Dec 08, 2020
The U.S. Senate on Tuesday voted to confirm Nathan Simington, President Donald Trump's parting nominee to the Federal Communications Commission, despite serious questions regarding his lack of qualification for the crucial post.
"Simington's confirmation is a cynical Republican ploy to deadlock the Biden FCC."
--Matt Wood, Free Press
The senators voted along party lines, 49-46, to confirm Simington, an attorney and former senior adviser at the Department of Commerce's National Telecommunications and Information Administration.
Simington is a Trump loyalist who backed the president's May 2020 executive order to reinterpret Section 230, described by the digital rights group Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) as "the most important law protecting internet speech." Simington said he was acting in the name of protecting free online expression.
\u201cBREAKING: The Senate just voted to confirm Trump FCC nom #NathanSimington, for the sole purpose of kneecapping the agency and preventing them from restoring #netneutrality and getting kids online during a pandemic. Chip in to keep the fight alive: https://t.co/DgBZfkAeWe\u201d— @email@example.com on Mastodon (@@firstname.lastname@example.org on Mastodon) 1607465621
However, critics called this claim highly dubious, noting the president issued the order after Twitter added warnings to two of his tweets for the first time, labeling his lies about mail-in voting as "potentially misleading."
Trump tapped Simington after withdrawing Republican FCC Commissioner Michael O'Rielly's nomination for a new term in August following the commissioner expressing skepticism over whether the agency even had the constitutional authority to issue new social media regulations.
"His only qualifications are his steadfast loyalty to an outgoing wannabe tyrant and his undying love for convoluted attacks on internet freedom," Greer wrote.
\u201c"By confirming Simington, they\u2019re not \u2018owning the libs\u2019 or \u2018sticking it to Biden,\u2019 they\u2019re just hurting our kids, small businesses, and our communities. It\u2019s up to us to make sure they regret it.\u201d https://t.co/IaHieQhL48 solid reporting on this \ud83d\udca9show by @lauren_feiner at @CNBC\u201d— Evan Greer is on Mastodon (@Evan Greer is on Mastodon) 1607467051
\u201cBREAKING: In a decision that will be disastrous for digital rights, the U.S. Senate confirmed Trump's @FCC pick, Nathan Simington.\n\nThe future of net neutrality, Section 230, internet access, and free speech does not look good.\u201d— Access Now (@Access Now) 1607465595
Simington's appointment, and the impending departure of Pai--who will step down on Trump's final day in office--means the FCC will be deadlocked with two Republican and two Democratic commissioners when President-elect Joe Biden is inaugurated on January 20. A deadlocked FCC would effectively thwart any early efforts to restore net neutrality rules repealed during Pai's tenure as chair.
While progressives and digital rights advocates applauded last month's announcement that Pai would be stepping down, those same voices expressed deep concerns about Simington.
Matt Wood, general counsel and vice president of policy at Free Press, called Simington's confirmation "a cynical Republican ploy to deadlock the Biden FCC."
Wood added that:
The whole point is to prevent a duly elected new administration and its appointees from getting to work. That's unacceptable, considering everything that a Biden FCC must do to promote broadband equity, increase media diversity, and ensure people can get and stay connected during this pandemic.
[Senate Majority Leader Mitch] McConnell rammed this confirmation through despite Simington's utter lack of experience and expertise. But Simington needed only one qualification to pass muster with McConnell: a willingness to obstruct the incoming Biden administration from repairing the damage done under four years of Chairman Pai's incompetent and unpopular leadership.
All that the Trump FCC has to show for four years of negligence is nearly 80 million people without adequate home-internet service--tens of millions of them Black and Indigenous people of color, and all of them lacking affordable broadband choices in urban, rural, and tribal areas alike.
"This is a desperate bid by Senate Republicans as their majority still hangs in the balance," Wood said. "But it leaves the FCC with a profoundly unqualified commissioner placed there to prioritize industry pipe dreams and purposeful gridlock over the serious work the agency must do to help people connect and communicate during a national emergency."
Democratic lawmakers also expressed their staunch opposition to Simington's appointment. Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) called Simington "the wrong person at the wrong time for the FCC."
\u201cDuring his confirmation hearing even the most basic questions about FCC issues seemed to trip up Nathan Simington. It\u2019s clear he is wholly unqualified to help lead this agency. #StopSimington https://t.co/HoTnEIGlWl\u201d— Richard Blumenthal (@Richard Blumenthal) 1607441604
\u201cFCC nominee Nathan Simington's only qualification is his eagerness to defend the President's attacks on the First Amendment and Sec. 230.\n\nHis attempts to recruit Fox News hosts to bully the FCC shows he has no place leading that agency.#StopSimington https://t.co/Xln6T4zrlH\u201d— Senator Mazie Hirono (@Senator Mazie Hirono) 1607444338
\u201cI voted no on Nathan Simington\u2019s nomination to the Federal Communications Commission. Americans need a champion for consumers at the FCC, not an unqualified Trump acolyte who wants to create federal speech police.\u201d— Ron Wyden (@Ron Wyden) 1607465744
Biden--who has expressed support for net neutrality--has not indicated whether he will promote one of the two Democratic FCC commissioners--Jessica Rosenworcel or Geoffrey Starks--to replace Pai, or if he will look outside the agency for the next chairperson.
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.