SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
"Amazon Ring cameras are dangerous, not just for the people who buy them, but for their neighbors, their communities, and society as a whole," said Evan Greer of Fight for the Future. (Photo: Smith Collection/Gado/Getty Images)
A Threat to 'Both Society and Consumers': New Campaign Urges Reviewers to Stop Recommending Amazon Doorbell Cameras
"Ignoring the broader societal impact of a product does not make your review 'neutral,' it makes it reckless and incomplete."
Dec 07, 2020
A coalition of more than 15 consumer protection, civil liberties, and civil rights groups on Tuesday launched a new campaign urging technology review websites to rescind or suspend their recommendations of Amazon Ring doorbell cameras, a product that critics say is detrimental to the well-being of families, communities, and democracy.
"From a technical perspective it's just a bad idea to fill your home with internet-connected devices capable of constantly watching and listening."
--Ken Mickles, Fight for the Future
The "Rescind Ring" effort seeks to persuade product reviewers to "consider the overall impact of a product on society at large in addition to the value to consumers in their assessment," organizers explained in a statement.
"Ignoring the broader societal impact of a product does not make your review 'neutral,' it makes it reckless and incomplete," said Evan Greer, deputy director of Fight for the Future, which is leading the push, alongside the Action Center on Race and the Economy, Demand Progress, and the Surveillance Technology Oversight Project, among others.
The groups plan to mobilize thousands of supporters to pressure CNET, Consumer Reports, Digital Trends, Gizmodo, TechRadar, and Tom's Guide--websites targeted for their "best in category Ring recommendations made in the past year"--to "rescind their endorsement and update relevant guides before the holidays." The campaign also targets Wirecutter, which "suspended their Ring review last December but is in the process of reviewing the camera for a possible reversal of suspension."
Because "we know these recommendations play a critical role in purchasing decisions people make during the holidays," Greer said, "it's important reviewers uphold their commitment to consumers and the trust the public puts in their endorsements by withdrawing or suspending their Ring recommendation."
"Product review sites would not recommend, for example, stalkerware apps used by abusers to track their spouses. They shouldn't recommend harmful products like Ring, either," Greer added.
According to the progressive organizations behind the campaign, "Amazon Ring cameras threaten both society and consumers."
Campaigners say the cameras have poor security features, leaving consumers vulnerable to hacks and leaks. In addition, Amazon last month recalled 350,000 Ring doorbells after some of the surveillance devices caught fire, which watchdogs called "the latest example of the tech giant moving too quickly, and being reckless with security and safety, in order to flood our communities with cameras."
"Beyond the obvious privacy issues, Ring has a terrible track record when it comes to security even for the users who buy them," noted Fight for the Future's chief technical officer, Ken Mickles.
"Amazon's monopoly power and aggressive pursuit of surveillance partnerships with police set them apart from their competitors."
--Evan Greer, Fight for the Future
"High-profile incidents where Ring cameras were hacked and used to spy on children forced the company to make some improvements, but from a technical perspective it's just a bad idea to fill your home with internet-connected devices capable of constantly watching and listening," Mickles continued. "I'd never trust one of these devices on my front door or around my kids."
Moreover, the groups argue that partnerships between Amazon and police departments nationwide "challenge fundamental basic liberties, violate sacred privacy rights, and--along with the Neighbors App--foster racial profiling and increased criminalization of Black and brown people."
"Amazon Ring cameras are dangerous, not just for the people who buy them, but for their neighbors, their communities, and society as a whole," said Greer. "Amazon's monopoly power and aggressive pursuit of surveillance partnerships with police set them apart from their competitors."
Collaboration between the tech giant and law enforcement agencies can exacerbate "racist targeting," the campaign said, which "is especially worrisome when coupled with the fact that" over a third of all police killings in the U.S. since 2015 can be attributed to about half of the roughly 1,400 police departments partnered with Amazon.
"Tech blogs can't say 'Black Lives Matter' and then give five star ratings to products that exacerbate racism," Greer noted.
