Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) takes his mask off as he arrives at a news conference at the U.S. Capitol January 7, 2021 in Washington, DC. (Photo: Alex Wong/Getty Images)
Jan 16, 2021
Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham was roundly denounced Sunday after sending a letter to Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer that characterized President Donald Trump's pending trial as "vengeance" and "political retaliation" that he argued would further divide the nation.
"Nothing Republican leaders say about unity is worth a nickel."
--Rep. Bill Pascrell Jr. (D-N.J.)While the U.S. House impeached Trump for his role in inciting a violent mob of his supporters to storm the nation's capitol building on January 6--an insurrectionist effort unparalleled in U.S. history that left at least five people dead--Graham argues in his letter that Schumer, if he proceeds with a trial in the Senate, would be guilty of "one more unconstitutional action in this disgraceful saga" that he said would only "incite further division."
However, critics of Graham immediately pounced on the South Carolina Republican for his faulty logic and the disgraceful nature of the letter.
"Lindsey Graham should take the first step towards healing and resign," quipped People for Bernie in response.
"This is basically extortionate: Sorry, no unity until the demands for accountability are dropped," wroteWashington Post political correspondent Greg Sargent. "The answer to this is 'No. You are the ones who have committed the offense. You don't get to set one-sided conditions for unity after what you did.'"
\u201cHey Senator, any word on how many of your colleagues acknowledge that Joe Biden won a fair election? Why don't you get back to us on that before you make ridiculous calls for unity.\u201d— Dean Baker (@Dean Baker) 1610902139
Rep. Don Beyer (D-Va.) unleashed on Graham in a series of tweets, citing the Republican's own behavior that fostered Trump's lies about the outcome of the 2020 election and his long history of two-faced accommodation to Trump's anti-democratic authoritarianism.
"Graham," said Beyer, "pressured election officials in Georgia to throw out lawful ballots and overturn the result." He then added:
\u201cIf you went from calling Trump a con man who couldn\u2019t be trusted with the nuclear arsenal and an \u201cout-and-out racist\u201d to his biggest yes man who regularly debased himself in Trump\u2019s defense maybe you shouldn\u2019t call anyone else an \u201cincredibly weak figure\u201d\u201d— Rep. Don Beyer (@Rep. Don Beyer) 1610901525
Journalist Rachel Bitecofer noted that what Graham is essentially, if not illogically, arguing in his letter to Schumer is "that those responsible for the attack on the Capitol will be held responsible if the Senate lets the main person responsible evade responsibility." But, she adds, "he fails to consider his own culpability at all--which is significant since he lied about fraud."
Likewise, Rep. Bill Pascrell (D-N.J) said that it's nearly impossible to take the words of Graham seriously given the role that he, along with so many of his Republican colleagues in Congress, have said and done to the nation in recent months--including those who voted against certification of the President-elect Joe Biden's win.
"For months, GOP leaders spread lies about the election," Pascrell tweeted Sunday in response to Graham's letter. "Acting on those lies, fascists ransacked the Capitol and *hours later* 138-of-202 (68%) House republicans voted to make trump a dictator."
\u201cFor posterity here are the 138 House republicans who voted to install trump as a dictator hours after murderous terrorists tried to do the same. How do you lecture about \u201cunity\u201d and \u201chealing\u201d after seeking to end American democracy?\u201d— Bill Pascrell, Jr. \ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8\ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\udde6 (@Bill Pascrell, Jr. \ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8\ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\udde6) 1610903182
"Nothing Republican leaders say about unity," he added, "is worth a nickel."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham was roundly denounced Sunday after sending a letter to Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer that characterized President Donald Trump's pending trial as "vengeance" and "political retaliation" that he argued would further divide the nation.
"Nothing Republican leaders say about unity is worth a nickel."
--Rep. Bill Pascrell Jr. (D-N.J.)While the U.S. House impeached Trump for his role in inciting a violent mob of his supporters to storm the nation's capitol building on January 6--an insurrectionist effort unparalleled in U.S. history that left at least five people dead--Graham argues in his letter that Schumer, if he proceeds with a trial in the Senate, would be guilty of "one more unconstitutional action in this disgraceful saga" that he said would only "incite further division."
However, critics of Graham immediately pounced on the South Carolina Republican for his faulty logic and the disgraceful nature of the letter.
"Lindsey Graham should take the first step towards healing and resign," quipped People for Bernie in response.
"This is basically extortionate: Sorry, no unity until the demands for accountability are dropped," wroteWashington Post political correspondent Greg Sargent. "The answer to this is 'No. You are the ones who have committed the offense. You don't get to set one-sided conditions for unity after what you did.'"
\u201cHey Senator, any word on how many of your colleagues acknowledge that Joe Biden won a fair election? Why don't you get back to us on that before you make ridiculous calls for unity.\u201d— Dean Baker (@Dean Baker) 1610902139
Rep. Don Beyer (D-Va.) unleashed on Graham in a series of tweets, citing the Republican's own behavior that fostered Trump's lies about the outcome of the 2020 election and his long history of two-faced accommodation to Trump's anti-democratic authoritarianism.
