again, our antitrust laws have been shown by the courts to be woefully inadequate to address the abuses of the richest companies in the world."
A federal court's Monday dismissal of lawsuits against Facebook brought by the Federal Trade Commission and a coalition of state attorneys general elicited fresh calls for antitrust reform.
"Once again, our antitrust laws have been shown by the courts to be woefully inadequate to address the abuses of the richest companies in the world," said Alex Harman, competition policy advocate for Public Citizen, in response to the ruling.
At issue are two decisions from U.S. District Judge James Boasberg regarding complaints filed in December at the U.S. District Court for D.C. by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and 48 state attorneys general, both of which accused Facebook of abusing its market power and scrutinized the company's acquisitions of the photo-sharing platform Instagram in 2012 and the messaging service WhatsApp in 2014.
"The FTC has failed to plead enough facts to plausibly establish... that Facebook has monopoly power in the market for Personal Social Networking (PSN) Services," Boasberg wrote in his ruling (pdf). The coalition of states led by New York Attorney General Letitia James, he further determined (pdf), targeted alleged Facebook violations that were too "long-past."
Boasberg said the FTC can file a new complaint within 30 days.
According to Sarah Miller, executive director of the American Economic Liberties Project, the pair of decisions "clearly underscores why Congress must pass bright-line standards to guide courts as they judge unfair methods of competition."
A number of actions should happen immediately, she said, including for the FTC to file a new complaint and for the state AGs to appeal.
Lawmakers should also take as a model New York state Senate Bill 933, which passed the Senate earlier this month. According to lead sponsor Senate Deputy Leader Michael Gianaris, a Democrat, the proposal would shift interpretations of antitrust law by "moving from the existing monopoly standard to the 'abuse of dominance' standard."
Miller called on Congress to act because the "idea that Big Tech operates in a functioning free market can no longer be taken as a serious position."
Public Citizen's Harmon pointed to a package of antitrust legislation taking aim at Big Tech's power passed last week by the House Judiciary Committee as a step in the right direction.
"Additional reforms to the antitrust laws will be necessary to stop powerful corporate monopolies from harming consumers, workers, innovators, and our democracy," he said. "Facebook is one of the worst offenders, and it's long past time for this company to be broken up."
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just four days to go in our Spring Campaign, we are not even halfway to our goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
A federal court's Monday dismissal of lawsuits against Facebook brought by the Federal Trade Commission and a coalition of state attorneys general elicited fresh calls for antitrust reform.
"Once again, our antitrust laws have been shown by the courts to be woefully inadequate to address the abuses of the richest companies in the world," said Alex Harman, competition policy advocate for Public Citizen, in response to the ruling.
At issue are two decisions from U.S. District Judge James Boasberg regarding complaints filed in December at the U.S. District Court for D.C. by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and 48 state attorneys general, both of which accused Facebook of abusing its market power and scrutinized the company's acquisitions of the photo-sharing platform Instagram in 2012 and the messaging service WhatsApp in 2014.
"The FTC has failed to plead enough facts to plausibly establish... that Facebook has monopoly power in the market for Personal Social Networking (PSN) Services," Boasberg wrote in his ruling (pdf). The coalition of states led by New York Attorney General Letitia James, he further determined (pdf), targeted alleged Facebook violations that were too "long-past."
Boasberg said the FTC can file a new complaint within 30 days.
According to Sarah Miller, executive director of the American Economic Liberties Project, the pair of decisions "clearly underscores why Congress must pass bright-line standards to guide courts as they judge unfair methods of competition."
A number of actions should happen immediately, she said, including for the FTC to file a new complaint and for the state AGs to appeal.
Lawmakers should also take as a model New York state Senate Bill 933, which passed the Senate earlier this month. According to lead sponsor Senate Deputy Leader Michael Gianaris, a Democrat, the proposal would shift interpretations of antitrust law by "moving from the existing monopoly standard to the 'abuse of dominance' standard."
Miller called on Congress to act because the "idea that Big Tech operates in a functioning free market can no longer be taken as a serious position."
Public Citizen's Harmon pointed to a package of antitrust legislation taking aim at Big Tech's power passed last week by the House Judiciary Committee as a step in the right direction.
"Additional reforms to the antitrust laws will be necessary to stop powerful corporate monopolies from harming consumers, workers, innovators, and our democracy," he said. "Facebook is one of the worst offenders, and it's long past time for this company to be broken up."
A federal court's Monday dismissal of lawsuits against Facebook brought by the Federal Trade Commission and a coalition of state attorneys general elicited fresh calls for antitrust reform.
"Once again, our antitrust laws have been shown by the courts to be woefully inadequate to address the abuses of the richest companies in the world," said Alex Harman, competition policy advocate for Public Citizen, in response to the ruling.
At issue are two decisions from U.S. District Judge James Boasberg regarding complaints filed in December at the U.S. District Court for D.C. by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and 48 state attorneys general, both of which accused Facebook of abusing its market power and scrutinized the company's acquisitions of the photo-sharing platform Instagram in 2012 and the messaging service WhatsApp in 2014.
"The FTC has failed to plead enough facts to plausibly establish... that Facebook has monopoly power in the market for Personal Social Networking (PSN) Services," Boasberg wrote in his ruling (pdf). The coalition of states led by New York Attorney General Letitia James, he further determined (pdf), targeted alleged Facebook violations that were too "long-past."
Boasberg said the FTC can file a new complaint within 30 days.
According to Sarah Miller, executive director of the American Economic Liberties Project, the pair of decisions "clearly underscores why Congress must pass bright-line standards to guide courts as they judge unfair methods of competition."
A number of actions should happen immediately, she said, including for the FTC to file a new complaint and for the state AGs to appeal.
Lawmakers should also take as a model New York state Senate Bill 933, which passed the Senate earlier this month. According to lead sponsor Senate Deputy Leader Michael Gianaris, a Democrat, the proposal would shift interpretations of antitrust law by "moving from the existing monopoly standard to the 'abuse of dominance' standard."
Miller called on Congress to act because the "idea that Big Tech operates in a functioning free market can no longer be taken as a serious position."
Public Citizen's Harmon pointed to a package of antitrust legislation taking aim at Big Tech's power passed last week by the House Judiciary Committee as a step in the right direction.
"Additional reforms to the antitrust laws will be necessary to stop powerful corporate monopolies from harming consumers, workers, innovators, and our democracy," he said. "Facebook is one of the worst offenders, and it's long past time for this company to be broken up."