Feb 16, 2021
A coalition of more than 40 advocacy groups is calling on President Joe Biden to take executive action imposing a moratorium on U.S. government use of facial recognition and other biometric technology, block state and local governments from using federal funds for such tools, and support related legislation introduced in Congress last year.
The organizations--including the ACLU, Access Now, Amnesty International USA, Center for Constitutional Rights, Electronic Frontier Foundation, Fight for the Future, Free Press Action, and the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights--sent Biden a lengthy letter Tuesday laying out how the use facial recognition technology (FRT) "in policing, public housing, schools, and other areas of public life poses profound and unprecedented threats to core civil rights and civil liberties."
"Facial recognition technology is a threat to civil rights and civil liberties when it works, and when it doesn't. It disproportionately misidentifies people of color, women, trans people, and other marginalized groups, but its ability to track our movements across space and time would be dangerous even if it worked perfectly," said Kate Ruane, senior legislative counsel for the ACLU, in a statement Wednesday.
\u201cFacial recognition is biased against POC, women, and more, and even if it worked as designed, it would be a surveillance nightmare. In keeping with his commitment to racial equity and civil liberties, @POTUS must take action. Read the letter from 40+ orgs: https://t.co/IutPsnrTHj\u201d— Open Tech Institute (@Open Tech Institute) 1613585335
"Multiple Black men have been arrested and incarcerated for crimes they didn't commit after facial recognition technology falsely identified them, and its use will continue to disproportionately harm marginalized communities, especially Black and Brown people," Ruane added. "In keeping with President Biden's commitment to racial equity, he must immediately take this important first step."
The letter notes that study after study has shown facial recognition technology "exhibits particularly disturbing accuracy and bias issues against people with darker skin, LGBTQ people, women--especially women of color--and youth." It also highlights the impact of such flaws by pointing to some specific stories of people who have been harmed by misidentification.
For example, in January 2020, Robert Williams, a Black man, was wrongfully arrested on his front lawn while his wife and young daughters watched, then detained for nearly 30 hours, after software owned by Michigan State Police misidentified him as a shoplifting suspect. Williams, who lives outside of Detroit, has since spoken out against police using FRT.
\u201cThese biases have real consequences that disproportionately harm Black people.\n\nRobert Williams, Michael Oliver, and Nijeer Parks are all Black men who were wrongly arrested and detained because of this technology. https://t.co/lYu1Mgvm05\u201d— ACLU (@ACLU) 1613581848
Stories like Williams' have fueled calls for barring law enforcement at all levels from using such tools. While noting with alarm that "the FBI and other federal law enforcement agencies have been using FRT for years and without explicit authorization or guidance from Congress," the letter also makes clear that government use of the tech is far more sweeping.
"FRT is extraordinarily dangerous to core freedoms even when it works exactly as advertised," the groups warn. "Never before has the government possessed a technology that purportedly enables it to keep a running record of every person's every public movement, habit, and association--until now."
"If the government can track everyone who goes to a place of worship, attends a political rally, or seeks healthcare for reproductive health or substance use," the letter says, "we lose our freedom to speak our minds, freely criticize the government, pray to the god we want, and access healthcare in private."
Emphasizing that "these are not hypothetical dangers," the groups point out that "the authoritarian government in China is deploying FRT to control and oppress the religious minority Uighur population, to devastating effect."
The letter applauds activists and elected officials for enacting FRT restrictions and bans across the country--from San Francisco to Boston--but also notes that "local and state governments are largely powerless to control the way the FBI and other federal agencies use this technology in our communities."
\u201cNever before has the government possessed a surveillance tool this dangerous.\n\nTell President Biden to honor his promise to center racial equity and put a stop to this invasive technology. https://t.co/bBkITO2utx\u201d— ACLU (@ACLU) 1613581848
"At present, decisions about how to use this dangerous technology are being made by unelected officials, behind closed doors," the letter to Biden says. "We respectfully urge you to bring democratic control over this dangerous, biased technology by swiftly signing an executive order that halts the federal government's use of FRT so long as bias pervades these systems and as long as Congress has not acted to authorize the use of the technology in specific circumstances and with sufficient safeguards to protect our privacy and the public interest, and prevent harm."
In addition to limiting the ability of state and local governments to use federal money for FRT, the groups ask Biden to support the Facial Recognition and Biometric Technology Moratorium Act. The bill, introduced by Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.), would codify the federal moratorium and impose limits on federal funding of biometric tools.
Some groups that signed on to the letter have called for governments to go even further. In a statement Wednesday, Access Now reiterated its support for "a full ban on FRT and other biometric technologies that enable mass surveillance because they inherently undermine human and civil rights."
"Facial recognition technology is extremely harmful," said Jennifer Brody, U.S. advocacy manager at Access Now. "It is increasingly used to identify, surveil, and make life-altering decisions about people. Yet, the technology remains biased against communities of color, particularly Black people and Black women."
"While a ban is preferable because safeguards can never fully address the technology's harms," she said, "a moratorium is better than nothing."
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.