She alluded to a case this summer in which "a man was killed by sheriffs in a Ring-related incident" and asked, "How many people have to be jailed or killed before tech reviewers realize Ring is not safe for anyone?"
"Review sites," Mickles concluded, "are putting their credibility at risk by continuing to recommend these products."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Kenny Stancil
Kenny Stancil is senior researcher at the Revolving Door Project and a former staff writer for Common Dreams.
A coalition of more than 15 consumer protection, civil liberties, and civil rights groups on Tuesday launched a new campaign urging technology review websites to rescind or suspend their recommendations of Amazon Ring doorbell cameras, a product that critics say is detrimental to the well-being of families, communities, and democracy.
"From a technical perspective it's just a bad idea to fill your home with internet-connected devices capable of constantly watching and listening."
--Ken Mickles, Fight for the Future
The "Rescind Ring" effort seeks to persuade product reviewers to "consider the overall impact of a product on society at large in addition to the value to consumers in their assessment," organizers explained in a statement.
"Ignoring the broader societal impact of a product does not make your review 'neutral,' it makes it reckless and incomplete," said Evan Greer, deputy director of Fight for the Future, which is leading the push, alongside the Action Center on Race and the Economy, Demand Progress, and the Surveillance Technology Oversight Project, among others.
The groups plan to mobilize thousands of supporters to pressure CNET, Consumer Reports, Digital Trends, Gizmodo, TechRadar, and Tom's Guide--websites targeted for their "best in category Ring recommendations made in the past year"--to "rescind their endorsement and update relevant guides before the holidays." The campaign also targets Wirecutter, which "suspended their Ring review last December but is in the process of reviewing the camera for a possible reversal of suspension."
Because "we know these recommendations play a critical role in purchasing decisions people make during the holidays," Greer said, "it's important reviewers uphold their commitment to consumers and the trust the public puts in their endorsements by withdrawing or suspending their Ring recommendation."
"Product review sites would not recommend, for example, stalkerware apps used by abusers to track their spouses. They shouldn't recommend harmful products like Ring, either," Greer added.
According to the progressive organizations behind the campaign, "Amazon Ring cameras threaten both society and consumers."
Campaigners say the cameras have poor security features, leaving consumers vulnerable to hacks and leaks. In addition, Amazon last month recalled 350,000 Ring doorbells after some of the surveillance devices caught fire, which watchdogs called "the latest example of the tech giant moving too quickly, and being reckless with security and safety, in order to flood our communities with cameras."
"Beyond the obvious privacy issues, Ring has a terrible track record when it comes to security even for the users who buy them," noted Fight for the Future's chief technical officer, Ken Mickles.
"Amazon's monopoly power and aggressive pursuit of surveillance partnerships with police set them apart from their competitors."
--Evan Greer, Fight for the Future
"High-profile incidents where Ring cameras were hacked and used to spy on children forced the company to make some improvements, but from a technical perspective it's just a bad idea to fill your home with internet-connected devices capable of constantly watching and listening," Mickles continued. "I'd never trust one of these devices on my front door or around my kids."
Moreover, the groups argue that partnerships between Amazon and police departments nationwide "challenge fundamental basic liberties, violate sacred privacy rights, and--along with the Neighbors App--foster racial profiling and increased criminalization of Black and brown people."
"Amazon Ring cameras are dangerous, not just for the people who buy them, but for their neighbors, their communities, and society as a whole," said Greer. "Amazon's monopoly power and aggressive pursuit of surveillance partnerships with police set them apart from their competitors."
Collaboration between the tech giant and law enforcement agencies can exacerbate "racist targeting," the campaign said, which "is especially worrisome when coupled with the fact that" over a third of all police killings in the U.S. since 2015 can be attributed to about half of the roughly 1,400 police departments partnered with Amazon.
"Tech blogs can't say 'Black Lives Matter' and then give five star ratings to products that exacerbate racism," Greer noted.
She alluded to a case this summer in which "a man was killed by sheriffs in a Ring-related incident" and asked, "How many people have to be jailed or killed before tech reviewers realize Ring is not safe for anyone?"
