

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Greenpeace activists delivered 500 solar panels with a total area of over 800 square meters to BP's London headquarters in St. James Square Feb. 5, 2020. Activists locked to oil barrels blocked all six office doors around the building. (Photo:Suzanne Plunkett/Greenpeace)
Amid declining fossil fuel consumption worldwide during the Covid-19 pandemic, oil giant BP on Tuesday said it would reduce its oil and gas production by 40 percent by 2030. Climate campaigners said the announcement--on top of a $16.8 quarterly loss--should be a warning to other giants in the industry about the economic writing on the wall when it comes to the future of fossil fuels.
Environmental groups that have long targeted BP as one of the world's premier climate villains said the new commitment to reduce production at a much faster rate than any other comparable-sized company comes at a crucial time and should not be ignored.
"The good news is that BP will actually produce less oil and gas, and they're making that change this decade," John Sauven, executive director of Greenpeace UK, said in a statement. "That is vital. Up to this point, many companies, from fossil fuel majors to the aviation industry have focused on offsetting--which all too often is not even damage limitation."
BP, the company responsible for the Deepwater Horizon disaster that spewed an estmated 4 million barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico in 2010--also said it will increase renewable energy production and lower carbon emissions over the same period, but the reductions, as Sauven and others point out, don't include all of BP's fossil fuel-related economic interests.
"BP must go further," Sauven said, also noting that BP competitor Shell has yet to make similar commitments. "[BP] needs to account for or ditch its share in Russian oil company, Rosneft. But this is a necessary and encouraging start."
BP attempted to rebrand itself as an eco-friendly company in 2000, adopting a fresh logo and the tagline "Beyond Petroleum," but the 2010 spill, the largest in the history of marine oil drilling, put the company in the public eye for negligent practices.
Still, climate activists say this latest effort, even if motivated by monetary loss for BP rather than concern for the environment, is a win.
"Today's announcement is an important signal to the rest of the industry that the only credible way to cut pollution is to cut fossil fuel production," said Kelly Trout, senior research analyst at Oil Change International.
"Vague promises of ambition by 2050 are meaningless," added Trout, "without clear details on the actions oil majors will take to manage a rapid decline in extraction within this decade, the critical time frame for staying within 1.5 degrees of warming."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Amid declining fossil fuel consumption worldwide during the Covid-19 pandemic, oil giant BP on Tuesday said it would reduce its oil and gas production by 40 percent by 2030. Climate campaigners said the announcement--on top of a $16.8 quarterly loss--should be a warning to other giants in the industry about the economic writing on the wall when it comes to the future of fossil fuels.
Environmental groups that have long targeted BP as one of the world's premier climate villains said the new commitment to reduce production at a much faster rate than any other comparable-sized company comes at a crucial time and should not be ignored.
"The good news is that BP will actually produce less oil and gas, and they're making that change this decade," John Sauven, executive director of Greenpeace UK, said in a statement. "That is vital. Up to this point, many companies, from fossil fuel majors to the aviation industry have focused on offsetting--which all too often is not even damage limitation."
BP, the company responsible for the Deepwater Horizon disaster that spewed an estmated 4 million barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico in 2010--also said it will increase renewable energy production and lower carbon emissions over the same period, but the reductions, as Sauven and others point out, don't include all of BP's fossil fuel-related economic interests.
"BP must go further," Sauven said, also noting that BP competitor Shell has yet to make similar commitments. "[BP] needs to account for or ditch its share in Russian oil company, Rosneft. But this is a necessary and encouraging start."
BP attempted to rebrand itself as an eco-friendly company in 2000, adopting a fresh logo and the tagline "Beyond Petroleum," but the 2010 spill, the largest in the history of marine oil drilling, put the company in the public eye for negligent practices.
Still, climate activists say this latest effort, even if motivated by monetary loss for BP rather than concern for the environment, is a win.
"Today's announcement is an important signal to the rest of the industry that the only credible way to cut pollution is to cut fossil fuel production," said Kelly Trout, senior research analyst at Oil Change International.
"Vague promises of ambition by 2050 are meaningless," added Trout, "without clear details on the actions oil majors will take to manage a rapid decline in extraction within this decade, the critical time frame for staying within 1.5 degrees of warming."
Amid declining fossil fuel consumption worldwide during the Covid-19 pandemic, oil giant BP on Tuesday said it would reduce its oil and gas production by 40 percent by 2030. Climate campaigners said the announcement--on top of a $16.8 quarterly loss--should be a warning to other giants in the industry about the economic writing on the wall when it comes to the future of fossil fuels.
Environmental groups that have long targeted BP as one of the world's premier climate villains said the new commitment to reduce production at a much faster rate than any other comparable-sized company comes at a crucial time and should not be ignored.
"The good news is that BP will actually produce less oil and gas, and they're making that change this decade," John Sauven, executive director of Greenpeace UK, said in a statement. "That is vital. Up to this point, many companies, from fossil fuel majors to the aviation industry have focused on offsetting--which all too often is not even damage limitation."
BP, the company responsible for the Deepwater Horizon disaster that spewed an estmated 4 million barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico in 2010--also said it will increase renewable energy production and lower carbon emissions over the same period, but the reductions, as Sauven and others point out, don't include all of BP's fossil fuel-related economic interests.
"BP must go further," Sauven said, also noting that BP competitor Shell has yet to make similar commitments. "[BP] needs to account for or ditch its share in Russian oil company, Rosneft. But this is a necessary and encouraging start."
BP attempted to rebrand itself as an eco-friendly company in 2000, adopting a fresh logo and the tagline "Beyond Petroleum," but the 2010 spill, the largest in the history of marine oil drilling, put the company in the public eye for negligent practices.
Still, climate activists say this latest effort, even if motivated by monetary loss for BP rather than concern for the environment, is a win.
"Today's announcement is an important signal to the rest of the industry that the only credible way to cut pollution is to cut fossil fuel production," said Kelly Trout, senior research analyst at Oil Change International.
"Vague promises of ambition by 2050 are meaningless," added Trout, "without clear details on the actions oil majors will take to manage a rapid decline in extraction within this decade, the critical time frame for staying within 1.5 degrees of warming."