SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Michael van der Veen, former President Donald Trump's defense lawyer, departs the Senate floor on the fourth day of the impeachment trial on February 12, 2021 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Jabin Botsford--Pool/Getty Images)
'What the Big Lie Is All About': Sanders Rips Trump Lawyer Over 'Pathetic' Refusal to Acknowledge Election Results
"Three months after the election, and 61 court decisions later, Trump and his attorneys still refuse to acknowledge that he lost the election."
Feb 12, 2021
When asked during the Q&A portion of Friday's impeachment proceedings whether he agrees with Democratic prosecutors that Donald Trump was perpetrating a falsehood when he repeatedly claimed the 2020 election was stolen from him, the former president's defense attorney Michael van der Veen demanded to know who submitted the question.
"I did," Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said from the Senate gallery, prompting a tense back-and-forth between the Vermont senator and van der Veen which forced Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), the presiding officer, to intervene.
Trump's attorney proceeded to dodge Sanders' question by claiming his judgement on the election results is "irrelevant" to the trial--to which Sanders responded, "No it's not."
Watch the exchange:
Following Friday's session, the fourth day of the former president's impeachment trial, Sanders denounced the Trump lawyer's "pathetic" refusal to admit the former president's election loss--denial that was at the heart of the mob attack on the U.S. Capitol Building last month.
"This is what the Big Lie is all about," Sanders tweeted Friday night. "Three months after the election, and 61 court decisions later, Trump and his attorneys still refuse to acknowledge that he lost the election."
As Slate's Jeremy Stahl wrote late Friday, "Trump's big lie--a claim that he had won the election in a landslide, and the Republic was going to be stolen from his followers unless they acted--is directly relevant to whether or not he incited the attack on the Capitol."
"Trump's attorneys insisted on focusing on the question of whether the text of his remarks the day of the attack--to the mob he had recruited and invited--can be proven to have incited them," Stahl added. "They refused to answer for the months of lies and exhortations to supporters to 'stop the steal' that culminated in the violent invasion of the Capitol. Trump refused to show up to testify in his own defense of those months of repeating the big lie. And Republican senators remain on course to ensure that Trump is exonerated for the violence he caused."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
When asked during the Q&A portion of Friday's impeachment proceedings whether he agrees with Democratic prosecutors that Donald Trump was perpetrating a falsehood when he repeatedly claimed the 2020 election was stolen from him, the former president's defense attorney Michael van der Veen demanded to know who submitted the question.
"I did," Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said from the Senate gallery, prompting a tense back-and-forth between the Vermont senator and van der Veen which forced Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), the presiding officer, to intervene.
Trump's attorney proceeded to dodge Sanders' question by claiming his judgement on the election results is "irrelevant" to the trial--to which Sanders responded, "No it's not."
Watch the exchange:
Following Friday's session, the fourth day of the former president's impeachment trial, Sanders denounced the Trump lawyer's "pathetic" refusal to admit the former president's election loss--denial that was at the heart of the mob attack on the U.S. Capitol Building last month.
"This is what the Big Lie is all about," Sanders tweeted Friday night. "Three months after the election, and 61 court decisions later, Trump and his attorneys still refuse to acknowledge that he lost the election."
As Slate's Jeremy Stahl wrote late Friday, "Trump's big lie--a claim that he had won the election in a landslide, and the Republic was going to be stolen from his followers unless they acted--is directly relevant to whether or not he incited the attack on the Capitol."
"Trump's attorneys insisted on focusing on the question of whether the text of his remarks the day of the attack--to the mob he had recruited and invited--can be proven to have incited them," Stahl added. "They refused to answer for the months of lies and exhortations to supporters to 'stop the steal' that culminated in the violent invasion of the Capitol. Trump refused to show up to testify in his own defense of those months of repeating the big lie. And Republican senators remain on course to ensure that Trump is exonerated for the violence he caused."
When asked during the Q&A portion of Friday's impeachment proceedings whether he agrees with Democratic prosecutors that Donald Trump was perpetrating a falsehood when he repeatedly claimed the 2020 election was stolen from him, the former president's defense attorney Michael van der Veen demanded to know who submitted the question.
"I did," Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said from the Senate gallery, prompting a tense back-and-forth between the Vermont senator and van der Veen which forced Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), the presiding officer, to intervene.
Trump's attorney proceeded to dodge Sanders' question by claiming his judgement on the election results is "irrelevant" to the trial--to which Sanders responded, "No it's not."
Watch the exchange:
Following Friday's session, the fourth day of the former president's impeachment trial, Sanders denounced the Trump lawyer's "pathetic" refusal to admit the former president's election loss--denial that was at the heart of the mob attack on the U.S. Capitol Building last month.
"This is what the Big Lie is all about," Sanders tweeted Friday night. "Three months after the election, and 61 court decisions later, Trump and his attorneys still refuse to acknowledge that he lost the election."
As Slate's Jeremy Stahl wrote late Friday, "Trump's big lie--a claim that he had won the election in a landslide, and the Republic was going to be stolen from his followers unless they acted--is directly relevant to whether or not he incited the attack on the Capitol."
"Trump's attorneys insisted on focusing on the question of whether the text of his remarks the day of the attack--to the mob he had recruited and invited--can be proven to have incited them," Stahl added. "They refused to answer for the months of lies and exhortations to supporters to 'stop the steal' that culminated in the violent invasion of the Capitol. Trump refused to show up to testify in his own defense of those months of repeating the big lie. And Republican senators remain on course to ensure that Trump is exonerated for the violence he caused."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.