"Review sites," Mickles concluded, "are putting their credibility at risk by continuing to recommend these products."
Kenny Stancil
Kenny Stancil is senior researcher at the Revolving Door Project and a former staff writer for Common Dreams.
A coalition of more than 15 consumer protection, civil liberties, and civil rights groups on Tuesday launched a new campaign urging technology review websites to rescind or suspend their recommendations of Amazon Ring doorbell cameras, a product that critics say is detrimental to the well-being of families, communities, and democracy.
"From a technical perspective it's just a bad idea to fill your home with internet-connected devices capable of constantly watching and listening."
--Ken Mickles, Fight for the Future
The "Rescind Ring" effort seeks to persuade product reviewers to "consider the overall impact of a product on society at large in addition to the value to consumers in their assessment," organizers explained in a statement.
"Ignoring the broader societal impact of a product does not make your review 'neutral,' it makes it reckless and incomplete," said Evan Greer, deputy director of Fight for the Future, which is leading the push, alongside the Action Center on Race and the Economy, Demand Progress, and the Surveillance Technology Oversight Project, among others.
The groups plan to mobilize thousands of supporters to pressure CNET, Consumer Reports, Digital Trends, Gizmodo, TechRadar, and Tom's Guide--websites targeted for their "best in category Ring recommendations made in the past year"--to "rescind their endorsement and update relevant guides before the holidays." The campaign also targets Wirecutter, which "suspended their Ring review last December but is in the process of reviewing the camera for a possible reversal of suspension."
Because "we know these recommendations play a critical role in purchasing decisions people make during the holidays," Greer said, "it's important reviewers uphold their commitment to consumers and the trust the public puts in their endorsements by withdrawing or suspending their Ring recommendation."
"Product review sites would not recommend, for example, stalkerware apps used by abusers to track their spouses. They shouldn't recommend harmful products like Ring, either," Greer added.
According to the progressive organizations behind the campaign, "Amazon Ring cameras threaten both society and consumers."
Campaigners say the cameras have poor security features, leaving consumers vulnerable to hacks and leaks. In addition, Amazon last month recalled 350,000 Ring doorbells after some of the surveillance devices caught fire, which watchdogs called "the latest example of the tech giant moving too quickly, and being reckless with security and safety, in order to flood our communities with cameras."
"Beyond the obvious privacy issues, Ring has a terrible track record when it comes to security even for the users who buy them," noted Fight for the Future's chief technical officer, Ken Mickles.
"Amazon's monopoly power and aggressive pursuit of surveillance partnerships with police set them apart from their competitors."
--Evan Greer, Fight for the Future
"High-profile incidents where Ring cameras were hacked and used to spy on children forced the company to make some improvements, but from a technical perspective it's just a bad idea to fill your home with internet-connected devices capable of constantly watching and listening," Mickles continued. "I'd never trust one of these devices on my front door or around my kids."
Moreover, the groups argue that partnerships between Amazon and police departments nationwide "challenge fundamental basic liberties, violate sacred privacy rights, and--along with the Neighbors App--foster racial profiling and increased criminalization of Black and brown people."
"Amazon Ring cameras are dangerous, not just for the people who buy them, but for their neighbors, their communities, and society as a whole," said Greer. "Amazon's monopoly power and aggressive pursuit of surveillance partnerships with police set them apart from their competitors."
Collaboration between the tech giant and law enforcement agencies can exacerbate "racist targeting," the campaign said, which "is especially worrisome when coupled with the fact that" over a third of all police killings in the U.S. since 2015 can be attributed to about half of the roughly 1,400 police departments partnered with Amazon.
"Tech blogs can't say 'Black Lives Matter' and then give five star ratings to products that exacerbate racism," Greer noted.
She alluded to a case this summer in which "a man was killed by sheriffs in a Ring-related incident" and asked, "How many people have to be jailed or killed before tech reviewers realize Ring is not safe for anyone?"
"Review sites," Mickles concluded, "are putting their credibility at risk by continuing to recommend these products."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.