"Graham," said Beyer, "pressured election officials in Georgia to throw out lawful ballots and overturn the result." He then added:
\u201cIf you went from calling Trump a con man who couldn\u2019t be trusted with the nuclear arsenal and an \u201cout-and-out racist\u201d to his biggest yes man who regularly debased himself in Trump\u2019s defense maybe you shouldn\u2019t call anyone else an \u201cincredibly weak figure\u201d\u201d— Rep. Don Beyer (@Rep. Don Beyer) 1610901525
Journalist Rachel Bitecofer noted that what Graham is essentially, if not illogically, arguing in his letter to Schumer is "that those responsible for the attack on the Capitol will be held responsible if the Senate lets the main person responsible evade responsibility." But, she adds, "he fails to consider his own culpability at all--which is significant since he lied about fraud."
Likewise, Rep. Bill Pascrell (D-N.J) said that it's nearly impossible to take the words of Graham seriously given the role that he, along with so many of his Republican colleagues in Congress, have said and done to the nation in recent months--including those who voted against certification of the President-elect Joe Biden's win.
"For months, GOP leaders spread lies about the election," Pascrell tweeted Sunday in response to Graham's letter. "Acting on those lies, fascists ransacked the Capitol and *hours later* 138-of-202 (68%) House republicans voted to make trump a dictator."
\u201cFor posterity here are the 138 House republicans who voted to install trump as a dictator hours after murderous terrorists tried to do the same. How do you lecture about \u201cunity\u201d and \u201chealing\u201d after seeking to end American democracy?\u201d— Bill Pascrell, Jr. \ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8\ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\udde6 (@Bill Pascrell, Jr. \ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8\ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\udde6) 1610903182
"Nothing Republican leaders say about unity," he added, "is worth a nickel."
Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham was roundly denounced Sunday after sending a letter to Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer that characterized President Donald Trump's pending trial as "vengeance" and "political retaliation" that he argued would further divide the nation.
"Nothing Republican leaders say about unity is worth a nickel."
--Rep. Bill Pascrell Jr. (D-N.J.)While the U.S. House impeached Trump for his role in inciting a violent mob of his supporters to storm the nation's capitol building on January 6--an insurrectionist effort unparalleled in U.S. history that left at least five people dead--Graham argues in his letter that Schumer, if he proceeds with a trial in the Senate, would be guilty of "one more unconstitutional action in this disgraceful saga" that he said would only "incite further division."
However, critics of Graham immediately pounced on the South Carolina Republican for his faulty logic and the disgraceful nature of the letter.
"Lindsey Graham should take the first step towards healing and resign," quipped People for Bernie in response.
"This is basically extortionate: Sorry, no unity until the demands for accountability are dropped," wroteWashington Post political correspondent Greg Sargent. "The answer to this is 'No. You are the ones who have committed the offense. You don't get to set one-sided conditions for unity after what you did.'"
\u201cHey Senator, any word on how many of your colleagues acknowledge that Joe Biden won a fair election? Why don't you get back to us on that before you make ridiculous calls for unity.\u201d— Dean Baker (@Dean Baker) 1610902139
Rep. Don Beyer (D-Va.) unleashed on Graham in a series of tweets, citing the Republican's own behavior that fostered Trump's lies about the outcome of the 2020 election and his long history of two-faced accommodation to Trump's anti-democratic authoritarianism.
"Graham," said Beyer, "pressured election officials in Georgia to throw out lawful ballots and overturn the result." He then added:
\u201cIf you went from calling Trump a con man who couldn\u2019t be trusted with the nuclear arsenal and an \u201cout-and-out racist\u201d to his biggest yes man who regularly debased himself in Trump\u2019s defense maybe you shouldn\u2019t call anyone else an \u201cincredibly weak figure\u201d\u201d— Rep. Don Beyer (@Rep. Don Beyer) 1610901525
Journalist Rachel Bitecofer noted that what Graham is essentially, if not illogically, arguing in his letter to Schumer is "that those responsible for the attack on the Capitol will be held responsible if the Senate lets the main person responsible evade responsibility." But, she adds, "he fails to consider his own culpability at all--which is significant since he lied about fraud."
Likewise, Rep. Bill Pascrell (D-N.J) said that it's nearly impossible to take the words of Graham seriously given the role that he, along with so many of his Republican colleagues in Congress, have said and done to the nation in recent months--including those who voted against certification of the President-elect Joe Biden's win.
"For months, GOP leaders spread lies about the election," Pascrell tweeted Sunday in response to Graham's letter. "Acting on those lies, fascists ransacked the Capitol and *hours later* 138-of-202 (68%) House republicans voted to make trump a dictator."
\u201cFor posterity here are the 138 House republicans who voted to install trump as a dictator hours after murderous terrorists tried to do the same. How do you lecture about \u201cunity\u201d and \u201chealing\u201d after seeking to end American democracy?\u201d— Bill Pascrell, Jr. \ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8\ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\udde6 (@Bill Pascrell, Jr. \ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8\ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\udde6) 1610903182
"Nothing Republican leaders say about unity," he added, "is worth a nickel."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.