Ranked choice voting advocates are pointing to a crowded congressional primary in Massachusetts as the "poster child" for their cause, which, thanks to a citizen initiative, will be on the ballot in the Bay State in November.
"To me the problem is that democracy isn't creating the results [that reflect the will of the people]," Evan Falchuk, chair of the board for Yes on 2, the ranked choice voting (RCV) ballot initiative campaign in Massachusetts, told Common Dreams Monday. "The biggest structural problem we have is 'first past the post' voting," Falchuk continued. "[Which] means you can win an election with 25% of vote...that's not fair."
The RCV process allows voters to rank candidates in order of preference. Under the system, if no candidate wins the approval of more than half the voters after the first round of tabulation, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated. When a voter's first choice is eliminated, their vote is redistributed to the voter's second choice. This process continues until one candidate gets at least 50% of vote.
Ranked Choice Voting means you can vote for the candidate you like most without fearing the "spoiler effect".
It also ensures candidates need to have *majority support* to win elections.
— RepresentUs (@representus) July 11, 2020
Referring to a nine-way primary in Massachusetts' 4th congressional district earlier this month in which centrist Democrat and former Republican Jake Auchincloss won with less than 23% of the vote, Falchuk called the race a "poster child" for RCV.
Auchincloss, Falchuk noted, opposes Medicare for All, a policy growing in popularity amidst the Covid-19 pandemic and supported by several of Auchincloss' progressive challengers. "There's just something wrong with that," Falchuk said.
Jess Mermell, one of Achincloss' progressive challengers and a Medicare for All supporter, came in second place in the contest to replace outgoing Rep. Joe Kennedy (D-Mass.), with 21.1% of the vote.
In a video following the election, Mermell said, "If the ranked choice voting campaign needs a new face, give me a call, guys. I've got some time on my hands."
Before and after the primary, critics were quick to blame the progressive slate of challengers for Auchincloss' win, arguing they "spoiled" the opportunity for a more left-leaning candidate to win by remaining in the race and not dropping out instead of throwing their support behind one progressive campaign. Criticism of candidates challenging established party-line ideas is commonplace. Establishment Democrats, for example, continuously paint Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) as a spoiler in both his presidential runs.
But, Falchuk said, ranked choice voting is designed to eliminate that "spoiler effect" and promote the democratic process.
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
Never Miss a Beat.
Get our best delivered to your inbox.
"No candidate should feel like they're at risk of splitting the vote," Falchuk said. "Go out there. Run for office. Make a difference."
Ranked choice voting is currently employed in local elections across the country. In Maine, the practice was approved via citizen initiative in 2016 and again in 2018 for use in statewide elections.
"Ranked choice voting is one of the best reforms we can make to preserve and enhance our democracy," said Betsy Sweet, a former U.S. Senate and Maine gubernatorial candidate who helped pass RCV in the Pine Tree state. "As a candidate who has run in a statewide ranked choice system of voting twice it has made a huge difference," Sweet told Common Dreams.
"Most importantly, it dramatically affects who can run, and who believes they can run. It reduces negative campaigning, and it forces candidates to focus on issues," Sweet continued. "It also provides better governance and trust in our legislators because everyone is elected with more than 50% of the vote."
Sweet partnered with fellow candidate Mark Eves during her gubernatorial run in 2018 in a video that showed how ranked choice voting can affect the way campaigns and candidates treat each other and voters.
"People don't like seeing a leader talk about how terrible somebody else is," Falchuk said. Instead, RCV advocates say, voters want to hear from candidates about positive policy changes they plan to enact.
Data collected from elections in which RCV is used, Falchuk said, shows that it makes campaigns more substantive and positive and increases voter turnout "because people feel like they have a voice."
With ranked choice voting, Falchuk continued, candidates are able to have constructive dialogue with voters who support their opponents, a practice candidates in the current system seldom exercise.
Many of the candidates in the race to replace Kennedy, including Auchincloss, came out in support of RCV, Falchuk said. What's more, ranked choice voting has bipartisan support. Progressive leaders including Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) have publicly supported the process, and conservative talk show host Ben Shapiro this week endorsed the idea.
As the United States grapples with uncertainty ahead of November, Falchuk said ranked choice voting is a logical step in creating more representative campaigns and election results.
"This is one of these no brainers that just makes our democracy better," he said.